Abstract
Research on plant tolerance to herbivory has been so far largely focussed on herbaceous plants partly due to the implicit assumption that woody plants are inherently lower in their compensatory potential as compared to herbs. However, tolerance to herbivory should be an important part of resistance of woody plants because their apparency to herbivory is high due to a large size and long life span, and their defence systems cannot completely exclude herbivory. Moreover, the longer life span, more complex modularity and higher sectorality of woody plants as compared to herbs imply that compensatory responses in woody plants may take several years to develop, and that consequences of herbivore damage to individual modules may profoundly differ from whole-plant responses. Therefore, short-term studies using branches or ramets as experimental units are likely to underestimate the tolerance of woody plants to herbivory. In addition, defoliation by insects (the most common type of herbivory experienced by woody plants) is less likely to release apical dominance and trigger biomass compensation than mammalian grazing on herbaceous plants. We conclude, therefore, that the seemingly different recovery potentials exhibited by woody and herbaceous plants are more likely to be the consequences of differences between the two types of plants in modular architecture, longevity and the type of herbivory they commonly experience rather than indications of inherent differences in compensatory ability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aarssen, L.W. (1995) Hypotheses for the evolution of apical dominance in plants: implications for the interpretation of overcompensation. Oikos 74, 149-156.
Aarssen, L.W. and Irwin, D.L. (1991) What selection: herbivory or competition? Oikos 60, 261-262.
Beck, C.B., Schmid, R. and Rothwell, G.W. (1982) Stelar morphology and the primary vascular system of seed plants. Bot. Rev. 48, 691-815.
Bejer, B. (1988) The nun moth in European spruce forests. In A.A. Berryman (ed.) Dynamics of Forest Insect Populations: Patterns, Causes, Implications. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 211-231.
Belsky, A.J., Carson, W.P., Jensen, C.L. and Fox, G.A. (1993) Overcompensation by plants: herbivore optimization or red herring? Evol. Ecol. 7, 109-121.
Bilbrough, C.J. and Richards, J.H. (1993) Growth of sagerbrush and bitterbrush following simulated winter browsing: mechanisms of tolerance. Ecology 74, 481-492.
Cline, M.G. (1991) Apical dominance. Bot. Rev. 57, 318-358.
Cline, M.G. (1994) The role of hormones in apical dominance. New approaches to an old problem in plant development. Physiol. Plant. 90, 230-237.
Crawley, M.J. (1987) Benevolent herbivores? Trends Ecol. Evol. 2, 167-168.
Danell, K., Haukioja, E. and Huss-Danell, K. (1997) Morphological and chemical responses of birch leaves and twigs to winter browsing along a gradient of plant productivity. Écoscience 4, 296-303.
Dangerfield, J.M. and Modukanele, B. (1996) Overcompensation by Acacia erubescens in response to simulated browsing. J. Trop. Ecol. 12, 905-908.
Doak, D.F. (1992) Lifetime impacts of herbivory for a perennial plant. Ecology 73, 2086-2099.
Feeny, P. (1976) Plant apparency and chemical defense. Rec. Adv. Phytochem. 10, 1-40.
Haukioja, E. (1991) The influence of grazing on the evolution, morphology and physiology of plants as modular organisms. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. Lond. B 333, 241-247.
Haukioja, E., Ruohomäki, K., Senn, J., Suomela, J. and Walls, M. (1990) Consequences of herbivory in the mountain birch (Betula pubescens ssp. tortuosa): importance of the functional organization of the tree. Oecologia 82, 238-247.
Henriksson, J. (2000) Differential shading of branches or whole trees: survival, growth, and reproduction. Oecologia D01 10.1007/S 004420000547.
Hjältén, J. (1999) Willow response to pruning: the effect on plants growth, survival and susceptibility to leafgallers. Écoscience 6, 62-67.
Honkanen, T. and Haukioja, E. (1994) Why does a branch suffer more after branch-wide than after tree-wide defoliation? Oikos 71, 441-450.
Kallio, P., Niemi, R., Sulkinoja, M. and Valanne, T. (1983) The Fennoscandian birch and its evolution in the marginal forest zone. Nordicana 47, 101-110.
Kerbes, R.H., Kotanen, P.M. and Jefferies, R.L. (1990) Destruction of wetland habitats by lesser snow geese: a keystone species on the west coast of Hudson Bay. J. Anim. Ecol. 27, 242-258.
Kirkwood, T.B.L. (1981) Repair and its evolution: survival versus reproduction. In C.R. Townsend and P. Callow (eds) Physiological Ecology. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, pp. 165-189.
Körner, C. (1994) Biomass fractionation in plants: a reconsideration of definitions based on plant functions. In J. Roy and F. Garnier (eds) A Whole Plant Perspective on Carbon-Nitrogen Interactions. SPB Academic Publishing bv, The Hague, pp. 175-185.
Krause, S.C. and Raffa, K.F. (1996) Differential growth and recovery rates following defoliation in related deciduous and evergreen trees. Trees 10, 308-316.
Lehtilä, K., Haukioja, E., Kaitaniemi, P. and Laine, K.A. (2000) Allocation of resources within mountain birch canopy after simulated winter browsing. Oikos 90, 160-170.
Lehtonen, J. and Heikkinen, R.K. (1995) On the recovery of mountain birch after Epirrita damage in Finnish Lapland, with a particular emphasis on reindeer grazing. Écoscience 2, 349-356.
Lennartsson, T., Tuomi, J. and Nilsson, P. (1997) Evidence for an evolutionary history of over-compensation in the grassland biennial Gentianella campestris (Gentianaceae). Am. Nat. 149, 1147-1155.
Långström, B., Tenow, O., Ericsson, A., Hellqvist, C. and Larsson, S. (1990) Effects of shoot pruning on stem growth, needle biomass, and dynamics of carbohydrates and nitrogen in Scots pine as related to season and tree age. Can. J. For. Res. 20, 514-523.
Marquis, R.J. (1996) Plant architecture, sectorality and plant tolerance to herbivores. Vegetatio 127, 85-97.
Maschinski, J. and Whitham, T.G. (1989) The continuum of plant responses to herbivory: the influence of plant association, nutrient availability and timing. Am. Nat. 134, 1-19.
Mattson, W.J., Simmons, G.A. and Witter, J.A. (1988) The spruce budworm in eastern North America. In A.A. Berryman (ed.) Dynamics of Forest Insect Populations: Patterns, Causes, Implications. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 309-330.
McNaughton, S.J. (1985) Grazing lawns: animals in herds, plant form, and coevolution. Amer. Nat. 124, 863-886.
van der Meijden, E., Wijn, M. and Verkaar, H.J. (1988) Defence and regrowth, alternative plant strategies in the struggle against herbivores. Oikos 51, 355-363.
Neuvonen, S. and Haukioja, E. (1991) The effects of inducible resistance in host foliage on birch-feeding herbivores. In D.W. Tallamy and M.J. Raupp (eds) Phytochemical Induction by Herbivores. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 277-291.
Obeso, J.R. (1993) Does defoliation affect reproductive output in herbaceous perennials and woody plants in different ways? Funct. Ecol. 7, 150-155.
Paige, K.N. (1994) Herbivory and Ipomopsis aggregata: differences in response, differences in experimental protocol: a reply to Bergelson and Crawley. Am. Nat. 143, 739-749.
Paige, K.N. and Whitham, T.G. (1987) Overcompensation in response to mammalian herbivory: the advantage of being eaten. Am. Nat. 129, 407-416.
Poorter, H. and Nagel, O. (2000) The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review. Aust. J. Plant. Physiol. 27, 595-607.
Reichenbacker, R.R., Schultz, R.C. and Hart, E.R. (1996) Artificial defoliation effect on Populus growth, biomass production, and total nonstructural carbohydrate concentration. Environ. Entomol. 25, 632-642.
Rosenthal, J.P. and Kotanen, P.M. (1994) Terrestrial plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9, 145-148.
Ruohomäki, K., Haukioja, E., Repka, S. and Lehtilä, K. (1997a) Leaf value: effects of damage to individual leaves on growth and reproduction of mountain birch shoots. Ecology 78, 2105-2117.
Ruohomäki, K., Virtanen, T., Kaitaniemi, P. and Tammaru, T. (1997b) Old mountain birches at high altitudes are prone to outbreaks of Epirrita autumnata (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Environ. Entomol. 26, 1096-1104.
Ruohomäki, K., Tanhuanpää, M., Ayres, M.P., Kaitaniemi, P., Tammaru, T. and Haukioja, E. (2000) Causes of cyclicity of Epirrita autumnata (Lepidoptera, Geometridae) — grandiose theory and tedious practice. Res. Popul. Ecol. 42: 211-223.
Sacchi, C.F. and Connor, E.F. (1999) Changes in reproduction and architecture in flowering dogwood, Cornus florida, after attack by the dogwood club gall, Resseliella clavula. Oikos 86, 138-146.
Sachs, T. and Novoplansky, A. (1995) Tree form: architectural models do not suffice. Israel J. Plant Sci. 43, 203-212.
Sachs, T., Novoplansky, A. and Cohen, D. (1993) Plants as competing populations of redundant organs. Plant Cell Environ. 16, 765-770.
Sachs, T. and Hassidim, M. (1996) Mutual support and selection between branches of damaged plants. Vegetatio 127, 25-30.
Tenow, O. (1972) The outbreaks of Oporinia autumnata Bkh. and Operophthera spp. (Lep., Geometridae) in the Scandinavian mountain chain and northern Finland 1862–1968. Zool. Bidr. Uppsala 2, 1-107.
Tenow, O. and Bylund, H. (2000) Recovery of a Betula pubescens forest in Northern Sweden after a severe defoliation by Epirrita autumnata. J. Veget. Sci. 11: 855-862.
Tuomi, J., Haukioja, E., Honkanen, T. and Augner, M. (1994) Potential benefits of herbivore behaviour inducing amelioration of food-plant quality. Oikos 70, 161-166.
Vanderklein, D.W. and Reich, P.B. (1999) The effect of defoliation intensity and history on photosynthesis, growth and carbon reserves of two conifers with contrasting leaf lifespans and growth habits. New Phytol. 144, 121-132.
Watson, M.A. and Casper, B.B. (1984) Morphogenetic constraints on patterns of carbon distribution in plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15, 233-258.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haukioja, E., Koricheva, J. Tolerance to herbivory in woody vs. herbaceous plants. Evolutionary Ecology 14, 551–562 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011091606022
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011091606022