Nuclear actin-related protein is required for chromosome segregation in Toxoplasma gondii

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molbiopara.2011.09.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Apicomplexa parasites use complex cell cycles to replicate that are not well understood mechanistically. We have established a robust forward genetic strategy to identify the essential components of parasite cell division. Here we describe a novel temperature sensitive Toxoplasma strain, mutant 13-20C2, which growth arrests due to a defect in mitosis. The primary phenotype is the mis-segregation of duplicated chromosomes with chromosome loss during nuclear division. This defect is conditional-lethal with respect to temperature, although relatively mild in regard to the preservation of the major microtubule organizing centers. Despite severe DNA loss many of the physical structures associated with daughter budding and the assembly of invasion structures formed and operated normally at the non-permissive temperature before completely arresting. These results suggest there are coordinating mechanisms that govern the timing of these events in the parasite cell cycle. The defect in mutant 13-20C2 was mapped by genetic complementation to Toxoplasma chromosome III and to a specific mutation in the gene encoding an ortholog of nuclear actin-related protein 4. A change in a conserved isoleucine to threonine in the helical structure of this nuclear actin related protein leads to protein instability and cellular mis-localization at the higher temperature. Given the age of this protist family, the results indicate a key role for nuclear actin-related proteins in chromosome segregation was established very early in the evolution of eukaryotes.

Highlights

Toxoplasma clone 13-20C2 is a conditional-lethal mitotic mutant. ► Temperature sensitivity was rescued by nuclear actin-related protein 4a. ► A single mutation in the helical domain of TgARP4a leads to mis-localization. ► While a lethal defect, daughter and spindle structures still form normally. ► Thus, division coordination likely requires both microtubule organizing centers.

Introduction

Apicomplexan parasites replicate by strategies that differ in nuclear division, but are similar with respect to the formation of new daughter parasites by a unique process of internal budding. Apicomplexans are remarkably accomplished specialists of multinuclear replication. In schizogony, parasites form multiple nuclei by alternating rounds of DNA synthesis and mitosis with cytokinesis delayed until the last round of nuclear division [1]. Endopolygenic division is a variation on schizogony where multiple rounds of chromosome replication occur within a single (polyploid) nucleus that undergoes concerted nuclear division and parasite budding at the end of the cycle [2], [3]. By contrast, endodyogeny is a simple binary division with a single chromosome replication followed by concurrent mitosis and parasite budding [4]. Cytokinesis in endodyogeny occurs through a unique internal assembly of daughters that is very similar to the final cycle of schizogony in other apicomplexans suggesting that there is a common set of cell cycle controls that operate in both division strategies [5], [6].

The comparative simplicity of endodyogenic division and strengths of the Toxoplasma experimental model system have allowed the major phases of the tachyzoite cell cycle and the basic order and timing of nuclear and organelle division to be established [7]. Toxoplasma tachyzoites divide using a three-phase cycle comprised of a G1 (60%), S (30%) and mitosis (10%) with the classic G2 period between S phase and mitosis either very short or absent [8], [9]. The length of the S phase period in the tachyzoite cell cycle has been independently verified by [H3]-thymidine radiolabeling, time-lapse microscopy of transgenic parasites expressing TgPCNA1-GFP (monitoring replication foci), and by calculating the length of S phase from genomic DNA analysis of synchronized populations [8]. It is not yet possible to pinpoint the start of mitosis, although conoids appear to form at this time [8], [10] and replication foci dissolve <1 h before nuclear division consistent with a minimal or absent G2 period [8]. This finding parallels similar observations in Theileria and other protozoa [11], [12]. S phase distributions in tachyzoites are peculiar [8], [13], with late S phase parasites (∼1.8N) more numerous than parasites in early S. It is intriguing that internal daughter budding also appears to initiate in late S phase [13], and therefore, a novel apicomplexan mechanism has been proposed that safeguards the proper timing of budding with mitosis might be responsible for the 1.8N subpopulation [8]. Establishing the molecular basis for these observations is needed to understand these unusual cell cycle distributions.

Checkpoint control of apicomplexan cell division is poorly understood, although factors commonly associated with eukaryotic cell cycle checkpoints are present in apicomplexan parasites including cyclins, CDKs, MAPKs, and components of the anaphase promoting complex [14] that regulates mitosis. While these findings predict that cell cycle controls exist in these parasites, they do not provide information about where checkpoints function or how these controls operate to coordinate the diverse strategies utilized by these parasites to proliferate. Experimental proof for active checkpoint control in Toxoplasma has been controversial [15], [16], however, there is now growing evidence for a model that proposes specific transitions in the tachyzoite cell cycle where parasites naturally halt during progression through the G1, S and mitotic phases [8], [9], [17], [18]. In this paper, we describe a new Toxoplasma mitotic mutant and identify the essential defect responsible for conditional growth through genetic complementation. The fundamental nuclear factor revealed by these studies is required for chromosome segregation in Toxoplasma and other eukaryotes establishing an ancient cell cycle mechanism conserved over hundreds of million years of eukaryotic cell evolution. The primary defect in this mutant also provides insight into the mechanistic restrictions that coordinate mitosis and the internal assembly of daughter parasites in the Apicomplexa.

Section snippets

Cell culture

Parasites were grown in human foreskin fibroblasts (HFF) as described [19]. All transgenic and mutant parasite lines are derivatives of the RHΔhxgprt parasite strain. Temperature sensitive clone 13-20C2 was obtained by chemical mutagenesis of the RHΔhxgprt strain [18]. Parasite growth measurements were obtained using parasites pre-synchronized by limited invasion [20]. Briefly, a seed parasite stock was prepared using freshly lysed parasites inoculated into HFF monolayers (MOI 1:5) at 34 °C.

Chemical mutant 13-20C2 is a temperature sensitive strain with defects in nuclear division

Methods to generate conditional growth mutants by chemical mutagenesis in Toxoplasma gondii were established three decades ago [25], although only recent genetic strategies permit the affected genes to be identified [18]. These advances opened investigations into cell cycle mechanisms of apicomplexan parasites through the generation of an expanded collection of conditional growth strains in T. gondii [18]. The clone 13-20C2 is one of the isolates from a recent screen of >60,000 chemical mutants

Discussion

Here we describe a novel conditional mutant of T. gondii that rapidly growth arrests at higher temperature. Chromosome mis-segregation and abnormal nuclear division is the predominant phenotype of this mutant, which classifies this clone in a broad category of conditional mutants with defects in mitosis isolated in a recent chemical mutagenesis screen [18]. A nucleotide transition that alters a single amino acid within the helix adjacent the conserved actin domain of TgARP4a appears to be

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health to MWW (R01-AI077662 and R01-AI089885. T. gondii genomic and/or cDNA sequence data were accessed via http://ToxoDB.org.

References (61)

  • J.L. Gordon et al.

    Comparative genome analysis reveals a conserved family of actin-like proteins in apicomplexan parasites

    BMC Genomics

    (2005)
  • R.B. Meagher et al.

    Nuclear actin-related proteins in epigenetic control

    Int Rev Cell Mol Biol

    (2009)
  • S.E. Dixon et al.

    A decade of epigenetic research in Toxoplasma gondii

    Mol Biochem Parasitol

    (2010)
  • S. Frankel et al.

    The actin-related proteins

    Curr Opin Cell Biol

    (1996)
  • C.A. Blessing et al.

    Actin and arps: action in the nucleus

    Trends Cell Biol

    (2004)
  • V. Dion et al.

    Actin-related proteins in the nucleus: life beyond chromatin remodelers

    Curr Opin Cell Biol

    (2010)
  • M.A. Hakimi et al.

    Epigenetics in apicomplexa: control of gene expression during cell cycle progression, differentiation and antigenic variation

    Curr Opin Microbiol

    (2007)
  • W.J. Sullivan et al.

    Histone mediated gene activation in Toxoplasma gondii

    Mol Biochem Parasitol

    (2006)
  • M.M. Bhatti et al.

    Histone acetylase GCN5 enters the nucleus via importin-alpha in protozoan parasite Toxoplasma gondii

    J Biol Chem

    (2005)
  • S.E. Dixon et al.

    Regions of intrinsic disorder help identify a novel nuclear localization signal in Toxoplasma gondii histone acetyltransferase TgGCN5-b

    Mol Biochem Parasitol

    (2011)
  • K. Zhao et al.

    Rapid and phosphoinositol-dependent binding of the SWI/SNF-like BAF complex to chromatin after t lymphocyte receptor signaling

    Cell

    (1998)
  • J.P. Dubey et al.

    Toxoplasma gondii-like schizonts in the tracheal epithelium of a cat

    J Parasitol

    (1991)
  • E.U. Canning et al.

    The organization of the ookinete and observations on nuclear division in oocysts of Plasmodium berghei

    Parasitology

    (1973)
  • C.A. Speer et al.

    An ultrastructural study of first- and second-generation merogony in the coccidian Sarcocystis tenella

    J Protozool

    (1981)
  • B. Striepen et al.

    Building the perfect parasite: cell division in apicomplexa

    PLoS Pathog

    (2007)
  • H.G. Sheffield et al.

    The fine structure and reproduction of Toxoplasma gondii

    J Parasitol

    (1968)
  • N. Ogino et al.

    The fine structure and mode of division of Toxoplasma gondii

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (1966)
  • J.R. Swedlow et al.

    Measuring tubulin content in Toxoplasma gondii: a comparison of laser-scanning confocal and wide-field fluorescence microscopy

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2002)
  • M. Fujishima

    Microspectrophotometric and autoradiographic study of the timing and duration of pre-meiotic DNA synthesis in Paramecium caudatum

    J Cell Sci

    (1983)
  • K. Hu et al.

    Variability and heritability of cell division pathways in Toxoplasma gondii

    J Cell Sci

    (2004)
  • Cited by (18)

    • The Toxoplasma cytoskeleton: Structures, proteins, and processes

      2020, Toxoplasma Gondii: The Model Apicomplexan - Perspectives and Methods
    • Apicomplexa Cell Cycles: Something Old, Borrowed, Lost, and New

      2018, Trends in Parasitology
      Citation Excerpt :

      We do not know if a G2 period is short or absent [38] in these parasites, however, the lack of a discernable G2 period is not uncommon in unicellular eukaryotes, including other apicomplexans [40,41]. We and others have shown that the function of certain proteins is linked to a specific tachyzoite cell cycle stage [13,34,42–47], and the ability to reversibly arrest the Toxoplasma tachyzoite cell cycle [48] operationally demonstrates that the conserved rule of the checkpoint regulation in apicomplexans is in place. The general topology of cell cycle regulation is conserved too.

    • The Toxoplasma Cytoskeleton. Structures, Proteins and Processes

      2013, Toxoplasma Gondii: The Model Apicomplexan - Perspectives and Methods: Second Edition
    • Cytoskeleton Assembly in Toxoplasma gondii Cell Division

      2012, International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although the function of these myosins and ALPs has not been determined, it is likely that some of these function in cell division. In support of this hypothesis is the recent description of actin-related protein 4a (ARP4a) with a role in chromosome segregation (Suvorova et al., 2012). Multiple lines of evidence indicate that nuclear division does not require functional cytoskeletal development.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text