Elsevier

Journal of Proteomics

Volume 93, 20 November 2013, Pages 5-19
Journal of Proteomics

Review
Proteomics of model and crop plant species: Status, current limitations and strategic advances for crop improvement

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2013.05.036Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Major advances in plant proteomics were made with the model species Arabidopsis and rice.

  • Limitations inherent to plant proteomics need to be addressed for both model and crop species.

  • Strategic advances will help increasing the contribution of plant proteomics to crop improvement.

Abstract

In the last decade proteomics studies have gained increasing importance in plant research. The development of proteomics techniques allowing increased proteome coverage and quantitative measurements of proteins have been particularly instrumental to characterize proteomes and their modulation during plant development, biotic and abiotic stresses. Despite important advances, plant proteome analysis, including those of model plant species, remain constrained by limitations inherent to proteomics techniques and data interpretation. Here we review the approaches and achievements of proteomics with model plant and crop species (i.e. Arabidopsis and rice) and discuss the current limitations of crop proteomics. We anticipate future directions that could advance the contribution of plant proteomics to crop improvement.

This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Translational Plant Proteomics.

Introduction

Following the sequencing of the model plant species Arabidopsis thaliana [1], genomes of important crops including rice, potato, maize, tomato and soybean [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] as well as genomes of so-called orphan crops such as sorghum, millet and cassava [7], [8], [9] have been released into public databases [10]. Despite the currently limited annotation of most crop genomes, the availability of genome sequences now provides new opportunities to study crop traits and stress responses using rapidly expanding OMICS technologies. Although model plants have significantly advanced our understanding of plant responses to biotic and abiotic stresses [11], [12], molecular investigations of crop system responses to biotic and abiotic stress remain essential to understand specificity and phenotypic diversity.

During the last decade, microarray and subsequent next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies (reviewed in [13], [14]) have been extensively used to characterize crop transcriptomes and to investigate their molecular responses to various stress conditions. In particular, NGS technologies that are now providing access to gene sequence diversity can be combined with expression profiles of sequenced and un-sequenced crop species [15]. However, gene expression data alone do not reveal the full complexity of molecular responses to perturbations. In addition to transcription control, translation of mRNA into proteins and protein modifications are important additional regulatory mechanisms that control the intensity and specificity of plant responses to perturbations. Molecular systems biology and bioinformatics studies of various organisms have revealed that transcript levels do not always correlate with protein quantity [16], [17], [18], [19]. Thus, protein accumulation cannot be readily inferred from transcript data. While transcript data can also provide insights into production of protein variants [20], [21], identification and quantitation of post-translational modifications (PTMs) of proteins are only possible using advanced proteomics approaches [22].

Translational proteomics is being considered a meaningful way of proteomics research with the main objective of delivering useful applications to address and possibly solve societal problems [23]. In the specific case of plants, translational proteomics intends to improve crop tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses, to achieve yield stability in agricultural production, to advance sustainable development of plant-based bioenergy feedstocks, and to optimize food safety as well as food quality controls. In order to achieve these objectives, plant proteomics is shifting increasingly from model plants to crops.

Here we review our current knowledge of proteomes from the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana and the model crop Oryza sativa, in research topics relevant to crop improvement. Based on those achievements, we consider future developments and strategic advances that crop proteomics could take to generate novel insight useful for crop improvement.

Section snippets

Proteomics advances in model plants

The term “proteomics” was first used in the late 1990s [24]. Proteomics generates a comprehensive description of proteins in organisms and allows the characterization of protein level modulation and modifications in response to perturbations. Proteomics encompasses, among others, protein profiling, protein quantification, post-translation modifications as well as protein/protein interactions [25].

Initially, plant proteome analysis was largely a qualitative approach describing protein profiles

Translational plant proteomics towards crop improvement

Translational plant proteomics applies and extends knowledge gained from proteomics on both model and crop plants into practical applications benefiting society. Proteomics studies of model and crop plants have been extensively reviewed [23], [118], [119]. Recent developments in shotgun quantitative proteomics (see above) have substantially extended proteome coverage and protein quantitation data of several crop species. Such proteomics studies of crops have significant potential of translation

Crop proteomics: current limitations and strategic advances

Similar to current applications of proteomics in farm animals [135], e.g., to establish the neutraceutical properties of the milk proteome [136] or to monitor the in vivo performances of livestock animals [137], there is also increasing use of proteomics in crop plants to facilitate breeding or to understand the basis of increased yield in hybrids. With few exceptions, however, protein identification in most crop species at present cannot take advantage of fully sequenced genomes with high

Facilitating information from crop systems and natural diversity using proteomics

Arabidopsis continues to be useful for much of basic plant biology research [179] and currently has the highest plant proteome coverage [180], but it is not a suitable model for many aspects and traits specific to crops. Initiatives to promote tomato as a model for fruit development [181], potato for tuber formation [182], foxtail millet for C4 photosynthesis and bioenergy grasses [183], [184], alfalfa and soybean for nodulation [185], [186] will benefit from the deployment of proteomics

Conclusion

Proteomics has greatly advanced our understanding of proteome composition, modulation and modification in model plant systems, and crop research is now rapidly taking advantage of proteomics pipelines as well. While crop proteome data are needed for understanding traits and responses to biological perturbations that are specific to crop systems, good examples of how this information can be integrated into advanced breeding strategies are still few. This will change, however, with the increasing

Acknowledgement

We gratefully acknowledge the support of our work by ETH Zurich. E.L. is supported by the Brazilian Swiss Joint Research Programme (BSJRP) EUPHORIAWATT project and a fellowship from the PLANT FELLOWS programme. I.Z. is supported by a Sawiris scholarship.

References (205)

  • A. von Zychlinski et al.

    Proteome analysis of the rice etioplast: metabolic and regulatory networks and novel protein functions

    Mol Cell Proteomics

    (2005)
  • P.L. Ross et al.

    Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents

    Mol Cell Proteomics

    (2004)
  • B.F. Quirino et al.

    Proteomic approaches to study plant–pathogen interactions

    Phytochemistry

    (2010)
  • B.N. Kunkel

    A useful weed put to work: genetic analysis of disease resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana

    Trends Genet

    (1996)
  • F.A.R. Kaffarnik et al.

    Effector proteins of the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae alter the extracellular proteome of the host plant, Arabidopsis thaliana

    Mol Cell Proteomics

    (2009)
  • N.F. Keinath et al.

    PAMP (pathogen-associated molecular pattern)-induced changes in plasma membrane compartmentalization reveal novel components of plant immunity

    J Biol Chem

    (2010)
  • J.J. Benschop et al.

    Quantitative phosphoproteomics of early elicitor signaling in Arabidopsis

    Mol Cell Proteomics

    (2007)
  • A.K. Mukherjee et al.

    Proteomics of the response of Arabidopsis thaliana to infection with Alternaria brassicicola

    J Proteomics

    (2010)
  • S.G. Kim et al.

    In-depth insight into in vivo apoplastic secretome of rice–Magnaporthe oryzae interaction

    J Proteomics

    (2013)
  • J.P. Brizard et al.

    Proteome analysis of plant–virus interactome: comprehensive data for virus multiplication inside their hosts

    Mol Cell Proteomics

    (2006)
  • K. Kosova et al.

    Plant proteome changes under abiotic stress—contribution of proteomics studies to understanding plant stress response

    J Proteomics

    (2011)
  • M.K. Choudhary et al.

    Dehydration-responsive nuclear proteome of rice (Oryza sativa L.) illustrates protein network, novel regulators of cellular adaptation, and evolutionary perspective

    Mol Cell Proteomics

    (2009)
  • S. Koussevitzky et al.

    Ascorbate peroxidase 1 plays a key role in the response of arabidopsis thaliana to stress combination

    J Biol Chem

    (2008)
  • Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana

    Nature

    (2000)
  • P.S. Schnable et al.

    The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics

    Science

    (2009)
  • J. Schmutz et al.

    Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean

    Nature

    (2010)
  • X. Xu et al.

    Genome sequence and analysis of the tuber crop potato

    Nature

    (2011)
  • The map-based sequence of the rice genome

    Nature

    (2005)
  • The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution

    Nature

    (2012)
  • A.H. Paterson et al.

    The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses

    Nature

    (2009)
  • G. Zhang et al.

    Genome sequence of foxtail millet (Setaria italica) provides insights into grass evolution and biofuel potential

    Nat Biotechnol

    (2012)
  • S. Prochnik et al.

    The cassava genome: current progress, future directions

    Trop Plant Biol

    (2012)
  • T. Hirayama et al.

    Research on plant abiotic stress responses in the post-genome era: past, present and future

    Plant J

    (2010)
  • M.T. Nishimura et al.

    Arabidopsis and the plant immune system

    Plant J

    (2010)
  • L.M. de Godoy et al.

    Comprehensive mass-spectrometry-based proteome quantification of haploid versus diploid yeast

    Nature

    (2008)
  • K. Baerenfaller et al.

    Systems-based analysis of Arabidopsis leaf growth reveals adaptation to water deficit

    Mol Syst Biol

    (2012)
  • A. Ghazalpour et al.

    Comparative analysis of proteome and transcriptome variation in mouse

    PLoS Genet

    (2011)
  • M. Piques et al.

    Ribosome and transcript copy numbers, polysome occupancy and enzyme dynamics in Arabidopsis

    Mol Syst Biol

    (2009)
  • S. Zenoni et al.

    Characterization of transcriptional complexity during berry development in Vitis vinifera using RNA-Seq

    Plant Physiol

    (2010)
  • S.S. Yang et al.

    Using RNA-Seq for gene identification, polymorphism detection and transcript profiling in two alfalfa genotypes with divergent cell wall composition in stems

    BMC Genomics

    (2011)
  • Y. Zhao et al.

    Modification-specific proteomics: strategies for characterization of post-translational modifications using enrichment techniques

    Proteomics

    (2009)
  • P. James

    Protein identification in the post-genome era: the rapid rise of proteomics

    Q Rev Biophys

    (1997)
  • S. Baginsky

    Plant proteomics: concepts, applications, and novel strategies for data interpretation

    Mass Spectrom Rev

    (2009)
  • S. Komatsu et al.

    A rice protein library — a data-file of rice proteins separated by 2-dimensional electrophoresis

    Theor Appl Genet

    (1993)
  • M. Kamo et al.

    Separation and characterization of Arabidopsis thaliana proteins by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis

    Electrophoresis

    (1995)
  • W.X. Schulze et al.

    Quantitation in mass-spectrometry-based proteomics

    Annu Rev Plant Biol

    (2010)
  • M. Wilm et al.

    Femtomole sequencing of proteins from polyacrylamide gels by nano-electrospray mass spectrometry

    Nature

    (1996)
  • A. Gorg et al.

    2-DE with IPGs

    Electrophoresis

    (2009)
  • P. Giavalisco et al.

    Proteome analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation-time of flight mass spectrometry

    Proteomics

    (2005)
  • A. Koller et al.

    Proteomic survey of metabolic pathways in rice

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2002)
  • Cited by (72)

    • Proteomics as a tool to understand the biology of agricultural crops

      2022, Bioinformatics in Agriculture: Next Generation Sequencing Era
    • Bioinformatics-assisted multiomics approaches to improve the agronomic traits in cotton

      2022, Bioinformatics in Agriculture: Next Generation Sequencing Era
    • Proteomics in Food Quality

      2020, Comprehensive Foodomics
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Translational Plant Proteomics.

    View full text