Do chromatin loops provide epigenetic gene expression states?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2010.06.007Get rights and content

Control of gene expression involves the concerted action of multiple regulatory elements some of which can act over large genomic distances. Physical interaction among these elements can lead to looping of the chromatin fiber. Although posttranslational modifications of chromatin are thought to play a role in the conveyance of epigenetic information, it is largely unknown whether higher order chromatin organization such as looping contributes to epigenetic memory. A related unresolved question is whether chromatin loops are the cause or the effect of transcriptional regulation. Recent work on diverse organisms suggests a memory function for long-range chromatin interactions. It is proposed that higher order folding of the chromatin fiber can serve to maintain active and repressed states of gene expression.

Introduction

The eukaryotic genome is packaged in a highly organized fashion to fit within the spatial constraints of the cell nucleus and at the same time allow for access of regulatory factors to the underlying sequences. The first layer of packaging involves the winding of 147 base pairs of DNA around an octamer of core histone proteins to form a nucleosome, the crystal structure of which has been solved [1]. A string of nucleosomes without any further folding presents itself as an 11 nm fiber under the electron microscope. The next layer of packaging involves the helical stacking of nucleosomes to form a chromatin fiber with a diameter of ∼30 nm of which the structural organization is beginning to be unraveled [2]. While the architecture of chromatin folding at the next higher level is much more obscure, it has become clear that the chromatin fiber is flexible and allows for movement inside of the nucleus [3].

In simple terms, chromatin fiber flexibility allows for physical interactions between distant regulatory sites in the genome in a manner involving contacts in cis and in trans (Figure 1). The term chromatin loop describes interactions in cis with the intervening sequence looped out. However, it is conceivable that trans interactions might turn out to be as important. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and chromosome conformation capture (3C) and its derivatives have provided strong evidence that distant enhancers can loop to the promoters they control [4, 5, 6, 7]. Importantly, chromatin loops can be found at both active and repressed genes and are not limited to enhancer–promoter interactions but can also involve insulator elements. Genetic loci at which chromatin loops have been found and the diverse roles loops might play have been extensively reviewed recently [8, 9, 10, 11, 12]. Moreover, with the advent of new technologies that detect a broader spectrum of chromatin contacts, interactions in trans are being increasingly appreciated, although their functions remain largely obscure [13]. A functionally relevant trans interaction is discussed below in the context of polycomb-mediated chromatin interactions. Here we limit our discussion to a specific aspect of chromatin looping, namely the possible role of long-range chromatin interactions in epigenetic memory.

Our topic necessitates a brief description of the term epigenetics and how it will be used here. An epigenetic trait is defined as a stably heritable phenotype resulting from changes in a chromosome without alterations in the DNA sequence [14]. The term ‘heritable’ is most often used in the context of transgenerational inheritance or inheritance from mother to daughter cell, that is, a form of memory that persists through mitosis or meiosis. However, frequently, the term epigenetic memory is employed when considering events that do not necessarily involve cell division, such as the memory of recent transcriptional activity. In the case of the inducible GAL1 gene in yeast, it has been proposed that changes in chromatin organization and subnuclear localization might mediate this form of transcriptional memory [15, 16] (Figure 2, see below). However, additional work, including elegant heterokaryon experiments, indicates that this memory function can be imparted by information contained within the cytoplasm and can be maintained over several cell division cycles [17, 18••].

A form of transcriptional memory in mammalian cells, also referred to as transiently poised state or dynamic bookmarking has been linked to the persistence of general transcription factors. For example, a recent study in T cells showed that following repression, the prolonged presence of the histone acetyltransferase p300 and RNA polymerase II facilitates rapid re-induction of immediate early genes by stimuli that by themselves are ineffective without prior transcription [19]. Thus, possible mechanisms that mark genes for rapid activation might include chromatin modifications, transcription factors, and cytoplasmic proteins. In view of these possibilities, the above definition of epigenetics is somewhat arbitrarily confined, although it follows conventional and perhaps pragmatic thinking of epigenetics in the context of proteins associated with chromatin. In the following sections we specifically consider not only some recent but also older work from different systems suggesting that higher order chromatin organization might play a role epigenetic memory.

Section snippets

Stability and dynamics of chromatin loops

A memory function for chromatin loops might require that they are stable even in the absence of transcription or throughout the mitotic phase of the cell cycle when transcription is silenced globally [20] (Figure 3). Indeed, chromatin loops at the mammalian β-globin locus persist when transcription is silenced pharmacologically [21, 22]. In addition, in yeast, promoter-terminator gene loops are maintained for extended periods of time even after transcription has been repressed [23••, 24••] (

Polycomb-mediated long-range interactions

A well studied model of epigenetic maintenance of transcription states involves the Polycomb group (PcG) and Trithorax group (trxG) regulatory systems. PcG complexes are typically associated with gene repression. Originally discovered in Drosophila, they are required to maintain repressed states of target genes throughout multiple rounds of cell division during development. Since PcG proteins can maintain repression in a manner independent of the initiating repressive event, they are thought to

Initiator-terminator loops and transcriptional memory

Transcriptional re-activation of a gene for the second time following an intervening period of silencing might require a shorter stimulus than activation for the first time. This phenomenon is referred to as transcriptional memory. Many factors are implicated in the transcriptional memory of the inducible yeast GAL genes. Moreover, depending on whether short term (∼1 or 2 cell divisions) or long term (5 or 6 cell divisions) memory is considered, factor requirements might vary. The molecular

Conclusions and perspective

It is difficult to establish with certainty that a given chromatin modification exerts a truly epigenetic function. Chromatin marks are established or erased by nuclear factors that recruit the modifying enzymes. As such, chromatin modifications might simply be downstream mediators in a pathway rather than initiators of a given function [55]. The same holds for chromatin loops. If a loop persists during mitosis for example, is it the loop or the factors that tie the loop that specify epigenetic

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

We apologize to those whose work could not be discussed owing to space limitations. We thank Ann Dean, Job Dekker, Christopher Vakoc, Jumin Zhao, and members of the laboratory for critical comments on the manuscript. GAB is supported by NIH Grants DK58044 and DK54937.

References (58)

  • C. Hou et al.

    Cell type specificity of chromatin organization mediated by CTCF and cohesin

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2010)
  • L. Xin et al.

    Exploring cellular memory molecules marking competent and active transcriptions

    BMC Mol Biol

    (2007)
  • R.J. Palstra et al.

    The beta-globin nuclear compartment in development and erythroid differentiation

    Nat Genet

    (2003)
  • J. Mateos-Langerak et al.

    Polycomb group proteins and long-range gene regulation

    Adv Genet

    (2008)
  • H.H. Ng et al.

    Targeted recruitment of Set1 histone methylase by elongating Pol II provides a localized mark and memory of recent transcriptional activity

    Mol Cell

    (2003)
  • J.M. O'Sullivan et al.

    Gene loops juxtapose promoters and terminators in yeast

    Nat Genet

    (2004)
  • S.L. Ameres et al.

    Inducible DNA-loop formation blocks transcriptional activation by an SV40 enhancer

    EMBO J

    (2005)
  • J.H. Brickner

    Transcriptional memory at the nuclear periphery

    Curr Opin Cell Biol

    (2009)
  • K. Luger et al.

    Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution

    Nature

    (1997)
  • C. Lanctot et al.

    Dynamic genome architecture in the nuclear space: regulation of gene expression in three dimensions

    Nat Rev Genet

    (2007)
  • K.E. Cullen et al.

    Interaction between transcription regulatory regions of prolactin chromatin

    Science

    (1993)
  • J. Dekker et al.

    Capturing chromosome conformation

    Science

    (2002)
  • D. Carter et al.

    Long-range chromatin regulatory interactions in vivo

    Nat Genet

    (2002)
  • S.L. Berger et al.

    An operational definition of epigenetics

    Genes Dev

    (2009)
  • S. Kundu et al.

    SWI/SNF is required for transcriptional memory at the yeast GAL gene cluster

    Genes Dev

    (2007)
  • D.G. Brickner et al.

    H2A.Z-mediated localization of genes at the nuclear periphery confers epigenetic memory of previous transcriptional state

    PLoS Biol

    (2007)
  • M. Acar et al.

    Enhancement of cellular memory by reducing stochastic transitions

    Nature

    (2005)
  • J.S. Byun et al.

    Dynamic bookmarking of primary response genes by p300 and RNA polymerase II complexes

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2009)
  • G.P. Delcuve et al.

    Mitotic partitioning of transcription factors

    J Cell Biochem

    (2008)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text