Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry

Abstract

Speciation is facilitated if ecological adaptation directly causes assortative mating1, but few natural examples are known. Here we show that a shift in colour pattern mimicry was crucial in the origin of two butterfly species. The sister species Heliconius melpomene and Heliconius cydno recently diverged to mimic different model taxa, and our experiments show that their mimetic coloration is also important in choosing mates. Assortative mating between the sister species means that hybridization is rare in nature, and the few hybrids that are produced are non-mimetic, poorly adapted intermediates. Thus, the mimetic shift has caused both pre-mating and post-mating isolation. In addition, individuals from a population of H. melpomene allopatric to H. cydno court and mate with H. cydno more readily than those from a sympatric population. This suggests that assortative mating has been enhanced in sympatry.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Heliconius melpomene melpomene (left, French Guiana), H. melpomene rosina (centre, Panama), H. cydno chioneus (right, Panama) are shown together with co-mimics (below) H. erato hydara, H. erato cf. petiveranus and H. sapho sapho respectively.
Figure 2: Time spent courting live females in 10-min trials with 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 3: Relative probabilities of male approach and courtship of colour pattern models.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Maynard Smith, J. Sympatric speciation. Am. Nat. 100, 637–650 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bates, H. W. Contributions to an insect fauna of the Amazon valley. Lepidoptera: Heliconidae. Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond. 23, 495–566 (1862).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vane-Wright, R. I. in Diversity of Insect Faunas (eds Mound, L. A. & Waloff, N.) 56–70 (Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Turner, J. R. G. Adaptation and evolution in Heliconius: a defense of neo-Darwinism. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12, 99–121 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mallet, J. & Joron, M. Evolution of diversity in warning colour and mimicry: Polymorphisms, shifting balance and speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30, 201–233 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Turner, J. R. G. Adaptive radiation and convergence in subdivisions of the butterfly genus Heliconius (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 58, 297–308 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McMillan, W. O., Jiggins, C. D. & Mallet, J. What initiates speciation in passion vine butterflies? Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 8628–8633 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mallet, J., McMillan, W. O. & Jiggins, C. D. in Endless Forms: Species and Speciation (eds Howard, D. J. & Berlocher, S. H.) 390–403 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Linares, M. Adaptive Microevolution Through Hybridization and Biotic Destruction in the Neotropics (Thesis, Univ. Texas, Austin, Texas, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gilbert, L. E. in Ecology and Evolution Taking Flight: Butterflies as Model Systems (eds Boggs, C. L., Watt, W. B. & Ehrlich, P. R.) (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, in the press).

  11. Brower, A. V. Z. Parallel race formation and the evolution of mimicry in Heliconius butterflies: a phylogenetic hypothesis from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Evolution 50, 195–221 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mallet, J. Causes and consequences of a lack of coevolution in Müllerian mimicry. Evol. Ecol. 13, 777–806 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dobzhansky, T. Speciation as a stage in evolutionary divergence. Am. Nat. 74, 312–321 (1940).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Butlin, R. Speciation by reinforcement. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2, 8–12 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Noor, M. A. F. Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry. Heredity 83, 503–508 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mallet, J. & Barton, N. H. Strong natural selection in a warning color hybrid zone. Evolution 43, 421–431 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dieckmann, U. & Doebeli, M. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 400, 354–357 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kirkpatrick, M. Reinforcement and divergence under assortative mating. Proc. Roy. R. Lond. B 267, 1649–1655 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Craig, T. P., Itami, J. K., Abrahamson, W. G. & Horner, J. D. Behavioral evidence for host-race formation in Eurosta solidaginis. Evolution 47, 1696–1710 (1993).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Feder, J. L. et al. Host fidelity is an effective premating barrier between sympatric races of the apple maggot fly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 7990–7994 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rundle, H. D., Nagel, L., Wenrick Boughman, J. & Schluter, D. Natural selection and parallel speciation in sympatric sticklebacks. Science 287, 306–308 (2000).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mallet, J. & Gilbert, L. E. Why are there so many mimicry rings? Correlations between habitat, behaviour and mimicry in Heliconius butterflies. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 55, 159–180 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Edwards, A. W. F. Likelihood (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1972).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank C. Paresce, C. Estrada, R. Woods, M. Beltrán and L. O'Donovan for help with experiments; B. Hermiers for help in French Guiana; F. Jiggins, M. Joron, I. Emelianov, E. Bermingham and G. Hurst for discussion; and S. Upson at Perkin Elmer for reflectance measurements. This work was carried out with permission from ANAM (Autoridad Nacional del Ambiente) to work in the República de Panamá, and was funded by the Natural Environment Research Council and a BBSRC (Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council) studentship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris D. Jiggins.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jiggins, C., Naisbit, R., Coe, R. et al. Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature 411, 302–305 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35077075

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35077075

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing