Elsevier

Journal of Biomechanics

Volume 44, Issue 4, 24 February 2011, Pages 771-773
Journal of Biomechanics

Short communication
Elucidation of extracellular matrix mechanics from muscle fibers and fiber bundles

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.10.044Get rights and content

Abstract

The importance of the extracellular matrix (ECM) in muscle is widely recognized, since ECM plays a central role in proper muscle development (Buck and Horwitz, 1987), tissue structural support (Purslow, 2002), and transmission of mechanical signals between fibers and tendon (Huijing, 1999). Since substrate biomechanical properties have been shown to be critical in the biology of tissue development and remodeling (Engler et al., 2006, Gilbert et al., 2010), it is likely that mechanics are critical for ECM to perform its function. Unfortunately, there are almost no data available regarding skeletal muscle ECM viscoelastic properties. This is primarily due to the impossibility of isolating and testing muscle ECM. Therefore, this note presents a new method to quantify viscoelastic ECM modulus by combining tests of single muscle fibers and fiber bundles. Our results demonstrate that ECM is a highly nonlinearly elastic material, while muscle fibers are linearly elastic.

Introduction

Extracellular matrix (ECM) is essential for the development, maintenance and regeneration of skeletal muscle (Buck and Horwitz, 1987, Purslow, 2002). ECM is involved in the macrostructure of muscle, arranging fibers into bundles, bundles into fascicles and integrating muscle structure with aponeurosis and tendon. Additionally, ECM is thought to play a vital role in mechanotransduction and transmitting force laterally from the fiber to the tendon and vice versa (Fomovsky et al., 2010, Huijing, 1999, Purslow and Trotter, 1994, Street, 1983). The mechanical strength and elasticity of the ECM are critical to its functional performance—it must be strong enough to sustain the loads of contraction yet elastic enough to prevent tearing under externally applied strains (Purslow, 2002). These properties change both with age and disease, where chronic alterations to the ECM appear to impair muscle function (Lieber et al., 2003, Zhou and Lu, 2010). Unfortunately, there are almost no data available regarding skeletal muscle ECM viscoelastic properties. This is primarily due to the impossibility of isolating and testing muscle ECM.

Attempts to remove muscle cells chemically from the ECM to test its properties directly have all met with some degradation or compromised mechanical properties (Borschel et al., 2004, Qing and Qin, 2009). Additionally, the geometry of the ECM structure is modified when part of its composite structure (the fiber) is removed, which likely affects the orientation of collagen fibers and thus the modulus of elasticity. This report describes a new technique for indirectly determining the mechanical properties of the ECM without digestion, by combining tests from single muscle fibers and fiber bundles and using the analytical approach of composite theory.

Section snippets

Methods

Experiments were performed on single muscle fibers and muscle fiber bundles from the 5th toe of the extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscle in mice (129/Sv 7–9 weeks old; Taconic Farms, Germantown, NY, USA). Details of the dissection procedure and the solutions used have been described previously (Shah et al., 2004). All procedures were performed in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Use and Care of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the University of California and Department of

Results

The relaxed quadratic modulus, representing the amount of nonlinearity present in the stress–sarcomere length relationship of the three experimental groups revealed that fiber bundle modulus was six fold greater than the modulus of individual fibers, where elasticity is essentially linear (Fig. 2). This indicates that a source of nonlinearity present in the fiber bundles is not present in isolated fibers.

Because fiber bundles are composites of fibers and ECM, nonlinearity could arise from

Discussion

Here we describe a new method to quantify passive mechanical properties of the muscle ECM without tissue digestion. Previous studies used methods of subtraction, where the ECM was “preferentially” digested from muscle and its properties inferred from subtracting the digested state from the undigested state (see review by Fomovsky et al., 2010, Granzier and Irving, 1995). However, this method includes the uncertainty of incomplete or non-specific digestion. Additionally, it has not been

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgement

We gratefully acknowledge the National Institutes of Health grant AR40050 and the Department of Veterans Affairs. We also thank Dr. Sam Ward and Lucas Smith for helpful discussions.

Cited by (0)

View full text