How to measure metabolic fluxes: a taxonomic guide for 13C fluxomics
Graphical abstract
Section snippets
The world of metabolic fluxes
Metabolism is defined by the interaction of metabolites and enzymes. Metabolic fluxes provide a quantitative readout of cellular function and, thus, contribute to the understanding of cell growth and maintenance as well as the cell's responses to environmental changes [1]. Here, the term ‘metabolic flux’ is used as a synonym for all reaction and transport rates in living cells (the fluxome). The end-product of a fluxome study, the flux map, reveals how metabolism actually works in the cells’
Ingredients of 13C fluxomics
Isotopic tracers (2H, 13C, 14C, 15N and others) have been used since the 1930s to reveal metabolically active pathways as well as enzyme mechanisms in all types of organisms [6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. In the ‘omics’ age, the neologism ‘13C fluxomics’ was coint. It is defined by the detailed quantification — rather than topological elucidation — of intracellular metabolic flux rates with 13C isotope labeling experiments (ILEs) [11, 12]. Meanwhile, 13C fluxomics, which also trades under the name 13C metabolic
Tools of the trade: 13C fluxomics modeling frameworks
To calculate fluxes, several computational techniques are available that differ significantly in modeling complexity as well as the required data input and output (Figure 2). We propose a taxonomic guideline based on the presence of specific essential ingredients for a modeling framework. If an ingredient is missing, choosing a simpler framework makes modeling easier, but less biological detail can be described and analyzed. We start with the general and most advanced metabolic dynamic setup,
Fluxes at different levels of biological organization and complexity
Traditional fluxomics investigations dealt with highly controlled and standardized experimental scenarios, usually a single microorganism cultivated in a bioreactor. In fact, many biological systems involve much less controlled real-life environments. Complexity rises with biological organization levels from single cells to tissues and organs, and whole organisms. Modeling these systems is further complicated by the presence of physicochemical gradients and interactions among multiple cell
Concluding remarks
The absolute number and throughput of 13C fluxomics is still small compared to other ‘omics’ technologies (e.g., metabolomics > 1000samples/d [71]). New lab automation techniques enable flux measurements of central carbon metabolism in high throughput (20 studies/d), at least for single bacterial and yeast model applications [72•]. The clue to increased throughput and resolution is standardized experimental and computational workflows that are transferable and robust. To date, the main stumbling
Acknowledgement
S.N. acknowledges the BMBF for his post-doctoral fellowship grant within the e:ToP initiative DynaMeTox (#031A271B).
References (76)
Metabolic fluxes and metabolic engineering
Metab Eng
(1999)13C metabolic flux analysis in complex systems
Curr Opin Biotechnol
(2011)- et al.
Deuterium as an indicator in the study of intermediary metabolism
J Biol Chem
(1935) - et al.
Pathway profiling in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: elucidation of cholesterol-derived catabolite and enzymes that catalyze its metabolism
J Biol Chem
(2011) - et al.
Tracing compartmentalized NADPH metabolism in the cytosol and mitochondria of mammalian cells
Mol Cell
(2014) - et al.
Genomics to fluxomics and physiomics — pathway engineering
Curr Opin Microbiol
(2002) - et al.
Fluxomics: mass spectrometry versus quantitative imaging
Curr Opin Plant Biol
(2007) - et al.
Stable isotope-assisted metabolomics to detect metabolic flux changes in mammalian cell cultures
Curr Opin Biotechnol
(2013) - et al.
Novel biological insights through metabolomics and 13C-flux analysis
Curr Opin Microbiol
(2009) - et al.
Chapter nineteen — 13C isotope-assisted methods for quantifying glutamine metabolism in cancer cells
Methods Enzymol
(2014)