Molecular-level tradeoffs and metabolic adaptation to simultaneous stressors

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2010.05.011Get rights and content

Life is a dynamic process driven by the complex interplay between physical constraints and selection pressures, ranging from nutrient limitation to inhibitory substances to predators. These stressors are not mutually exclusive; microbes have faced concurrent challenges for eons. Genome-enabled systems biology approaches are adapting economic and ecological concepts like tradeoff curves and strategic resource allocation theory to analyze metabolic adaptations to simultaneous stressors. These methodologies can accurately describe and predict metabolic adaptations to concurrent stresses by considering the tradeoff between investment of limiting resources into enzymatic machinery and the resulting cellular function. The approaches represent promising links between computational biology and well-established economic and ecological methodologies for analyzing the interplay between physical constraints and microbial fitness.

Section snippets

Mathematical modeling of microbial responses to environment

Microbes are complex systems; mathematical expressions have been used to predict and interpret these dynamic systems for more than a century (e.g. [1, 2, 3]). Microbial growth expressions were soon combined into systems of differential equations to consider a multitude of stressors including combinations of limiting substrates, competitors, predators, and the presence of inhibitors [4, 5]. Unfortunately, kinetic models are parameter heavy, in terms of both number and sensitivity. Literature

Stoichiometric analysis of single stress adaptations

The functional properties of metabolic systems are the product of evolutionary processes and are competitive given the organism's life history. Therefore, assumptions about competitive cellular behavior are used to select solutions to stoichiometry-based models. A widely utilized criterion presumes that microorganisms maximize biomass yield (microbe production from a fixed quantity of substrate). This criterion is convenient, simple, and successfully describes microbial behavior under certain

Economic considerations and metabolic strategies

Resource availability limits growth in most environments and is an important component of animal immune systems, commonly referred to as nutritional immunity [22••, 23]. This has driven microbial evolution toward strategies that allocate limiting resources to different metabolic isozymes and alternative pathways in a manner that favors fitness [24]. Standard economics approaches such as resource allocation theory and tradeoff analysis can be used to quantitatively compare the huge number of

Resource allocations and simultaneous stresses

Life is inherently competitive and stressors are not mutually exclusive. Microbes cope simultaneously with an assortment of constraints [37]. Economic and ecological theory provides a framework for predicting and interpreting microbial adaptations to multiple stresses [28, 38•, 39]. When subjected to multiple pressures, cells must allocate finite resources to different subsystems in a proportion that improves fitness; the systems biology challenge is to determine how these allocations respond

Stress adaptations and opportunity costs

Microbial responses to a variety of stressors can be quantified using the economic concept of opportunity costs. As an example of opportunity costs, E. coli shifts from the phosphotransferase system (Km  5 μm) to a higher affinity ABC transporter (Km < 1 μm) coupled with glucose kinase under glucose-scarce conditions [42]. The high affinity system requires more resources to assemble and operate (Figure 3); however, these costs are offset by improved glucose uptake at low external concentrations. The

Biodiversity, network robustness, and the Darwinian demon

All life faces physical, physiological, energetic, and temporal constraints. Resources allocated to one capacity cannot be allocated elsewhere. The resulting tradeoffs have been used to explain biodiversity on both an evolutionary and a dynamic basis [43, 44•]. Ecologists often invoke a thought experiment to test the null hypothesis of free specialization. The exercise proposes the existence of a ‘superspecies’, termed a Darwinian demon, unconstrained by tradeoffs: living long, reproducing

Conclusions

Decades of economic and ecological studies have highlighted the importance of strategic resource allocation and the associated constraints on competitive functionality. These concepts are relevant at all biological scales, from individual microbes to ecosystems, and appear to play key roles in the composition, organization, and functioning of molecular-level metabolic systems. The large body of theoretical and applied work in these fields provides a firm foundation for systems approaches to

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by financial support from National Institutes of Health (EB006532 and P20 RR024237).

References (55)

  • K. Kovárová-Kovar et al.

    Growth kinetics of suspended microbial cells: from single-substrate-controlled growth to mixed-substrate kinetics

    Microbiol Mol Biol Rev

    (1998)
  • S. Borger et al.

    Prediction of enzyme kinetic parameters based on statistical learning

    Genome Inform

    (2006)
  • E. Klipp et al.

    Inferring dynamic properties of biochemical reaction networks from structural knowledge

    Genome Inform

    (2004)
  • K. Smallbone et al.

    Something from nothing—bridging the gap between constraint-based and kinetic modeling

    FEBS J

    (2007)
  • K. Smallbone et al.

    Towards a genome-scale kinetic model of cellular metabolism

    BMC Syst Biol

    (2010)
  • L.M. Tran et al.

    Ensemble modeling of metabolic networks

    Biophys J

    (2008)
  • L.M. Blank et al.

    Metabolic flux distributions: genetic information, computational predictions, and experimental validation

    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol

    (2010)
  • J.L. Reed et al.

    Thirteen years of building constraint-based in silico models of Escherichia coli

    J Bacteriol

    (2003)
  • C.H. Schilling et al.

    Metabolic pathway analysis: basic concepts and scientific applications in the post-genomic era

    Biotechnol Prog

    (1999)
  • R. Mahadevan et al.

    Dynamic flux balance analysis of diauxic growth in Escherichia coli

    Biophys J

    (2002)
  • A.L. Meadows et al.

    Application of dynamic flux balance analysis to an industrial Escherichia coli fermentation

    Metab Eng

    (2010)
  • A. Varma et al.

    Stoichiometric flux balance models quantitatively predict growth and metabolic by-product secretion in wild-type Escherichia coli W3110

    Appl Environ Microbiol

    (1994)
  • R. Schuetz et al.

    Systematic evaluation of objective functions for predicting intracellular fluxes in Escherichia coli

    Mol Syst Biol

    (2007)
  • S. Schuster et al.

    Is maximization of molar yield in metabolic networks favoured by evolution?

    J Theor Biol

    (2008)
  • R.W. Sterner et al.

    Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere

    (2002)
  • P. Dhurjati et al.

    A cybernetic view of microbial growth: modeling of cells as optimal strategists

    Biotechnol Bioeng

    (1985)
  • R.P. Carlson

    Metabolic systems cost-benefit analysis for interpreting network structure and regulation

    Bioinformatics

    (2007)
  • Cited by (28)

    • Implications of carbon catabolite repression for plant–microbe interactions

      2022, Plant Communications
      Citation Excerpt :

      This allows them to fulfil their nutritional needs via a wide range of resources present in the environment. However, this functional versatility comes with high energetic costs for the cell (Carlson and Taffs, 2010). To reduce the effects of such energy constraints, microorganisms have developed a variety of metabolic regulatory mechanisms.

    • Extinction-colonization dynamics upon a survival-dispersal trade-off

      2020, Ecological Complexity
      Citation Excerpt :

      Trade-offs are highlighted as one of the candidate mechanisms that explain the generation and maintenance of the huge diversity of species in Earth (Chesson, 2000; Farahpour et al., 2018; Rees, 1993). Trade-offs occur because of physical, physiological, energetic, and temporal constraints (Carlson and Taffs, 2010). They prevent the evolution of a superspecies, also termed Darwinian demon, such that all traits can not be optimized simultaneously (Kneitel and Chase, 2004; Tilman, 1982).

    • Bacterial economics: Adaptation to stress conditions via stage-wise changes in the response mechanism

      2015, Food Microbiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In excess carbon bacteria use spilling pathways (Russell, 2007). These phenomena have been modelled in the context of optimization problems in different ways: by assuming an optimized growth yield with kinetics (Adadi et al., 2012; Vazquez et al., 2008), or cell wall occupancy constraints (Zhuang et al., 2011); by justifying a change of objective function as a result of competition for nutrient availability during evolution (Pfeiffer and Schuster, 2005); or as a result of trade-offs (Carlson and Taffs, 2010; Molenaar et al., 2009). The different approaches are compared in Table 1.

    • Synthetic Escherichia coli consortia engineered for syntrophy demonstrate enhanced biomass productivity

      2012, Journal of Biotechnology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Engineering a single microbe to simultaneously optimize multiple tasks which are not consistent with its native functionality represents a major challenge (Brenner et al., 2008). In fact, the ‘superbug’ concept contradicts a common ecological theory regarding stable, competitive ecological functioning; optimization of one trait comes at the price of other traits due to tradeoffs in resource allocation (Carlson and Taffs, 2010; Kneitel and Chase, 2004). When analyzed from an ecological perspective, bioprocesses based on robust consortia should outcompete a single ‘superbug’ at performing multiple, complex tasks (McMahon et al., 2007).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text