Elsevier

Current Opinion in Immunology

Volume 47, August 2017, Pages 64-69
Current Opinion in Immunology

Germinal center enhancement by extended antigen availability

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2017.06.008Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Extended antigen delivery immunization results in stronger humoral immune responses.

  • Germinal centers are enhanced by extended antigen delivery.

  • Slow antigen release can limit responses targeting non-native epitopes.

Vaccine elicitation of protective antibody responses has proved difficult for a number of important human pathogens, including HIV-1. The amount of somatic hypermutation associated with the development of broadly neutralizing antibodies against HIV has not been achieved using conventional immunization strategies. An underexplored aspect of vaccine design is modulation of antigen kinetics. Immunization strategies with extended antigen availability have recently been shown to enhance humoral responses. In this review, we explore the mechanisms through which sustained antigen availability can enhance germinal center responses and the potency of antibody responses. These potential mechanisms include shifting B cell recognition away from non-neutralizing immunodominant epitopes, altered kinetics of immune complex deposition, improved T follicular helper (Tfh) cell responses, enhanced affinity maturation, and enhanced development of B cell memory. Finally, we discuss immunization strategies that result in extended antigen availability.

Introduction

Most licensed human vaccines rely on antibody-mediated responses for protection. Those responses are primarily dependent on CD4+ T cells and germinal centers (GCs). GCs are sites within lymphoid organs where B cells undergo B cell receptor (BCR) somatic hypermutation (SHM) to enhance BCR affinity for antigen. Knowledge of the GC processes can almost certainly improve rational vaccine design, if parameters that modulate those processes can be understood. The use of model protein antigens has provided considerable insight into the mechanisms underlying GC and antibody responses. However, the use of simple model antigens most likely does not reflect the immunological challenges presented by more complex pathogen antigens, which have potently been driven by eons of evolution to be difficult for host B cells to recognize and neutralize. Few mutations are required for development of high-affinity antibodies against most simple model antigens, including the most commonly studied model antigen 4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl acetyl (NP), which only requires a single BCR amino acid mutation to develop high affinity antibodies [1]. Protective antibodies against some pathogens, including HIV-1, contain high numbers of amino acid mutations (>10) and develop over extended periods of time during infection [2, 3]. Lastly, the lifespan of GCs elicited by model antigens can also be short compared to even acute natural infections, where there is frequently a prolonged supply of antigen and GC reactions can last many weeks [4]. Thus, experimental studies of more complex antigens are necessary to study the importance of GC parameters involved in the development of potent antibodies against difficult epitopes on pathogens [5].

One example of a difficult pathogen antigen for B cell recognition and neutralization is HIV envelope (Env). Approximately 10% of HIV+ individuals develop potent broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) targeting HIV Env [3]. These bnAbs take multiple years to develop and accumulate more amino acid mutations than antibodies generated during conventional immunizations. Many HIV bnAbs require rare SHM events, including deletions or combinatorial mutations (e.g. addition of a new disulfide bond across a CDR loop). Longitudinal analyses of BCR and viral lineages throughout HIV infection has provided clear evidence that bnAbs undergo high amounts of affinity maturation before obtaining their broadly neutralizing activity [6, 7•]. The development of bnAbs via immunization is a major challenge and it is likely that certain conditions that resemble natural infection, including persistent antigen presence, are required for HIV bnAb development [8].

A promising avenue in rational vaccine design for modulating GCs is the sustained delivery of antigen, which can more mimic natural infection. Sporadic studies more than a decade ago found that controlled release of antigen over a longer period of time could result in stronger immune responses than conventional bolus injections [9, 10, 11]. More recent studies have revisited this concept with substantial success [12••, 14••]. Here we describe several mechanisms through which sustained antigen availability may modulate the GC response to enhance the humoral response. These mechanisms include 1) increased availability of native antigen, 2) increased immune complex deposition, 3) modulation of Tfh help and affinity maturation, and 4) modulation of memory B cell formation. Lastly, we discuss the implications of these immunological processes and extended antigen strategies for vaccine design.

Section snippets

Availability of intact protein antigen

GC B cells with the highest affinity for antigen are selected to survive and proliferate based on the ability of the B cell to strip antigen from follicular dendritic cells (FDCs) and subsequently receive help from Tfh cells. One should consider how that process aligns with conventional immunizations. Conventional protein immunizations deliver antigen and adjuvant in a single bolus injection. A potential shortcoming of that strategy is that it is not synchronized with the GC response. The GC

Immune complex deposition

FDCs concentrate and present intact antigen in the form of immune complexes to B cells in the light zone (LZ) of the GC [18, 19]. B cells test their evolving affinity on FDC immune complexes. B cells with BCRs with higher affinity to the antigen are selected to survive and undergo an additional round of affinity maturation or develop into plasma cells. The resulting higher affinity IgG from newly generated plasma cells can then form new immune complexes, replacing the lower affinity immune

Tfh cell help and affinity maturation

T follicular helper (Tfh) cells are required for GC development and function [22]. GC B cells with the highest affinity capture and present the most antigen, in the form of peptide-MHCII complexes to GC Tfh cells in the LZ. GC Tfh cells selectively help B cells that present the most antigen by providing signals essential for GC B cell survival, proliferation, and mutation [23, 24]. Surviving GC B cells migrate to the dark zone (DZ), where they proliferate and undergo SHM. Mutated GC B cells

Development of memory

Vaccination strategies to elicit memory B cells (MBCs) that can reenter GCs are attractive, as it is highly unlikely a single conventional immunization will allow for the extensive mutations required for neutralization of some pathogens. Few, if any, studies have explored the effect of vaccination with persistent antigen on the development of memory. Antigen kinetics may affect the pathways that control the decisions to differentiate into MBCs or PCs. B cells with lower affinity preferentially

Delivery systems and adjuvants

Osmotic pumps have been used for sustained immunization delivery in several proof-of-principle animal studies. While surgical implantation of osmotic pumps may be feasible for a Phase I human vaccine trial, osmotic pumps are clearly impractical for large scale human vaccine trials. Near daily repeated injections are also impractical for large scale human vaccine trials. More pragmatic delivery systems include slow release microneedles implanted through the skin with a patch and injectable

Summary

Protein vaccines safely elicit protective responses in humans and have greatly improved public health globally. For some pathogens with difficult neutralizing epitopes, nontraditional vaccination strategies may be required for long-lived immunity. It will be important to further understand how modulating immunogen kinetics impacts Tfh cell help, SHM, and MBC formation. Insights into the kinetics of the GC response, particularly in humans and NHPs, will benefit the efforts to optimize

Conflict of interest

We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication.

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

We thank Crotty lab members for helpful discussions. This work was supported by UM1 AI100663 (CHAVI-ID) and R01 AI134796 (S.C.) from the NIH.

References (36)

  • U. Weiss et al.

    The repertoire of somatic antibody mutants accumulating in the memory compartment after primary immunization is restricted through affinity maturation and mirrors that expressed in the secondary response

    J Exp Med

    (1990)
  • E. Landais et al.

    Broadly neutralizing antibody responses in a large longitudinal sub-Saharan HIV primary infection cohort

    PLOS Pathog

    (2016)
  • Y. Adachi et al.

    Distinct germinal center selection at local sites shapes memory B cell response to viral escape

    J Exp Med

    (2015)
  • C. Havenar-Daughton et al.

    Tfh cells and HIV bnAbs, an immunodominance model of the HIV neutralizing antibody generation problem

    Immunol Rev

    (2017)
  • X. Wu et al.

    Focused evolution of HIV-1 neutralizing antibodies revealed by structures and deep sequencing

    Science

    (2011)
  • H.-X. Liao et al.

    Co-evolution of a broadly neutralizing HIV-1 antibody and founder virus

    Nature

    (2013)
  • P. Borrow et al.

    Immunologic characteristics of HIV-infected individuals who make broadly neutralizing antibodies

    Immunol Rev

    (2017)
  • J.M. Kemp et al.

    Continuous antigen delivery from controlled release implants induces significant and anamnestic immune responses

    Vaccine

    (2002)
  • Cited by (76)

    • mRNA-based therapies: Preclinical and clinical applications

      2022, International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text