Elsevier

Ultramicroscopy

Volume 123, December 2012, Pages 38-49
Ultramicroscopy

Development and application of STEM for the biological sciences

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.04.005Get rights and content

Abstract

The design of the scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM), as conceived originally by Crewe and coworkers, enables the highly efficient and flexible collection of different elastic and inelastic signals resulting from the interaction of a focused probe of incident electrons with a specimen. In the present paper we provide a brief review for how the STEM today can be applied towards a range of different problems in the biological sciences, emphasizing four main areas of application. (1) For three decades, the most widely used STEM technique has been the mass determination of proteins and other macromolecular assemblies. Such measurements can be performed at low electron dose by collecting the high-angle dark-field signal using an annular detector. STEM mass mapping has proven valuable for characterizing large protein assemblies such as filamentous proteins with a well-defined mass per length. (2) The annular dark-field signal can also be used to image ultrasmall, functionalized nanoparticles of heavy atoms for labeling specific amino-acid sequences in protein assemblies. (3) By acquiring electron energy loss spectra (EELS) at each pixel in a hyperspectral image, it is possible to map the distributions of specific bound elements like phosphorus, calcium and iron in isolated macromolecular assemblies or in compartments within sectioned cells. Near single atom sensitivity is feasible provided that the specimen can tolerate a very high incident electron dose. (4) Electron tomography is a new application of STEM that enables three-dimensional reconstruction of micrometer-thick sections of cells. In this technique a probe of small convergence angle gives a large depth of field throughout the thickness of the specimen while maintaining a probe diameter of <2 nm; and the use of an on-axis bright-field detector reduces the effects of beam broadening and thus improves the spatial resolution compared to that attainable by STEM dark-field tomography.

Highlights

► We review, with a historical perspective, current applications of STEM in the biological sciences. ► The most widely used application of biological STEM is mass determination of proteins. ► Dark-field STEM enables localization of ultrasmall bionanoparticles containing heavy atoms. ► STEM-EELS hyperspectral imaging enables elemental mapping of subcellular compartments. ► Axial bright-field STEM tomography provides 3D ultrastructure in micrometer thick sections.

Introduction

From the outset Albert Crewe and his coworkers recognized the potential of their newly developed scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) for applications to biological systems. In fact, the earliest paper from Crewe’s Laboratory in 1970 describing the full design of a “scanning microscope with 5 Å resolution” was published in the Journal of Molecular Biology, and includes the use of STEM to study a variety of biological structures including viruses, bacteriophages, catalase crystals, and ferritin molecules [1]. It was quickly realized that the flexible configuration of detectors in the STEM not only enabled a very high collection efficiency for signals generated by interaction of the finely focused electron probe with the specimen but it also provided the means for obtaining quantitative information pixel by pixel. This is particularly clear in the case of the annular dark-field detector (ADF), which yields a signal that is proportional to the mass of the biological structure that is contained within a defined volume illuminated by the probe.

We shall begin our review by describing two types of applications of ADF-STEM. First, ADF imaging can be used to determine the molecular masses of macromolecular assemblies, which has led to the vast majority of STEM applications in biology over the past 30 years [2], [3]. Second, the strong electron elastic scattering produced by high atomic number elements, first exploited by Crewe and coworkers in the early 1970s to image single atoms [4], can be applied more broadly to visualize small heavy atom clusters that are used for labeling specific amino-acid sequences of isolated protein assemblies or for localizing specific proteins in their cellular context [5], [6], [7].

Another technique originally developed for application to biological materials in Crewe’s laboratory was electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS). The initial work by Isaacson et al. in the early 1970s included acquisition of high resolution spectra of low-loss and core-edge fine structure from DNA bases and other compounds, as well as an assessment of how radiation damage degraded this information [8], [9]. Subsequently, Isaacson and Johnson set out the formalism for determining detection limits for elemental nanoanalysis based on the cross sections for core edge excitations, and reached the prescient conclusion published in the first volume of Ultramicroscopy that single atom detection should be feasible [10]. The next section of this review summarizes the present capabilities and limitations of EELS nanoanalysis of biological specimens, as well as nanoanalysis by energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDXS).

The capability today of carrying out high-performance STEM in transmission electron microscope columns has the potential to offer many more researchers the opportunity to apply STEM to biological systems. In this regard, amongst the biology community there has been rapidly growing interest in the use of electron tomography to image cellular ultrastructure in three dimensions. Recently, it has been demonstrated that STEM tomography provides some important advantages over conventional TEM tomography for imaging thicker sections of cells [11], [12], [13], [14]. The final section of our review describes this new technique, which has considerable potential for imaging micrometer-sized volumes of complex cellular architecture at a spatial resolution of approximately 5 nm.

Thus the aim of the present paper is to demonstrate how the STEM has evolved into a flexible tool with capabilities for (1) determining the masses of individual protein molecules, (2) localizing specific sites on protein assemblies labeled with ultrasmall heavy-metal nanoparticles, (3) analyzing the elemental composition of macromolecular assemblies as well as subcellular organelles by EELS and EDXS, and (4) elucidating the 3D structure of large volumes of complex eukaryotic cells. Fig. 1 shows in schematic form the principal modes of operation of the STEM microscope in connection with the types of applications discussed in this review. All these methods are complementary to TEM techniques, which can now be performed on the same instrument.

Section snippets

Mass measurement of macromolecular assemblies

STEM imaging in the ADF mode provides a unique means with which to determine the molecular mass of isolated protein assemblies [2], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]. Importantly, because the mass of the protein is computed from an image, molecular mass can be directly correlated with molecular shape. Thus, it becomes feasible not only to measure the total mass of a complex and to determine its oligomeric state, i.e., tertiary and quaternary structure, assuming that the subunit mass is known, but

Visualization of ultrasmall heavy-metal clusters

Development of the STEM by Albert Crewe and colleagues was motivated by the prospect of visualizing single atoms of high atomic number elements supported on a lower atomic number matrix. This was indeed proved possible in 1970, in a milestone paper in Science [4]. Since then, the capability of ADF-STEM to image single heavy atoms has found innumerable applications in materials science (e.g., [43], [44]). In biology however, the electron dose required to visualize single atoms exceeds by orders

Biological nanoanalysis

In STEM the capability of collecting multiple signals originating from the interaction of the incident electron probe with atoms in the specimen enables point-by-point compositional analysis [61], [62]. Electrons that are scattered inelastically by the specimen carry quantitative information about the numbers of atoms of specific elements. This information is acquired by means of a magnetic prism spectrometer that disperses the electrons across a detector consisting of a scintillator coupled to

Three-dimensional imaging of micrometer-thick sections

Electron tomography (ET) in the TEM is a well-established technique for generating detailed 3D views of cellular ultrastructure at nanoscale (3–10 nm) spatial resolution [82], [83], [84]. For 3D ultrastructural studies of large eukaryotic cells and tissues, most work is carried out on samples prepared by rapid freezing/freeze substitution, heavy metal staining and sectioning in an ultramicrotome. The characteristic sample thickness for a 300 kV microscope falls in the range of 100 to 400 nm, with

Conclusion

Forty years after the development of the STEM by Albert Crewe and colleagues, the technique has matured to the point where it can be applied almost routinely to biological structures, and the new generation of (S)TEMs has made the technique more generally available. Mass mapping based on imaging with the annular dark-field signal, as originally developed by Wall [17] and by Engel [15], has been STEM’s most widespread application. This technique enables the analysis of large and heterogeneous

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Dr. Guofeng Zhang and Dr. Martin Hohmann-Marriott for providing the specimens of C. reinhardtii and pancreatic beta cells; Mr. Daniel Cox for assistance in tomographic reconstruction and 3D modeling; Dr. Christopher Ackerson for valuable discussions on the synthesis of the Au144 clusters; and Ms. April Adams for help in synthesizing the Au144 clusters. This work was supported by the Intramural Research Programs of the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and

References (98)

  • V. Citovsky et al.

    The molecular structure of agrobacterium VirE2-single stranded DNA complexes involved in nuclear import

    Journal of Molecular Biology

    (1997)
  • D.F. Holmes et al.

    STEM/TEM studies of collagen fibril assembly

    Micron

    (2001)
  • S.A. Müller et al.

    STEM Analysis of Caenorhabditis elegans muscle thick filaments: evidence for microdifferentiated substructures

    Journal of Molecular Biology

    (2001)
  • J.D. Sipe et al.

    Review: history of the amyloid fibril

    Journal of Structural Biology

    (2000)
  • F.Q. Song et al.

    Free-standing graphene by scanning transmission electron microscopy

    Ultramicroscopy

    (2010)
  • R.S. Pantelic et al.

    Graphene oxide: a substrate for optimizing preparations of frozen-hydrated samples

    Journal of Structural Biology

    (2010)
  • R.S. Pantelic et al.

    Graphene: Substrate preparation and introduction

    Journal of Structural Biology

    (2011)
  • T. Iiyama et al.

    Direct determination of intermolecular structure of ethanol adsorbed in micropores using X-ray diffraction and reverse Monte Carlo analysis

    Coll. Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects

    (2009)
  • L. Gregori et al.

    Binding of amyloid β protein to the 20 S proteasome

    Journal of Biological Chemistry

    (1997)
  • M.O. Steinmetz et al.

    Evaluating atomic models of F-actin with an Undecagold-tagged Phalloidin derivative

    Journal of Molecular Biology

    (1998)
  • U. Ziese et al.

    Three-dimensional localization of ultrasmall immuno-gold labels by HAADF-STEM tomography

    Journal of Structural Biology

    (2002)
  • A.A. Sousa et al.

    On the feasibility of visualizing ultrasmall gold labels in biological specimens by STEM tomography

    Journal of Structural Biology

    (2007)
  • A.A. Sousa et al.

    Determination of quantitative distributions of heavy-metal stain in biological specimens by annular dark-field STEM

    Journal of Structural Biology

    (2008)
  • C.J. Ackerson et al.

    Site-specific biomolecule labeling with gold clusters

    Methods in Enzymology

    (2010)
  • J.R. Kremer et al.

    Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD

    Journal of Structural Biology

    (1996)
  • A.E. Yakushevska et al.

    STEM tomography in cell biology

    Journal of Structural Biology

    (2007)
  • J.A. Hunt et al.

    Electron energy-loss spectrum-imaging

    Ultramicroscopy

    (1991)
  • C. Colliex et al.

    Scanning transmission electron microscopy of biological structures

    Biology Cell

    (1994)
  • R.D. Leapman et al.

    Towards single atom analysis of biological structures

    Ultramicroscopy

    (1999)
  • R.D. Leapman et al.

    Measurement of low calcium concentrations in cryosectioned cells by parallel-EELS mapping

    Ultramicroscopy

    (1993)
  • P. Zhang et al.

    Electron tomography of degenerating neurons in mice with abnormal regulation of iron metabolism

    Journal of Structural Biology

    (2005)
  • Y.-H. Pan et al.

    3D morphology of the human hepatic ferritin mineral core: new evidence for a subunit structure revealed by single particle analysis of HAADF-STEM images

    Journal of Structural Biology

    (2009)
  • S. Yakovlev et al.

    Quantitative nanoscale water mapping in frozen-hydrated skin by low-loss electron energy-loss spectroscopy

    Ultramicroscopy

    (2010)
  • A. Sousa et al.

    Water mapping in hydrated soft materials

    Ultramicroscopy

    (2006)
  • M. Bárcena et al.

    Electron tomography in life science

    Stem Cell Development Biology

    (2009)
  • A. Hoenger et al.

    Probing the macromolecular organization of cells by electron tomography

    Current Opinion in Cell Biology

    (2009)
  • J.C. Bouwer et al.

    Automated most-probable loss tomography of thick selectively stained biological specimens with quantitative measurement of resolution improvement

    Journal of Structural Biology

    (2004)
  • D.J. Smith et al.

    Aperture contrast in thick amorphous specimens using scanning transmission electron microscopy

    Ultramicroscopy

    (1975)
  • J. Biskupek et al.

    Optimization of STEM tomography acquisition—A comparison of convergent beam and parallel beam STEM tomography

    Ultramicroscopy

    (2010)
  • J.K. Hyun et al.

    Beam spreading and spatial resolution in thick organic specimens

    Ultramicroscopy

    (2008)
  • A.A. Sousa et al.

    Monte Carlo electron trajectory simulations in bright-field and dark-field STEM: Implications for tomography of thick biological sections

    Ultramicroscopy

    (2009)
  • D.B. Peckys et al.

    Fully hydrated yeast cells imaged with electron microscopy

    Biophysical Journal

    (2011)
  • J.S. Wall et al.

    Mass mapping with the scanning transmission electron microscope

    Annual Review of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry

    (1986)
  • A. Engel

    Scanning transmission electron microscopy: Biological applications

    Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics

    (2009)
  • A.V. Crewe et al.

    Visibility of single atoms

    Science

    (1970)
  • J.F. Hainfeld

    A small gold-conjugated antibody label: improved resolution for electron microscopy

    Science

    (1987)
  • J.F. Hainfeld et al.

    A 1.4 nm gold cluster covalently attached to antibodies improves Immunolabeling

    Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry

    (1992)
  • M. Isaacson

    Interaction of 25 keV electrons with the nucleic acid bases, adenine, thymine, and uracil. II. inner shell excitation and inelastic scattering cross sections

    Journal of Chemical Physics

    (1972)
  • M. Isaacson et al.

    Electron beam excitation and damage of biological molecules; its implications for specimen damage in electron microscopy

    Radition Research

    (1973)
  • Cited by (66)

    • Imaging biological samples by integrated differential phase contrast (iDPC) STEM technique

      2022, Journal of Structural Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Meanwhile, we also compared iDPC-STEM and ABF-STEM techniques on the biological sections with the minimal staining. Previous studies have suggested ABF-STEM can yield better images with better contrast in comparison with the conventional TEM (Hohmann-Marriott et al., 2009; Sousa and Leapman, 2012; Wolf et al., 2014). Our present study also confirmed this observation.

    • Exploring valence states of abnormal mineral deposits in biological tissues using correlative microscopy and spectroscopy techniques: A case study on ferritin and iron deposits from Alzheimer's disease patients

      2021, Ultramicroscopy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Likewise such experiments have contributed to notable advances, particularly for early stage cancer detection and treatment [15,16]. Some particularly well-known examples of phys-EM techniques in the biological field concern the use of holographic analysis of magnetic fields in magnetotactic bacteria [17] and various STEM techniques (EELS, EDS and tomography) and energy filtered TEM (EFTEM) in pathological tissues [18,19]. As background for the present research, it is known that inorganic trace elements, such as calcium, magnesium, chromium, iron and copper, are essential to human health [20].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text