Controlled release nanoparticle-embedded coatings reduce the tissue reaction to neuroprostheses

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.04.025Get rights and content

Abstract

Controlled release coatings were developed for neuroprostheses with the aim of combating the tissue reaction following implantation in the brain. The coatings consist of poly(propylene sulfide) drug-eluting nanoparticles embedded in a poly(ethylene oxide) matrix. The nanoparticles are loaded with dexamethasone, an anti-inflammatory drug known to have an effect on the cells activated during the damage caused by implantation. The nanoparticles are not affected by the coating process and the drug remains bioactive after it is released. The coating was applied to microfabricated cortical neuroprostheses consisting of platinum and polyimide. Coated drug-eluting devices were implanted in the cortex of rats. After implantation the matrix dissolves, exposing the electrode surfaces, while the nanoparticles remain in the vicinity of the tissue–implant interface. Using electrical impedance spectroscopy and comparative histology, a long-term decrease in the tissue response in comparison to control devices was observed. These coatings can therefore be used to increase the reliability and long-term efficacy of neuroprostheses.

Introduction

Microelectrodes implanted in nervous tissue can be used to stimulate or record neural activity and may one day reproduce neural functions lost to trauma or disease [1]. A limiting factor with microelectrodes chronically implanted in the brain is their loss of electrical contact with neural tissue due to the post-implantation inflammatory reaction, gliosis, and fibrosis [2], [3], [4]. Glial cells rapidly migrate to the implantation site surrounding the device, thus physically separating the microelectrode sites from the neurons they are meant to be recording from or stimulating. The efficiency of the implanted device decreases steadily with time. After approximately two to three weeks, the inflammatory response has reached its peak, electrical impedance measurements have stabilized at their maximum [5], and the number of chronically recorded single units has reached its minimum [6]. If microelectrode arrays are to be effective in neural stimulation and recording, the tissue response must be reduced or prevented in order to maintain stable microelectrode–tissue contact and neuroprostheses functionality.

Several approaches to limiting this tissue reaction have been reported, including surface modification to prevent cell adhesion [7], localized release of alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone (α-MSH) [8] or nerve growth factor β [9], and dexamethasone injection [10]. The approach presented here involves coating microelectrode arrays with bio-resorbable drug-eluting material. We hypothesized that highly localized delivery of an anti-inflammatory drug around the implantation site would reduce the tissue response to implantation and improve recording and stimulation characteristics. The goal of this work was to determine the efficacy of these drug-eluting coatings to combat the inflammatory response to implantation.

Novel nanoparticle-embedded coatings were designed and evaluated for the controlled release of dexamethasone, which has been shown to be effective in reducing the brain response to implantable devices [10], [11]. Its release from poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles was shown by Kim and Martin [12] using rigid silicon probes, however in this experiment the neuroprostheses were polymeric, resulting in less post-implantation injury and eventually a more straightforward translation into clinical use.

Dexamethasone was loaded into poly(propylene sulfide) (PPS) nanoparticles which were then incorporated into poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), a bio-resorbable polymer, and applied as a coating to the neuroprosthesis. The PEO is meant to dissolve soon after implantation, thereby releasing the drug-loaded nanoparticles and exposing the electrode sites. The nanoparticles are large enough to not diffuse from the surface of the implanted device and can maintain sustained release at the implantation site. The nanoparticles were characterized before and after the coating process, to ensure that they were not damaged using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and in vitro release rates were obtained. In vivo efficacy in the brain was evaluated using two different methods in the rat model. The first was by measuring the electrical characteristics of the tissue reaction using electrical impedance spectroscopy. The second was with immuno-fluorescence which gives qualitative insight into the cell morphology around the device.

We demonstrate with this study that the highly localized release of dexamethasone around the neuroprosthesis indeed reduces the long-term tissue reaction. In stimulation applications of neuroprostheses, a reduction in the tissue reaction will enable more efficient charge transfer during neural stimulation, reducing the current required and preventing toxic electrochemical reactions at the metal microelectrode surface [13]. In recording applications of neuroprostheses, the signal-to-noise ratio may be improved if the degree of the tissue reaction is reduced [14], [15]. These are important factors for the continued use of microelectrode based neuroprostheses in research, and may accelerate the translation of this technology into clinic applications.

Section snippets

Microelectrode array fabrication

Several materials and processes to make neuroprostheses using thin film technology have been shown [16], [17], [18]. The devices presented here are based on polyimide-platinum microfabrication, for which the full fabrication method has been previously published [19], [20]. These devices have also been demonstrated in vivo for both acute and chronic measurements [20], [21]. Fig. 1A) demonstrates the device used in these experiments, while Fig. 1B) shows a close-up of the tip dimensions. The tip

Nanoparticle–PEO coating synthesis

Fig. 3 demonstrates a neural probe tip before and after coating. The average dimensions of the coating are 230 µm wide, 30 µm thick, and approximately 1000 µm in length. The coating is present on both sides of the implant giving a final coating volume of ∼ 15 nL.

The nanoparticle median diameter as measured with DLS is depicted in Fig. 4 before and after integration within the PEO matrix. An average diameter of 100 nm is measured for the nanoparticles before integration. After integration and

Discussion

In comparison to loading a biodegradable material with dexamethasone [30], the nanoparticle technique presented here prevents the rapid diffusion of the drug away from the implantation site [31]. After the coating process, nanoparticles are large enough (800 nm) that they remain close to the implantation site where the highest concentration of the drug is required.

The method of release and degradation of the particles is a combination of oxidation of the PPS core [27] and diffusion. It is not

Conclusion

We have described a method to synthesize nanoparticles with a hydrophobic core made of poly(propylene sulfide) and a hydrophilic corona of poly(ethylene glycol). The nanoparticles were loaded with dexamethasone, a hydrophobic drug, and incorporated it into a high molecular weight poly(ethylene oxide) matrix for use as an anti-inflammatory coating on microfabricated polymer neuroprostheses. The nanoparticles protect the drug from degradation, and ensure its controlled release with first order

References (36)

  • A. Mercanzini

    Demonstration of cortical recording using novel flexible polymer neural probes

    Sensors and Actuators A: Physical

    (2008)
  • K.C. Cheung

    Flexible polyimide microelectrode array for in vivo recordings and current source density analysis

    Biosensors & Bioelectronics

    (2007)
  • S.T. Reddy

    In vivo targeting of dendritic cells in lymph nodes with poly(propylene sulfide) nanoparticles

    Journal of Controlled Release

    (2006)
  • S.T. Reddy

    Targeting dendritic cells with biomaterials: developing the next generation of vaccines

    Trends in Immunology

    (2006)
  • G. Kwon

    Block copolymer micelles for drug delivery: loading and release of doxorubicin

    Journal of Controlled Release

    (1997)
  • W.M. Saltzman et al.

    Drugs released from polymers — diffusion and elimination in brain-tissue

    Chemical Engineering Science

    (1991)
  • W. He et al.

    Nanoscale neuro-integrative coatings for neural implants

    Biomaterials

    (2005)
  • K.D. Wise

    Silicon microsystems for neuroscience and neural prostheses

    IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine

    (2005)
  • Cited by (69)

    • Inflammation-Responsive Polymers

      2019, Smart Polymers and Their Applications
    • Prospects for a Robust Cortical Recording Interface

      2018, Neuromodulation: Comprehensive Textbook of Principles, Technologies, and Therapies, Second Edition: Volume 1-3
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text