Synapse adhesion: a dynamic equilibrium conferring stability and flexibility

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2011.09.011Get rights and content

Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) linked to cytoskeleton generate stable cell–cell junctions. Cadherins provide a canonical example, but paradoxically, they participate in a multitude of transient and regulatable interactions. Their extracellular binding generates weak adhesion that is modified by clustering; interactions with F-actin are regulated, can be transient, and can alter F-actin dynamics. Additionally, cadherin recycling from the cell surface can modify the size and location of junctions and strength of adhesion. In epithelial cells, this ongoing dynamic behavior is important for maintaining stable junctions. Recent work supports that cadherins act similarly at synapses where their actions are likely to be shared by integrins and other actin-linked CAMs. Together the collaborative activities of such CAMs provide a stable, but flexible structure that can promote and support changes in synapse shape and size while maintaining stable junctions to permit information flow.

Highlights

► Synapse adhesion must be both stable and dynamic. ► Classic cadherins and other actin-linked adhesion molecules display stable and dynamic behaviors. ► Synapse adhesion may exist as a dynamic equilibrium during development. ► Mature synapses require dynamic and stable elements.

Introduction

Synapses evolved to transfer information within networks of neurons and other cells. Information flows principally by a sequence of presynaptic membrane depolarization, neurotransmitter release and diffusion, and postsynaptic activation of neurotransmitter receptors, but can also occur through the exchange of growth factors, peptides and by cell-to-cell contact-mediated signals. Out of the recognition of this primary function grew the concept that synapse adhesive structure evolved mostly to provide a passive support, perhaps more sophisticated than glue, but nevertheless a relatively simple strut-like scaffold maintaining a constant gap separating rigidly parallel synaptic membranes. Here, the synapse, with its adhesive struts, can be viewed as two shorelines separated by a one-way bridge that allows vehicles (information) to travel across.

Synapses also store information over long periods, and they do this, in part, by changes in overall size or shape of postsynaptic dendritic spines, or by incorporating perforations or evaginations [1, 2••, 3••, 4]. This makes a bridge analogy insufficient. In order to change shape while maintaining information transfer, a stable, but flexible structure is required in which proteins, membranes, and cytoskeletal support networks can be added or removed without jeopardizing communication. Here, we propose that this basic structure can be provided by cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) linked to F-actin cytoskeleton.

A variety of adhesion proteins are found at synapses. Many of those identified can initiate synapse formation, customarily demonstrated by an ability to generate artificial synapses between CAM-expressing non-neuronal cells or CAM-coated beads and neurons [5]. Synaptogenic CAMs include presynaptic neurexins which can bind to postsynaptic neuroligins, LRRTMs, or a complex of cerebellin1 and gluRdelta2, presynaptic netrin Gs and LAR protein tyrosine phosphatase receptors which bind to postsynaptic netrin G ligands, presynaptic latrophilin 1 and postsynaptic teneurin-2, ephB interactions with ephrin-Bs, homophilic binding between synCAMs, and interactions between as yet unidentified presynaptic partners and postsynaptic SALMs. It is not known how many of each of these families are co-expressed at synapses, whether they act competitively, or cooperatively. However, in-depth analyses indicate that particular pairs impart unique synaptic features, supporting the idea that CAMs can act cooperatively. Synaptogenic CAMs typically bind PDZ proteins rather than F-actin. Because these have been the subjects of several recent reviews [6, 7, 8, 9, 10], they will not be discussed in depth here. Instead, in this review, we focus on the nature of synapse adhesion and the contributions of non-synaptogenic, actin-linked CAMs to the generation and maintenance of synapse adhesive structure (Figure 1). The focus is on cadherins, but much of what is covered is equally applicable to the integrin family.

Section snippets

An overview of actin-linked adhesion

Neither cadherins nor integrins appear to be able to trigger synaptogenesis, but they both can confer synapse stability [11, 12, 13, 14]. Cadherins and integrins are bona fide adhesion proteins that are tethered in the plasma membrane by links to the F-actin cytoskeleton, and they both can generate junctions. Adherens junctions between epithelial cells assemble on a foundation of E-cadherin transcellular homophilic binding [15, 16], where they contribute to cell polarity and to the organization

Dynamic adhesion based on structure

The cadherin superfamily encompasses over 100 members. All are Type I transmembrane proteins with a variable number of cadherin repeats in the extracellular domain, but with respect to a role in junction development and maintenance, we will focus on the classic (or Type I and Type II) cadherins. In vertebrates, they have 5 extracellular cadherin (EC) repeat domains and a highly conserved intracellular domain that can bind members of the p120 catenin family in the juxtamembrane region and

Dynamic and stable interactions with actin

Extracellular binding is stabilized by interactions of the intracellular C-terminal domain with F-actin. Cadherins engage F-actin indirectly and can influence its organization or promote its assembly via a variety of mechanisms. The best studied is via β-catenin interactions with α-catenin. Alpha-catenin can bind F-actin via several different partners, including, α-actinin, afadin, and formin [40, 41, 42]. It can also bind F-actin directly, but α-catenin interactions with β-catenin or F-actin

Recycling and renewal

Cadherins at both adherens and synaptic junctions are also recycled. They are removed from the surface via clathrin-dependent endocytosis [48, 58], and in epithelia, they are trafficked to the plasma membrane using components of the exocyst complex [59]. Internalization requires breaking interactions with the actin cytoskeleton, but is most likely regulated by interactions at the intracellular, juxtamembrane domain of cadherins, which binds p120 catenin family members. In non-neuronal cells,

Supporting and stabilizing junctional morphing

It is easy to see why dynamic adhesion and cadherin recycling may be important to developing synapses. Developing synapses change their size and shape constantly over the first few weeks. Several studies have shown that developing dendritic spines are highly motile and while they dance relative to their anchorage sites on dendritic shafts, and morph in length and head-size, they maintain contact with their presynaptic terminals [69•, 70•, 71•]. Such movement demands that developing junctions

Maintaining stable synapse structure

In contrast to developing synapses, mature synaptic structure is stable. Time-lapse imaging studies show that the vast majority of dendritic spines do not turn over or even move very much [93, 94, 95, 96], and biochemical studies indicate that the proteinaceous networks that form postsynaptic densities are coherent and readily purified [97, 98, 99]. Actin-linked adhesion is present, but no longer necessary to maintain appositions [72••]. The maintained expression of actin-linked CAMs at

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

References (114)

  • K. Hatta et al.

    Expression of N-cadherin adhesion molecules associated with early morphogenetic events in chick development

    Nature

    (1986)
  • T.J. Boggon et al.

    C-cadherin ectodomain structure and implications for cell adhesion mechanisms

    Science

    (2002)
  • S.D. Patel et al.

    Type II cadherin ectodomain structures: implications for classical cadherin specificity

    Cell

    (2006)
  • E. Perret et al.

    Trans-bonded pairs of E-cadherin exhibit a remarkable hierarchy of mechanical strengths

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2004)
  • K.A. Knudsen et al.

    Interaction of a-actinin with the cadherin/catenin cell–cell adhesion complex via a-catenin

    J Cell Biol

    (1995)
  • M. Cavey et al.

    A two-tiered mechanism for stabilization and immobilization of E-cadherin

    Nature

    (2008)
  • S. Roura et al.

    Regulation of E-cadherin/catenin association by tyrosine phosphorylation

    J Biol Chem

    (1999)
  • Y. Takai et al.

    Nectin and afadin: novel organizers of intercellular junctions

    J Cell Sci

    (2003)
  • F. Pilot et al.

    Spatial control of actin organization at adherens junctions by a synaptotagmin-like protein Btsz

    Nature

    (2006)
  • Baum B, Georgiou M: Dynamics of adherens junctions in epithelial establishment, maintenance, and remodeling. J Cell...
  • K. Xiao et al.

    p120-Catenin regulates clathrin-dependent endocytosis of VE-cadherin

    Mol Biol Cell

    (2005)
  • C.C. Calkins et al.

    Desmoglein endocytosis and desmosome disassembly are coordinated responses to pemphigus autoantibodies

    J Biol Chem

    (2006)
  • A. Stan et al.

    Essential cooperation of N-cadherin and neuroligin-1 in the transsynaptic control of vesicle accumulation

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2010)
  • A.M. Fannon et al.

    A model for central synaptic junctional complex formation based on the differential adhesive specificities of the cadherins

    Neuron

    (1996)
  • M. Yamagata et al.

    Lamina-specific expression of adhesion molecules in developing chick optic tectum

    J Neurosci

    (1995)
  • M.E. Williams et al.

    Cadherin-9 regulates synapse-specific differentiation in the developing hippocampus

    Neuron

    (2011)
  • F. Ango et al.

    Ankyrin-based subcellular gradient of neurofascin, an immunoglobulin family protein, directs GABAergic innervation at Purkinje axon initial segment

    Cell

    (2004)
  • K. Korematsu et al.

    Cadherin-8 protein expression in gray matter structures and nerve fibers of the neonatal and adult mouse brain

    Neuroscience

    (1998)
  • L. Saglietti et al.

    Extracellular interactions between GluR2 and N-cadherin in spine regulation

    Neuron

    (2007)
  • P.T. Kelly et al.

    Synaptic proteins. Characterization of tubulin and actin and identification of a distinct postsynaptic density polypeptide

    J Cell Biol

    (1978)
  • O. Bozdagi et al.

    Persistence of coordinated long-term potentiation and dendritic spine enlargement at mature hippocampal CA1 synapses requires N-cadherin

    J Neurosci

    (2010)
  • J. Spacek et al.

    Trans-endocytosis via spinules in adult rat hippocampus

    J Neurosci

    (2004)
  • M. Matsuzaki et al.

    Structural basis of long-term potentiation in single dendritic spines

    Nature

    (2004)
  • Q. Zhou et al.

    Shrinkage of dendritic spines associated with long-term depression of hippocampal synapses

    Neuron

    (2004)
  • T. Biederer et al.

    Mixed-culture assays for analyzing neuronal synapse formation

    Nat Protoc

    (2007)
  • T.J. Siddiqui et al.

    Synaptic organizing complexes

    Curr Opin Neurobiol

    (2011)
  • M.B. Dalva et al.

    Cell adhesion molecules: signalling functions at the synapse

    Nat Rev Neurosci

    (2007)
  • K. Han et al.

    Synaptic adhesion molecules and PSD-95

    Prog Neurobiol

    (2008)
  • D.L. Benson et al.

    Building and remodeling synapses

    Hippocampus

    (2011)
  • K. Abe et al.

    Stability of dendritic spines and synaptic contacts is controlled by alphaN-catenin

    Nat Neurosci

    (2004)
  • H. Togashi et al.

    Cadherin regulates dendritic spine morphogenesis

    Neuron

    (2002)
  • J.S. Ehrlich et al.

    Spatio-temporal regulation of Rac1 localization and lamellipodia dynamics during epithelial cell–cell adhesion

    Dev Cell

    (2002)
  • A. Vaezi et al.

    Actin cable dynamics and Rho/Rock orchestrate a polarized cytoskeletal architecture in the early steps of assembling a stratified epithelium

    Dev Cell

    (2002)
  • C.K. Miranti et al.

    Sensing the environment: a historical perspective on integrin signal transduction

    Nat Cell Biol

    (2002)
  • M. Abedin et al.

    Diverse evolutionary paths to cell adhesion

    Trends Cell Biol

    (2010)
  • M. Abedin et al.

    The premetazoan ancestry of cadherins

    Science

    (2008)
  • D.L. Brower et al.

    Molecular evolution of integrins: genes encoding integrin beta subunits from a coral and a sponge

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (1997)
  • P. Clezardin

    Recent insights into the role of integrins in cancer metastasis

    Cell Mol Life Sci

    (1998)
  • A. Nose et al.

    Expressed recombinant cadherins mediate cell sorting in model systems

    Cell

    (1988)
  • Y. Shirayoshi et al.

    The calcium-dependent cell–cell adhesion system regulates inner cell mass formation and cell surface polarization in early mouse development

    Cell

    (1983)
  • Cited by (32)

    • The tetrapartite synapse: a key concept in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia

      2018, European Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      ECM molecules bind to neuronal surface receptors (e.g. integrins), which in turn link the postsynaptic density to the actin cytoskeleton on one side, and to the ECM and pre-synaptic terminal of the other side. Through this arrangement, cell adhesion molecules (CAMs)-mediate ECM and PSD signaling may impact the dendritic spine actin network, and thus the spine shape [211–217]. This possibility is supported by evidence that several ECM molecules, including CSPGs and Reelin, known to modulate spine formation, size and stability through ECM receptors, are also implicated in the pathology of SZ [76–79,88–92,218].

    • A Critical Role of Presynaptic Cadherin/Catenin/p140Cap Complexes in Stabilizing Spines and Functional Synapses in the Neocortex

      2017, Neuron
      Citation Excerpt :

      We passed over several prominent synaptogenic molecules, including neuroligins, neurexins, leucine-rich repeat transmembrane proteins, and Ig superfamily members (Giagtzoglou et al., 2009; Missler et al., 2012; Shen and Scheiffele, 2010; Siddiqui and Craig, 2011), because they are heterophilic, have multiple binding partners, and/or have isoforms with overlapping functions, making it difficult to use the same genetic manipulation to equally manipulate both sides of the synapse. Instead, we chose the homophilic cadherin/catenin complex, the first cell adhesion complex implicated in promoting axo-dendritic adhesion during synapse formation (Hirano and Takeichi, 2012), for the following reasons: (1) all members of the complex, including N-cadherin, β-catenin, and αN-catenin, are present at high levels during synaptogenesis and localize both pre- and postsynaptically; (2) essential component β-catenin, which interacts with all classical cadherins, is encoded by a single non-redundant gene; and (3) extensive work, mostly using cultured neurons, demonstrated both pre- and postsynaptic roles of the cadherin/catenin complex in synapse formation (Arikkath and Reichardt, 2008; Benson and Huntley, 2012; Brigidi and Bamji, 2011; Giagtzoglou et al., 2009; Hirano and Takeichi, 2012; McAllister, 2007; Missler et al., 2012; Tai et al., 2008). Having chosen the circuit and the molecule, we set about examining whether and how cadherin/catenin complexes regulate synaptogenesis and spinogenesis in the mouse primary somatosensory cortex.

    • Coordinated Spine Pruning and Maturation Mediated by Inter-Spine Competition for Cadherin/Catenin Complexes

      2015, Cell
      Citation Excerpt :

      N-cadherin is a homophilic, calcium-dependent transmembrane cell adhesion molecule present at high levels pre- and post-synaptically. Together with its intracellular binding partners β-catenin and αN-catenin, it forms the cadherin/catenin complex, which has been shown to play important roles in synapse formation and plasticity (Arikkath and Reichardt, 2008; Benson and Huntley, 2012; Brigidi and Bamji, 2011; Hirano and Takeichi, 2012; Tai et al., 2008). To investigate requirement for the cadherin/catenin complex in spine pruning in vivo, we conditionally knocked out endogenous β-catenin in excitatory neurons of the cerebral cortex and hippocampus using inducible CaMKCreERT2 (β-catfl/fl; CaMKCreERT2+/−; β-cat cKO) from 1 m, after the peak of synaptogenesis (Figures S2A–S2F).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Grant sponsor: National Institutes of Health: Work discussed in this review was supported by grants from NINDS NS037731 (DLB), NIMH MH075783 (GWH), and the Simons Foundation (SFARI# 206384 to DLB and GWH).

    View full text