Role of CA3 and CA1 subregions of the dorsal hippocampus on temporal processing of objects

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2007.04.013Get rights and content

Abstract

Previous research in the dorsal CA1 and dorsal CA3 subregions of the hippocampus has been shown to play an important role in mediating temporal order memory for spatial location information. What is not known is whether the dorsal CA3 and dorsal CA1 subregions of the hippocampus are also involved in temporal order for visual object information. Rats with dorsal CA1, dorsal CA3 or control lesions were tested in a temporal order task for visual objects using an exploratory paradigm. The results indicated that the controls and the dorsal CA3 lesioned rats preferred the first rather then the last object they had explored previously, indicating good memory for temporal order of object presentation. In contrast, rats with dorsal CA1 lesions displayed a profound deficit in remembering the order of the visual object presentations in that they preferred the last object rather than the first. All three groups of rats preferred a novel object compared to a previously explored object suggesting normal detection of visual object novelty. The results suggest that only the dorsal CA1, but not dorsal CA3, region is critical for processing temporal information for visual objects without affecting the detection of new visual objects.

Introduction

The hippocampus has been shown to play an important role in processing of temporal information (Kesner, 1998, Levy, 1996, Lisman, 1999, Rolls and Kesner, 2006). More specifically the hippocampus supports processing of temporal order, recency discrimination or temporal pattern separation for spatial location and order information in that a lesion of the hippocampus produces temporal order memory deficits (Chiba et al., 1994, Fortin et al., 2002, Gilbert et al., 1998, Kesner et al., 2002). Similar results were obtained for temporal order memory for spatial locations in hypoxic subjects with hippocampal damage (Hopkins et al., 1995a, Hopkins et al., 1995b). It should be noted that patients with prefrontal lobe damage or rats with medial prefrontal cortex lesions also have difficulty in temporal order memory for spatial location information (for a review see Kesner, 1998). There are likely to be important interactions between the hippocampus and the prefrontal cortex. With respect to a subregional locus for processing temporal order for spatial locations, it has been reported that the dorsal CA1, but not dorsal dentate gyrus, is of critical importance in that dorsal CA1, but not dorsal dentate gyrus, lesions disrupt performance on a temporal order for spatial location information task (Gilbert, Kesner, & Lee, 2001). Based on unpublished data it appears that the dorsal CA3 also produces a deficit in processing temporal order for spatial information (Kesner and Gilbert, unpublished observation).

It would be of interest to extend the above mentioned finding to temporal order memory for visual object information. A modified paradigm was used based on previous research described by Mitchell and Laiacona (1998) and Hannesson, Howland, and Phillips (2004). They showed that rats when exposed to two or three different sets of objects select on a subsequent preference or recency discrimination test between the first or second and the third of the previously experienced objects the earlier of the two objects. As a control, normal rats when given a test between the first or the second and a novel object select the novel object. They show that rats with medial prefrontal or perirhinal cortex lesions disrupt recency discrimination or temporal order for visual objects without altering their preference for the novel object or recognition memory for the visual objects. The purpose of the present study was to use this new paradigm to examine temporal order memory for visual object information to examine whether both the dorsal CA1 and CA3 regions are critical for processing of temporal information for objects or whether the dorsal CA3 region only processes temporal information for space, but not for objects, in which case there would not be a deficit for dorsal CA3. Alternatively dorsal CA1 may mediate temporal processing for both spatial and nonspatial information and thus, there might be a deficit for visual object information.

Section snippets

Subjects

Twenty-nine Long-Evans hooded rats, weighing 300–375 gm at the beginning of the study, were used as subjects. Food and water were available ad libitum throughout the experiment. Rats were maintained in standard plastic rodent cages throughout the experiment. All experimental procedures were performed during the light portion of the 12 h light/dark cycle.

Surgery

Rats were handled 15 min daily for 1 week prior to surgery. They were then randomly divided into three separate groups that received dorsal CA1 (n

Histology

Since neither a CA1 nor CA3-unique neurotoxin is available, we have developed injection parameters suitable to induce subregion-specific lesions with ibotenic acid, which produce selective damage to either CA1 (Gilbert et al., 2001) or CA3 (Gilbert and Kesner, 2003, Jerman et al., 2005, Lee and Kesner, 2004) pyramidal cells. Although it is difficult to define the boundary between the dorsal and ventral portions of the hippocampus, the dorsal region was defined as the anterior 50% of the

Discussion

The results indicate that for the temporal order task, control rats prefer object A in comparison with object C. In order to explain this preference for object A, it is assumed that rats prefer object A, because the rat has had more time for consolidation of object A in comparison with object C and thus has greater memory strength for object A. The results also indicate that rats with CA3 lesions have the same preference for object A as observed for control subjects. In contrast, results

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by NSF IBN-0135273 and NIH R01MH065314 awarded to R.P.K.

References (24)

  • D.K. Hannesson et al.

    Interaction between perirhinal and medial prefrontal cortex is required for temporal order but not recognition memory for objects in rats

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (2004)
  • R.O. Hopkins et al.

    Memory for novel and familiar temporal spatial and linguistic temporal distance information in hypoxic subjects

    International Journal of Neuropsychology

    (1995)
  • Cited by (124)

    • Ontogeny of spontaneous recognition memory in rodents

      2021, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text