Elsevier

European Urology

Volume 67, Issue 4, April 2015, Pages 692-701
European Urology

Platinum Priority – Review – Testis Cancer
Editorial by Robert Huddart on pp. 702–703 of this issue
Gonadal Maldevelopment as Risk Factor for Germ Cell Cancer: Towards a Clinical Decision Model

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.011Get rights and content

Abstract

Context

A disturbed process of gonadal formation and maintenance may result in testicular dysgenesis syndrome or disorders of sex development (DSDs), with an increased germ cell cancer (GCC) risk. Early diagnosis and treatment requires the identification of relevant risk factors and initial pathologic stages.

Objective

To evaluate current knowledge and novel insights regarding GCC risk in patients with DSDs, with the aim of providing a model for clinical use.

Evidence acquisition

A Medline search was conducted to identify all original and review articles assessing the aetiology of GCC, GCC risk in DSD patients, new predictive markers related to GCC, and possible clinical scenarios related to GCC and DSDs.

Evidence synthesis

Embryonic development is controlled by orchestrated patterns of gene and subsequent protein expression. Knowledge of these networks is essential to understand the mechanisms of disturbed development including GCC formation. GCCs are subdivided into seminomas and nonseminomas, and they all arise from embryonic germ cells that have failed to mature appropriately. The precursor is known as carcinoma in situ (also referred to as testicular intratubular neoplasia and intratubular germ cell neoplasia unclassified) in a testicular microenvironment and gonadoblastoma in a dysgenetic/ovarian microenvironment. GCCs mimic embryonic development, resulting in the identification of diagnostic markers (eg, OCT3/4, SRY [sex determining region Y]-box 2 [SOX2], and [sex determining region Y]-box 17 [SOX17]). Novel insights indicate a subtle interplay of specific single nucleotide polymorphisms, environmental factors, and epigenetic aberrations in the aetiology of GCCs. A genvironmental model combining these factors is presented, proposed as a guideline for clinical management by an experienced multidisciplinary team. The goal is individualised treatment including preservation of gonadal function (if possible) and prevention of malignant transformation.

Conclusions

A hypothesis is presented in which combined interactions of epigenetic and environmental parameters affect embryonic gonadal development, resulting in delayed/blocked germ cell maturation that determines the risk for GCC formation. Current and future possibilities for early detection of GCCs in risk populations and follow-up in a clinical setting are discussed.

Patient summary

This review analyses current knowledge about the underlying networks that relate to the development of a germ cell cancer in the context of a disorder of sex development. A combined effect of epigenetic and environmental factors is identified in the pathogenesis, and a model is proposed to apply this knowledge to clinical practice.

Introduction

A disturbed process of gonadal formation and maintenance, as often found in patients with disorders of sex development (DSDs), can increase the risk of developing a malignant germ cell tumour (GCT), referred to as germ cell cancer (GCC). In the general white adolescent and young male population, GCC is the most common cancer, with the incidence still rising [1], [2]. GCCs are part of a heterogeneous group of neoplasms subdivided into five entities [3]. In the context of DSDs, only GCCs (also known as type II GCTs) are relevant and therefore the focus of this review.

Early diagnosis of a rare cancer requires hallmarks to identify risk populations and subsequently informative markers to demonstrate the presence of the earliest pathologic stages with a high likelihood of progression. The histology of the precursor of GCC depends on the microenvironmental context. Within the testis it is referred to as carcinoma in situ (CIS) and within the ovary/dysgenetic gonad as gonadoblastoma (GB). CIS is also known as intratubular germ cell neoplasia unclassified and testicular intratubular neoplasia [3], [4], [5]. Although not correct based on its cell of origin, the abbreviation CIS is the most widely known and therefore is used in this paper. CIS and GB are composed of germ cells with embryonic characteristics, most likely reflecting their origin from primordial germ cells/gonocytes. These cells are assumed to be blocked in their process of maturation due to disturbances within the gonadal microenvironment during early (intrauterine) development. The GCC precursor lesions, CIS and GB, are known to progress to an invasive GCC in most cases when left untreated [4], [6].

DSD is an umbrella term encompassing a spectrum of phenotypes ranging from normal male, mild undervirilisation, ambiguous genitalia to a normal female phenotype. In patients with DSDs, GCC risk depends on the presence of a defined region of the Y chromosome, the so-called gonadoblastoma region on the Y chromosome (GBY region). This specific genetic fragment promotes GCC development in the context of disturbed gonadal development (ie, a dysgenetic gonad [7]) and possibly also in the normally developed testis, for which a testis-specific protein on the Y chromosome (TSPY) is the assumed responsible candidate [8]. Additional risk factors for CIS/GB include the anatomic position of the gonad (ie, of the testis) and epigenetic and microenvironmental parameters.

Section snippets

Evidence acquisition

We conducted a Medline search to identify all original and review articles assessing the aetiology of GCC, GCC risk in DSD patients, new markers related to GCC, and possible clinical propositions related to GCC and DSDs. Keywords used were DSD, embryonic development, GCC, germ cell cancer, germ cell tumour, environment, pluripotency, genetic, epigenetic markers, management, surgery, and gonadectomy (a more detailed description is provided in the Supplement).

Gonadal development

Embryonic development is controlled by a complex functional network of gene products, both in time and place. A number of highly informative reviews have been published recently; therefore only the most relevant items in the context of DSDs and GCC are highlighted in this paper. Any disruption in these processes, due to intrinsic or extrinsic parameters, may result in (minor or severe) abnormalities including development of the various forms of DSDs, with differences in GCC risk. Conceptually,

Conclusions

New scientific evidence over the past few years and new molecular techniques (ie, next-generation sequencing) has resulted in a better understanding of the aetiology underlying GCC in patients with DSDs. We presented an overall pathobiologic hypothesis in which both epigenetic as well as microenvironmental parameters are incorporated, referred to as the genvironmental model. We hypothesise that disturbed regulation, through the combined interaction of epigenetic and microenvironmental

References (71)

  • M.S. Verp et al.

    Abnormal sexual differentiation and neoplasia

    Cancer Genet Cytogenet

    (1987)
  • G.J. Netto et al.

    Global DNA hypomethylation in intratubular germ cell neoplasia and seminoma, but not in nonseminomatous male germ cell tumors

    Mod Pathol

    (2008)
  • J.P. Richie

    OCT4 staining in testicular tumors. A sensitive and specific marker for seminoma and embryonal carcinoma

    J Urol

    (2005)
  • Y. Li et al.

    The Y-encoded TSPY protein: a significant marker potentially plays a role in the pathogenesis of testicular germ cell tumors

    Hum Pathol

    (2007)
  • J. Zeron-Medina et al.

    A polymorphic p53 response element in KIT ligand influences cancer risk and has undergone natural selection

    Cell

    (2013)
  • Y. Lin et al.

    Reciprocal regulation of Akt and Oct4 promotes the self-renewal and survival of embryonal carcinoma cells

    Mol Cell

    (2012)
  • I.A. Hughes et al.

    Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society/European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology Consensus Group. Consensus statement on management of intersex disorders

    J Pediatr Urol

    (2006)
  • P.M. Voorhoeve et al.

    A genetic screen implicates miRNA-372 and miRNA-373 as oncogenes in testicular germ cell tumors

    Cell

    (2006)
  • G. Belge et al.

    Serum levels of microRNAs miR-371-3: a novel class of serum biomarkers for testicular germ cell tumors?

    Eur Urol

    (2012)
  • A.J. Gillis et al.

    Targeted serum miRNA (TSmiR) test for diagnosis and follow-up of (testicular) germ cell cancer patients: a proof of principle

    Mol Oncol

    (2013)
  • J.W. Oosterhuis et al.

    Testicular germ-cell tumours in a broader perspective

    Nat Rev Cancer

    (2005)
  • P.J. Woodward et al.

    Testicular germ cell tumors

  • R.E. Scully et al.

    A review of 74 cases

    Cancer

    (1970)
  • D.C. Page

    Hypothesis: a Y-chromosomal gene causes gonadoblastoma in dysgenetic gonads

    Development

    (1987)
  • S.W. Oram et al.

    TSPY potentiates cell proliferation and tumorigenesis by promoting cell cycle progression in HeLa and NIH3T3 cells

    BMC Cancer

    (2006)
  • D. Wilhelm et al.

    Sex determination and gonadal development in mammals

    Physiol Rev

    (2007)
  • K. Molyneaux et al.

    Primordial germ cell migration

    Int J Dev Biol

    (2004)
  • J.L. Millan et al.

    Biology of human alkaline phosphatases with special reference to cancer

    Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci

    (1995)
  • C.E. Hoei-Hansen et al.

    Stem cell pluripotency factor NANOG is expressed in human fetal gonocytes, testicular carcinoma in situ and germ cell tumours

    Histopathology

    (2005)
  • H.R. Scholer et al.

    New type of POU domain in germ line-specific protein Oct-4

    Nature

    (1990)
  • A.H. Sinclair et al.

    A gene from the human sex-determining region encodes a protein with homology to a conserved DNA-binding motif

    Nature

    (1990)
  • P. Koopman et al.

    Regulation of male sexual development by Sry and Sox9

    J Exp Zool

    (2001)
  • K. Pauls et al.

    Spatial expression of germ cell markers during maturation of human fetal male gonads: an immunohistochemical study

    Hum Reprod

    (2006)
  • F. Honecker et al.

    Pathobiological implications of the expression of markers of testicular carcinoma in situ by fetal germ cells

    J Pathol

    (2004)
  • A. Biason-Lauber

    WNT4, RSPO1, and FOXL2 in sex development

    Semin Reprod Med

    (2012)
  • Cited by (88)

    • Oncologic outcomes of pre-malignant and invasive germ cell tumors in patients with differences in sex development – A systematic review

      2020, Journal of Pediatric Urology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Gonadectomy is not to be taken lightly due to the wide-ranging benefits of gonadal function. A variety of literature suggests that a well-defined risk stratification approach could be followed to identify individuals who could either postpone gonadectomy or retain gonads for life if they are of no or low malignancy risk and provide recommendations based on a variety of factors [8,11,16,17]. For the most part, recommendations are based on weak data because this condition is rare and large, prospective studies are incredibly difficult.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text