Accurate prediction of human drug toxicity: a major challenge in drug development

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2004.09.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Over the past decades, a number of drugs have been withdrawn or have required special labeling due to adverse effects observed post-marketing. Species differences in drug toxicity in preclinical safety tests and the lack of sensitive biomarkers and nonrepresentative patient population in clinical trials are probable reasons for the failures in predicting human drug toxicity. It is proposed that toxicology should evolve from an empirical practice to an investigative discipline. Accurate prediction of human drug toxicity requires resources and time to be spent in clearly defining key toxic pathways and corresponding risk factors, which hopefully, will be compensated by the benefits of a lower percentage of clinical failure due to toxicity and a decreased frequency of market withdrawal due to unacceptable adverse drug effects.

Section snippets

Drugs with adverse effects routinely escape preclinical and clinical trials

One of the major challenges in drug development is the accurate assessment of human drug toxicity. A review by Lasser et al. [1] found that in the last four decades, 2.9% of the marketed drugs were withdrawn from the market due to severe adverse drug effects, with seven drugs approved and marketed since 1993 and subsequently withdrawn to be associated with over 1000 deaths. Lasser et al. [1] also estimated that from 1975 to 1999, 10.2% of approved drugs required black box warnings to be added

Reasons for failures in the prediction of human drug toxicity

A clear understanding of reasons for the failure to predict human drug toxicity is the first step to the development of a better approach. A review of the standard approach to drug development yields clues on why human drug toxicity is not always accurately predicted (Table 3). Drug safety is initially evaluated preclinically in laboratory animals, generally in three animal species such as mouse, rat and dog. Preclinical safety study results are submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug

A need for toxicology to be an investigative discipline

Toxicity is a complex biological property that cannot be accurately estimated purely based on dose–response relationships without a sound scientific understanding of the effects. Classical toxicologists rely on Paracelsus’ Principle [7]:

“All things are poison and nothing is without poison. Solely the dose determines that a thing is not a poison.”

This principle of toxicology derived in the 15th century is the cornerstone of today's traditional practice of toxicology. Dose–response relationship

Conclusion

Accurate prediction of human drug toxicity is a major challenge in drug development that needs to be overcome. Failure to predict human drug toxicity is indicated by the occurrence of postmarketing withdrawal and new safety warning labels of marketed drugs. It is necessary to re-evaluate our past practices to determine on areas of weakness. It is proposed here that toxicology should include mechanistic evaluation in additional to the commonly practiced of the determination of a safe dose based

Cited by (69)

  • Cardiovascular disease models: A game changing paradigm in drug discovery and screening

    2019, Biomaterials
    Citation Excerpt :

    Even though a step closer toward representing the human population than preclinical studies, clinical trials are also challenging. Clinical trials have relatively small sample sizes, narrow subgroups of patient demographics, and require non-invasive endpoints for study monitoring [8]. As a result, rare events may not be detected until after clinical trials, when the drug is already in the clinic.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text