Trends in Microbiology
Volume 16, Issue 3, March 2008, Pages 107-114
Journal home page for Trends in Microbiology

Opinion
The role of microbiota in infectious disease

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2007.12.008Get rights and content

The intestine harbors an ecosystem composed of the intestinal mucosa and the commensal microbiota. The microbiota fosters development, aids digestion and protects host cells from pathogens – a function referred to as colonization resistance. Little is known about the molecular basis of colonization resistance and how it can be overcome by enteropathogenic bacteria. Recently, studies on inflammatory bowel diseases and on animal models for enteric infection have provided new insights into colonization resistance. Gut inflammation changes microbiota composition, disrupts colonization resistance and enhances pathogen growth. Thus, some pathogens can benefit from inflammatory defenses. This new paradigm will enable the study of host factors enhancing or inhibiting bacterial growth in health and disease.

Introduction

Most bacterial pathogens infect their hosts via mucosal surfaces of the respiratory, urogenital or gastrointestinal tracts. Mucosal surfaces are protected against infection by several mechanical and immunological barriers, which have recently been reviewed elsewhere 1, 2. Here, we focus on an additional protective mechanism – colonization resistance – which is characteristic of the heavily colonized intestinal mucosa (Box 1). Colonization resistance describes the failure of most pathogenic bacteria to colonize the normal gut and cause enteric disease (Box 2). It results from the presence of a dense (1012 organisms per ml) microbial community called the microbiota (see Glossary). In the normal gut the relationship between the microbiota and the host is mutually beneficial. The microbiota is provided with steady growth conditions and a (somewhat limited) nutrient supply. In return, the microbiota contributes to the host's nutrition, immune system development, angiogenesis and fat storage 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. This complex network of interactions is thought to stabilize the population structure of the microbiota and to prohibit colonization by intruding pathogens. The molecular basis of colonization resistance is still poorly understood.

In spite of colonization resistance and numerous other defenses, some pathogens are still capable of infecting the gut. The mechanisms that pathogens use to overcome these barriers, to compete against the intrinsic microbiota and to guarantee successful infection also remain elusive. One such mechanism has recently been shown in studies on the enteropathogenic bacteria Citrobacter rodentium and Salmonella enterica spp. I serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) 10, 11. Remarkably, both enteropathogens were shown to rely on the inflammatory host response, which they evoke in the gut: inflammation changed the composition of the commensal gut microbiota and concurrently fostered pathogen growth. Similar observations were made in patients and animal models for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). In this case, the gut inflammation also coincided with altered population structure of the microbiota 11, 12, 13, 14. These findings identify a shared mechanism of gut ecosystem intrusion by enteropathogens: that is, triggering the host's inflammatory response to overcome colonization resistance. The molecular basis of this strategy is still unclear and might involve different molecular mechanisms. The inflamed gut might offer altered conditions such as changes in the available nutrients and adhesion sites that can be exploited by the pathogen but not by the microbiota (the ‘food hypothesis’). Alternatively, changes in antimicrobial compounds such as lectins and defensins released by the inflamed tissue might be detrimental for the microbiota but not for the pathogen (the ‘differential killing hypothesis’).

In this review, we describe the ‘classical’ observations linking a disturbed gut microbiota to increased susceptibility to gut infections. We then discuss how inflammation might alleviate colonization resistance and how these basic findings can be extended to help elucidate the interactions between bacteria and the gut mucosa in health and disease.

Section snippets

Classical observations linking the microbiota to colonization resistance

It has long been recognized that disruption of the normal microbiota by antibiotics increases the risk for gut infections. The classic example is pseudomembranous colitis, a frequent form of infectious diarrhea caused by Clostridium difficile in hospitalized patients [15]. Pseudomembranous colitis occurs after broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment (e.g. ampicillin, cephalosporins and clindamycin). Similar observations have been made for several other pathogens [16]. Several animal models for

Disrupting colonization resistance by triggering mucosal inflammation

Recent work has shown that colonization resistance can be disrupted by gut inflammation. This strategy is used by at least two enteropathogenic bacteria, Citrobacter rodentium (a close relative of enteropathogenic E. coli) and Salmonella enterica spp. I serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) 10, 11. In mouse infection models, pre-existing or pathogen-induced inflammatory conditions in the large intestine drastically boosted colonization by the pathogen. Conversely, both pathogens failed to

Possible mechanisms of disruption

What is the causal link between gut inflammation and disruption of colonization resistance? There are several plausible hypotheses:

  • The inflamed mucosa might release antibacterial factors that could kill or retard growth of certain members of the microbiota that would normally inhibit enteropathogen growth under steady-state conditions. However, the pathogen would be able to resist these factors (see ‘differential killing hypothesis’, following section).

  • There could be a loss of key species (i.e.

The food hypothesis

The large intestine represents an anaerobic bioreactor synthesizing essential amino acids, vitamins and short chain fatty acids (SCFA) while breaking down a variety of proteins and otherwise indigestible polysaccharides, including plant-derived pectin, cellulose, hemicelluloses and resistant starches [21]. This ‘bioreactor’ is fuelled only by those parts of the diet that cannot be processed or resorbed by the small intestine and by glycoconjugates, proteins and cellular debris released by the

The differential killing hypothesis

The differential susceptibility towards host defenses might provide an alternative explanation for the loss of colonization resistance in the inflamed gut. At the cellular level inflammatory responses are well understood. Immune effector cells such as macrophages, dendritic cells and neutrophils are attracted to the site of bacterial intrusion. They produce lysozyme, acidic hydrolases, nitric oxide, cationic antimicrobial peptides, iron-scavenging lactoferrin and the respiratory burst

Altered microbiota composition in inflammatory bowel disease

Altered population structures of the gut microbiota are also observed in inflammatory bowel diseases. In this case, the inflammation is triggered by exaggerated immune defenses directed against members of the commensal microbiota and not by pathogen insult. It is assumed that similar antibacterial defenses are induced as in the case of an acute enteropathogenic infection (Table 1). Interestingly, the fraction of γ-proteobacteria was increased in the microbiota of IBD patients 12, 13, 14.

Concluding remarks and future directions

Is the triggering of gut inflammation a common strategy used by enteropathogenic bacteria to invade the intestinal ecosystem? In most cases this question has not been addressed directly. However, there are multiple reports providing circumstantial evidence to support this concept: mutations attenuating mucosal inflammation often result in reduced gut colonization levels. These examples include Salmonella infections in the calf model 31, 32, S. flexneri infections [33], V. cholerae infections

Update

It was demonstrated recently that S. Typhimurium can benefit form sugars (i.e. galactose) released as a component of the mucosal defence in the inflamed gut. Stecher B. et al. (2008) Motility allows S. Typhimurium to benefit from the mucosal defence. Cellular Microbiology (in press).

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by a grant from the Swiss National Foundation (SNF) 310000–113623/1 and a grant from the European Union ‘SavinMucoPath’ FP6–2004-INCO-DEV-3, both to Wolf-Dietrich Hardt.

Glossary

Axenic or germfree
animals that have been raised in a sterile environment without microbiota. Axenic mice differ from colonized mice in many ways. They have an underdeveloped immune system, no colonization resistance, and require higher caloric intake than normal mice to maintain body weight.
Commensal
Originating from the Latin meaning ‘sharing the same table’; an alternative term for microbiota.
Gnotobiotic
animals colonized with a defined microbiota.
Inflammation
host response following extraneous

References (84)

  • K. Smith

    Use of axenic animals in studying the adaptation of mammals to their commensal intestinal microbiota

    Semin. Immunol.

    (2006)
  • A.M. O’Hara et al.

    The gut flora as a forgotten organ

    EMBO Rep.

    (2006)
  • L. Bry

    A model of host-microbial interactions in an open mammalian ecosystem

    Science

    (1996)
  • H.L. Klaasen

    Apathogenic, intestinal, segmented, filamentous bacteria stimulate the mucosal immune system of mice

    Infect. Immun.

    (1993)
  • T.S. Stappenbeck

    Developmental regulation of intestinal angiogenesis by indigenous microbes via Paneth cells

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2002)
  • Y.S. Lopez-Boado

    Bacterial exposure induces and activates matrilysin in mucosal epithelial cells

    J. Cell Biol.

    (2000)
  • S.A. Keilbaugh

    Activation of RegIIIbeta/gamma and interferon gamma expression in the intestinal tract of SCID mice: an innate response to bacterial colonisation of the gut

    Gut

    (2005)
  • L.V. Hooper

    Angiogenins: a new class of microbicidal proteins involved in innate immunity

    Nat. Immunol.

    (2003)
  • H.L. Cash

    Symbiotic bacteria direct expression of an intestinal bactericidal lectin

    Science

    (2006)
  • B. Stecher

    Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium exploits inflammation to compete with the intestinal microbiota

    PLoS Biol.

    (2007)
  • M.M. Heimesaat

    Shift towards pro-inflammatory intestinal bacteria aggravates acute murine colitis via Toll-like receptors 2 and 4

    PLoS ONE

    (2007)
  • D.N. Frank

    Molecular-phylogenetic characterization of microbial community imbalances in human inflammatory bowel diseases

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2007)
  • V. Mai

    Monitoring of stool microbiota in subjects with diarrhea indicates distortions in composition

    J. Clin. Microbiol.

    (2006)
  • D.E. Voth et al.

    Clostridium difficile toxins: mechanism of action and role in disease

    Clin. Microbiol. Rev.

    (2005)
  • D. van der Waaij

    Colonization resistance of the digestive tract in conventional and antibiotic-treated mice

    J. Hyg. (Lond.)

    (1971)
  • B.A. McCormick

    Roles of motility, chemotaxis, and penetration through and growth in intestinal mucus in the ability of an avirulent strain of Salmonella typhimurium to colonize the large intestine of streptomycin-treated mice

    Infect. Immun.

    (1988)
  • D.E. Chang

    Carbon nutrition of Escherichia coli in the mouse intestine

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2004)
  • Cummings, J.H. (1997) The large intestine in nutrition and disease. Danone Chair Monograph. 103–110, Institute Danone,...
  • M. Iimura

    Cathelicidin mediates innate intestinal defense against colonization with epithelial adherent bacterial pathogens

    J. Immunol.

    (2005)
  • C.M. Rosenberger

    Interplay between antibacterial effectors: a macrophage antimicrobial peptide impairs intracellular Salmonella replication

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2004)
  • S.M. Dann et al.

    Innate immune defenses in the intestinal tract

    Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol.

    (2007)
  • T. Ganz

    Defensins: antimicrobial peptides of innate immunity

    Nat. Rev. Immunol.

    (2003)
  • O. Froy

    Regulation of mammalian defensin expression by Toll-like receptor-dependent and independent signalling pathways

    Cell. Microbiol.

    (2005)
  • A. Peschel et al.

    The co-evolution of host cationic antimicrobial peptides and microbial resistance

    Nat. Rev. Microbiol.

    (2006)
  • W.W. Navarre

    Co-regulation of Salmonella enterica genes required for virulence and resistance to antimicrobial peptides by SlyA and PhoP/PhoQ

    Mol. Microbiol.

    (2005)
  • S. Uzzau

    Differential accumulation of Salmonella[Cu, Zn] superoxide dismutases SodCI and SodCII in intracellular bacteria: correlation with their relative contribution to pathogenicity

    Mol. Microbiol.

    (2002)
  • J. Bispham

    Salmonella pathogenicity island 2 influences both systemic salmonellosis and Salmonella-induced enteritis in calves

    Infect. Immun.

    (2001)
  • B.K. Coombes

    Analysis of the contribution of Salmonella pathogenicity islands 1 and 2 to enteric disease progression using a novel bovine ileal loop model and a murine model of infectious enterocolitis

    Infect. Immun.

    (2005)
  • G.H. Rabbani

    Development of an improved animal model of shigellosis in the adult rabbit by colonic infection with Shigella flexneri 2a

    Infect. Immun.

    (1995)
  • S.P. Sigel

    Ability of an avirulent mutant of Vibrio cholerae to colonize in the infant mouse upper bowel

    Infect. Immun.

    (1981)
  • W. Deng

    Citrobacter rodentium translocated intimin receptor (Tir) is an essential virulence factor needed for actin condensation, intestinal colonization and colonic hyperplasia in mice

    Mol. Microbiol.

    (2003)
  • M. Margulies

    Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors

    Nature

    (2005)
  • Cited by (420)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text