Invited review
The organization of physiological brain networks

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2012.01.011Get rights and content

Abstract

One of the central questions in neuroscience is how communication in the brain is organized under normal conditions and how this architecture breaks down in neurological disease. It has become clear that simple activation studies are no longer sufficient. There is an urgent need to understand the brain as a complex structural and functional network. Interest in brain network studies has increased strongly with the advent of modern network theory and increasingly powerful investigative techniques such as “high-density EEG”, MEG, functional and structural MRI. Modern network studies of the brain have demonstrated that healthy brains self-organize towards so-called “small-world networks” characterized by a combination of dense local connectivity and critical long-distance connections. In addition, normal brain networks display hierarchical modularity, and a connectivity backbone that consists of interconnected hub nodes. This complex architecture is believed to arise under genetic control and to underlie cognition and intelligence. Optimal brain network organization becomes disrupted in neurological disease in characteristic ways. This review gives an overview of modern network theory and its applications to healthy brain function and neurological disease, in particular using techniques from clinical neurophysiology, such as EEG and MEG.

Highlights

► The brain can be represented as a complex network with functionally connected units at several levels that changes in neurological and psychiatric disease. ► Existing clinical neurophysiology techniques and network models to explain network properties are reviewed. ► In addition to the already established network models, we suggest a heuristic model including hierarchical modularity.

Introduction

The brain can be seen as a complex anatomical and functional network. Theories that apply to complex networks in general, such as modern network theory and complex systems theory, are increasingly used in neuroscience to understand how normal brain function arises and what happens in disease. They provide a totally new perspective leading to some very new insights. This review gives an overview of the fundamentals and applications of modern network theory in the study of normal and developing brain function. In addition, we aim to explain how it is possible that various brain diseases can be understood in terms of failing network characteristics. The focus will be mainly on functional aspects of brain networks, but structural connectivity, animal studies, and modeling will also be discussed to provide a wider perspective. Since network studies are based upon a fundament of functional connectivity, the neurophysiological basis of normal and disrupted synchronization is discussed first. Subsequently, the basic concepts and tools of modern network theory are introduced. The application of network theory is illustrated by studies in healthy subjects, and various disorders such as schizophrenia, depression, dementia, trauma and epilepsy with an emphasis on functional, and in particular neurophysiological approaches. Finally we suggest a general framework for the study of the organization of physiological brain networks.

Section snippets

Representing the brain as a network

In 1906, Ramon Y Cajal and Camillo Golgi shared the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. Although they shared the prize, they did not share each other’s ideas (Jacobson, 1995, Rapport, 2005). According to Golgi, a defender of the reticular theory, the brain should be viewed as a large syncytium, or conglomerate, of directly connected neurons. Instead, Cajal, using the silver nitrate preparation developed by Golgi, interpreted his findings in support of the neuron theory that maintained that

Time series and brain function

To gain an understanding how the brain is organized as a functional network, several elements are required: (i) we need to have a reliable measurement of the level of activity of the network elements; (ii) communication between network elements needs to be characterized and quantified; (iii) the full pattern of pair wise interactions between network elements needs to be integrated and analyzed within the framework of network theory; (iv) the interdependencies between functional and structural

Graph theory, statistical physics and dynamical systems

While connectivity studies constitute a useful extension of local activation studies, the complexity of the data presents a challenge that is hard to face without a proper theoretical framework. One attempt to develop such a framework is modern network theory, also referred to as graph theory (Newman, 2010). While network theory and graph theory are sometimes referred to as if they were synonyms, they are not, and understanding how they are related may help to obtain a better idea what network

From local activation to network organization

In this review, we have argued for the need and potential usefulness of studying the brain from the perspective of a complex organized network (Fig. 9). The underlying question is simple and daunting at the same time: why is our brain so complex? If we assume that our brain is the result of a long evolutionary process we can expect that its complex organization is not random but rather reflects some kind of optimal solution to multiple, possibly conflicting, constraints. The question then

Acknowledgements

We thank Alexandra Linger for her secretary support.

References (277)

  • A.L. Bokde et al.

    Assessing neuronal networks: understanding Alzheimer’s disease

    Prog Neurobiol

    (2009)
  • D.B. Chorlian et al.

    Heritability of EEG coherence in a large sib-pair population

    Biol Psychol

    (2007)
  • G.K. Cooray et al.

    Decreased cortical connectivity and information flow in type 1 diabetes

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2011)
  • O. David et al.

    Evaluation of different measures of functional connectivity using a neural mass model

    Neuroimage

    (2004)
  • S. Dehaene et al.

    Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing

    Neuron

    (2011)
  • L. Douw et al.

    Treatment-related changes in functional connectivity in brain tumor patients: a magnetoencephalography study

    Exp Neurol

    (2008)
  • L. Douw et al.

    Functional connectivity in the brain before and during intra-arterial amobarbital injection (Wada test)

    Neuroimage

    (2009)
  • L. Douw et al.

    Cognition is related to resting-state small-world network topology: an magnetoencephalographic study

    Neuroscience

    (2011)
  • R. Ferri et al.

    Dynamics of the EEG slow-wave synchronization during sleep

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2005)
  • R. Ferri et al.

    Small-world network organization of functional connectivity of EEG slow-wave activity during sleep

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2007)
  • R. Ferri et al.

    The functional connectivity of different EEG bands moves towards small-world network organization during sleep

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2008)
  • P. Fries et al.

    The gamma cycle

    Trends Neurosci

    (2007)
  • K. Friston

    Functional integration and inference in the brain

    Prog Neurobiol

    (2002)
  • D. Gmehlin et al.

    Development of brain synchronisation within school-age - Individual analysis of resting (alpha) coherence in a longitudinal data set

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2011)
  • J.J. González et al.

    Assessment of electroencephalographic functional connectivity in term and preterm neonates

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2011)
  • L.F. Abbott et al.

    Synaptic plasticity: taming the beast

    Nat Neurosci

    (2000)
  • S. Achard et al.

    A resilient, low-frequency, small-world human brain functional network with highly connected association cortical hubs

    J Neurosci

    (2006)
  • S. Achard et al.

    Efficiency and cost of economical brain functional networks

    PLoS Comput Biol

    (2007)
  • Y. Adachi et al.

    Functional connectivity between anatomically unconnected areas is shaped by collective network-level effects in the macaque cortex

    Cereb Cortex

    (2011)
  • A.M.H.J. Aertsen et al.

    Dynamics of neuronal firing correlation: modulation of ‘effective connectivity’

    J Neurophysiol

    (1989)
  • A.F. Alexander-Bloch et al.

    Disrupted modularity and local connectivity of brain functional networks in childhood-onset schizophrenia

    Front Syst Neurosci

    (2010)
  • K. Ansari-Asl et al.

    Quantitative evaluation of linear an nonlinear methods characterizing interdependencies between brain signals

    Phys Rev E

    (2006)
  • N. Axmacher et al.

    Interactions between medial temporal lobe, prefrontal cortex, and inferior temporal regions during visual working memory: a combined intracranial EEG and functional magnetic resonance imaging study

    J Neurosci

    (2008)
  • C. Babiloni et al.

    Abnormal fronto-parietal coupling of brain rhythms in mild Alzheimer’s disease: a multicentric EEG study

    Eur J Neurosci

    (2004)
  • P. Bak et al.

    Self-organized criticality: an explanation of the 1/f noise

    Phys Rev Lett

    (1987)
  • A.L. Barabasi

    Scale-free networks: a decade and beyond

    Science

    (2009)
  • A.L. Barabasi et al.

    Emergence of scaling in random networks

    Science

    (1999)
  • M. Barahona et al.

    Synchronization in small-world systems

    Phys Rev Lett

    (2002)
  • A. Barrat et al.

    Dynamical processes on complex networks

    (2008)
  • F. Bartolomei et al.

    How do brain tumors alter functional connectivity? A magnetoencephalography study

    Ann Neurol

    (2006)
  • D.S. Bassett et al.

    Hierarchical organization of human cortical networks in health and schizophrenia

    J Neurosci

    (2008)
  • J.M. Beggs et al.

    Neuronal avalanches in neocortical circuits

    J Neurosci

    (2003)
  • M. Benayoun et al.

    EEG, temporal correlations, and avalanches

    J Clin Neurophysiol

    (2010)
  • B.C. Bernhardt et al.

    Graph-theoretical analysis reveals disrupted small-world organization of cortical thickness correlation networks in temporal lobe epilepsy

    Cereb Cortex

    (2011)
  • A.W. Bero et al.

    Neuronal activity regulates the regional vulnerability to amyloid-β deposition

    Nat Neurosci

    (2011)
  • L.M. Bettencourt et al.

    Functional structure of cortical neuronal networks grown in vitro

    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys

    (2007)
  • S. Bialonski et al.

    From brain to earth and climate systems: small-world interaction networks or not?

    Chaos

    (2010)
  • K.J. Blinowska

    Review of the methods of determination of directed connectivity from multichannel data

    Med Biol Eng Comput

    (2011)
  • M. Boersma et al.

    Network analysis of resting state EEG in the developing young brain: structure comes with maturation

    Hum Brain Mapp

    (2011)
  • J.L. Bosboom et al.

    MEG resting state functional connectivity in Parkinson’s disease related dementia

    J Neural Transm

    (2009)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text