Elsevier

Steroids

Volume 76, Issue 8, July 2011, Pages 772-776
Steroids

An in vitro model showing adaptation to long-term oestrogen deprivation highlights the clinical potential for targeting kinase pathways in combination with aromatase inhibition

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2011.02.035Get rights and content

Abstract

Aromatase inhibitors (AI) have improved the treatment of oestrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer. Despite the efficacy of these agents over 40% of patients relapse with endocrine resistant disease. Here we describe an in vitro model of acquired resistance to long-term oestrogen deprivation (LTED). The LTED cells retain expression of the ER and appear hypersensitive to oestrogen as a result of altered kinase activity. Furthermore analysis of temporal changes in gene expression during the acquisition of resistance highlight growth factor receptor pathways as key mediators of this adaptive process.

Introduction

Oestrogen (E) plays a pivotal role in the development of oestrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer. This has been exploited clinically by the development of endocrine therapies. These seek to deprive the hormone dependent tumour cells of E using anti-oestrogens such as tamoxifen and fulvestrant (ICI 182 780) both of which compete with E for the oestrogen receptor (ER) or aromatase inhibitors (AI), which block the conversion of androgens into E [1]. AIs have improved the treatment of ER+ early and advanced breast cancer [2], [3]. However, one of the major hurdles in the clinical management of hormone receptor positive breast cancer is the development of endocrine resistance. Identification of the molecular mechanisms associated with relapse on endocrine therapy is of paramount importance for the identification of new biomarkers together with novel therapeutic targets. In an effort to address this we, like some other groups, have developed cell lines modelling relapse on an AI [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. In vitro and in vivo studies suggest that cross-talk between the ER and growth factor pathways allow breast tumours to circumvent the need for steroid hormones whilst in most cases retaining expression of the ER [9], [10]. In the following manuscript we review previous data and provide some insight into the temporal changes in gene expression that occur during acquisition of resistance to long-term oestrogen deprivation (LTED).

Section snippets

Materials and methods

For detailed methodologies see Refs. [11], [13].

Results and discussion

During adaptation to LTED the MCF7 cells passed through two distinct phases: quiescent, followed by hypersensitivity where basal cell growth was maximally stimulated by concentration of oestradiol (E2) as low as 10−13 M (Fig. 1A). In contrast the wt-MCF7 cells required concentrations in excess of 10−10 M [5], [9], [11], [13]. Clinical data supporting hypersensitivity as a means of resistance comes from a study of pre-menopausal patients who initially responded and then relapsed after E withdrawal

Acknowledgements

We thank the Mary-Jean Mitchell Green Foundation and Breakthrough Breast Cancer for funding. We also acknowledge NHS funding to the Royal Marsden NIHR Biomedical Research Centre.

References (17)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (17)

  • Optimal adjuvant endocrine treatment of ER+/HER2+ breast cancer patients by age at diagnosis: A population-based cohort study

    2018, European Journal of Cancer
    Citation Excerpt :

    Indeed, results from the combined SOFT/TEXT analysis confirmed that the AI exemestane plus ovarian ablation (OA) significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS), breast cancer-free interval and distant metastasis-free survival when compared with TAM plus OA and TAM alone [2,3]. Studies on the crosstalk between the ER and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) pathways, however, resulted in the discovery of a differential endocrine treatment response between ER+/HER2− and ER+/HER2+ preclinical breast cancer models, suggesting that ER+/HER2+ cell lines are resistant to TAM [4–7]. Clinical studies confirmed the benefit of AI over TAM in postmenopausal ER+/HER2+ patients, although the difference was not significant [8–10].

  • Estrogen can restore Tamoxifen sensitivity in breast cancer cells amidst the complex network of resistance

    2017, Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy
    Citation Excerpt :

    Despite estrogen having a lower impact on Tam-R cell growth due to reduced ERα66 expression, contrary to responsive cells [28], ERα66 was found to be over-activated in Tam-R cells [14]. Regardless, LTED-R cells are more hypersensitive and reliant on estrogen than Tam-R cells are [29–31]. Therefore, the administration of aromatase inhibitors cannot inhibit LTED-R proliferation[3].

  • Biomarker changes associated with the development of resistance to aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer

    2014, Annals of Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Moreover, recurrences occur in a sizeable minority of patients treated with adjuvant AIs [2, 3]. Much effort has been expended in trying to elucidate the mechanisms involved in endocrine resistance [4–10]. The discovery of predictive biomarkers has been primarily based on correlative analysis between the molecular characteristics of the primary tumours and time to recurrence, in patients treated with adjuvant [5, 6] or neoadjuvant therapy [7–10].

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text