Enhanced expression of secretable influenza virus neuraminidase in suspension mammalian cells by influenza virus nonstructural protein 1

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2011.08.010Get rights and content

Abstract

Influenza neuraminidase (NA) is a major target for anti-influenza drugs. With an increasing number of viruses resistant to the anti-NA drug oseltamivir, functionally active recombinant NA is needed for screening novel anti-NA compounds. In this study, the secretable NA (sNA) head domain of influenza A/Vietnam/DT-036/05 (H5N1) virus was expressed successfully in human embryonic kidney (HEK-293T) cells and shown to be enzymatically active. The inclusion of a plasmid encoding nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) of influenza A/Puerto Rico/8/34 virus with the sNA plasmid in the cotransfection demonstrated an increase in H5N1 sNA expression by 7.4 fold. Subsequently, the sNA/NS1 cotransfection protocol in serum-free 293-F suspension cell culture was optimized to develop a rapid transient gene expression (TGE) system for expression of large amounts of H5N1 sNA. Under optimized conditions, NS1 enhanced H5N1 sNA expression by 4.2 fold. The resulting H5N1 sNA displayed comparable molecular weight, glycosylation, Km for MUNANA, and Ki for oseltamivir carboxylate to those of H5N1 NA on the virus surface. Taken together, the NS1-enhancing sNA expression strategy presented in this study could be used for rapid high-level expression of enzymatically active H5N1 sNA in suspension mammalian cells. This strategy may be applied for expression of sNA of other strains of influenza virus as well as the other recombinant proteins.

Highlights

► Secretable NA (sNA) head domain of influenza A/Vietnam/DT-036/05 (H5N1) virus was expressed in mammalian cells. ► Cotransfection of a plasmid encoding nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) of influenza A/Puerto Rico/8/34 virus with the sNA plasmid increased sNA expression by 7.4 fold. ► The sNA/NS1 cotransfection protocol was optimized for rapid transient gene expression system in serum-free mammalian cell culture. ► The resulting sNA displayed comparable MW, glycosylation, Km for MUNANA, and Ki for oseltamivir carboxylate to those of H5N1 NA on the virus surface. ► This strategy may be applied for rapid expression of sNA of other strains of influenza virus as well as other recombinant proteins.

Introduction

Influenza neuraminidase (NA) is a viral surface glycoprotein whose role is to cleave sialic acids of host glycoproteins to allow the release of newly formed virions from infected cells (Compans et al., 1969, Dowdle et al., 1974). Although the neuraminidase inhibitors oseltamivir and zanamivir are effective against most strains of influenza A and B viruses (Kim et al., 1997, von Itzstein et al., 1993), oseltamivir-resistant variants continue to emerge (Kiso et al., 2010, Tamura et al., 2009). In 2005, for example, oseltamivir-resistant variants of avian influenza A (H5N1) containing NA mutations were isolated from patients (de Jong et al., 2005). In addition, global spread of the 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus was also followed shortly by the emergence of oseltamivir-resistant variants (Le et al., 2010, Leung et al., 2009). These observations indicate an urgent need for new anti-NA compounds for controlling virus infection.

Screening for NA inhibitors requires a large amount of enzymatically active NA protein. Although native NA can be extracted directly from viral particles (McKimm-Breschkin et al., 1991, Wanitchang et al., 2010, Wu et al., 1995), recombinant NA expressed in cell cultures provides a safer alternative that does not rely on the limited supply of embryonated chicken eggs. So far, heterologous expression of NA has been reported in yeast, insect cells, and mammalian cells (Dalakouras et al., 2006, Hogue and Nayak, 1994, Tanimoto et al., 2004, Yongkiettrakul et al., 2009). Unfortunately, due to low expression levels, large amounts of membrane-bound NA may be difficult to obtain. There is also a need to develop specialized purification schemes which could complicate further the production process. Alternatively, NA has been expressed in secreted form (sNA) to contain the enzymatic head domain fused to a secretion signal at its N-terminus (Yongkiettrakul et al., 2009). This soluble and catalytically active sNA was expressed successfully in Pichia pastoris. The protein displayed kinetic properties (Km) and affinity for the inhibitor oseltamivir (Ki) comparable to those of NA on the virus surface. However, the inherent hyperglycosylation of protein expressed in yeast renders it a weak candidate for induction of proper anti-influenza immune responses (Martinet et al., 1997). On the other hand, sNA expressed in mammalian cells was reported to be able to elicit a protective immune response against lethal challenge with pathogenic influenza virus (Bosch et al., 2010). Mammalian cells are therefore considered a suitable platform for sNA expression due to glycosylation patterns that are physiologically relevant in the context of human infection. Recombinant protein expression in mammalian cells normally involves the generation of stable cell lines, requiring substantial time and resources. A transient gene expression (TGE) system serves as a good alternative due to its ability to express recombinant proteins rapidly and its capacity for large scale production (Durocher et al., 2002, Geisse, 2009, Majors et al., 2008). Nevertheless, the yield obtained from this system is still lower than that from stable cell lines, indicating a need for strategies to enhance protein expression in the TGE system (Backliwal et al., 2008).

One possible approach is the use of influenza virus nonstructural protein 1 (NS1), which plays multiple roles during viral replication, including regulating protein expression in infected cells (Hale et al., 2010). Several reports have shown that NS1 enhances expression of influenza viral proteins such as nucleoprotein (NP) and matrix (M) (de la Luna et al., 1995). The increase in protein expression due to NS1 is not limited to influenza virus genes, as expression of non-viral genes such as luciferase was also shown to increase in the presence of NS1 (Salvatore et al., 2002). Accordingly, NS1 may serve as an enhancer for sNA expression in the TGE system in mammalian cells.

This study describes a novel expression protocol for high-yield and rapid expression of sNA of avian influenza A (H5N1) virus in mammalian cells. The method combines the use of influenza virus NS1 to enhance H5N1 sNA expression with the TGE system in serum-free suspension cultures to obtain large amounts of H5N1 sNA. The obtained H5N1 sNA protein displayed comparable kinetic properties and glycosylation to those of native NA on the viral surface. Hence, this method could be used for rapid high-level expression of sNA of other influenza virus strains and, possibly, other recombinant proteins.

Section snippets

psNA plasmids

NA of avian influenza A/Vietnam/DT-036/05 (H5N1) virus (GenBank accession no. DQ094291) is a viral membrane glycoprotein composed of a cytoplasmic tail (CD), a signal-anchor or transmembrane domain (TM), a stalk region, and a globular head containing the active site of the enzyme (Fig. 1A). To generate the psNA plasmid, the sequence encoding the NA head domain (amino acids 63-449) was PCR amplified and inserted into a modified pSecTag2/hygro A vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) containing

Expression of sNA

In order to express NA of avian influenza (H5N1) virus in a secretable form, the psNA plasmid was generated to encode the NA head domain (amino acids 63-449) fused in-frame with a murine Ig-κ chain leader sequence, which is cleaved off in the endoplasmic reticulum (Fig. 1B). At the C-terminus, a c-myc epitope and polyhistidine residues (6xHis) were included for detection and purification and an enterokinase cleavage site for potential removal of the c-myc epitope and 6xHis tag from the protein (

Discussion

A method is described for expression of secretable NA head domain of avian influenza A (H5N1) virus in mammalian cells using the combined approach of TGE and NS1 cotransfection. The molecular weight of sNA obtained corresponded to the calculated theoretical size. The oligosaccharide size of sNA obtained was more closely related to that of NA on the virus surface than that of yeast-derived sNA, which is characterized by a major band of hyperglycosylated protein at 72 kDa (Yongkiettrakul et al.,

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Robert G. Webster (St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA) for kindly providing the NA gene of avian influenza A/Vietnam/DT-036/05 (H5N1) virus and the NS gene of influenza A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (H1N1) virus. The NA gene of the 2009 pandemic influenza A/Nonthaburi/102/09 (H1N1) virus was obtained as a kind gift from Dr. Anan Jongkaewwattana (National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Thailand). The authors would like to thank

References (41)

  • S. Yongkiettrakul et al.

    Avian influenza A/H5N1 neuraminidase expressed in yeast with a functional head domain

    J. Virol. Methods

    (2009)
  • C.S. Boosani et al.

    Validation of different systems for tumstatin expression and its in-vitro and in-vivo activities

    J. Cancer Sci. Ther.

    (2009)
  • B.J. Bosch et al.

    Recombinant soluble, multimeric HA and NA exhibit distinctive types of protection against pandemic swine-origin 2009 A(H1N1) influenza virus infection in ferrets

    J. Virol.

    (2010)
  • I. Burgui et al.

    PABP1 and eIF4GI associate with influenza virus NS1 protein in viral mRNA translation initiation complexes

    J. Gen. Virol.

    (2003)
  • P.J. Collins et al.

    Crystal structures of oseltamivir-resistant influenza virus neuraminidase mutants

    Nature

    (2008)
  • R.W. Compans et al.

    Effect of antibody to neuraminidase on the maturation and hemagglutinating activity of an influenza A2 virus

    J. Virol.

    (1969)
  • W.R. Dowdle et al.

    Inhibition of virus release by antibodies to surface antigens of influenza viruses

    J. Virol.

    (1974)
  • M.D. de Jong et al.

    Oseltamivir resistance during treatment of influenza A (H5N1) infection

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2005)
  • S. de la Luna et al.

    Influenza virus NS1 protein enhances the rate of translation initiation of viral mRNAs

    J. Virol.

    (1995)
  • Y. Durocher et al.

    High-level and high-throughput recombinant protein production by transient transfection of suspension-growing human 293-EBNA1 cells

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (2002)
  • Cited by (10)

    • Purification of viral neuraminidase from inclusion bodies produced by recombinant Escherichia coli

      2020, Journal of Biotechnology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Moreover, screening of inhibitors requires sufficient amount of biologically active NA, which can be ensured by its recombinant production. The production of NA in a suitable heterologous host is fast and relatively cheap method and also allows the production of specific mutants (Nivitchanyong et al., 2011; Schmidt et al., 2011). Although eukaryotic expression systems such as yeasts (Yongkiettrakul et al., 2009), plants (Pua et al., 2012) and insect cells (Dalakouras et al., 2006) have already been used for the recombinant NA production, the mammalian cells are preferred (Prevato et al., 2015).

    • Self-enzyme chemiluminescence immunoassay capable of rapidly diagnosing the infection of influenza A (H1N1) virus

      2019, Talanta
      Citation Excerpt :

      NA, a subtype of influenza A virus, can be applied as an enzyme to devise biosensors with fluorescence detection. 2′-(4-Methylumbelliferyl)-α-D-N-acetylneuraminic acid (MUNANA), a fluorogenic substrate, is converted to 4-methyllumbelliferone (4-MU) in the presence of NA at acidic condition (pH 4.5–6) [18,19]. The concentration of 4-MU formed from MUNANA in this reaction is determined on the concentration of NA in a sample.

    • Construction of a convenient system for easily screening inhibitors of mutated influenza virus neuraminidases

      2013, FEBS Open Bio
      Citation Excerpt :

      One of the first steps in drug discovery is the preparation of the target protein, which requires laborious processes including not only protein production and confirmation of activity but also purification, a most time-consuming process. As to influenza virus NAs, although their biotechnological production was achieved by the secretory system using insect, yeast, and mammalian cells for the head domain of NA, all the researchers will need several steps to purify it [7–9]. In this regard, the yeast cell surface display technology is promising; it has been used for screening binding proteins with specific affinity to a target molecule and endowing yeasts with heterogenous abilities like glucoamylase activity [10,11].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text