Epidemiology of Fusarium head blight on small-grain cereals

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.07.032Get rights and content

Abstract

Fusarium head blight (FHB) is one of the most serious diseases affecting wheat and barley worldwide. It is caused by Fusarium graminearum along with F. culmorum, F. avenaceum and other related fungi. These fungi also produce several mycotoxins. Though the disease results in reduced seed quality and yield, the toxins which may accompany the disease are often a more serious problem. Pathogen inoculum is usually very abundant, however production and dispersal of inoculum are weather-sensitive processes. An abundance of colonized substrate (i.e. maize or cereal debris) in a region contributes to airborne inoculum throughout the area. Local residues beneath the cereal crop (i.e. from previous crop) may have a less obvious effect, particularly in regions where long-distance dispersal is likely due to wind conditions. The host is most susceptible to infection at anthesis and shortly thereafter. A warm, moist environment characterized by frequent precipitation or heavy dew is highly favorable to fungal growth, infection and development of disease in head tissues. As the fungus grows, it produces mycotoxins which are water-soluble and may be translocated between tissues or leeched from source tissues. Important epidemiological issues have arisen recently and include an apparent shift in prevalence of Fusarium species on infected heads in Europe toward F. graminearum; and the presence of multiple chemotypes and aggressiveness variants within a species in a region.

Introduction

Fusarium head blight (FHB), also called ear blight or scab, is a major fungal disease affecting several gramineous hosts including wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). The disease occurs throughout much of the world and is associated with several Fusarium spp. including Fusarium graminearum Schwabe (teleomorph: Gibberella zeae (Schwein.) Petch) and F. culmorum (W.G. Smith) Sacc., as well as F. poae (Peck) Wollenw., F. avenaceum (Fr.) Sacc., F. sporotrichoides Scherb., and Microdochium nivale (Fr.) Samuels & I.C. Hallett. While F. graminearum is often the prevalent species in many of the affected regions, the others can be highly pathogenic or are frequently found in association with the disease. These fungi are capable of producing a number of trichothecene mycotoxins including deoxynivalenol (DON) and nivalenol (NIV), as well as zearalenone (ZEA) and moniliformin (MON), all of which have a range of toxicity to animals (Desjardin, 2006, Leslie and Summerell, 2006, Rotter et al., 1996).

Fusarium head blight of wheat appears as blighted head and peduncle tissues which turn brown or tan and senesce prematurely. Symptoms often are accompanied by evidence of the fungus, which may include purple-black perithecia and/or pink sporodochia on heads, especially on glumes. Seed from FHB-affected fields often is shrunken, or shriveled with a characteristically bleached appearance (Andersen, 1948, Goswami and Kistler, 2004, McMullen et al., 1997, Parry et al., 1995). The disease results in direct economic losses including reduced grain yield and quality (aborted or shriveled seed, reduced seed size), and indirect loss due to contamination by mycotoxins leading to rejection or downgrading of grain at marketing (Parry et al., 1995, Snijders, 1990, Sutton, 1982). Additional outcomes have included socially destabilizing economic impacts within FHB-affected regions (McMullen et al., 1997, Nganje et al., 2004, Windels, 2000).

Epidemics of FHB (like those of many other disease systems) are strongly influenced by local and regional environment, host factors such as physiological state and genetic make-up, and pathogen factors including adaptation and virulence.

The objective of this review is to outline the current state of knowledge for FHB and highlight a number of epidemiological issues. A further objective is to discuss some of the pressing issues that have emerged more recently or that have proven especially difficult to deal with experimentally.

Section snippets

Inoculum sources

The causal agents of FHB survive and over-winter on or within plant tissue residues including small grain stems and roots as well as maize (Zea mays L.) stalks and ear pieces. The fungi are present and survive in colonized crop residues as mycelium, and may develop saprophytically on residues during the fall, winter, and spring (Sutton, 1982). Pathogen survival is enhanced within reduced tillage systems while tillage (residue burial) speeds decomposition and reduces pathogen reproduction and

Climate and ecology

Each fungus in the FHB disease system has somewhat different biological and environmental requirements (Table 1) which can, in part, explain why the frequencies of these species varies by location. For example, F. graminearum grows well over a wide range of temperatures up to 30 °C and is associated with the warmer regions of the world, whereas F. poae, which is a more efficient pathogen at lower temperatures (i.e. 20 °C) is found more frequently in temperate climates. Most of the species can

Host factors

The abundance of fungal niches both during and after the growing season coupled with a broadly (environmentally) adapted group of pathogenic species makes the FHB disease system difficult to manage and to predict. However, the role of the host as a component of the disease system cannot be overlooked. Host factors of importance include genetic resistance to the pathogen and also physiological condition of the host as influenced by nutrition, hydration, and age. The host response to infection

Non-pathogenic fungal development

Because of the impact that mycotoxins have on small grain quality, it is important to remember that there is some risk to the crop even in the absence of major symptom development. Many of the fungi mentioned are weak pathogens on wheat spikes or are poorly pathogenic during certain developmental stages of the host. Yet all of these fungi can survive as saprophytes and some may colonize tissues without parasitizing them (Ali and Francl, 2001). Grain in storage is also susceptible to fungal

Conclusions

Most scientists agree that management of FHB will require an integrated approach (Krupinsky et al., 2002). Components of integrated management could include cultural practices to avoid or minimize risk, planting of resistant hosts or modifying the cropping system to mitigate risk, fungicide treatments to protect susceptible hosts, and utilization of weather-based risk assessment or disease forecasting systems in conjunction with chemical treatments. Understanding the epidemiology of the disease

References (64)

  • J.M. Brennan et al.

    Effect of temperature on head blight of wheat caused by Fusarium culmorum and F. graminearum

    Plant Pathology

    (2005)
  • A.E. Desjardin

    Fusarium mycotoxins

  • R. Dill Macky et al.

    The effect of previous crop residues and tillage on fusarium head blight of wheat

    Plant Disease

    (2000)
  • F.M. Doohan et al.

    Influence of climatic factors on Fusarium species pathogenic to cereals

    European Journal of Plant Pathology

    (2003)
  • N.S. Dufault et al.

    Role of temperature and moisture in the production and maturation of Gibberella zeae perithecia

    Plant Disease

    (2006)
  • L. Francl et al.

    Daily inoculum levels of Gibberella zeae on wheat spikes

    Plant Disease

    (1999)
  • L.R. Gale

    Population biology of Fusarium species causing head blight of grain crops

  • J. Gilbert et al.

    Epidemiology and biological control of Gibberella zeae/Fusarium graminearum

    Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology

    (2004)
  • J. Gilbert et al.

    Review: recent developments in research on fusarium head blight of wheat in Canada

    Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology

    (2000)
  • R.S Goswami et al.

    Heading for disaster: Fusarium graminearum on cereal crops

    Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions

    (2004)
  • J.C. Guenther et al.

    The development and differentiation of Gibberella zeae (anamorph: Fusarium graminearum) during colonization of wheat

    Mycologia

    (2005)
  • H.M. Horberg

    Patterns of splash dispersed conidia of Fusarium poae and Fusarium culmorum

    European Journal of Plant Pathology

    (2002)
  • Y. Jin et al.

    Survival of Gibberella zeae ascospores on the plant surface

    Phytopathology

    (2001)
  • E.B. Khonga et al.

    Inoculum production and survival of Gibberella zeae in maize and wheat residues

    Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology

    (1988)
  • J.M. Krupinsky et al.

    Managing plant disease risk in diversified cropping systems

    Agronomy Journal

    (2002)
  • E.C. Large

    Growth stages in cereals — illustration of the Feekes scale

    Plant Pathology

    (1954)
  • W.G. Legge et al.

    Progress in breeding for resistance to fusarium head blight in barley

    Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology

    (2004)
  • J.F. Leslie et al.

    The Fusarium Laboratory Manual

    (2006)
  • A. Logrieco et al.

    Toxigenic Fusarium species and mycotoxins associated with maize ear rot in Europe

    European Journal of Plant Pathology

    (2002)
  • W.Z. Lu et al.

    Research on Wheat Scab

    (2001)
  • B.D. McCallum et al.

    Influence of inoculation method and growth stage on Fusarium head blight in barley

    Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology

    (2002)
  • M. McMullen et al.

    Scab of wheat and barley: a re-emerging disease of devastating impact

    Plant Disease

    (1997)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Tel.: +1 605 688 5540; fax: +1 605 688 4024.

    View full text