Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of cut-off values for leucocytes and bacteria for urine flow cytometer (UF-100) in urinary tract infections

  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Leucocytes and bacteria in urine are the important indices for diagnosing urinary tract infections. Urine specimens from 260 patientswere examined for leucocytes and bacteria with the UF-100 flow cytometer (Sysmex Corporation, Japan). The results obtained with the UF-100 were compared with those obtained by bacteriologic cultures of the same urine samples. Bacteriologic samples were found to be positive in 48 urine samples. The best detected cut-off value for bacteria is 3800/μL (senstivity = 73%, specificity = 78%) and 25/μL for leucocytes (sensitivity = 73%, specificity = 92%). In addition, comparison of leucocyte count by manually and with UF-100 shows good correlation (r = 0.91). A flow cytometric urinalysis analyzer operates in a time saving manner, increases throughput and decrease microscopy review rates. It also provides a reliable information to clinicians prior to bacteriologic culture results, in terms of leucocyte and bacteria count.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. NCCLS. Urinalysis and collection, transportation and preservation of urine specimens; approved guideline, NCCLS document GP 16-A(ISBN 1-56238). NCCLS, 771 East Lancaster Avenue, Villanova, Pennsylvania 19085 USA, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gadeholt H. Quantitative estimation of urinary sediment with special regard to sources of error. Br Med J 1964; 1547–1549.

  3. Kellogg JA, Manzella JP, Shaffer SN, Schwartz BB. Clinical relevance of culture versus screens for the detection of microbial pathogens in urine specimens. Am J Med 1987; 83: 739–745.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hannemann-Pohl K, Carsten Kampf S. Automation of urine sediment examination: A comparison of the Sysmex UF-100 automated flow cytometer with routine manual diagnosis (microscopy, test strips, and bacterial culture). Clin Chem Lab Med 1999; 37(7): 753–764.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fenill D, Pirovano B. The automation of sediment urinalysis using a new urine flow cytometer (UF-100 TM). Clin Chem Lab Med 1998; 36(12): 909–917.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Okada H, Sakai Y, Kawabata G et al. Automated urinalysis. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-50. Am J Clin Pathol 2001; 115: 605–610.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kouri TT, Kahkönen U, Malminiemi K et al. Evaluation of Sysmex UF-100 urine flow cytometer vs chamber counting of supravitally stained specimens and conventional bacterial cultures. Am J Clin Pathol. 1999; 112: 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Delanghe JR, Kouri TT, Huber AR et al. The role of automated urine particle flow cytometry in clinical practice. Clin Chim Acta. 2000; 301: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koken, T., Aktepe, O.C., Serteser, M. et al. Determination of cut-off values for leucocytes and bacteria for urine flow cytometer (UF-100) in urinary tract infections. Int Urol Nephrol 34, 175–178 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023292113462

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023292113462

Navigation