The multifunctional nuclear pore complex: a platform for controlling gene expression

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2014.02.001Get rights and content

In addition to their established roles in nucleocytoplasmic transport, the intimate association of nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) with chromatin has long led to speculation that these structures influence peripheral chromatin structure and regulate gene expression. These ideas have their roots in morphological observations, however recent years have seen the identification of physical interactions between NPCs, chromatin, and the transcriptional machinery. Key insights into the molecular functions of specific NPC proteins have uncovered roles for these proteins in transcriptional activation and elongation, mRNA processing, as well as chromatin structure and localization. Here, we review recent studies that provide further molecular detail on the role of specific NPC components as distinct platforms for these chromatin dependent processes.

Introduction

Nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) perforate an otherwise impermeable nuclear envelope (NE) membrane and the primary function long ascribed to these channels is to regulate exchange of water-soluble metabolites and macromolecules between the cytoplasm and the nucleoplasm. NPCs are unlike other transport channels, both in their degree of complexity and the mechanisms by which they move a highly diverse array of cargos across the NE. Cylindrical in geometry, and ∼60–100 million Daltons in mass, these evolutionarily conserved structures exhibit a distinguishing octagonal symmetry around a central transport channel. NPCs do not cross the two lipid bilayers of the NE, but rather they extend from the surface of the chromatin and penetrate the NE at pores formed where the inner and outer nuclear membranes are fused. The membrane walls of these pores are attached to the ‘waists’ of cylindrical NPCs (Figure 1) (reviewed in [1, 2]).

Despite their large size and elaborate structure, NPCs are composed of relatively few proteins (∼30). These nucleoporins (Nups) are present in multiple copies, and specific groups of Nups contribute to distinct repetitive subunits that assemble to form the NPC. On the basis of their structural features and localization within the NPC, Nups can be placed into distinct groups (Figure 1). Integral proteins of the pore membrane interact with complexes of Nups that form the core scaffold of the NPC, which includes the Nup84-subcomplexes and Nup170-subcomplexes. Multiple copies of these subcomplexes are organized into eightfold symmetrical ring structures that line the circumference of the pore where they interact with the pore membrane proteins and the membrane itself. Interestingly, sequence similarities between some Nups and coat proteins of secretory vesicles suggest these Nups have evolved from similar membrane coating ancestors. The core scaffold also supports Nups containing natively unfolded domains rich in phenylalanine-glycine (FG) residue repeats that occupy the central channel. These FG-Nups play a central role in transport. Among the FG-Nups, several members show a biased or strict localization to the nucleoplasmic or cytoplasmic face of the NPC. This group contributes to filaments that extend from the NPC core into the cytoplasm or nucleoplasm. In addition to FG-Nups, the nuclear fibers (a.k.a. nuclear basket) also consist of the proteins Mlp1 and Mlp2 (termed Tpr in vertebrates) (reviewed in [1, 2]). Nuclear filaments likely play a role in transport, however, an accumulating body of data suggests these structures and other Nups exposed to the nucleoplasmic face of the NPC also play important roles in modulating chromatin structure and gene expression (reviewed in [3]).

In this review we summarize insights into the functional relationships between NPCs and the regulation of gene expression. It has long been speculated that NPCs are intimately associated with chromatin. Studies have underscored the importance of chromatin in NPC assembly, both in yeast and higher eukaryotes, including an intriguing requirement for chromatin remodeling factors in the assembly of yeast NPCs [4]. Conversely, observations continue to emerge showing the importance of Nups in chromatin structure and the regulation of gene expression. In this regard it is reasonable to view many Nups as chromatin-associated factors that act within the context of the NPC platform to influence genome function.

Section snippets

NPCs associate with transcriptionally active and inactive chromatin

Chromatin is not randomly distributed within the nucleus. Each chromosome occupies a defined nuclear territory, and the chromatin therein localizes to specific spatial domains that are dependent upon distinct structural and functional states, including heterochromatin, which is highly compact and transcriptionally silent, and euchromatin, which is loosely packed and contains transcriptionally active loci [5]. Electron micrographs of nuclei from higher eukaryotes reveal that a portion of their

Nuclear basket and transcriptional activation

Various studies in yeast have implicated the nuclear basket as a binding platform for numerous highly transcribed housekeeping genes and genes strongly induced by changes in environmental conditions (reviewed in [10, 11, 12]).

While recruitment of activated genes to NPCs may facilitate mRNA export, recruitment could also serve additional purposes. Among the most studied of the inducible genes are those functioning in galactose metabolism (GAL genes), which are derepressed and actively

Nups in transcript elongation and processing

Binding of activated genes to NPCs is followed by the initiation of transcription and, transcript elongation. The coupling of these reactions with NPC association appears to reflect the involvement of distinct components of the NPC in various steps of mRNA synthesis, processing, and export (reviewed in [10]).

The nuclear basket has been shown to associate with the 5′ and 3′ ends of some activated genes to form NPC tethered gene loops [13, 26, 27, 28]. Gene loops are also associated with mRNA

FG Nups in transcriptional memory

Various FG-Nups in yeast [37], flies [38, 39] and human cells [40] have also been detected in association with transcriptionally active genes. In yeast, the FG-Nups (with the exception of Nup2) are only detected in association with NPCs [41], while in higher eukaryotes many FG-Nups are mobile and also present within the nucleoplasm. Here a subset of FG-Nups, including Nup98, has been shown to regulate gene transcription at intranuclear loci [38, 39, 40]. More recently, FG-Nups have also been

NPC platforms as repressors of transcription

While the majority of studies have investigated the relationships between Nups and active transcription, NPCs also function in transcriptional repression. An observation consistent with this notion showed that the association of the yeast GAL1 gene with NPCs, after a shift from repressive (glucose medium) to activating (galactose medium) conditions, appeared to dampen its transcriptional activation [44••]. Furthermore, mutant cells lacking Nup1p or the SAGA complex component Ada2p, both of

Conclusions

It is becoming clear that the NPC is a complex platform where distinct groups of Nups associate themselves with various nuclear functions, including gene transcription and the maintenance of chromatin structure. The field continues to identify distinctive roles for individual Nups in facilitating both gene activation and repression through the characterization of their interactions with components of the transcriptional machinery (e.g. activator and repressor proteins), regulators of chromatin

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

We thank Jason Brickner (Northwestern University, USA) for critical reading of the manuscript. Funds for this work were provided to RWW by the CIHR (MOP 130404 and MOP 106502), and AIHS, and to JDA by the NIH (P50 GM076547, U54 GM103511, and 1U01GM098256-01).

References (50)

  • T. Yoshida et al.

    Actin-related protein Arp6 influences H2A.Z-dependent and -independent gene expression and links ribosomal protein genes to nuclear pores

    PLoS Genet

    (2010)
  • D.W. Van de Vosse et al.

    A role for the nucleoporin Nup170p in chromatin structure and gene silencing

    Cell

    (2013)
  • G.J. Ruben et al.

    Nucleoporin mediated nuclear positioning and silencing of HMR

    PLoS ONE

    (2011)
  • P. Therizols et al.

    Telomere tethering at the nuclear periphery is essential for efficient DNA double strand break repair in subtelomeric region

    J Cell Biol

    (2006)
  • J.D. Aitchison et al.

    The yeast nuclear pore complex and transport through it

    Genetics

    (2012)
  • A. Hoelz et al.

    The structure of the nuclear pore complex

    Annu Rev Biochem

    (2011)
  • C. Strambio-De-Castillia et al.

    The nuclear pore complex: bridging nuclear transport and gene regulation

    Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol

    (2010)
  • L.C. Titus et al.

    Members of the RSC chromatin-remodeling complex are required for maintaining proper nuclear envelope structure and pore complex localization

    Mol Biol Cell

    (2010)
  • S. Krull et al.

    Protein Tpr is required for establishing nuclear pore-associated zones of heterochromatin exclusion

    EMBO J

    (2010)
  • G. Blobel

    Gene gating: a hypothesis

    Proc Natl Acad Sci

    (1985)
  • A. Taddei et al.

    Structure and function in the budding yeast nucleus

    Genetics

    (2012)
  • M. Niepel et al.

    The nuclear basket proteins Mlp1p and Mlp2p are part of a dynamic interactome including Esc1p and the proteosome

    Mol Biol Cell

    (2013)
  • G. Dieppois et al.

    Connecting the transcription site to the nuclear pore: a multi-tether process that regulates gene expression

    J Cell Sci

    (2010)
  • G. Arib et al.

    Multiple facets of nuclear periphery in gene expression control

    Curr Opin Cell Biol

    (2011)
  • M. Schmid et al.

    Nup-PI: the nucleopore–promoter interaction of genes in yeast

    Mol Cell

    (2006)
  • Cited by (73)

    • PNET2 is a component of the plant nuclear lamina and is required for proper genome organization and activity

      2022, Developmental Cell
      Citation Excerpt :

      The NL-mediated chromatin tethering to the nuclear periphery is tightly regulated during cell development and differentiation and profoundly affects the expression of genes, although the mechanism has not been fully understood (Finlan et al., 2008; Mekhail and Moazed, 2010; Misteli, 2007). In metazoan, the nuclear periphery generally establishes a transcriptionally quiescent environment that is usually associated with heterochromatin and genomic regions with repressed gene expression (Kind and van Steensel, 2010; Reddy et al., 2008; Shevelyov et al., 2009; Towbin et al., 2009), whereas active chromatin is largely distributed in the nuclear interior and nuclear pore regions (Ptak et al., 2014). Similarly, in plants, the nuclear-periphery-anchored chromatin domains were found to be enriched with transposons, inactive protein-coding genes, and repressive histone marks (Bi et al., 2017; Hu et al., 2019).

    • One Ring to Rule them All? Structural and Functional Diversity in the Nuclear Pore Complex

      2021, Trends in Biochemical Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      The nuclear side of the NE can be envisaged as a surface in which NPCs are prominent reference points where molecular machineries can be recruited, anchored, and coordinated. This dual role for NPCs as hubs of both communication and regulation was suggested by Günter Blobel [7] and has been expanded upon by a multitude of subsequent studies (reviewed in detail in [8–11]). NPCs have been shown to organize chromatin and regulate gene expression by partially overlapping mechanisms that can be broadly grouped into: (i) modulation of chromatin state and architecture [12–14], (ii) post-translational modification of chromatin-associated proteins [15–18] or Nups themselves [19], and (iii) tethering of specific transcription factors to control gene positioning by recruitment of their cognate DNA-binding sites [20–22].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text