Skip to main content
Log in

Tolerance to herbivory in woody vs. herbaceous plants

  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on plant tolerance to herbivory has been so far largely focussed on herbaceous plants partly due to the implicit assumption that woody plants are inherently lower in their compensatory potential as compared to herbs. However, tolerance to herbivory should be an important part of resistance of woody plants because their apparency to herbivory is high due to a large size and long life span, and their defence systems cannot completely exclude herbivory. Moreover, the longer life span, more complex modularity and higher sectorality of woody plants as compared to herbs imply that compensatory responses in woody plants may take several years to develop, and that consequences of herbivore damage to individual modules may profoundly differ from whole-plant responses. Therefore, short-term studies using branches or ramets as experimental units are likely to underestimate the tolerance of woody plants to herbivory. In addition, defoliation by insects (the most common type of herbivory experienced by woody plants) is less likely to release apical dominance and trigger biomass compensation than mammalian grazing on herbaceous plants. We conclude, therefore, that the seemingly different recovery potentials exhibited by woody and herbaceous plants are more likely to be the consequences of differences between the two types of plants in modular architecture, longevity and the type of herbivory they commonly experience rather than indications of inherent differences in compensatory ability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarssen, L.W. (1995) Hypotheses for the evolution of apical dominance in plants: implications for the interpretation of overcompensation. Oikos 74, 149-156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aarssen, L.W. and Irwin, D.L. (1991) What selection: herbivory or competition? Oikos 60, 261-262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, C.B., Schmid, R. and Rothwell, G.W. (1982) Stelar morphology and the primary vascular system of seed plants. Bot. Rev. 48, 691-815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bejer, B. (1988) The nun moth in European spruce forests. In A.A. Berryman (ed.) Dynamics of Forest Insect Populations: Patterns, Causes, Implications. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 211-231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belsky, A.J., Carson, W.P., Jensen, C.L. and Fox, G.A. (1993) Overcompensation by plants: herbivore optimization or red herring? Evol. Ecol. 7, 109-121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilbrough, C.J. and Richards, J.H. (1993) Growth of sagerbrush and bitterbrush following simulated winter browsing: mechanisms of tolerance. Ecology 74, 481-492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cline, M.G. (1991) Apical dominance. Bot. Rev. 57, 318-358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cline, M.G. (1994) The role of hormones in apical dominance. New approaches to an old problem in plant development. Physiol. Plant. 90, 230-237.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, M.J. (1987) Benevolent herbivores? Trends Ecol. Evol. 2, 167-168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danell, K., Haukioja, E. and Huss-Danell, K. (1997) Morphological and chemical responses of birch leaves and twigs to winter browsing along a gradient of plant productivity. Écoscience 4, 296-303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dangerfield, J.M. and Modukanele, B. (1996) Overcompensation by Acacia erubescens in response to simulated browsing. J. Trop. Ecol. 12, 905-908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doak, D.F. (1992) Lifetime impacts of herbivory for a perennial plant. Ecology 73, 2086-2099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feeny, P. (1976) Plant apparency and chemical defense. Rec. Adv. Phytochem. 10, 1-40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haukioja, E. (1991) The influence of grazing on the evolution, morphology and physiology of plants as modular organisms. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. Lond. B 333, 241-247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haukioja, E., Ruohomäki, K., Senn, J., Suomela, J. and Walls, M. (1990) Consequences of herbivory in the mountain birch (Betula pubescens ssp. tortuosa): importance of the functional organization of the tree. Oecologia 82, 238-247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksson, J. (2000) Differential shading of branches or whole trees: survival, growth, and reproduction. Oecologia D01 10.1007/S 004420000547.

  • Hjältén, J. (1999) Willow response to pruning: the effect on plants growth, survival and susceptibility to leafgallers. Écoscience 6, 62-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honkanen, T. and Haukioja, E. (1994) Why does a branch suffer more after branch-wide than after tree-wide defoliation? Oikos 71, 441-450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallio, P., Niemi, R., Sulkinoja, M. and Valanne, T. (1983) The Fennoscandian birch and its evolution in the marginal forest zone. Nordicana 47, 101-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerbes, R.H., Kotanen, P.M. and Jefferies, R.L. (1990) Destruction of wetland habitats by lesser snow geese: a keystone species on the west coast of Hudson Bay. J. Anim. Ecol. 27, 242-258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwood, T.B.L. (1981) Repair and its evolution: survival versus reproduction. In C.R. Townsend and P. Callow (eds) Physiological Ecology. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, pp. 165-189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Körner, C. (1994) Biomass fractionation in plants: a reconsideration of definitions based on plant functions. In J. Roy and F. Garnier (eds) A Whole Plant Perspective on Carbon-Nitrogen Interactions. SPB Academic Publishing bv, The Hague, pp. 175-185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, S.C. and Raffa, K.F. (1996) Differential growth and recovery rates following defoliation in related deciduous and evergreen trees. Trees 10, 308-316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehtilä, K., Haukioja, E., Kaitaniemi, P. and Laine, K.A. (2000) Allocation of resources within mountain birch canopy after simulated winter browsing. Oikos 90, 160-170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehtonen, J. and Heikkinen, R.K. (1995) On the recovery of mountain birch after Epirrita damage in Finnish Lapland, with a particular emphasis on reindeer grazing. Écoscience 2, 349-356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennartsson, T., Tuomi, J. and Nilsson, P. (1997) Evidence for an evolutionary history of over-compensation in the grassland biennial Gentianella campestris (Gentianaceae). Am. Nat. 149, 1147-1155.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Långström, B., Tenow, O., Ericsson, A., Hellqvist, C. and Larsson, S. (1990) Effects of shoot pruning on stem growth, needle biomass, and dynamics of carbohydrates and nitrogen in Scots pine as related to season and tree age. Can. J. For. Res. 20, 514-523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis, R.J. (1996) Plant architecture, sectorality and plant tolerance to herbivores. Vegetatio 127, 85-97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maschinski, J. and Whitham, T.G. (1989) The continuum of plant responses to herbivory: the influence of plant association, nutrient availability and timing. Am. Nat. 134, 1-19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattson, W.J., Simmons, G.A. and Witter, J.A. (1988) The spruce budworm in eastern North America. In A.A. Berryman (ed.) Dynamics of Forest Insect Populations: Patterns, Causes, Implications. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 309-330.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton, S.J. (1985) Grazing lawns: animals in herds, plant form, and coevolution. Amer. Nat. 124, 863-886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Meijden, E., Wijn, M. and Verkaar, H.J. (1988) Defence and regrowth, alternative plant strategies in the struggle against herbivores. Oikos 51, 355-363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuvonen, S. and Haukioja, E. (1991) The effects of inducible resistance in host foliage on birch-feeding herbivores. In D.W. Tallamy and M.J. Raupp (eds) Phytochemical Induction by Herbivores. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 277-291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obeso, J.R. (1993) Does defoliation affect reproductive output in herbaceous perennials and woody plants in different ways? Funct. Ecol. 7, 150-155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paige, K.N. (1994) Herbivory and Ipomopsis aggregata: differences in response, differences in experimental protocol: a reply to Bergelson and Crawley. Am. Nat. 143, 739-749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paige, K.N. and Whitham, T.G. (1987) Overcompensation in response to mammalian herbivory: the advantage of being eaten. Am. Nat. 129, 407-416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poorter, H. and Nagel, O. (2000) The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review. Aust. J. Plant. Physiol. 27, 595-607.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbacker, R.R., Schultz, R.C. and Hart, E.R. (1996) Artificial defoliation effect on Populus growth, biomass production, and total nonstructural carbohydrate concentration. Environ. Entomol. 25, 632-642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, J.P. and Kotanen, P.M. (1994) Terrestrial plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9, 145-148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruohomäki, K., Haukioja, E., Repka, S. and Lehtilä, K. (1997a) Leaf value: effects of damage to individual leaves on growth and reproduction of mountain birch shoots. Ecology 78, 2105-2117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruohomäki, K., Virtanen, T., Kaitaniemi, P. and Tammaru, T. (1997b) Old mountain birches at high altitudes are prone to outbreaks of Epirrita autumnata (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Environ. Entomol. 26, 1096-1104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruohomäki, K., Tanhuanpää, M., Ayres, M.P., Kaitaniemi, P., Tammaru, T. and Haukioja, E. (2000) Causes of cyclicity of Epirrita autumnata (Lepidoptera, Geometridae) — grandiose theory and tedious practice. Res. Popul. Ecol. 42: 211-223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacchi, C.F. and Connor, E.F. (1999) Changes in reproduction and architecture in flowering dogwood, Cornus florida, after attack by the dogwood club gall, Resseliella clavula. Oikos 86, 138-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, T. and Novoplansky, A. (1995) Tree form: architectural models do not suffice. Israel J. Plant Sci. 43, 203-212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, T., Novoplansky, A. and Cohen, D. (1993) Plants as competing populations of redundant organs. Plant Cell Environ. 16, 765-770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, T. and Hassidim, M. (1996) Mutual support and selection between branches of damaged plants. Vegetatio 127, 25-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenow, O. (1972) The outbreaks of Oporinia autumnata Bkh. and Operophthera spp. (Lep., Geometridae) in the Scandinavian mountain chain and northern Finland 1862–1968. Zool. Bidr. Uppsala 2, 1-107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenow, O. and Bylund, H. (2000) Recovery of a Betula pubescens forest in Northern Sweden after a severe defoliation by Epirrita autumnata. J. Veget. Sci. 11: 855-862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomi, J., Haukioja, E., Honkanen, T. and Augner, M. (1994) Potential benefits of herbivore behaviour inducing amelioration of food-plant quality. Oikos 70, 161-166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderklein, D.W. and Reich, P.B. (1999) The effect of defoliation intensity and history on photosynthesis, growth and carbon reserves of two conifers with contrasting leaf lifespans and growth habits. New Phytol. 144, 121-132.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, M.A. and Casper, B.B. (1984) Morphogenetic constraints on patterns of carbon distribution in plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15, 233-258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haukioja, E., Koricheva, J. Tolerance to herbivory in woody vs. herbaceous plants. Evolutionary Ecology 14, 551–562 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011091606022

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011091606022

Navigation