Genome sequences as the type material for taxonomic descriptions of prokaryotes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2015.02.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Genome sequencing of type strains promises to revolutionize prokaryotic systematics by greatly improving the identification of species, elucidating the functional properties of taxonomic groups, and resolving many of the ambiguities in the phylogeny of the higher taxa. Genome sequences could also serve as the type material for naming prokaryotic taxa, which will greatly expand the nomenclature governed by the Bacteriological Code to include many fastidious and uncultured organisms and endosymbionts of great biological interest.

Section snippets

Genomics for species delineation

In the original proposal for the delineation of species based upon genome similarity [59], two measures of genetic relatedness were proposed to set the boundary for prokaryotic species. The first measure was the change in the melting temperature (or ΔTm) of heteroduplex DNA formed upon annealing the DNAs from the two strains to be tested. The ΔTm is directly related to the sequence identity of the DNAs, and a ΔTm of about 5 °C, the cutoff proposed for prokaryotic species, corresponds to an

Genomics for identification of functional properties of taxonomic groups

In addition to setting the criteria for delineation of species, genomics can play an important role in how thresholds are applied. While thresholds are necessary to maintain uniformity in taxonomic ranks among phylogenetic lineages, there are many reasons why they should be applied flexibly [12], [35]. First, no matter what threshold is chosen, there will be certain groups that fall just below or above the threshold and would be inappropriately subdivided or grouped, respectively (Fig. 1). A

Genomics for delineation of higher taxa

The same concerns that exist at the species level also occur at the higher taxonomic ranks. In addition, the phylogeny of the taxonomic groups becomes critical at the higher taxonomic ranks where phylogenetic trees based upon single genes often fail to resolve the tree. For instance, 16S rRNA gene trees fail to resolve branching patterns of most of the orders within the class Actinobacteria [33]. Complete or draft genome sequences can overcome many of these limitations. Because many more genes

Genomics in the description of novel species

The opportunity genomics provides to microbial systematics is enormous, and we should expect that genome sequences will become common in descriptions of new species. The sequences are just too valuable not to determine. Moreover, the value of the sequences increases with the size of the data base of genome sequences. According to a search of the NCBI database, at the end of 2014 complete or draft genome sequences were available for about 3600 type strains of prokaryotes. The DOE-JGI

Genome sequence as type material

Therefore, it is recommended that the genome sequence be allowed serve as the type material when it has been obtained from either a clonal population or a single cell. In this case, samples of the DNA should be submitted to public culture collections to insure the authenticity of the sequence. When the genome sequence is not possible, as might be the case for obligate endosymbionts, multilocus sequence analyses would be a suitable alternative if it can be shown to provide an unambiguous

Recommendations

It is proposed that the sequence identity of homologous genes be accepted as the new criterion for delineation of species. Sequence identity could be based upon measures of the entire genome such as ANI and distance formula d4 of the GGDC package, selections of specific genes such as specI or multilocus sequence analysis, or similar criteria deemed to be appropriate for each prokaryotic group. The similarity of gene content or DDH will then become a describable property of the species, as

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by a NSF Dimensions of Biodiversity grant OCE-1342694. I also thank Jongsik Chun, Michael Galperin, Radhey S. Gupta, Kuo Hong, Hans-Peter Klenk, Nikos Krypides, Haiwei Luo, Amrita Pati, and Tanja Woyke for helpful discussions.

References (62)

  • C.E. Blank

    An expansion of age constraints for microbial clades that lack a conventional fossil record using phylogenomic dating

    J. Mol. Evol.

    (2011)
  • A. Caccone et al.

    Calibration of the change in thermal-stability of DNA duplexes and degree of base pair mismatch

    J. Mol. Evol.

    (1988)
  • P.S. Chain et al.

    Genomics. Genome project standards in a new era of sequencing

    Science

    (2009)
  • J. Chun et al.

    Integrating genomics into the taxonomy and systematics of the Bacteria and Archaea

    Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.

    (2014)
  • R.R. Colwell

    Polyphasic taxonomy of bacteria

  • J.R. De La Torre et al.

    Cultivation of a thermophilic ammonia oxidizing archaeon synthesizing crenarchaeol

    Environ. Microbiol.

    (2008)
  • D. Gevers et al.

    Opinion: re-evaluating prokaryotic species

    Nat. Rev. Microbiol.

    (2005)
  • M. Goodfellow

    International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology XVIth International Congress of Microbiology: Minutes of the Meetings, 2, 3, and 5 July 1994, Prague, Czech Republic

    Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.

    (1995)
  • J. Goris et al.

    DNA–DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities

    Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.

    (2007)
  • G. Greub

    International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes Subcommittee on the taxonomy of the Chlamydiae: Minutes of the inaugural closed meeting, 21 March 2009, Little Rock, AR, USA

    Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.

    (2010)
  • R. Hatzenpichler et al.

    A moderately thermophilic ammonia-oxidizing crenarchaeote from a hot spring

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    (2008)
  • J.L. Johnson et al.

    Similarity analysis of DNAs

  • J.L. Johnson et al.

    Similarity analysis of DNAs

  • P. Kampfer et al.

    Prokaryotic taxonomy in the sequencing era – the polyphasic approach revisited

    Environ. Microbiol.

    (2012)
  • M. Kim et al.

    Large-scale evaluation of experimentally determined DNA G + C contents with whole genome sequences of prokaryotes

    Syst. Appl. Microbiol.

    (2014)
  • M. Konneke et al.

    Isolation of an autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing marine archaeon

    Nature

    (2005)
  • K.T. Konstantinidis et al.

    Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    (2005)
  • N.C. Krypides et al.

    Genomic encyclopedia of type strains. Phase I: the one thousand microbial genomes (KMG-I) project

    Stand. Genom. Sci.

    (2014)
  • C.H. Kuo et al.

    Inferring clocks when lacking rocks: the variable rates of molecular evolution in bacteria

    Biol. Dir.

    (2009)
  • N.C. Kyrpides et al.

    Genomic encyclopedia of bacteria and archaea: sequencing a myriad of type strains

    PLoS Biol.

    (2014)
  • D. Labeda

    International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology: IXth International (IUMS) Congress of Bacteriology and Applied Microbiology

    Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.

    (2000)
  • Cited by (78)

    • Development of the SeqCode: A proposed nomenclatural code for uncultivated prokaryotes with DNA sequences as type

      2022, Systematic and Applied Microbiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Hedlund et al. [15] and Konstantinidis and Rossello-Mora [20] proposed revision of the Candidatus concept from the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (ICNP) to incorporate SAGs and MAGs regardless of the ability to visualize these organisms in natural samples. Whitman [61,62] further proposed revision of the ICNP to incorporate high-quality genome sequences as nomenclatural types. That proposal would have paved the way for validation of Candidatus names and improved the stability of their nomenclature [64].

    • It is time for a new type of type to facilitate naming the microbial world

      2022, New Microbes and New Infections
      Citation Excerpt :

      Indeed, despite General Consideration 5 of the ICNP stating the code “applies to all prokaryotes,” since January 2001 only species with type strains available in pure culture can be validly named [3], meaning that the code itself would be more accurately named the “International Code of Nomenclature of Cultivated Prokaryotes.” Whitman [26,27] proposed modification of the ICNP to recognize DNA sequence data as a category of nomenclatural type for species and subspecies proposals, and others have additionally suggested that a parallel code of nomenclature should be developed if Whitman's proposal did not gain approval [28,29]. Oren and Garrity [30] argued that a parallel system of nomenclature would cause chaos.

    • Phylogenomics and molecular signatures support division of the order Neisseriales into emended families Neisseriaceae and Chromobacteriaceae and three new families Aquaspirillaceae fam. nov., Chitinibacteraceae fam. nov., and Leeiaceae fam. nov.

      2021, Systematic and Applied Microbiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, in the 16S rRNA trees, Chromobacteriaceae species exhibited extensive diversity indicating that further work on this family based on a more comprehensive set of genome sequences is required to more reliably understand the evolutionary relationships and classification scheme for Neisseriales species [1,3–5]. In the past few years, as a result of several major genomic-sequence projects, and as genome sequence data has become part of novel species descriptions [7,8], genomes for large numbers of prokaryotic species have become available in the public domain [9–11]. According to the LPSN webserver [12] the families Neisseriaceae and Chromobacteriaceae presently contain 18 and 19 genera with validly published names, respectively.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text