Coordinated events of nuclear assembly

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2016.12.008Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Changes at the chromatin surface initiate nuclear envelope formation and attract membrane from the endoplasmic reticulum.

  • Formation of the nascent nuclear envelope depends on membrane remodeling.

  • Recent discoveries further inform a mechanism of pore formation as cells exit mitosis.

  • Distinct regions of the chromatin disc are associated with different proteins and functions.

Each time a metazoan cell undergoes open mitosis, the nucleus is dismantled in order to partition DNA content to the daughter cells. After chromosomes separate, changes at the chromatin surface usher in reestablishment of nuclear architecture. Proteins destined for the nuclear envelope are attracted to chromatin and concomitantly recruit membrane. As nuclear envelope and protein constituents spread to coat chromatin, distinct regions emerge—some rich in rapid pore formation, others occupied by microtubules that remain attached to kinetochores. Microtubule connections present physical barriers that must be remodeled in order for the nuclear envelope to seal. Regions of the nascent nuclear envelope that are initially characterized by contrasting repertoires of nuclear envelope proteins rapidly coalesce as nuclei expand and enter interphase.

Introduction

The nucleus is a structurally complex organelle that houses and protects the genome, as well as providing an environment that facilitates regulation of genomic information. In addition, intimate association between the nucleus and cytoskeleton expands the role of the nucleus as a central organizing hub of the cell [1]. Several human diseases are characterized by defects in nuclear architecture, underscoring a link between proper nuclear organization and normal cell function ([2] and see Dorado and Andrés, this issue). A foundational component of nuclear architecture is the nuclear envelope (NE), a double membrane barrier that separates the nucleoplasm from the cytoplasm. The outer nuclear membrane (ONM) is contiguous with both the inner nuclear membrane (INM) and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The former connectivity occurs at sites where nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) create channels in the nuclear envelope, each surrounded by a highly curved region of membrane connecting INM to ONM. NPCs are large proteinaceous structures that provide sites of selective macromolecular transport across the NE. Embedded within both outer and inner nuclear membranes are transmembrane proteins that form a network of interactions, spanning from the cytoskeleton to the NE lumen to the meshwork of lamin proteins that lines the INM termed the nuclear lamina. Interconnectivity between these elements of nuclear architecture is reinforced by interactions between lamin proteins and both nuclear pore complex components and INM proteins (e.g., [3]). Further, the INM protein SUN1 localizes in proximity to NPCs, suggesting the presence of an NPC influences the neighboring membrane protein repertoire [4].

When cells undergo an open mitosis, the highly integrated architecture of the nucleus is dismantled before partitioning the genome. Once sister chromatids separate in anaphase, nuclear envelope proteins target to the chromatin surface, mediating rapid engulfment of chromosomes by membrane. ONM and INM proteins, constituents of NPCs, and lamins rely on distinct mechanisms of recruitment and transiently enrich at discrete regions of the chromatin surface as the nucleus forms. These targeting events are coordinated within an astonishingly rapid timeframe—a notable and important feat considering that disrupted nuclear architecture can result in significant deleterious consequences for the cell [2]. Here, we will focus on how nuclear assembly, and establishment of the nuclear envelope composition that underpins nuclear architecture, is accomplished with each cell division.

Section snippets

The chromatin template for nuclear assembly

With some exceptions, chromosomes destined for each daughter cell are clustered compactly together in a disc-like configuration at anaphase. Chromatin composition at the surface of these discs plays an important role in regulating nuclear assembly. A DNA-histone nucleosome template is required to recruit FG-rich nucleoporins, lamin, and the nucleoporin ELYS, when steps of nuclear assembly are reconstituted in vitro or examined in vivo [5, 6]. Nucleosomes also provide a stimulatory platform for

Membrane targeting and dynamics

Entry into mitosis triggers rapid disassembly of the nuclear envelope. At this time, nuclear membranes are remodeled and intermix, in large part, with the tubulo-vesicular mitotic ER [9]. The depletion of factors critical for membrane clearance from mitotic chromatin – REEP3 and REEP4 – leads to aberrant association of membranes with chromatin at metaphase and ultimately to malformed nuclei [28]. This study underscores the importance of temporal regulation in membrane recruitment to the

Nuclear pore formation: rapid, slow, and en masse

As membrane engulfs the anaphase chromatin disc, pore proteins concomitantly assemble into NPCs [32, 38]. This rapid process of post-mitotic (or, post-metaphase) pore formation is distinguishable from a slower mechanism that prevails at interphase [38, 39]. While the former path is initiated by ELYS-mediated recruitment of the Nup107-160 nucleoporin subcomplex, Nup153 is required for the latter [14, 40••]. Consistent with this, Nup133 (a component of the Nup107-160 complex) and Nup153 are each

Spatial organization during nuclear assembly

Chromatin discs are oriented parallel to the midzone of dividing cells, typically perpendicular to the plane of cell attachment (Figure 1). The central region of the disc that faces the midzone constitutes the “inner core” while the central region that faces away constitutes the “outer core.” The peripheral edge of the disc is referred to as the “non-core” region [12, 17, 19, 42••, 45]. INM proteins and membrane destined for the nuclear envelope make initial contacts at the non-core region

Outlook

Improvements in imaging techniques have enabled researchers to examine nuclear assembly with ever-escalating temporal and spatial resolution, providing exciting new insights into how membrane enclosure of chromatin is coordinated with other dynamic processes at this time. This growing knowledge of nuclear formation provides a crucial context for understanding aberrancies in nuclear architecture found in disease. Moreover, with newly-appreciated parallels between nuclear envelope assembly and

Note

After this review was written, some related papers of interest were published, pointing to acetylation as an important post-translational node of regulation for LEM4/ANKLE2 during nuclear assembly [63], underscoring the importance of ELYS, and potentially other nucleoporins, in phosphatase-mediated maintenance of LBR INM targeting [64], and connecting a Nup153-Repoman-PP1 axis to localized changes in the chromatin modification landscape [65]. This latter study also identified phosphorylation of

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

We thank Adam Frost for critical feedback and discussion, Diana Lim for graphic design, and the Huntsman Cancer Foundation for funding.

References (66)

  • E. Dultz et al.

    Live imaging of single nuclear pores reveals unique assembly kinetics and mechanism in interphase

    J Cell Biol

    (2010)
  • M. Schwartz et al.

    Analysis of the initiation of nuclear pore assembly by ectopically targeting nucleoporins to chromatin

    Nucleus

    (2015)
  • M. Vietri et al.

    Spastin and ESCRT-III coordinate mitotic spindle disassembly and nuclear envelope sealing

    Nature

    (2015)
  • J.Z. Xue et al.

    Chromatin-bound Xenopus Dppa2 shapes the nucleus by locally inhibiting microtubule assembly

    Dev Cell

    (2013)
  • A.P. Sagona et al.

    Association of CHMP4B and autophagy with micronuclei: implications for cataract formation

    Biomed Res Int

    (2014)
  • T. Karg et al.

    Aurora B-mediated localized delays in nuclear envelope formation facilitate inclusion of late-segregating chromosome fragments

    Mol Biol Cell

    (2015)
  • E.M. Hatch et al.

    Catastrophic nuclear envelope collapse in cancer cell micronuclei

    Cell

    (2013)
  • C.Z. Zhang et al.

    Chromothripsis from DNA damage in micronuclei

    Nature

    (2015)
  • T. Kaufmann et al.

    SIRT2 regulates nuclear envelope reassembly through ANKLE2 deacetylation

    J Cell Sci

    (2016)
  • Y. Mimura et al.

    ELYS regulates the localization of LBR by modulating its phosphorylation state

    J Cell Sci

    (2016)
  • A.P. Navarro et al.

    The nucleus is a conserved mechanosensation and mechanoresponse organelle

    Cytoskeleton (Hoboken)

    (2016)
  • H.J. Worman et al.

    Diseases of the nuclear envelope

    Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol

    (2010)
  • Q. Liu et al.

    Functional association of Sun1 with nuclear pore complexes

    J Cell Biol

    (2007)
  • C. Zierhut et al.

    Nucleosomal regulation of chromatin composition and nuclear assembly revealed by histone depletion

    Nat Struct Mol Biol

    (2014)
  • A. Inoue et al.

    Nucleosome assembly is required for nuclear pore complex assembly in mouse zygotes

    Nat Struct Mol Biol

    (2014)
  • M.E. Nemergut et al.

    Chromatin docking and exchange activity enhancement of RCC1 by histones H2A and H2B

    Science

    (2001)
  • M. Furuta et al.

    Chromatin binding of RCC1 during mitosis is important for its nuclear localization in interphase

    Mol Biol Cell

    (2016)
  • A. Schooley et al.

    The lysine demethylase LSD1 is required for nuclear envelope formation at the end of mitosis

    J Cell Sci

    (2015)
  • M. Clever et al.

    The nucleoporin ELYS/Mel28 regulates nuclear envelope subdomain formation in HeLa cells

    Nucleus

    (2012)
  • C. Franz et al.

    MEL-28/ELYS is required for the recruitment of nucleoporins to chromatin and postmitotic nuclear pore complex assembly

    EMBO Rep

    (2007)
  • B.A. Rasala et al.

    ELYS is a dual nucleoporinkinetochore protein required for nuclear pore assembly and proper cell division

    PNAS

    (2006)
  • G. Chatel et al.

    Nucleoporins: leaving the nuclear pore complex for a successful mitosis

    Cell Signal

    (2011)
  • L.J. Barton et al.

    Networking in the nucleus: a spotlight on LEM-domain proteins

    Curr Opin Cell Biol

    (2015)
  • Cited by (39)

    • Making and breaking the inner nuclear membrane proteome

      2022, Current Opinion in Cell Biology
    • Inherited nuclear pore substructures template post-mitotic pore assembly

      2021, Developmental Cell
      Citation Excerpt :

      Alternative descriptions of how elements of the mitotic ER regenerate nuclear membranes. One set of observations has led to the suggestion that membrane tubules extending from the ER network first contact chromatin, flatten, and expand to form the nuclear envelope sheet and to enclose NPCs assembling directly on the chromatin surface (Anderson and Hetzer, 2007; LaJoie and Ullman, 2017; Wandke and Kutay, 2013). Other, more recent, observations suggest that ER sheets attach to decondensing chromatin and that nuclear pores appear within these attached sheets (Bilir et al., 2019; Lu et al., 2011).

    • CHMPions of repair: Emerging perspectives on sensing and repairing the nuclear envelope barrier

      2020, Current Opinion in Cell Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      It will be interesting to more thoroughly assess the commonalities/differences between the order of assembly of distinct nuclear envelope factors at chromatin exposed by rupture and that exposed during mitotic nuclear envelope reformation. A key question, for example, would be whether the biochemical components that form the ‘core’ and ‘noncore’ regions, as defined in postmitotic nuclear envelope reformation [50], show any preference for being recruited to an interphase rupture site. Not only will this be important to understand a nuclear envelope repair mechanism, but it may also inform the robustness of the repaired domain and whether it might be susceptible to future rupture events.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text