Screening of Colorectal Cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soc.2005.05.009Get rights and content

Section snippets

Progress in colorectal cancer

CRC accounts for approximately 945,000 new cases and 500,000 deaths each year worldwide [3]. Considerable progress has been made in the past 25 years in our ability to reduce this burden with introduction of technology for screening, early diagnosis, and prevention by removal of premalignant polyps [4]. During this period of time, greater insight into the adenoma carcinoma sequence has provided an understanding of the progress made and the problems of screening. The risk for CRC in average risk

Risk for colorectal cancer

Most patients who develop CRC are considered to be at average risk (75%) with no special risk factors (Box 1). People at increased risk include individuals with inflammatory bowel disease, which is associated with 1% of CRCs each year, familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) (1%), hereditary nonpolyposis CRC (HNPCC) (2%–5%), and persons with a family history of one or two close relatives (15%–20%) [22], [23]. We currently have a much better understanding of the magnitude and clinical patterns in

Fecal occult blood testing

The early evidence of the benefit of CRC screening with fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) demonstrated a shift in screen-detected cancers to an earlier stage with fewer Duke's D screen-detected cancers as compared with controls [5]. This stage shift was challenged quickly, however, as possibly caused by length bias and lead time bias. Length bias suggests that screening would pick up cancers that are slow growing more often than cancers that are more aggressive, and lead time bias suggests that

Adenomas

The most frequent outcome of screening is not cancer but an adenomatous polyp [6]. These polyps can be removed expeditiously by colonoscopy as an outpatient procedure, with the entire colon being examined in 15 to 20 minutes. This was a major advance compared with the exploratory laparotomy and multiple colotomies that were performed in the past. The feasibility of removing polyps through the colonoscope was reported in the mid-1970s. Shortly thereafter, the National Polyp Study was organized

Average-risk patients

Average-risk patients are asymptomatic individuals age 50 and older with no personal or family history of CRC or adenomatous polyps and no history of inflammatory bowel disease [6].

Risk factors

Factors that increase the risk for development of CRC include a personal or family history of CRC or adenoma, a history of long-standing colitis caused by inflammatory bowel disease (eg, ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease), and a genetic predisposition caused by a hereditary polyposis or nonpolyposis syndrome (Boxes 1 and 2).

History of colorectal adenoma

Most CRCs develop from a benign, premalignant precursor lesion through what is commonly referred to as the “adenoma to carcinoma sequence.” This pathway describes a

Average-risk screening

The initial approach to CRC screening relies on a thorough risk assessment of a patient. Asymptomatic individuals are candidates for routine screening, whereas individuals at increased risk because of a personal or family history of CRC or adenoma, inflammatory bowel disease, or a hereditary colon cancer syndrome are at high risk and require individualized risk specific recommendations for screening and surveillance.

All average-risk men and women should begin CRC screening at age 50. Several

Family history of colorectal cancer and adenomas

Individuals who have one or two first-degree relatives who are affected with CRC or adenomas at an average age of less than 60 are at increased risk. These patients should undergo screening of the entire colon beginning at age 40 or, if younger, 10 years younger than the earliest diagnosed cancer or adenoma. For patients with more than two first-degree relatives who are affected with colon cancer and no history of a polyposis syndrome, one should consider a diagnosis of HNPCC and recommend

History of colorectal adenoma

Colonoscopy is the preferred surveillance examination in patients who have had a colorectal adenoma removed in the past. The recurrence rate of adenomas in patients after initial polypectomy is high enough to justify periodic follow-up. Ideally, all synchronous adenomas are removed at the time of the initial polypectomy. The frequency of missed synchronous lesions, primarily small and tubular, has been reported to be 15% to 25%, however [43], [44]. A surveillance program should provide an

Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening

Despite abundant evidence for the efficacy of screening and surveillance in reducing the incidence and mortality of CRC, relatively few individuals in the United States take advantage of these benefits. One significant part of the problem is that most health insurance plans do not recognize the potential benefits of tests for cancer prevention and do not reimburse for the costs of these examinations. On a positive note, however, as of July 2001, Medicare reimbursement is available for all

Screening rates

Screening rates for CRC are low and well below those for mammography. National health interview surveys have demonstrated this fact consistently. In the United States, only 20% of people over age 50 have had fecal occult blood tests, and 33% have had an endoscopic screening test in the previous 5 years [21]. One of the most frequent reasons for not getting screened (88%) is that “it was not recommended by my doctor,” according to one survey [6]. Health care providers play an important role in

Summary

Cost-effectiveness analyses have shown that the cost per year of life saved by screening with any of the tests recommended is reasonable by US standards. Although the specific results vary among analyses, in general the marginal cost-effectiveness of this screening is less than $25,000 per year of life saved. Screening for CRC was among the highest ranked services in an analysis of the value of preventive services based on the burden of disease prevented and cost-effectiveness. Although the

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (59)

  • J.H. Butt et al.

    A practical approach to the cancer risk in inflammatory bowel disease

    Med Clin North Am

    (1980)
  • I. Katzka et al.

    Assessment of colorectal cancer risk in patients with ulcerative colitis: experience from a private practice

    Gastroenterology

    (1983)
  • T. Gilat et al.

    Colorectal cancer in patients with ulcerative colitis: a population study in central Israel

    Gastroenterology

    (1988)
  • D.F. Ransohoff

    Colon cancer in ulcerative colitis

    Gastroenterology

    (1988)
  • I.P.M. MacDougall

    Cancer risk in ulcerative colitis

    Lancet

    (1964)
  • A. Greenstein et al.

    Cancer in universal and left-sided ulcerative colitis: factors determining risk

    Gastroenterology

    (1979)
  • P.M. Choi et al.

    Colonoscopic surveillance reduces mortality from colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis

    Gastroenterology

    (1993)
  • A. Ekbom et al.

    Increased risk of large bowel cancer in Crohn's disease with colonic involvement

    Lancet

    (1990)
  • C.G. Moertel et al.

    Multiple carcinomas of the large intestine: a review of the literature and a study of 261 cases

    Gastroenterology

    (1958)
  • D.A. Ahlquist et al.

    Colorectal cancer screening by detection of altered human DNA in stool: feasibility of a multitarget assay panel

    Gastroenterology

    (2000)
  • US Preventive Services Task Force

    Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendations and rationale

    Ann Intern Med

    (2002)
  • Winawer SJ, Classen M. World Gastroenterology News...
  • S.J. Winawer et al.

    Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy

    N Engl J Med

    (1993)
  • S.J. Winawer

    American Cancer Society award lecture: a quarter century of colorectal cancer screening. Progress and prospects

    J Clin Oncol

    (2001)
  • J. Kewenter et al.

    Results of screening, rescreening, and follow-up in a prospective randomized study for detection of colorectal cancer by fecal occult blood testing: results for 68,308 subjects

    Scand J Gastroenterol

    (1994)
  • J.S. Mandel et al.

    Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood: Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study

    N Engl J Med

    (1993)
  • J.V. Selby et al.

    A case control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (1992)
  • P.A. Newcomb et al.

    Screening sigmoidoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1992)
  • A.L. Frazier et al.

    Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population

    JAMA

    (2000)
  • Cited by (24)

    • Does participation to screening unintentionally influence lifestyle behaviour and thus lifestyle-related morbidity?

      2010, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Gastroenterology
      Citation Excerpt :

      One of the leading causes of cancer incidence and death in developed countries is colorectal cancer [17]. Although there are effective screening strategies in reducing mortality from colorectal cancer [18,19], Parkin et al stated that lifestyle modifications will contribute significantly to further eliminate the incidence of colorectal cancer [17]. The impact of colorectal cancer screening on lifestyle was measured in one randomised controlled trial.

    • Evolving molecular classification by genomic and proteomic biomarkers in colorectal cancer: Potential implications for the surgical oncologist

      2009, Surgical Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      From a screening perspective, all surrogate outcomes in individuals not diagnosed with cancer are risk factors. Colonic polyps, for instance, are a SEPB for screening and a risk factor for colon cancer [174,194]. The elements that are necessary in order to use risk factors as surrogate outcomes in screening, early detection, or prevention interventions are somewhat different.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Gastroenterology and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021.

    View full text