Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Mammalian chiasma frequencies as a test of two theories of recombination

Abstract

A broad survey of asexuality in the animal kingdom is sufficient to reject all theories of sex and recombination except two: the Red Queen and the Tangled Bank1,2. The Red Queen theory states that an organism's biotic environment tends to be 'contrary'3, consistently evolving to the detriment of the organism; sex and recombination result in progeny genetically distinct from their parents and grandparents and thus less susceptible to the antagonistic advances made during the previous generations, particularly by their parasites1,4,5. The alternative theory, the Tangled Bank, states that sex and recombination function to diversify the progeny from each other, thus reducing competition between them1,6. An extensive survey of mammalian recombination shows that the total number of chiasmata in excess of one per bivalent is strongly correlated with generation time but uncorrelated with fecundity. We conclude that crossing-over may function to combat antagonists with short generation times but does not function to reduce sib competition. Chromosome number is selectively neutral with respect to these factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bell, G. The Masterpiece of Nature: The Evolution and Genetics of Sexuality (Croom Helm, London, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bell, G. Experientia 41, 1235–1245 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Trivers, R. L. Social Evolution (Cummings, Menlo Park, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jaenike, J. Evol. Theory 3, 191–194 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hamilton, W. D. Oikos 35, 282–290 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghiselin, M. T. The Economy of Nature and the Evolution of Sex (University of California, Berkeley, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bremmerman, H. J. J. theor. Biol. 87, 671–702 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hamilton, W. D. in Population Biology of Infectious Disease Agents (eds Anderson, R. M. & May, R. M.) 269–296 (Springer, Berlin, 1982).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Tooby, J. J. theor. Biol. 97, 557–576 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Maynard Smith, J. J. theor. Biol. 63, 245–258 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eisenberg, J. F. The Mammalian Radiations: An Analysis of Trends in Evolution, Adaptation, and Behaviour (University of Chicago, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Patton, J. L. & Sherwood, S. W. A. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 14, 139–158 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. White, M. J. D. in Cytotaxonomy and Vertebrate Evolution (eds Chiarelli, A. B. & Capanna, E.) 95–128 (Academic, London, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wilson, A. C., Bush, G. L., Case, S. M. & King, M.-C. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72, 5061–5065 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Williams, G. C. Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought (Princeton University, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mather, K. Biol. Rev. 13, 252–292 (1938).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Searle, A. G., Berry, R. J. & Beechey, C. V. Mutat. Res. 9, 137–140 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hultén, M. Hereditas 76, 55–78 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Blueweiss, L. et al. Oecologia 37, 257–272 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bell, G. in The Origin and Evolution of Sex (eds Halvorson, H. O., Sager, R., Monroy, A. & Segal, S.) 221–256 (Liss, New York, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rees, H. & Dale, P. J. Chromosoma 47, 335–351 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hill, W. G. & Robertson, A. Genet. Res. 8, 269–294 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Thompson, V. Evol. Theory, 1, 131–156 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Williams, G. C. Sex and Evolution (Princeton University, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burt, A., Bell, G. Mammalian chiasma frequencies as a test of two theories of recombination. Nature 326, 803–805 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1038/326803a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/326803a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing