Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Induction of gut in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos

Abstract

TWO types of developmental events can cause an embryonic cell to adopt a fate different from that of its neighbours: during a cell division particular contents may be segregated to only one daughter cell and cells may experience different external cues, commonly in the form of inductive cell interactions. Work on development in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans suggests that most cell fates are specified without a need for cell interactions. In particular, the gut cell lineage of C. elegans has been used as a primary example of specification by differential segregation of determinants1. Here I re-examine the role of induction in gut specification by isolating early blastomeres. In C. elegans, the gut derives from all the progeny of a single blastomere (E) of the eight-cell stage2. When a gut precursor cell (EMS) is isolated during the first half of the four-cell stage, gut does not differentiate. Gut differentiation is rescued by recombining EMS with its posterior neighbour (P2), but not by recombining EMS with one or both of the other two cells of the four-cell stage. These results demonstrate that P2 induces EMS to form gut in C. elegans.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davidson, E. H. Gene Activity in Early Development 3rd edn (Academic, Orlando, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sulston, J. E. et al. Devl Biol. 100, 64–119 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schierenberg, E. Devl Biol. 122, 452–463 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Priess, J. R. & Thomson, J. N. Cell 48, 241–250 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Laufer, J. S. et al. Cell 19, 569–577 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Edgar, L. G. & McGhee, J. D. Devl Biol. 114, 109–118 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Maine, E. M. & Kimble, J. BioEssays 12, 265–271 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wood, W. B. Nature 349, 536–538 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Scbnabel, R. Mech. Dev. 34, 85–100 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Laufer, J. S. & von Ehrenstein, G. Science 211, 402–405 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sulston, J. & Hodgkin, J. in The Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans (ed. Wood, W. B.) 587–606 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chitwood, B. G. & Chitwood, M. B. Introduction to Nematology (University Park, Baltimore, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goldstein, B. Induction of gut in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Nature 357, 255–257 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/357255a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/357255a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing