Elsevier

Water Research

Volume 41, Issue 16, August 2007, Pages 3701-3715
Water Research

16S rRNA-based assays for quantitative detection of universal, human-, cow-, and dog-specific fecal Bacteroidales: A Bayesian approach

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.06.037Get rights and content

Abstract

We report the design and validation of new TaqMan® assays for microbial source tracking based on the amplification of fecal 16S rRNA marker sequences from uncultured cells of the order Bacteroidales. The assays were developed for the detection and enumeration of non-point source input of fecal pollution to watersheds. The quantitative “universal” Bacteroidales assay BacUni-UCD detected all tested stool samples from human volunteers (18 out of 18), cat (7 out of 7), dog (8 out of 8), seagull (10/10), cow (8/8), horse (8/8), and wastewater effluent (14/14). The human assay BacHum-UCD discriminated fully between human and cow stool samples but did not detect all stool samples from human volunteers (12/18). In addition, there was 12.5% detection of dog stool (1/8), but no cross-reactivity with cat, horse, or seagull fecal samples. In contrast, all wastewater samples were positive for the BacHum-UCD marker, supporting its designation as 100% sensitive for mixed-human source identification. The cow-specific assay BacCow-UCD fully discriminated between cow and human stool samples. There was 38% detection of horse stool (3/8), but no cross-specificity with any of the other animal stool samples tested. The dog assay BacCan-UCD discriminated fully between dog and cow stool or seagull guano samples and detected 62.5% stool samples from dogs (5/8). There was some cross-reactivity with 22.2% detection of human stool (4/18), 14.3% detection of cat stool (1/7), and 28.6% detection of wastewater samples (4/14). After validation using stool samples, single-blind tests were used to further demonstrate the efficacy of the developed markers; all assays were sensitive, reproducible, and accurate in the quantification of mixed fecal sources present in aqueous samples. Finally, the new assays were compared with previously published sequences, which showed the new methodologies to be more specific and sensitive. Using Bayes’ Theorem, we calculated the conditional probability that the four assays would correctly identify general and host-specific fecal pollution in a specific watershed in California for which 73 water samples had been analyzed. Such an approach allows for a direct comparison of the efficacy of different MST methods, including those based on library-dependent methodologies. For the universal marker BacUni-UCD, the probability that fecal pollution is present when the marker is detected was 1.00; the probability that host-specific pollution is present was 0.98, 0.84, and 0.89 for the human assay HF160F, the cow assay BacCow-UCD, and the dog assay BacCan-UCD, respectively. The application of these markers should provide meaningful information to assist with efforts to identify and control sources of fecal pollution to impaired watersheds.

Introduction

The water quality of many waterways and coastal waters is deteriorating due to point and non-point sources of fecal contamination caused by human and animal sources (Handler et al., 2006). Microbial source tracking (MST) is an increasingly used approach to determine host-specific contributions of fecal contamination to waterbodies, thus helping resolve these unknown sources. This information can, in turn, guide decisions regarding the appropriate corrective measures for affected waters. One emerging MST method is the detection of host-specific 16S rRNA markers that target the order Bacteroidales, which are found exclusively in feces, animal rumen, and other cavities of humans and animals (Paster et al., 1994), often in greater abundance than traditionally used coliform bacteria.

Kreader developed PCR-based assays to amplify genes from three cultivated strains of Bacteroides to monitor human fecal pollution in water (Kreader, 1995), and evaluated their persistence in the environment (Kreader, 1998). Others further advanced this approach by identifying host-specific Bacteroidales 16S rDNA markers for humans and cows based on DNA sequences representing uncultivated fecal diversity. Initially, researchers relied on length heterogeneity-PCR (LH-PCR) and terminal restriction length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis to screen fecal bacterial DNA extracts from environmental waters (Bernhard and Field, 2000a). With information obtained from this study, they identified cluster-specific primer sets that are useful in discriminating human and ruminant feces (Bernhard and Field, 2000a). The system of qualitative assays for presence/absence detection was further tested and confirmed to reliably and specifically detect host-specific markers from feces and polluted water samples (Field et al., 2003). These PCR targets were classified as belonging to the phylum Bacteroidetes, of which the cultivated fecal members are in the order Bacteroidales and the genera Bacteroides and Prevotella (Dick et al., 2005a). Early advances by Field and colleagues were followed by (i) a quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay for the detection of general fecal pollution based on a 16S rRNA marker specific for many fecal Bacteroidales sequences (Dick and Field, 2004), (ii) further conventional PCR assays for the detection of pig- and horse-specific fecal pollution (Dick et al., 2005a) as well as dog- and elk-specific fecal pollution (Dick et al., 2005b), and (iii) a real-time PCR assay using SYBR Green 1 for the detection of the previously identified human-specific marker sequence (Seurinck et al., 2005). Recently, additional qPCR assays have been developed for “total” (Layton et al., 2006), bovine-associated (Layton et al., 2006; Okabe et al., 2007; Reischer et al., 2006; Stricker et al., in press), pig-associated (Okabe et al., 2007), and human-associated Bacteroidales 16S rRNA genes (Layton et al., 2006; Okabe et al., 2007; Reischer et al., 2007; Stricker et al., in press).

To date, the development of molecular target detection assays for Bacteroidales has provided a fast, reliable, and relatively inexpensive means by which to diagnose the source(s) of fecal contamination to natural waters. A comparison study showed Bacteroidales to be the most accurate MST method for discriminating human vs. non-human impacts using tests of mixed fecal sources in aqueous samples (Griffith et al., 2003). There has been some discussion concerning the benefits in terms of sensitivity and specificity of TaqMan over SYBR Green assays, and the relative sensitivities of the two technologies have been debated (Morrison et al., 1998; Wittwer et al., 1997). With regard to specificity, TaqMan assays are considered the better choice for differentiation of host-specific DNA sequences when environmental samples are considered. This is because non-specific products and mRNAs with high sequence identity may be detected with the SYBR Green chemistry. Melting curve analysis can assist in proper identification of these false-positive sequences, but accurate quantification may be compromised, and a comparison of numerical data generated by SYBR Green with quantitative results obtained by TaqMan analysis has not been performed for Bacteroidales. By combining multiple species-specific TaqMan PCR assays, specificity can be expanded within a genus if new sequence information becomes available.

The ultimate goal of MST is to determine the relative amounts of host-specific fecal contributions to a water sample. In the case of Bacteroidales methodologies, the goal may be to directly quantify the relative contributions of specific hosts (e.g. humans) based on a relationship between host-specific markers and the total concentration of Bacteroidales DNA sequences detected. These data would provide watershed managers enhanced information with which to formulate more accurate plans to reduce the loading of fecal pollution to receiving waters. Therefore, there is a need for Bacteroidales methodologies to not only become more quantitative with respect to the amplified target sequences, but also for such data to be analyzed statistically to calculate conditional probabilities of correctly identifying sources of fecal pollution in a watershed, given that a particular host-specific assay tests positive in environmental samples. The specific objectives of the present study were the design of a new, more inclusive, quantitative universal Bacteroidales assay, as well as three new quantitative host-specific Bacteroidales assays, allowing the relative determination of the amount of human-, dog-, and cow-specific fecal contaminations over space and time. Further, we developed a conditional probability approach to estimate the likelihood of correctly identifying fecal sources of contamination in a water sample given the detection of the new markers.

Section snippets

Assay design

Real-time TaqMan PCR systems were designed against Bacteroidales DNA sequences found in the Genbank Database (Pittsburgh Supercomputing Centers, Pittsburgh, PA). Sequence alignment of several of the submitted Bacteroidales isolates revealed a conserved region in which the universal Bacteroidales assay (BacUni-UCD) was designed. Alignment of separate DNA sequences for host-specific Bacteroidales isolates indicated conserved regions for mixed human-specific (BacHum-UCD), dog-specific

Oligonucleotide sequences

The primers and internal probes for the newly designed TaqMan PCR assays are listed in Table 1. A universal Bacteroidales assay (BacUni-UCD) was designed to incorporate all Bacteroidales sequences from known fecal hosts that were available from public databases (NCBI and EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database) in 2005. BacUni-520f overlaps qBac560F (Okabe et al., 2007) by 13 bases and was designed independently prior to publication of qBac560F. BacUni-690r1 is a perfect match for Bac708R, a

Discussion

We identified a new “universal” marker sequence for the quantitative detection of fecal Bacteroidales, which is present at higher copy numbers, and may be a more comprehensive indicator of fecal contamination than the previously published total Bacteroidales assay (Dick and Field, 2004) and the AllBac Bacteroidales assay (Layton et al., 2006). Moreover, three new species-specific assays were developed for the quantitative detection of mixed human-, cow-, and dog-specific Bacteroidales. The

Conclusions

Four new molecular Bacteroidales assays targeting regions of the 16S rRNA gene were developed and validated against different non-target host species and in a single-blind trial. Microbial source tracking (MST) studies should benefit as follows:

  • Order of magnitude differences in fecal material concentrations were accurately reflected by reported values, which suggests the markers can be used to quantify relative fecal loading over space and time.

  • Duplicates were well within accepted limits (and

Acknowledgments

We thank N. Boon and W. Verstraate for providing a reference plasmid for the quantification of fecal Bacteroidales using their real-time HF183 PCR assay. K. Nelson and S. Stafford contributed dog fecal samples. D.E. Thompson is acknowledged for technical assistance in assay validation, and G. Reide for field assistance during the single-blind field validation study. This work was supported by the Environmental Division of the California Department of Transportation Contract no. 43A0168, TO 03,

References (25)

  • S.F. Altschul et al.

    Basic local alignment search tool

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (1990)
  • V.B. Rajal et al.

    Validation of hollow fiber ultrafiltration and real time PCR using bacteriophage PP7 as surrogate for the quantification of viruses from water samples

    Water Res.

    (2007)
  • A.E. Bernhard et al.

    Identification of nonpoint sources of fecal pollution in coastal waters by using host-specific 16S ribosomal DNA genetic markers from fecal anaerobes

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (2000)
  • A.E. Bernhard et al.

    A PCR assay to discriminate human and ruminant feces on the basis of host differences in Bacteroides–Prevotella genes encoding 16S rRNA

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (2000)
  • R. Boom et al.

    Rapid and simple method for purification of nucleic acids

    J. Clin. Microbiol.

    (1990)
  • L.K. Dick et al.

    Rapid estimation of numbers of fecal Bacteroidetes by use of a quantitative PCR assay for 16S rNA genes

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (2004)
  • L.K. Dick et al.

    Host distributions of uncultivated fecal Bacteroidales bacteria reveal genetic markers for fecal source identification

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (2005)
  • L.K. Dick et al.

    Microplate subtractive hybridization to enrich for Bacteroidales genetic markers for fecal source identification

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (2005)
  • EPA, U., 2005. Microbial Source Tracking Guide Document. Office of Research and Development National Risk Management...
  • K.G. Field et al.

    Molecular approaches to microbiological monitoring: fecal source detection

    Environ. Monitor. Assess.

    (2003)
  • J.F. Griffith et al.

    Evaluation of microbial source tracking methods using mixed fecal sources in aqueous test samples

    J. Water Health

    (2003)
  • N.B. Handler et al.

    Human development is linked to multiple water-body impairments along the California Coast

    Estuaries Coasts (formerly Estuaries)

    (2006)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Current address: Carollo Engineers, 2500 Venture Oaks Way, Suite 320, Sacramento, CA 95833, USA. Tel.: +1 916 565 4888; fax: +1 916 565 4880.

    2

    Current address: IDEXX Laboratories, Molecular Diagnostics, 2825 KOVR Drive, West Sacramento, CA 95605, USA.

    3

    Current address: Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, The University of Kansas, 2150 Learned Hall, 1530 W. 15th Street, Lawrence, KS 66045-7609, USA. Tel.: +1 785 864 3731; fax: +1 785 864 5379.

    4

    Current address: AMEC Earth & Environmental 3800 Ezell Road, Suite 100, Nashville, TN 37211, USA. Tel.: +1 615 333 0630x417; fax: +1 615 781 0655.

    5

    Current address: INIQUI (CONICET), Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional de Salta, Buenos Aires 177, Salta 4400, Argentina. Tel./fax: +54 387 425 1006.

    View full text