Skip to main content
Articles

Mediofrontal Negativities to Averted Gains and Losses in the Slot-Machine Task

A Further Investigation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803.19.4.256

Abstract: In a previous study we addressed the question whether a feedback-related negativity (FRN) can be elicited by outcomes that are not contingent on any preceding choice or action (Donkers, Nieuwenhuis, & Van Boxtel, 2005). Participants took part in a simple slot-machine task in which they experienced monetary gains and losses in the absence of responses. In addition, they performed a time estimation task often used to study the FRN, and a flanker task known to elicit the error-related negativity (Ne/ERN). Outcomes in the slot-machine task elicited a mediofrontal negativity whose amplitude correlated with the amplitude of the FRN associated with negative feedback in the time estimation task. However, the mediofrontal negativity was observed both for (unfavorable) outcomes that averted a gain and for (favorable) outcomes that averted a loss of money, a finding that is inconsistent with previous FRN research. In the present study we examined the similarity between the mediofrontal negativity observed in the slot-machine task and the frequency-sensitive N2. We manipulated the overall frequency of obtaining gains and losses in the slot-machine task and compared the negativities on averted gains and losses across the different trial probabilities. The results showed that larger feedback-related negativities were elicited by unexpected unfavorable outcomes than by expected unfavorable outcomes.

References

  • Donkers, F.C.L. , Nieuwenhuis, S. , Van Boxtel, G.J.M. (2005). Mediofrontal negativities to averted gains and losses in the absence of responding . Manuscript submitted for publication First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Falkenstein, M. , Hohnsbein, J. , Hoormann, J. , Blanke, L. (1990). Effects of errors in choice reaction tasks on the ERP under focused and divided attention. In C.H.M. Brunia, A.K.W. Gaillard, & A. Kok (Eds.), Psychophysiological brain research(Vol. 1, pp. 192-195). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gehring, W.J. , Goss, B. , Coles, M.G.H. , Meyer, D.E. , Donchin, E. (1993). A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychological Science, 4, 385– 390 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gehring, W.J. , Willoughby, A.R. (2002). The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science, 295, 2279– 2282 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gratton, G. , Coles, M.G.H. , Donchin, E. (1983). A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55, 468– 484 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hajcak, G. , Holroyd, C.B. , Moser, C.B. , Simons, R.F. (2005). Brain potentials associated with expected and unexpected good and bad outcomes. Psychophysiology, 42, 161– 170 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Holroyd, C.B. (2004). A note on the oddball N200 and the feedback ERN. In M. Ullsperger & M. Falkenstein (Eds.),Errors, conflict and the brain: Current opinions on performance monitoring (pp. 211-218). Leipzig: MPI of Cognitive Neurosciences First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Holroyd, C.B. , Coles, M.G.H. (2002). The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 109, 679– 709 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Holroyd, C.B. , Larsen, J.T. , Cohen, J.D. (2004). Context dependence of the event-related brain potential associated with reward and punishment. Psychophysiology, 41, 245– 253 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Holroyd, C.B. , Nieuwenhuis, S. , Yeung, N. , Cohen, J.D. (2003). Reward prediction errors are reflected in the event related potential. Neuroreport, 18, 1481– 1484 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Miltner, W.H.R. , Braun, C.H. , Coles, M.G.H. (1997). Event related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time estimation task: Evidence for a generic neural system for error detection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 787– 796 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nieuwenhuis, S. , Holroyd, C.B. , Mol, N. , Coles, M.G.H. (2004). Reinforcement-related brain potentials from medial frontal cortex: Origins and functional significance. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 441– 448 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nieuwenhuis, S. , Yeung, N. , Holroyd, C.B. , Schurger, A. , Cohen, J.D. (2004). Sensitivity of electrophysiological activity from medial frontal cortex to utilitarian and performance feedback. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 741– 747 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pritchard, W.S. , Shappell, S.A. , Brandt, M.E. (1991). Psychophysiology of N200/N400: A review and classification scheme. In J.R. Jennings, P.K. Ackles, & M.G. Coles (Eds.), Advances in psychophysiology (Vol. 4, pp. 43-106). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Van Boxtel, G.J.M. , Böcker, K.B.E. (2004). Cortical measures of anticipation. Journal of Psychophysiology, 18, 61– 76 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Vasey, M.W. , Thayer, J.F. (1987). The continuing problem of false positives in repeated measures ANOVA in psychophysiology: A multivariate solution. Psychophysiology, 24, 479– 486 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yeung, N. , Holroyd, C.B. , Cohen, J.D. (2005). ERP correlates of feedback and reward processing in the presence and absence of response choice. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 535– 544 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar