Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Cortical magnification factor predicts the photopic contrast sensitivity of peripheral vision

Abstract

THE area of visual cortex devoted to the analysis of a con-slant-size region in the visual field diminishes progressively for more peripheral locations. The change is described quantitatively by the cortical magnification factor, which indicates the linear extent of cortex in mm corresponding to one degree of visual angle at various eccentricities (angular distances from the middle fovea). The human cortical magnification factor has been estimated by Cowey and Rolls1 from the data of Brindley and Lewin2, who mapped the phosphenes (sensations of light) caused in the lower nasal visual field by electrical stimulation of the human visual cortex. Building on these results, we have studied the spatial contrast sensitivity functions in man at various eccentricities. We used two methods: in one the retinal image sizes of the test gratings were kept similar at different eccentricities and in the other, the calculated sizes of cortical projections of the test gratings were made similar at different locations. Our results indicate that peripheral contrast sensitivity and acuity are inferior to foveal performance, because of the diminished cortical projection area.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cowey, A. & Rolls, E. T. Expl Brain Res. 21, 447–454 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brindley, G. S. & Lewin, W. S. J. Physiol., Lond. 196, 479–493 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Virsu, V., Nyman, G. & Lehtiö, P. K. Perception 3, 323–336 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wetherill, G. B. & Levitt, H. Br. J. math. stat. Psychol. 18, 1–10 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lennie, P. Nature 266, 496 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Drasdo, N. Nature 266, 554–556 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kulikowski, J. J. & Tolhurst, D. J. J. Physiol., Lond. 232, 149–162 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Green, D. G. J. Physiol., Lond. 207, 351–356 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Anstis, S. M. Vision Res. 14, 589–592 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

ROVAMO, J., VIRSU, V. & NÄSÄNEN, R. Cortical magnification factor predicts the photopic contrast sensitivity of peripheral vision. Nature 271, 54–56 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/271054a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/271054a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing