Localisation of unilateral nasal stimuli across sensory systems
References (49)
- et al.
The neuronal correlates of intranasal trigeminal function—an ALE metaanalysis of human functional brain imaging data
Brain Res. Rev.
(2010) - et al.
Pseudoneglect: effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task
Neuropsychologia
(1980) - et al.
Bisecting rods and lines: effects of horizontal and vertical posture on left-side underestimation by normal subjects
Neuropsychologia
(1985) - et al.
Head and body space to left and right, front and rear. II. Visuotactual and kinesthetic studies and left-side underestimation
Neuropsychologia
(1983) - et al.
Intranasal trigeminal stimulation from odorous volatiles: psychometric responses from anosmic and normal humans
Physiol. Behav.
(1978) - et al.
Rightward shift of the auditory subjective straight ahead in right- and left-handed subjects
Neuropsychologia
(2007) - et al.
Responsiveness of human nasal mucosa to trigeminal stimuli depends on the site of stimulation
Neurosci. Lett.
(2004) - et al.
Chemosensory specific reduction of trigeminal sensitivity in subjects with olfactory dysfunction
Neuroscience
(2006) - et al.
Effects of olfactory function, age, and gender on trigeminally mediated sensations: a study based on the lateralization of chemosensory stimuli
Toxicol. Lett.
(2003) - et al.
Trigeminal activation using chemical, electrical, and mechanical stimuli
Pain
(2008)
Intranasal trigeminal function in subjects with and without an intact sense of smell
Brain Res.
Odor recognition memory in humans: role of right temporal and orbitofrontal regions
Brain Cogn.
Trigeminal perception is necessary to localize odors
Physiol. Behav.
Gender-specific hemispheric asymmetry in auditory space perception
Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res.
Capsaicin, acid and heat-evoked currents in rat trigeminal ganglion neurons: relationship to functional VR1 receptors
Physiol. Behav.
Chemosensory event-related potentials in the investigation of interactions between the olfactory and the somatosensory (trigeminal) systems
Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.
Dependency of olfactory localization on non-olfactory cues
Physiol. Behav.
Aging and the perception of nasal irritation
Physiol. Behav.
Reduction of odor and nasal pungency associated with aging
Neurobiol. Aging
Characterization of the mouse cold-menthol receptor TRPM8 and vanilloid receptor type-1 VR1 using a fluorometric imaging plate reader (FLIPR) assay
Br. J. Pharmacol.
Cerebral activation to intranasal chemosensory trigeminal stimulation
Chem. Senses
On the trigeminal percept of androstenone and its implications on the rate of specific anosmia
J. Neurobiol.
Olfactory sensitivity: reliability, generality, and association with aging
J. Exp. Psychol.
Interaction between chemoreceptive modalities of odour and irritation
Nature
Cited by (28)
Assessment of direct knowledge of the human olfactory system
2020, Experimental NeurologyCitation Excerpt :The pars externa is thought to be involved in olfactory lateralization in rodents (Esquivelzeta Rabell et al., 2017; Kikuta et al., 2010). Its absence in humans may account for poor human performance in lateralizing olfactory stimuli with no trigeminal component (Frasnelli et al., 2010; Frasnelli et al., 2008; Kobal and Hummel, 1992; Moessnang et al., 2011; Porter et al., 2005; Radil and Wysocki, 1998; Sorokowski et al., 2019; Wysocki et al., 2003). Rodent studies suggest a potential role for the AON in odor object formation (Aqrabawi and Kim, 2018; Haberly, 2001), and human resting functional connectivity data support this hypothesis (Zhou et al., 2019a).
Human olfactory lateralization requires trigeminal activation
2014, NeuroImageCitation Excerpt :Frasnelli et al. published two studies showing that humans on average lack olfactory lateralization ability (Frasnelli et al., 2010), irrespective whether stimuli are actively sniffed or passively applied (Frasnelli et al., 2009). However, their data also indicate that some people are able to lateralize above chance (Frasnelli et al., 2010) and that an increased numbers of molecules enhances localization ability even for relatively selective olfactory stimuli, like phenyl ethyl alcohol (Frasnelli et al., 2011). Olfactory lateralization ability depends on trigeminal input (Kobal et al., 1989; Lundstrom et al., 2012) and mixed chemicals, activating both receptor types typically can be localized without problems (Frasnelli et al., 2010, 2011; Hummel et al., 2003; Kleemann et al., 2009; Schneider and Schmidt, 1967; von Békésy, 1964; Wysocki et al., 2003).
Response times and response accuracy for odor localization and identification
2013, NeuroscienceCitation Excerpt :Participants were paid a small amount to participate. Odorous stimuli were delivered by an automated, computer-controlled pneumatic stimulator (Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, Germany) which provides air pulses of well-defined duration and has been adapted for olfactory research, as previously described (Frasnelli et al., 2010). In short, the machine’s outlets were connected to odor chambers via a polyurethane tubing with 3.2 mm outer diameter and an inner diameter of 1.7 mm (Fre-thane 85, Freelin-wade, McMinnville, OR, USA).
Olfactory priming leads to faster sound localization
2012, Neuroscience LettersCitation Excerpt :Still, previous studies using similar paradigms to ours successfully demonstrated effects of side congruency of the cues [29,39]. It may, however, seem surprising that we did not observe any effect of side congruency even for the somatosensory cues, even if the subjects were able to localize these somatosensory stimuli as shown previously [19]. This is in contrast to previous findings of enhanced performances in detection of visual or auditory targets after the presentation of tactile cues [9,20].
Hyposmia in COVID-19: Temporal Recovery of Smell: A Preliminary Study
2023, Medicina (Lithuania)