Trends in Neurosciences
Volume 31, Issue 9, September 2008, Pages 435-443
Journal home page for Trends in Neurosciences

Review
Molecular form follows function: (un)snaring the SNAREs

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2008.06.003Get rights and content

Exocytotic release of transmitters is mediated by the ternary SNARE complex. The form of this complex is consistent with its function in the positioning of vesicles to the plasma membrane and their fusion to it. Recent advances in single-molecule techniques, however, bring an additional layer of complexity to this process, implicating that there might be various modes of operation. For example, the binary syntaxin–synaptobrevin 2 complex, in addition to the ternary complex containing SNAP25, might enable vesicular docking. Single-molecule techniques allow direct measurements of the distance/extension, rupture force, spontaneous dissociation times and interaction energy for SNARE protein–protein interactions. These measurements are complementary to results and conclusions drawn from other techniques. Consequently, single-molecule techniques promise tremendous opportunities for in vitro investigations of SNARE proteins to improve our understanding of their role in exocytosis.

Introduction

The view that brain function follows its form dates back to ancient Roman times. The most prominent figure in Roman medicine, the Greek physician Galen (years ∼129–200), tried to deduce brain function from its physical properties. He poked around the cerebrum and the cerebellum with his finger. By comparing the stiffness, he assigned the softer cerebrum to be the receiver of sensation, whereas the harder cerebellum he thought commanded the muscles. Now nearly 19 centuries later his reasoning might appear dubious, but surprisingly he was not too far from the truth. In a similar manner in this review, we explore the relationship between form/structure of the SNARE complex and its function using contemporary tools. Our journey starts with a primer on the SNARE complex form, mainly guided by X-ray crystallography. We then briefly discuss SNARE function as proposed from biochemical, genetic and electrophysiological approaches followed by a comparison with the information gathered by single-molecule techniques, most notably fluorescence resonant energy transfer (FRET) and atomic force microscopy (AFM).

Section snippets

SNARE primer

The soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein (NSF) attachment protein (SNAP) receptor (SNARE) complex [1] is ubiquitously used for membrane fusion ranging from yeast to human [2]. In the brain, the major cell types, neurons and astrocytes, use regulated exocytosis for their intercellular communication [3]. In these cells, the increase in intracellular Ca2+ leads to the fusion of secretory organelles to the plasma membrane, causing the release of transmitters, stored within secretory

Single-molecule measurements: a closer look

The main motivation for using a single-molecule approach is to detect heterogeneities in nonequilibrium dynamics, which bulk biochemical approaches would not be able to detect directly. Indeed, the last decade has seen the development of special instrumentation for the manipulation of single molecules and for measuring their mechanical properties and structural characteristics with nm resolution. These techniques include pipette suction [34], magnetic beads [35], optical traps [36], FRET [37]

Concluding remarks

The primary purpose of this review was to briefly relate SNARE complex form and function. The acquisition of a comprehensive knowledge of the role of SNARE proteins in exocytosis requires multifaceted use of traditional biochemical, genetic and electrophysiological approaches combined with relatively recent single-molecule techniques. The emergent picture is that in isolated systems, Sx1–Sb2 can form parallel coiled-coils in the absence of SNAP25 and such a single binary complex can be

Acknowledgements

The authors’ work is supported by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (MH 069791) and a grant from the Department of Defense/Defense Microelectronics Activity under Award no. DOD/DMEA-H94003-06-2-0608.

References (60)

  • D.J. Woodbury et al.

    The t-SNARE syntaxin is sufficient for spontaneous fusion of synaptic vesicles to planar membranes

    Cell Biol. Int.

    (2000)
  • T. Liu

    SNARE-driven, 25-millisecond vesicle fusion in vitro

    Biophys. J.

    (2005)
  • M.E. Bowen

    Single molecule observation of liposome-bilayer fusion thermally induced by soluble N-ethyl maleimide sensitive-factor attachment protein receptors (SNAREs)

    Biophys. J.

    (2004)
  • E. Evans et al.

    Dynamic strength of molecular adhesion bonds

    Biophys. J.

    (1997)
  • R.A. Cardullo et al.

    Fluorescence resonance energy transfer microscopy: theory and instrumentation

    Methods Cell Biol.

    (2003)
  • Z. Xia

    Stable SNARE complex prior to evoked synaptic vesicle fusion revealed by fluorescence resonance energy transfer

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2001)
  • P.I. Hanson

    Structure and conformational changes in NSF and its membrane receptor complexes visualized by quick-freeze/deep-etch electron microscopy

    Cell

    (1997)
  • M.E. Bowen

    Single-molecule studies of synaptotagmin and complexin binding to the SNARE complex

    Biophys. J.

    (2005)
  • Y. Li

    Kinetics of complexin binding to the SNARE complex: correcting single molecule FRET measurements for hidden events

    Biophys. J.

    (2007)
  • K. Weninger

    Accessory proteins stabilize the acceptor complex for synaptobrevin, the 1:1 syntaxin/SNAP-25 complex

    Structure

    (2008)
  • J. Rizo

    A dynamic t-SNARE complex

    Structure

    (2008)
  • W. Liu

    Single molecule mechanical probing of the SNARE protein interactions

    Biophys. J.

    (2006)
  • S.M. Dennison

    Neuronal SNAREs do not trigger fusion between synthetic membranes but do promote PEG-mediated membrane fusion

    Biophys. J.

    (2006)
  • T. Sollner

    SNAP receptors implicated in vesicle targeting and fusion

    Nature

    (1993)
  • R. Jahn et al.

    SNAREs – engines for membrane fusion

    Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.

    (2006)
  • Y. Ni

    Vesicular release of glutamate mediates bidirectional signaling between astrocytes and neurons

    J. Neurochem.

    (2007)
  • Q. Zhang

    Synaptotagmin IV regulates glial glutamate release

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2004)
  • H. Dai

    Structural basis for the evolutionary inactivation of Ca2+ binding to synaptotagmin 4

    Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.

    (2004)
  • R.B. Sutton

    Crystal structure of a SNARE complex involved in synaptic exocytosis at 2.4 Å resolution

    Nature

    (1998)
  • P.B. Harbury

    A switch between two-, three-, and four-stranded coiled coils in GCN4 leucine zipper mutants

    Science

    (1993)
  • Cited by (30)

    • Probing single molecule mechanical interactions of syntaxin 1A with native synaptobrevin 2 residing on a secretory vesicle

      2022, Cell Calcium
      Citation Excerpt :

      For example, each neuronal vesicle contains ∼70 Sb2 molecules [39], while astrocytic vesicles contain ∼20 Sb2 molecules [40]. While the nanoanatomy of a single lactotroph vesicle is unknown, we can make an assumption that Sb2 would be relatively abundant, so that Sb2 molecules would be present throughout vesicle membrane and not solely located at the fusion site where 1–2 molecules are needed [7]. Those Sb2 molecules present on the diametrically opposite side of the vesicle docking/hemifusion site we probed here using Sx1A-functionalized tip to record single Sx1A-Sb2 mechanical interactions.

    • GPCR regulation of secretion

      2018, Pharmacology and Therapeutics
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text