Elsevier

Microbial Pathogenesis

Volume 90, January 2016, Pages 41-49
Microbial Pathogenesis

Biofilm formation in invasive Staphylococcus aureus isolates is associated with the clonal lineage

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2015.10.023Get rights and content

Abstract

The contribution of the genetic background of Staphylococcus aureus to biofilm formation is poorly understood. We investigated the association between the genetic background and the biofilm forming ability of clinical invasive S. aureus isolates. Secondary objectives included investigating any correlation with biofilm formation and methicillin resistance or the source of bacteraemia. The study was conducted at a 1300-bed tertiary hospital in Cape Town, South Africa. S. aureus isolates obtained from blood cultures between January 2010 and January 2012 were included. Genotypic characterization was performed by PFGE, spa typing, SCCmec typing and MLST. Thirty genotypically unique strains were assessed for phenotypic biofilm formation with the microtitre plate assay. All isolates were tested in triplicate and an average optical density, measured at a wavelength of 490 nm, was determined. The biofilm forming ability of isolates with A490 ≤ 0.17 were considered non-adherent, A490 > 0.17 ‘weak positive’ and A490 > 0.34 ‘strong positive’. Fifty seven percent of isolates formed biofilms. Weak biofilm formation occurred in 40% (n = 12) and strong biofilm formation in 17% (n = 5) of isolates. All 5 isolates capable of strong biofilm formation belong to one spa clonal complex (spa-CC 064). Strains from spa-CC 064 were capable of higher biofilm formation than other spa clonal complexes (p = 0.00002). These 5 strains belonged to MLST CC5 and CC8. Biofilm formation correlates with the spa clonal lineage in our population of invasive S. aureus strains. Biofilm formation did not correlate with methicillin resistance and was not related to the source of bacteraemia.

Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus has ensured its success as an important pathogen worldwide through its versatility, virulence factors and resistance mechanisms. Invasive S. aureus infections have a high mortality rate and infections with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) have even poorer outcomes [1], [2]. Biofilm formation is a major virulence factor of S. aureus.

A biofilm is ‘an assemblage of surface-associated microbial cells that is encased in an extracellular polymeric substance matrix’ [3]. These unique communities form on various indwelling medical devices. Bacteria embedded in a biofilm are more resistant to antimicrobials through several mechanisms. Overall antimicrobial penetration is poor, growth-dependent agents have decreased efficacy due to the slower metabolic state of the bacteria and exchange of resistance genes is easier due to the close proximity of cells. Formation of persister-cells, a subpopulation of bacteria that survive antimicrobial treatment, is also a contributing factor [4].

Due to advances in the medical field, prosthetic devices are increasingly used in patient management. Biofilms may develop on intravascular catheters, prosthetic heart valves and orthopaedic implants. Prosthetic devices become reservoirs for persistent infections and foci for metastatic complications such as endocarditis, deep tissue abscesses, septic arthritis, and osteomyelitis [5], [6]. Definitive management of device-related infection frequently requires removal or replacement of the prosthetic material.

The best-described mechanism of biofilm development in S. aureus involves the extracellular molecule polysaccharide intercellular adhesin or poly-N-acetylglucosamine (PIA/PNAG) [7]. PIA/PNAG synthesis is regulated by the intercellular adhesion (ica) locus [8]. PIA/PNAG and ica-independent biofilm formation, particularly in MRSA, has also been described [9], [10]. However, the relationship between biofilm formation and the genetic background of S. aureus is poorly understood. Different clonal lineages of S. aureus may have different biofilm forming capabilities. In the recent literature, differences in biofilm formation were found to be due to the staphylococcus protein A (spa) lineage [11]. Other studies found strong biofilm formation correlated with multilocus sequence typing (MLST) clonal complexes [12] or Staphylococcal Chromosome Cassette mec (SCCmec) typing [13].

This study investigated the association between the genetic background and the biofilm forming ability of clinical invasive S. aureus isolates. In addition, we investigated any correlation with biofilm formation and methicillin resistance or source of bacteraemia.

Section snippets

Setting & design

This was a prospective, descriptive study conducted at the National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) Microbiology Laboratory, Tygerberg Hospital, which is a 1300-bed tertiary referral hospital in Cape Town, South Africa.

Bacterial strains

S. aureus isolates obtained from pure blood cultures between January 2010 and January 2012 were included. Positive blood cultures were identified using the BACTEC 9240 system (Becton Dickinson, USA). Identification of S. aureus was done using Mannitol Salt agar (MSA) and DNase

Description of isolates

The 30 isolates selected comprised of 19 PFGE clusters, with 28 spa types and 15 MLST sequence types (ST). These were from 9 spa-clonal complexes (spa-CC) and 9 MLST clonal complexes (MLST CC) (Table 2). There were 9 MRSA (30%) and 21 methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) (70%). The source of infection was determined for all the S. aureus bacteraemias (Fig. 1). Ten originated from skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI), 9 from catheter-related blood-stream infections (CRBSI), 3 pneumonias

Discussion

Biofilm-associated infections caused by S. aureus are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality [24]. In this study strong biofilm formation was associated with strains from spa-CC 064 and MLST CC 5 and 8. Although MLST CC8 has now been incorporated into MLST CC5, it is considered separately in this analysis [15]. As MLST CC8 in now incorporated into MLST CC5, MLST CC5 may be associated with high biofilm formation. This suggests that certain clones are more prone to biofilm formation and

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Declaration on laboratory work

Declaration of contribution to laboratory work.

The biofilm assay was performed by Preneshni Naicker.

Clinical data collection and folder reviews were conducted by Preneshni Naicker.

PFGE, MLST, spa typing and SCCmec typing was performed by Karayem Karayem.

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) Research Trust. We are also grateful to the staff at NHLS Microbiology Tygerberg Hospital and to Mediclinic for funding laboratory equipment.

References (37)

  • F.D. Lowy

    Staphylococcus aureus infections

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (1998)
  • S.E. Cosgrove et al.

    Management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia

    Clin. Infect. Dis.

    (2008)
  • R.M. Donlan

    Biofilms: microbial life on surfaces

    Emerg. Infect. Dis.

    (2002)
  • S.E. Cramton et al.

    Biofilm development in Staphylococcus

  • J.W. Costerton et al.

    Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections

    Science

    (1999)
  • V.H. Chu et al.

    Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in patients with prosthetic devices: costs and outcomes

    Am. J. Med.

    (2005)
  • D. Mack et al.

    The intercellular adhesin involved in biofilm accumulation of Staphylococcus epidermidis is a linear beta-1,6-linked glucosaminoglycan: purification and structural analysis

    J. Bacteriol.

    (1996)
  • S.E. Cramton et al.

    The intercellular adhesion (ica) locus is present in Staphylococcus aureus and is required for biofilm formation

    Infect. Immun.

    (1999)
  • F. Fitzpatrick et al.

    Evidence for icaADBC-independent biofilm development mechanism in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates

    J. Clin. Microbiol.

    (2005)
  • E. O'Neill et al.

    A novel Staphylococcus aureus biofilm phenotype mediated by the fibronectin-binding proteins, FnBPA and FnBPB

    J. Bacteriol.

    (2008)
  • S.S. Atshan et al.

    Comparative characterisation of genotypically different clones of MRSA in the production of biofilms

    J. Biomed. Biotechnol.

    (2012)
  • S. Croes et al.

    Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation at the physiologic glucose concentration depends on the S. aureus lineage

    BMC Microbiol.

    (2009)
  • Y. Lim et al.

    Predictive genetic risk markers for strong biofilm-forming Staphylococcus aureus: fnbB gene and SCCmec type III

    Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.

    (2013)
  • R.H. Deurenberg et al.

    The molecular evolution of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

    Clin. Microbiol. Infect.

    (2007)
  • W.F. Oosthuysen et al.

    Population structure analyses of Staphylococcus aureus at Tygerberg Hospital, South Africa, reveals a diverse population, a high prevalence of Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes, and unique local methicillin-resistant S. aureus clones

    Clin. Microbiol. Infect.

    (2013)
  • L.K. McDougal et al.

    Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from the United States: establishing a national database

    J. Clin. Microbiol.

    (2003)
  • D. Harmsen et al.

    Typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a university hospital setting by using novel software for spa repeat determination and database management

    J. Clin. Microbiol.

    (2003)
  • C. Milheirico et al.

    Update to the multiplex PCR strategy for assignment of mec element types in Staphylococcus aureus

    Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.

    (2007)
  • Cited by (39)

    • Staphylococcus aureus surface protein G (sasG) allelic variants: correlation between biofilm formation and their prevalence in methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) clones

      2022, Research in Microbiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The endemic CC5 and CC8 MRSA clones, which are the most frequent in bloodstream infections in Spain [14], developed stronger biofilms than the sporadic isolates, such as CC1, CC30, CC45, CC72, CC88, and CC398. Previous studies have supported this observation by demonstrating that the CC5 and CC8 strains form stronger biofilms than strains from other clonal complexes [22–25]. This suggests that the ability to form strong biofilms in endemic clones may be an important virulence factor, helping the bacteria survive in the host or in the hospital environment and transforming them into successful pathogens.

    • Production of biofilm by Staphylococcus aureus: Association with infective endocarditis?

      2021, Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiologia Clinica
      Citation Excerpt :

      Moreover, Fernández-Hidalgo et al. only demonstrated an association between biomass production and the clonal linage of 209 S. aureus strains causing IE, whereas no other relationship was found between biomass production and other prognostic characteristics.9 Similar findings were also reported by Naicker et al., who could only demonstrate an association between biofilm formation and the clonal linage of S. aureus isolates, but not between biofilm formation and the source of bacteremia.15 These data correlate with our study findings, which show that neither high biomass production nor high metabolic activity of S. aureus strains was associated with IE or C-RBSI.

    • Biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus isolated from food poisoning outbreaks and effect of Butia odorata Barb. Rodr. Extract on planktonic and biofilm cells

      2020, LWT
      Citation Excerpt :

      Moreover, Torlak, Korkut, Uncu, and Sener (2017) found that 90.6% of S. aureus isolates had the ability to form biofilm on polystyrene. In another study, 57% of the S. aureus isolates formed biofilm on polystyrene (Naicker, Karayem, Hoek, Harvey, & Wasserman, 2016). Biofilm formation is important for the survival of staphylococci in a food-processing environment.

    • Antistaphylococcal activity of 2(5H)-furanone derivatives

      2019, New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering: Microbial Biofilms Current Research and Future Trends in Microbial Biofilms
    • Association between biomass formation and the prognosis of infective endocarditis due to Staphylococcus aureus

      2020, Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiologia Clinica
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, none of these complexes was associated with mortality or complications in the previous clinical study.2 These results are consistent with those of another study of clinically invasive isolates, in which CC5 proved to be a strong biofilm producer.8 Conversely, CC8 and CC15, which were clonal complexes that produced fewer biomass, were respectively associated with higher in-hospital mortality and higher early mortality (≤2 days).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text