Assessment of a regulatory sanitization process in Egyptian dairy plants in regard to the adherence of some food-borne pathogens and their biofilms

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.07.021Get rights and content

Abstract

Food-borne pathogens may develop certain strategies that enable them to defy harsh conditions such as chemical sanitization. Biofilm formation represents a prominent one among those adopted strategies, by which food-borne pathogens protect themselves against external threats. Thus, bacterial biofilm is considered as a major hazard for safe food production. This study was designed to investigate the adherence and the biofilm formation ability of some food-borne pathogens on stainless steel and polypropylene surfaces using chip assay, and to validate regular sanitizing process (sodium hypochlorite 250 mg/L) for effective elimination of those pathogens. Sixteen pathogenic bacterial strains, previously isolated from raw milk and dairy products at Zagazig city, Egypt (9 Staphylococcus aureus, 4 Cronobacter sakazakii and 3 Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium), were chosen for this study. Strains showed different patterns of adherence and biofilm formation on tested surfaces with minor significance between surfaces. The ability of sodium hypochlorite to completely eradicate either adhered or biofilm-embedded pathogens varied significantly depending on the strain and type of surface used. Whilst, sodium hypochlorite reduced tested pathogens counts per cm2 of produced biofilms, but it was not able to entirely eliminate neither them nor adherent Cronobacter sakazakii to stainless steel surface. This study revealed that biofilm is considered as a sustainable source of contamination of dairy products with these pathogens, and also emphasized the need of paying more attention to the cleaning and sanitizing processes of food contact surfaces.

Highlights

► Some dairy-borne pathogens and food-contact surfaces were used in this study. ► Biofilm developing abilities differ significantly between tested strains. ► Regulatory sanitizing agent (sodium hypochlorite 250 mg/L) does not satisfy safety requirements for dairy plant sanitation.

Introduction

Biofilm production is a natural mechanism by which some microorganisms try to protect themselves from unfavorable environments. Simply, after adhering to a wet surface, microorganisms begin to secrete a complex extracellular matrix and get embedded inside it (Simões et al., 2009). Microbial biofilms may be defined as microbial aggregates, embedded in matrices of exopolymers, which attached to either biotic or abiotic surfaces (Costerton and Lewandowski, 1995). Since the first reported incidence (Zobell, 1943), the ability of some microorganisms to form biofilms continues to constitute a major challenge to different industries (Maukonen et al., 2003, Veran, 2002). Nearly all branches of food industry, including dairy sectors are being challenged by biofilms problem (Chen et al., 2007, Frank et al., 2003, Jessen and Lammert, 2003, Somers and Wong, 2004).

In dairy plants, biofilms can be developed everywhere; tanks, pipes, working surfaces and even walls and floors (Sinde and Carballo, 2000). These biofilms are certainly resistant to antimicrobials and it is extremely difficult to remove them eventually from food contact surfaces (Simões et al., 2006). Such biofilms constitute major sources of contamination for dairy products either directly or indirectly (Gibson et al., 1999, Holah, 1992), and subsequently constitute serious threats for consumers' health. Biofilms may represent sources of contamination with many microorganisms rather than biofilm producers as certain microorganisms may embed themselves in preformed biofilms exploiting the protective nature of those biofilms (Lapidot et al., 2006, Lehner et al., 2005, Lomander et al., 2004, Møretrø and Langsrud, 2004). In addition to the hygienic and safety issues, biofilms may destroy or impair the function of the food contact surface leading to economic losses (Bremer et al., 2006, Gram et al., 2007). Biofilm development was found to induce corrosion of metallic food surfaces due to catalytic reaction beneath biofilms' areas (Vieira et al., 1993) and significantly reduce heat transfer efficacy of surfaces, rendering the microbiological quality of the final products very poor (Mittelman, 1998).

Many food-borne outbreaks have been associated with dairy products as main vehicles for transmission. Among those outbreaks, Staphylococcus aureus (Staph. aureus), Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) and Coronobacter sakazakii (Cron. sakazakii) were well documented as major causative agents (Durango et al., 2004, Kandhai et al., 2010, Seifu et al., 2004).

While, the majority of dairy processing plants often use stainless steel to construct the dairy equipment for its advantages as a durable, non-corroded, easily cleaned and sanitized surface, polypropylene is recently widely spread in dairy industry as a main material for pipe work, tanks and cutting surfaces (Pompermayer and Gaylarde, 2000). Sanitization of food processing equipment is an indispensable process for ensuring control of cross contamination between different batches of production (Rossoni and Gaylarde, 2000). Egyptian by-laws stated that sodium hypochlorite has to be used as the main sanitizer that all dairy plants and facilities should use for sanitization.

This study was aimed to assess the biofilm developing abilities of some strains of Staph. aureus, Cron. sakazakii and S. Typhimurium, isolated from raw milk and dairy products on two routinely adopted food contact surfaces (stainless steel and polypropylene). Additionally, the ability of sodium hypochlorite to eventually eradicate the adhered or biofilm-embedded pathogens was investigated.

Section snippets

Bacterial strains and culture media

Bacterial strains used in this study were all of dairy origin (Table 1), previously isolated using appropriate standard cultural methods and identified using both biochemical and molecular methods (unpublished data). All strains were stored at − 80 °C in 25% glycerol. Prior to conduction of experiments, all strains were transferred to Trypticase soy agar (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD; BD) and incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 24 h. A single colony of each strain was then picked up and inoculated

Results and discussion

Microbial biofilm formation goes through many stages until biofilm gets mature, briefly, initial adherence or attachment process, biofilm polymers formation, cell replication and finally cell detachment (Breyers and Ratner, 2004). In order to achieve the best controlling regime against food-borne pathogens, understanding each stage's criteria is a key step in accomplishing this target.

References (59)

  • J.J.R. Herrera et al.

    Adhesion and detachment kinetics of several strains of Staphylococcus aureus subsp. aureus under three different experimental conditions

    Food Microbiology

    (2007)
  • C. Iversen et al.

    Risk profile of Enterobacter sakazakii, an emergent pathogen associated with infant milk formula

    Trends in Food Science and Technology

    (2003)
  • K.K. Jefferson

    What drives bacteria to produce biofilm?

    FEMS Microbiology Letters

    (2004)
  • B. Jessen et al.

    Biofilm and disinfection in meat processing plants

    International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation

    (2003)
  • B. Joseph et al.

    Biofilm formation by Salmonella spp. on food contact surfaces and their sensitivity to sanitizers

    International Journal of Food Microbiology

    (2001)
  • M.C. Kandhai et al.

    A study into the occurrence of Cronobacter spp. in The Netherlands between 2001 and 2005

    Food Control

    (2010)
  • A. Lapidot et al.

    Biofilm formation and the survival of Salmonella Typhimurium on parsley

    International Journal of Food Microbiology

    (2006)
  • A. Lehner et al.

    Biofilm formation, extracellular polysaccharide production, and cell-to-cell signaling in various Enterobacter sakazakii strains: aspects promoting environmental persistence

    Journal of Food Protection

    (2005)
  • A. Lomander et al.

    Evaluation of chlorines impact on biofilms on scratched stainless steel surfaces

    Bioresources Technology

    (2004)
  • A. Ludwicka et al.

    Bioluminescent assay for measurement of bacterial attachment to polyethylene

    Journal of Microbiological Methods

    (1985)
  • D. Mack et al.

    Mechanisms of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus: functional molecules, regulatory circuits, and adaptive responses

    International Journal of Medical Microbiology

    (2004)
  • T.F. Mah et al.

    Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents

    Trends in Microbiology

    (2001)
  • M. Malcova et al.

    Biofilm formation in field strains of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium: identification of a new colony morphology type and the role of SGI1 in biofilm formation

    Veterinary Microbiology

    (2008)
  • M.W. Mittelman

    Structure and functional characteristics of bacterial biofilms in fluid processing operations

    Journal of Dairy Science

    (1998)
  • D.M.C. Pompermayer et al.

    The influence of temperature on the adhesion of mixed cultures of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli to polypropylene

    Food Microbiology

    (2000)
  • U. Römling et al.

    Flagella modulate the multicellular behavior of Salmonella Typhimurium on the community level

    FEMS Microbiology Letters

    (1999)
  • E.M.M. Rossoni et al.

    Comparison of sodium hypochlorite and peracetic acid as sanitizing agents for stainless steel food processing surfaces using epifluorescence microscopy

    International Journal of Food Microbiology

    (2000)
  • E. Seifu et al.

    Antibacterial activity of the lactoperoxidase system against food-borne pathogens in Saanen and South African indigenous goat milk

    Food Control

    (2004)
  • M. Simões et al.

    Control of flow-generated biofilms using surfactants—evidence of resistance and recovery

    Food and Bioproducts Processing

    (2006)
  • Cited by (31)

    • Evaluation of the antimicrobial activities and mechanisms of synthetic antimicrobial peptide against food-borne pathogens

      2022, Food Bioscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      This is because the pathways (such as cell wall synthesis, translation or topoisomerase activity) containing drug targets are inactive in dormant cells, so the antibacterial agents cannot act against bacteria even if they successfully combine with the target (Fisher et al., 2017; Zou et al., 2022). Therefore, the control or inhibition of biofilms has become an important aspect of ensuring food safety in the food processing environment (Chmielewski & Frank, 2003), and it is also one of the main reasons why food contact surfaces should be sanitized frequently (Bayoumi et al., 2012). However, the use of antimicrobial agents in the control of biofilms has safety problems because of their repeated use can cause drug resistance (Singh et al., 2017) and introduce antimicrobial residues into food (Falowo and F. A. O, 2019).

    • Isolation and characteristics of new phage JK004 and application to control Cronobacter sakazakii on material surfaces and powdered infant formula

      2022, LWT
      Citation Excerpt :

      Most inactivation methods used for the control of pathogenic bacteria in low-moisture foods require large and expensive equipment (Sanchez-Maldonado, Lee, & Farber, 2018). Although chemical disinfectants have a lower cost compared with most energy technologies (Sanchez-Maldonado et al., 2018), studies have confirmed that the conventional concentration used in dairy processing cannot completely eliminate C. sakazakii (Bayoumi, Kamal, Abd El Aal, & Awad, 2012). Salmonella phage preparations have been researched and developed for use in poultry farming, and the production cost per broiler is only 0.02 dollars (Torres-Acosta et al., 2019).

    • Formation and development of biofilm- an alarming concern in food safety perspectives

      2021, Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The goal is to lower bacteria populations to safe levels for humans, a process known as sanitization. Food processing equipment should be sanitized to reduce cross contamination (Bayoumi et al., 2012). Although chlorine-based sanitizers are extensively utilized in the food sector, some microorganisms have developed resistance to chlorine treatments.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text