Elsevier

Biomaterials

Volume 197, March 2019, Pages 60-71
Biomaterials

Review
Role of nuclear mechanosensitivity in determining cellular responses to forces and biomaterials

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.01.010Get rights and content

Abstract

Tissue engineers use biomaterials or apply forces to alter cell behaviors and cure damaged/diseased tissues. The external physical cues perceived by cells are transduced intracellularly along the mechanosensitive machineries, including subcellular adhesion molecules and cytoskeletons. The signals are further channeled to a nucleus through the physical links of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton or the biochemical translocation of transcription factors. Thus, the external cues are thought to affect directly or indirectly the nucleus and the genetic transcriptional process, ultimately determining cell fate. Here we communicate the importance of such mechanotransductory processes in cell and tissue engineering where external forces- or biomaterials-related physical cues essentially regulate cellular behaviors, with an emphasis on the mechanosensing and signaling along the road to a nucleus.

Section snippets

Forces and biomaterial-generated physical cues perceived by cells

Cells in our body are always under force while the mode and degree are different with time and position. Endothelial cells in blood vessels experience constantly the pulsatile shear force of blood fluid [1]. Chondrocytes in cartilage are under dynamic compression loads whereas tendon and ligament cells experience primarily tensile forces to properly function [2]. Therefore, cells in our body (i.e. fibroblasts, adipocytes, neurons, myoblasts, chondrocytes, and osteoblasts) are keen to adopt the

Mechanosensitive machineries toward nucleus and their implications in cell fate change

The physiological forces perceived by cells are known to be in a wide range depending on the environments. For example, approximately 0.1–100 Pa (10–10000 nN/mm2) exerts on endothelial or blood cells [18] whereas a few hundreds of MPa (N/mm2) is reported for muscle, cartilage and bone [[19], [20], [21], [22]]. The external physical forces transmit through diverse sets of mechanosensitive cellular components that are physically connected, which includes integrin sets, adhesion complex,

Mechanosensitive ion channels

Apart from the integrin receptors, the mechanosensitive ion channels have long been implicated to take essential part in cellular mechanoreception of external cues (Fig. 2h). Ion channels allow the passage of ions across the cell membrane in response to a mechanical stimulus [98]. Among them, Piezo1 and Piezo2 are well-known mechanically activated cation channels that mediate cellular perception, proprioception, development and cell differentiation [99]. Mechanical stretch of cells activates

Concluding remarks

A wealth of studies has demonstrated the importance of biophysical signals of biomaterials and applied forces in cellular fate change. Mechanosensitive machineries of not only the cell surface receptors, the associated focal adhesion complex, and the actomyosin contractile machinery, but also of the LINC complex and the subnuclear mechanotransductory molecules recently discovered highlight the physical transmission of external signals toward nucleus. The translocation of transcription factors

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) from Republic of Korea (Global Research Lab (GRL) Program 2015–0093829, NRF-2018R1A2B3003446, and Global Research Development Center (GRDC) Program NRF-2018K1A4A3A01064257).

References (136)

  • J.H. Lee et al.

    Electrical stimulation by enzymatic biofuel cell to promote proliferation, migration and differentiation of muscle precursor cells

    Biomaterials

    (2015)
  • J. Du et al.

    Optimal electrical stimulation boosts stem cell therapy in nerve regeneration

    Biomaterials

    (2018)
  • H.-S. Ahn et al.

    Carbon-nanotube-interfaced glass fiber scaffold for regeneration of transected sciatic nerve

    Acta Biomater.

    (2015)
  • D.-H. Kim et al.

    Cytoskeletal tension induces the polarized architecture of the nucleus

    Biomaterials

    (2015)
  • S. Alam et al.

    Nuclear forces and cell mechanosensing

    Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci.

    (2014)
  • A. Buxboim et al.

    Matrix elasticity regulates lamin-A,C phosphorylation and turnover with feedback to actomyosin

    Curr. Biol.

    (2014)
  • Wendy A. Bickmore et al.

    Genome architecture: domain organization of interphase chromosomes

    Cell

    (2013)
  • P.R. Cook

    A model for all genomes: the role of transcription factories

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (2010)
  • R. McBeath et al.

    Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment

    Dev. Cell

    (2004)
  • T. Miyamoto et al.

    Functional role for Piezo1 in stretch-evoked Ca(2)(+) influx and ATP release in urothelial cell cultures

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2014)
  • E. Dejana et al.

    The molecular basis of endothelial cell plasticity

    Nat. Commun.

    (2017)
  • K.H. Vining et al.

    Mechanical forces direct stem cell behaviour in development and regeneration

    Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.

    (2017)
  • L. Wang et al.

    Nanofiber Yarn/hydrogel core–shell scaffolds mimicking native skeletal muscle tissue for guiding 3D myoblast alignment, elongation, and differentiation

    ACS Nano

    (2015)
  • T.M. Bedair et al.

    Recent advances to accelerate re-endothelialization for vascular stents

    J. Tissue Eng.

    (2017)
  • J.-H. Lee et al.

    Emerging properties of hydrogels in tissue engineering

    J. Tissue Eng.

    (2018)
  • J.H. Lee et al.

    Artificial control of cell signaling and growth by magnetic nanoparticles

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2010)
  • B. Suki et al.

    A microfluidic chamber-based approach to map the shear moduli of vascular cells and other soft materials

    Sci. Rep.

    (2017)
  • V. Zablotskii et al.

    How a high-gradient magnetic field could affect cell life

    Sci. Rep.

    (2016)
  • O. Chaudhuri et al.

    Hydrogels with tunable stress relaxation regulate stem cell fate and activity

    Nat. Mater.

    (2015)
  • M. Guvendiren et al.

    Stiffening hydrogels to probe short- and long-term cellular responses to dynamic mechanics

    Nat. Commun.

    (2012)
  • Z.A. Cheng et al.

    Bioactive chemical nanopatterns impact human mesenchymal stem cell fate

    Nano Lett.

    (2013)
  • C. Allan et al.

    Osteoblast response to disordered nanotopography

    J. Tissue Eng.

    (2018)
  • M. Kolster et al.

    Outgrowing endothelial and smooth muscle cells for tissue engineering approaches

    J. Tissue Eng.

    (2017)
  • M. Maekawa et al.

    Signaling from Rho to the actin cytoskeleton through protein kinases ROCK and LIM-kinase

    Science

    (1999)
  • O. Valiron et al.

    Cellular disorders induced by high magnetic fields

    J. Magn. Reson. Imag.

    (2005)
  • S. Chatterjee

    Endothelial mechanotransduction, redox signaling and the regulation of vascular inflammatory pathways

    Front. Physiol.

    (2018)
  • A.D. Lantada et al.

    Novel system for bite-force sensing and monitoring based on magnetic near field communication

    Sensors (Basel)

    (2012)
  • C.D. Kuthe et al.

    Experimental evaluation of fiber orientation based material properties of skeletal muscle in tension

    Mol. Cell. BioMech.

    (2014)
  • N. Wang et al.

    Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus

    Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.

    (2009)
  • F. Falleroni et al.

    Cell mechanotransduction with piconewton forces applied by optical tweezers

    Front. Cell. Neurosci.

    (2018)
  • K. Haase et al.

    Extracellular forces cause the nucleus to deform in a highly controlled anisotropic manner

    Sci. Rep.

    (2016)
  • C. Guilluy et al.

    Isolated nuclei adapt to force and reveal a mechanotransduction pathway in the nucleus

    Nat. Cell Biol.

    (2014)
  • T.J. Kirby et al.

    Emerging views of the nucleus as a cellular mechanosensor

    Nat. Cell Biol.

    (2018)
  • S. Li et al.

    Hydrogels with precisely controlled integrin activation dictate vascular patterning and permeability

    Nat. Mater.

    (2017)
  • N.I. Reed et al.

    The αvβ1 integrin plays a critical in vivo role in tissue fibrosis

    Sci. Transl. Med.

    (2015)
  • V.D.L. G et al.

    Inhibition of focal adhesion kinase signaling by integrin α6β1 supports human pluripotent stem cell self‐renewal

    Stem Cell.

    (2016)
  • S.J. Shattil

    Signaling through platelet integrin alpha IIb beta 3: inside-out, outside-in, and sideways

    Thromb. Haemost.

    (1999)
  • M.J. Dalby et al.

    Harnessing nanotopography and integrin–matrix interactions to influence stem cell fate

    Nat. Mater.

    (2014)
  • M.J. Paszek et al.

    The cancer glycocalyx mechanically primes integrin-mediated growth and survival

    Nature

    (2014)
  • J.J. Northey et al.

    Tissue force programs cell fate and tumor aggression

    Cancer Discov.

    (2017)
  • Cited by (35)

    • Nuclear transport of STAT6 determines the matrix rigidity dependent M2 activation of macrophages

      2022, Biomaterials
      Citation Excerpt :

      Moreover, we noted the enhanced expression of nuclear lamin A/C by increasing the substrate stiffness (Supplementary Fig. 5), which was consistent with the highly mechanosensitive adhesion-dependent non-immunogenic cells [63]. Because lamin A/C-mediated tight coupling between the nucleus and actin cytoskeletons regulates the substrate stiffness-dependent nuclear deformation [41,64], these results indicates that BMDMs also mechano-sense the substrate rigidity through the nuclear deformation and lamin A/C remodeling, which further implies that the nuclear shape of BMDMs could represent a level of intracellular mechanical stress induced by F-actin-mediated mechanosensation. To systematically assess the relationship between nuclear morphological changes and M2 activation, we introduced the nuclear flattening index (NFI), a three-dimensional shape factor that represents the nuclear deformation, indicating NFI >1 for the oblate nuclei and NFI <1 for the prolate nuclei (Fig. 3d).

    • Therapeutic tissue regenerative nanohybrids self-assembled from bioactive inorganic core / chitosan shell nanounits

      2021, Biomaterials
      Citation Excerpt :

      Nanohybrid sample significantly enhanced the gene expression of integrin sets (integrin α2, α3, and β1) as well as adaptor proteins (talin and focal adhesion kinase) that link the integrins to actin filaments, when compared to Chit, demonstrating the altered initial adhesion events of MSCs on the nanohybrid were largely mediated through the integrin (specifically, α2β1-and α3β1)-dependent focal adhesions [37]. On the other hand, the LINC complex (Sun1, Nesprin1, and Nesprin2) and nucleus lamin A/C, which directly transmit intracellular mechanical signals to a nucleus, were maintained at the same mRNA levels regardless of the substrate, implying these mechanotrasduction machineries might not be strongly involved in the events or the possibility of stimulation at protein (not gene) levels, which yet warrants further studies [38,39]. Albeit such a limitation in analysis tools, the qPCR array result suggests the nanohybrid should affect the initial cell adhesion number and spreading of MSCs through α2β1-and α3β1-mediated focal adhesions, messaging the possibility of accelerating further osteogenic cascades [40].

    • The cell as matter: Connecting molecular biology to cellular functions

      2021, Matter
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, how physical/mechanical signals transduce from the extracellular microenvironment over a long distance to the nucleus is far from clear.72 Recently, the emerging concept of nuclear physical properties as a mechanoregulator of gene expression brings new insight into understanding how mechanical cues are transduced to the nucleus and how they influence nuclear mechanics, genome organization, and transcription (Figures 4A and 4C).73–80,81,82 More specifically, the nucleus can either serve as a downstream regulator of cytoplasmic signals or act as a direct effector independent of the cytoplasm (Figures 4B and 4C).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text