Dexterity in cerebellar agenesis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.08.011Get rights and content

Abstract

Given the well established role of the cerebellum in motor control, deficient motor performance during life time appears to be common in cerebellar agenesis. However, behavioural data on motor performance in living subjects with cerebellar agenesis are scarce. Dexterity during object manipulation was comparatively investigated in a 63-year old female with cerebellar agenesis and three healthy age- and gender-matched control subjects. Participants performed a transport task with an instrumented object and caught a weight that was dropped into a hand-held receptacle either expectedly from the opposite hand or unexpectedly from the experimenter's hand. Compared to healthy subjects, the subject with cerebellar agenesis generated greater grasping forces. For the transport task the patient showed a clear impairment of the predictive adjustment of grasping forces to the differential loading requirements of movement direction. For the weight-catching task, the patient established an accurate reactive mode of control when the weight was dropped unexpectedly. In case the weight was dropped expectedly from the opposite hand, predictive control mechanisms were severely disturbed in the subject with cerebellar agenesis. These data highlight the role of the cerebellum for predictive force control and are interpreted within the concept of internal models reflecting the causal relationship between actions and their consequences.

Introduction

Complete absence of the cerebellum is extremely rare with only a few cases reported in the literature since the first description in 1831 (Combettes, 1831, Priestley, 1920, Rubinstein and Freeman, 1940; Titomanlio, Romano, & Del Giudice, 2005; Velioglu, Kuzeyli, & Özmenoglu, 1998; for a review see Glickstein, 1994, Macchi and Bentivoglio, 1977). The majority of cases have been found post-mortem and the debate of whether or not motor performance is impaired in cerebellar agenesis is still unsettled. Given the well established role of the cerebellum in motor control and motor learning (Courchesne & Allan, 1997; Glickstein & Yeo, 1990; Middleton & Strick, 1997; Nowak et al., in press, Thach, 1998), deficient motor performance during life time appears to be common in cerebellar agenesis (see Glickstein, 1994 for a detailed review). However, behavioural data on motor performance in living subjects with cerebellar agenesis are hardly available (Richter et al., 2005, Timmann et al., 2003) and a detailed description of manual dexterity is still lacking in this entity.

The exquisite control of grasping forces when manipulating objects in the environment is an essential part of our daily motor repertoire. Skilled control of grasping forces involves different modes of control which rely on prediction and sensory feedback to different extents. When we handle objects in the environment that exhibit stable properties, predictive control mechanisms can effectively be exploited. When, for example, the load of a hand-held object is increased by a self generated action – such as moving the arm during a transport movement or dropping a weight from one hand into a receptacle held by the opposite hand – grasping forces increase in parallel with load forces without an obvious time delay (Flanagan & Wing, 1993; Johansson & Westling, 1988). When, on the other hand, we handle objects with unpredictable behaviour-like catching a weight that is unexpectedly dropped from another person into a hand-held receptacle – sensory feedback provides the most useful source to signal a change in load with the consequence that grasping forces tend to lag behind load (Johansson & Westling, 1988).

The predictive coupling between grasping and load force profiles has been interpreted within the theoretical concept of internal forward models (Wolpert & Flanagan, 2001). Given the regular anatomical cytoarchitecture of the cerebellar cortex and the well characterised functional circuitry with only one output cell and four main classes of interneurons, the cerebellum has been considered to incorporate such internal forward models (Wolpert, Miall, & Kawato, 1998). Indeed, single cell recordings obtained from cerebellar Purkinje cells and deep cerebellar nuclei suggest that cerebellar activity is closely linked to predictive mechanisms of grasping (Espinoza & Smith, 1990; Monzée & Smith, 2004). In addition, behavioural data have demonstrated that predictive control of grasping is severely impaired while reactive mechanisms of force control appear to be well preserved in subjects with cerebellar disorders (Babin-Ratté et al., 1999, Nowak et al., 2002, Nowak et al., 2004, Rost et al., 2005).

Here we report on the control of grasping forces in a case of cerebellar agenesis. Both predictive and reactive control mechanisms were tested. Based on behavioural data (Babin-Ratté et al., 1999, Nowak et al., 2002, Nowak et al., 2004, Nowak et al., 2005), single cell recordings (Espinoza & Smith, 1990; Monzée & Smith, 2004) and recent theoretical concepts on the role of the cerebellum for predictive motor control (Wolpert et al., 1998, Wolpert and Flanagan, 2001) we expected a clear deficit of predictive, but not reactive force control mechanisms in cerebellar agenesis.

Section snippets

Participants

A 63-year old right-handed white female (H.K.) with almost complete absence of the cerebellum as revealed by magnetic resonance imaging (Fig. 1) participated in the experiments. H.K.'s past medical and family histories have been described earlier in detail (Timmann et al., 2003). Neurological examination revealed mild to moderate cerebellar dysarthria, mild to moderate ataxia of the upper and lower limbs, mild ataxia of stance and impaired gait. Her gait disorder was aggravated by a marked

Results

The minimum grip forces necessary to prevent the object from slipping were similar for H.K. (2.6 ± 0.2 N) and the healthy control subjects (2.5 ± 0.2 N). Thus, any differences in the efficiency of grip force scaling between H.K. and the healthy control subjects could not be due to variations in the frictional condition at the skin-object interface.

Discussion

The present study was intended to investigate both predictive and reactive control mechanisms of dexterous manipulation in a case of cerebellar agenesis. Our data clearly demonstrate that the cerebellum appears to play a vital role for the predictive control of grasping, whereas it is less involved in reactive force control mechanisms. In the following we will discuss these findings in the context of recent theoretical concepts and lesion data, suggesting that the cerebellum is essential to

Conclusion

The efficiency and coordination of grasping forces during object manipulation was investigated in a case of cerebellar agenesis. Both predictive and reactive control mechanisms were tested. Compared to healthy control subjects, the subject with cerebellar agenesis produced excessive grasping forces and exhibited a clear deficit of predictive, but not of reactive force control mechanisms. These data highlight the role of the cerebellum for predictive motor performance and may be interpreted

Acknowledgement

The authors are indebted to H.K. and the healthy subjects for their willingness to participate in the current project. The project was supported by a grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG Ti-239/8-1 and He-3592/4-1).

References (32)

  • S. Babin-Ratté et al.

    Impaired anticipatory finger grip-force adjustments in a case of cerebellar degeneration

    Experimental Brain Research

    (1999)
  • A.J. Bastian et al.

    Cerebellar ataxia: abnormal control of interaction torques across multiple joints

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (1996)
  • M. Combettes

    Absence complète du cerevelet, des pédoncules postérieurs et de la protuberance cérébrale chez une jeune fille morte dans sa onziètme année

    Bulletin of the Society of Anatomy Paris

    (1831)
  • E. Courchesne et al.

    Prediction and preparation, fundamental functions of the cerebellum

    Learning and Memory

    (1997)
  • H.C. Diener et al.

    Pathophysiology of cerebellar ataxia

    Movement Disorders

    (1992)
  • E. Espinoza et al.

    Purkinje cell simple spike activity during grasping and lifting objects of different textures and weights

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (1990)
  • S.J. Fellows et al.

    Precision grip in cerebellar disorders in man

    Clinical Neurophysiology

    (2001)
  • J.R. Flanagan et al.

    Modulation of grip force with load force during point-to-point arm movements

    Experimental Brain Research

    (1993)
  • M. Glickstein

    Cerebellar agenesis

    Brain

    (1994)
  • M. Glickstein et al.

    The cerebellum and motor learning

    Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

    (1990)
  • R.S. Johansson et al.

    Programmed and triggered actions to rapid load changes during precision grip

    Experimental Brain Research

    (1988)
  • G. Macchi et al.

    Agenesis or hypoplasia of cerebellar structures

  • F.A. Middleton et al.

    Cerebellar output channels

    International Reviews in Neurobiology 1997

    (1997)
  • S.G. Massaquoi et al.

    Ataxia and other cerebellar syndromes

  • C.R. Mason et al.

    Purkinje cells signal hand shape and grasp force during reach-to-grasp in the monkey

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (2006)
  • J. Monzée et al.

    Responses of cerebellar interpositus neurons to predictable perturbations applied to an object held in a precision grip

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (2004)
  • Cited by (54)

    • Transient deactivation of dorsal premotor cortex or parietal area 5 impairs feedback control of the limb in macaques

      2021, Current Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is also interesting to note that reductions in parameters associated with the forward model led to large errors even for small reductions in gain and even oscillatory behavior for reductions at ∼50% (Figures 1C and S1A). Accumulating evidence supports a role of the cerebellum for forward models in motor control74–79. The forward model is essential to make a prediction of the state to overcome sensorimotor delays that can destabilize control39,80.

    • The cerebellum, internal models and prediction in ‘non-motor’ aspects of language: A critical review

      2016, Brain and Language
      Citation Excerpt :

      This internal model ‘feedback’ allows the perceiver to rapidly interpret the perceptual signal and react accordingly, complete percepts received incompletely and/or under noise, and disambiguate in situations of uncertainty (Jordan & Wolpert, 2000). While internal models are conceivably located in all brain regions with synaptic plasticity that receive and send relevant information for their input and output (Kawato, 1999), a broad range of electrophysiological (Gilbert & Thach, 1977; Medina & Lisberger, 2009), imaging (Blakemore, Frith, & Wolpert, 2001; Desmurget et al., 2001; Imamizu et al., 2000; Puttemans, Wenderoth, & Swinnen, 2005), and clinical studies (Müller & Dichgans, 1994; Nowak, Timmann, & Hermsdorfer, 2007) have established the cerebellum as ‘the most likely site for forward models to be stored’ (Kawato et al., 2003, p. 171). However, the cerebellum exhibits a combination of two striking properties that support the involvement of its internal models beyond motor control: namely, its ‘essentially uniform, monotonously repetitive architecture’ (Schmahmann, 2000, p. 206) and its massive connectivity with virtually all major subdivisions of the brain.

    • Force control in chronic stroke

      2015, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
    • The impact of unilateral brain damage on anticipatory grip force scaling when lifting everyday objects

      2014, Neuropsychologia
      Citation Excerpt :

      Second, a set of objects was selected in a way that size alone did not provide reliable information about the object׳s weight. The maximum grip force rate before liftoff was analyzed since it is known to be a highly sensitive measure to indicate successful preplanning of manual interaction with familiar objects (Gordon et al., 1991b; Hermsdörfer et al., 2011; Johansson & Westling, 1988; Li et al., 2009; Nowak, Timmann, & Hermsdörfer, 2007). The comparison of the different groups (left brain damage, right brain damage, corresponding controls) led to the finding that left brain damage impairs anticipatory skills during manipulation of everyday objects.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text