Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The National Resources Inventory: a long-term multi-resource monitoring programme

  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interest in natural resources and the environment has led to the development of new federal monitoring efforts, the expansion of existing federal inventory programmes, and discussions of inter-agency collaboration for natural resource assessment data collection. As federal programmes evolve, knowledge gained from existing long-term survey programmes can provide valuable contributions to statistical and operational aspects of survey efforts. This paper describes the National Resources Inventory (NRI), which has been conducted by the US Department of Agriculture's Natural Resources Conservation Service in cooperation with the Iowa State University Statistical Laboratory for several decades. The current NRI is a longitudinal survey of soil, water, and related environmental resources designed to assess conditions and trends every five years on non-federal US lands. An historical overview is provided highlighting the development of the survey programme. Sample design, data collection, and estimation procedures used in the 1992 NRI are described, and statistical issues related to long-term monitoring are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, H.D., Fuller, W.A. and Goebel, J.J. (1992) Sample design and estimation procedures for the 1987 National Resources Inventory. Statistical Laboratory, Iowa State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birdsey, R.A., Hahn, J.T., MacLean, C.D., Arner, S.L., Bechtold, W.A., Williams, M.S., Schreuder, H.T., Scott, C.T., Moisen, G.G., Stage, A.R. and Born, J.D. (1995) Techniques for forest surveys when cluster plots straddle two or more conditions. Forest Science Monograph 31.

  • Breidt, F.J. (1995) Markov chain designs for one-per-stratum sampling. Survey Methodology 21, 63-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breidt, F.J., McVey, A.M. and Fuller, W.A. (1996) Two-phase estimation by imputation. Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics (Golden Jubilee number) 49, 79-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, D.L. (1993) Inclusion probabilities for environmental monitoring in FHM and EMAP. 1992 Proceedings of the Section on Statistics and Environment, American Statistical Association, 82-5.

  • Francisco, C.A. (1986) A quality evaluation study of the 1982 National Resources Inventory. Statistical Laboratory, Iowa State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, W.A. (1990) Analysis of repeated surveys. Survey Methodology 16, 167-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, W.A. (1996) Estimation for the 1992 NRI. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Fuller, W.A. and Goebel, J.J. (1993) Sample design for the Alaska NRI. Unpublished manuscript

  • Fuller, W.A., Breidt, F.J. and Huang, H.C. (1995) The 1995 Erosion Study sample. Unpublished manuscript

  • Fuller, W.A., Kennedy, W.J., Schnell, D., Sullivan, G. and Park, H.J. (1986) PC CARP. Statistical Laboratory, Iowa State Universit

    Google Scholar 

  • Goebel, J.J. and Baker, H.D. (1987) The 1982 National Resources Inventory sample design and estimation procedures. Statistical Laboratory, Iowa State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goebel, J.J. and George, T.A. (1996) Establishing a Consistent National Base for Assessing Natural Resource Issues. In Evaluating Natural Resource Use in Agriculture: Analytical Tools Now and into the Future, edited by T. Robertson, B.C. English and R.R. Alexander, University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, 319-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Goebel, J.J. and Schmude, K.O. (1982) Quality control and evaluation for the SCS National Resources Inventories. In In-Place Resource Inventories: Principles and Practice. Society of American Foresters, Publication No. 82-02, 871-6.

  • Goebel, J.J., Reiser, M. and Hickman, R.D. (1985) Sampling and estimation in the 1982 National Resources Inventory. Paper presented at the 145th annual meeting of the American Statistical Association, Las Vegas, Nevada.

  • Goebel, J.J., Schreuder, H.T., Geissler, P.H., House, C.C., Olsen, A.R. and Williams, W. (1996) Reinventing the Nation's Environmental Efforts: A Proposal to Merge Federal Surveys. Paper presented at American Statistical Association Workshop on Statistical Issues for Ecological and Natural Resource Monitoring Programs in the US, Washington, DC.

  • Helsel, D.R. (1995) Design of a relational water-quality assessment program. 1995 Proceedings of the Biometrics Section, American Statistical Association, 60-7.

  • Kasprzyk, D., Duncan, D., Kalton, G. and Singh, M.P. (1989) Panel Surveys. Wiley, New York. Kellogg, R.L., TeSelle, G.W. and Goebel, J.J. (1994) Highlights from the 1992 National Resources Inventory. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 49, 521-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, R.J. and Rubin, D.B. (1987) Statistical analysis with missing data. Wiley, New York. Max, T.A., Schreuder, H.T., Hazard, J.W., Oswald, D.D., Teply, J. and Alegria, J. (1996) The Pacific Northwest Region Vegetation and Inventory Monitoring System. Research Paper PNW-RP-493, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR.

  • Messer, J.J., Linthurst, R.A. and Overton, W.S. (1991) An EPA program for monitoring ecological status and trends. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 17, 67-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormack, R.M. (1988) Statistical challenges in the environmental sciences: a personal view. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 151, 201-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • McVey, A.M., Breidt, F.J. and Fuller, W.A. (1994) Two-phase estimation through imputation. 1994 Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association, 1053-8.

  • Nusser, S.M. (1995) Sampling issues in regional monitoring programs. 1995 Proceedings of the Biometrics Section, American Statistical Association, 68-70.

  • Nusser, S.M., Breidt, F.J. and Fuller, W.A. Design and estimation for investigating the dynamics of natural resources. Submitted to the Journal of Ecological Applications.

  • Nusser, S.M., Thompson, D.M. and DeLozier, G.S. (1996) Using personal digital assistants to collect survey data. 1996 Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association (forthcoming).

  • Overton, W.S. and Stehman, S.V. (1993) Properties of designs for sampling continuous spatial resources from a triangular grid. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods 22, 2641-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton, W.S. and Stehman, S.V. (1994) Variance estimation in the EMAP strategy for sampling discrete ecological resources. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 1, 133-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton, W.S. and Stehman, S.V. (1995) Desirable design characteristics for long-term monitoring of ecological variables. 1995 Proceedings of the Biometrics Section, American Statistical Association, 50-9.

  • Peck, S.L., Rawlings, J.O. and Finkner, A.L. (1992) A comparison of sampling design options for EMAP-Agro ecosystems. 1991 Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association, 191-5.

  • Platek, R., Rao, J.N.K., Särndal, C.E. and Singh, M.P. (1987) Small Area Statistics. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, D.S., McWilliams, W.H. and Birdsey, R.A. (1994) History, change and the US forest inventory. Journal of Forestry 92, 6-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saeboe, H.V. (1983) Land use and environmental statistics obtained by point sampling. Proceedings of the Session of the International Statistical Institute 50, 1317-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreuder, H.T. and Czaplewski, R.L. (1993) Long-term strategy for the statistical design of a forest health monitoring system. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 27, 82-94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreuder, H.T., Gregoire, T.G. and Wood, G.B. (1993) Sampling Methods for Multi-resource Forest Inventory. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stehman, S.V. and Overton, W.S. (1992) Properties of designs for sampling continuous spatial resources. 1991 Proceedings of the Section on Statistics and the Environment, American Statistical Association, 182-7.

  • Stehman, S.V. and Overton, W.S. (1994a) Environmental Sampling and Monitoring. In Handbook of Statistics, Vol. 12, G.P. Patil and C.R. Rao (eds) Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 263-30

  • Stehman, S.V. and Overton, W.S. (1994b) Comparison of variance estimators of the Horvitz-Thompson estimator for randomized variable probability systematic sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association 89, 30-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, D.L. and Olsen, A.R. (1992) Statistical issues in environmental monitoring and assessment. 1991 Proceedings of the Section on Statistics and the Environment, American Statistical Association, 76-85.

  • Tollefson, M.H. (1992) Variance estimation under random imputation. Ph.D. Thesis. Iowa State University.

  • Tollefson, M.H. (1994) Imputation programs for the 1992 NRI. Unpublished manuscript.

  • US Department of Agriculture (1945) Soil and water conservation needs estimates for the United States by states. Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Agriculture (1962) Basic statistics of the National Inventory of Soil and Water Conservation Needs. Statistical Bulletin No. 317, Washington, DC

  • US Department of Agriculture (1981) Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States. Agricultural Handbook 296, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Agriculture (1991) Instructions for collecting 1992 National Resources Inventory sample data. Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC.

  • US Department of Agriculture (1994a) Summary Report: 1992 National Resources Inventory. Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC., and Statistical Laboratory, Iowa State University.

  • US Department of Agriculture (1994b) National Resources Inventory Data Analysis Software: User's Guide, Version 1. Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC.

  • US Geological Survey (1982) A US Geological Survey standard: Codes for the identification of hydrologic units in the United States and the Caribbean outlying areas. Geological Survey Circular 878-A.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011-1210, USA

    S. M. NUSSER

  2. US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC, 20013-2890, USA

    J. J. GOEBEL

Authors
  1. S. M. NUSSER
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. J. GOEBEL
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

NUSSER, S.M., GOEBEL, J.J. The National Resources Inventory: a long-term multi-resource monitoring programme. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 4, 181–204 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018574412308

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018574412308

Search

Navigation