Original articleThe Role of Neuropsychologic Tests in the Diagnosis of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Introduction
It has been assumed that attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurologic, behavioral, and cognitive disorder [1]. Symptoms of inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity are considered the main behavioral characteristics of ADHD and have been incorporated into diagnostic systems with an estimated prevalence of 3% to 5% in school-age children [2]. It has also been reported that ADHD is frequently comorbid with both externalizing and internalizing psychopathologies, such as oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, depression, bipolar disorder, alcoholism, and substance abuse [3], [4], [5]. Additionally, attention and working memory impairment, metalinguistic deficiency, and executive dysfunction are considered the core cognitive problems related to ADHD [6], [7].
A gold-standard procedure for ADHD diagnosis includes psychiatric, psychologic, and neurologic evaluations. Psychiatric and psychologic interviews are important, given both the difficulty in distinguishing ADHD from other child psychiatric disorders and the high risk of having ADHD present concurrently with other psychiatric disorders. Psychiatric assessment is becoming mandatory in genetic studies, and clinical-medical and neurologic evaluations are recommended in all cases, to complete the ADHD diagnostic criterion E of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) [2], which requires ruling out other conditions that might better explain the symptoms. None of the objective laboratory exams have demonstrated validity for ADHD diagnosis [2], [8], [9], [10].
Currently, rating scales are commonly used for ADHD studies, and there is consensus regarding the need for a multirater and multimethod process of ADHD diagnosis [11]. In other words, a more valid diagnosis requires information from multiple reporters about the individual’s typical behavior in several settings (typically, at home and at school or at work). Additionally, formal and informal observations, anecdotal reports, semistructured clinical interviews, and behavioral checklists are all optional methods that should be integrated when diagnosing ADHD. Self-reports are recommended as well, although individuals with ADHD tend to be poor reporters of their own functioning [12], [13]. However, findings in previous confirmatory factor analyses of rating scales have demonstrated that most ADHD symptoms contain more source than trait variance, thus providing weak evidence for the convergent and discriminant validity of the symptoms as measured by these rating scales [14] and suggesting that a multimethod approach might add validity to the diagnosis.
Many studies report that ADHD children perform poorly on tasks that assess continuous vigilance, processing speed, verbal learning and memory, working memory, phonological awareness, and executive function [1], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]. Several meta-analytic reviews have been published on the validity of intellectual functioning [20], inhibitory control [21], [22], and executive function [23], [24] as predominant cognitive characteristics of ADHD.
The debate surrounding the identification of the core cognitive impairment has been the primary focus of multiple analyses [1], [21], [23], [25], [26]. The discussion revolves around the question of whether ADHD cognitive impairment is specific [21] or generalized [20], [25]. Another point of contention is whether ADHD is a multiple domain cognitive deficit or an underlying basic impairment affecting all kinds of functions that rely on that particular process [16], [25]. It has been argued that, although there are several specific cognitive problems, the tasks, which are designed to assess brain damage, do not have enough sensitivity to detect the mild disabilities present in most of the affected ADHD patients.
We hypothesized that construction of multiple levels of analysis can demonstrate the validity of a neuropsychologic battery to differentiate between ADHD and control children and predicted that neuropsychologic tests would have a high degree of accuracy for making the ADHD diagnosis.
Section snippets
Sample Selection and Procedure
Databases from 904 registered private and public schools of Medellín, Colombia, were obtained from the Education offices of Medellín’s metropolitan area and the Antioquia State Education Department. The initial selection unit was the school; that is, to obtain a sample of children aged 6 to 11 years old, 74 (15%) out of 504 elementary schools were randomly selected. Each school’s principal was contacted and meetings with teachers and parents were arranged to explain the objective of the study.
Results
The analysis of variance results (P < 0.05) demonstrated that ADHD children had significantly poorer scores on attention variables (mental control and auditory continuous performance test), number of trials necessary to retain visual-verbal information, visual-motor skills tasks, verbal comprehension (token test), and executive function examination (Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and Verbal Fluency test). The effect of group sizes for sex, school grade level, and age covariates was small (0.24) to
Discussion
Our results revealing the inability of neuropsychologic measures to classify cases into known groups can be explained by the hypothesis proposed by Swanson et al. [10]. Specifically, children with ADHD form a heterogeneous group, exhibiting a variety of cognitive problems that differ by etiology. Although not diagnostic per se, statistically significant differences were found between ADHD and control children on the performance of variables that assessed attention, such as mental control
References (53)
- et al.
Clinical and diagnostic implications of lifetime attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder comorbidity in adults with bipolar disorder: data from the first 1000 STEP-BD participants
Biol Psychiatry
(2005) - et al.
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and comorbidities in 18 Paisa Colombian multigenerational families
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(2004) Diagnostic interview for children and adolescents (DICA)
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(2000)- et al.
Validity of the executive function theory of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a meta-analytic review
Biol Psychiatry
(2005) - et al.
Inhibition in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a psychophysiological study of the stop task
Biol Psychiatry
(2002) - et al.
Validation of two rating scales for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder diagnosis in Colombian children
Pediatr Neurol
(2005) Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents (DICA)
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(2000)- et al.
Normative data and screening power of a shortened version of the Token Test
Cortex
(1978) - et al.
A meta-analysis of working memory impairments in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(2005) - et al.
Neuropsychological and behavioral assessment of ADHD in seven- to twelve-year-old children: a discriminant analysis
J Learn Disabil
(1999)
Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV)
Further evidence for family-genetic risk factors in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: patterns of comorbidity in probands and relatives psychiatrically and pediatrically referred samples
Arch Gen Psychiatry
Neuropsychological analyses of comorbidity between reading disability and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: in search of the common deficit
Dev Neuropsychol
Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: constructing a unifying theory of ADHD
Psychol Bull
Clinical practice guidelines: diagnosis and evaluation of the child with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
Pediatrics
Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder children with a 7-repeat allele of the dopamine receptor D4 gene have extreme behavior but normal performance on critical neuropsychological tests of attention
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC)
Do parental concerns predict a diagnosis of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder?
J Dev Behav Pediatr
Multitrait-multisource confirmatory factor analytic approach to the construct validity of ADHD rating scales
Psychol Assess
Research on executive function in a neurodevelopmental context: application of clinical measures
Dev Neuropsychol
Attention and executive function tests components in attention deficit/hyperactivity children [In Spanish]
Rev Neurol
Different verbal behavior in children with attention deficit between 7 and 12 years of age [In Spanish]
Rev Neurol
Executive function and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: relationship with behavioral rating and cognitive ability
Dev Neuropsychol
Confirmation of an inhibitory control deficit in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
J Abnorm Child Psychol
Meta-analysis of intellectual and neuropsychological test performance in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
Neuropsychology
Cited by (43)
Methylphenidate significantly improves neurocognitive impairments in children with ADHD
2022, Psychiatry ResearchAssociation of mitochondrial DNA 10398 A/G polymorphism with attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder in Korean children
2017, GeneCitation Excerpt :These results mean that larger sample sets are needed to clarify the relationship of 10398 A/G polymorphism with gender and subtypes. The BASC scale is designed to assess internal/externalizing psychopathology in children and also used to detect neurological disorders (Pineda et al., 2007). Merrell (2008) mentioned the BASC-2 as one of the best tools for the diagnosis of behavior-rating scale.
An Ultraconserved Brain-Specific Enhancer Within ADGRL3 (LPHN3) Underpins Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Susceptibility
2016, Biological PsychiatryCitation Excerpt :In agreement with their findings, we show a significant association of ECR variants with lower ACVTCR scores and higher ACVTO scores. Impaired response inhibition and poor sustained attention, as measured by these two tests, are fundamental components of the executive dysfunction present in patients with ADHD (54–57). In the same vein, the inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive motor phenotype associated with patients with ADHD is expected to affect the ability to perform the ROCFT copy test, and therefore the significant association with ECR risk variants.
Functional impairment in adults positively screened for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: The role of symptom presentation and executive functioning
2013, Comprehensive PsychiatryCitation Excerpt :Besides the possibility of an overall impairment, recent genetic association studies, in addition to reaction time variability [23], suggested that certain specific EFs (such as response inhibition, working memory and set shifting, along with processing speed) share their genetic basis with ADHD, and thus are thought to be potentially useful cognitive endophenotypes for ADHD [23–27]. In addition, while the general role of neuropsychological tests in the diagnosis of ADHD is in question [28], executive deficits of ADHD patients measured by them are relatively stable from childhood on into young adulthood. These deficits appear to be independent of the remission of symptoms of inattention or hypercativity/impulsivity [29].
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, differential diagnosis with blood oxygenation, beta/theta ratio, and attention measures
2013, International Journal of Clinical and Health PsychologyAhead of the (ROC) Curve: A Statistical Approach to Utilizing Ex-Gaussian Parameters of Reaction Time in Diagnosing ADHD Across Three Developmental Periods
2022, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society