Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Mutual sexual selection in a monogamous seabird

Abstract

DARWIN1 believed that elaborate ornamental traits expressed in both sexes might be favoured by mutual sexual selection driven by both female and male mate choice. Experimental studies on birds2–5 and fish6–9 have shown that male ornaments can be favoured by female mating preferences. But the concept of mutual mate choice has remained untested experimentally, although it has been supported by recent modelling10. Here we report the results of a study of mate preferences of the crested auklet Aethla cristatella, a monogamous seabird in which both sexes are ornamented. In two experiments we recorded the sexual response of male and female auklets to realistic opposite-sex models with crest ornaments experimentally shortened and lengthened within the range of natural variation. Males responded to accentuated female models with more frequent sexual displays, as did females to accentuated male models, confirming the idea that ornaments expressed in both sexes could be favoured by mutual mating preferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Darwin, C. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex (Murray, London, 1871).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andersson, M. Nature 299, 818–820 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Møller, A. P. Nature 332, 640–642 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hill, G. E. Anim. Behav. 40, 563–572 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Andersson, S. Anim. Behav. 43, 379–388 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bischoff, R. J., Gould, J. L. & Rubenstein, D. I. Behl Ecol. Sociobiol. 17, 253–256 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Basolo, A. L. Anim. Behav. 40, 332–338 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Milinski, M. & Bakker, T. B. Nature 344, 330–332 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Houde, A. Science 248, 1405–1407 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kirkpatrick, M., Price, T. & Arnold, S. J. Evolution 44, 180–193 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zubakin, V. A. in Study of Colonial Seabirds of the USSR 9–13 (Academy of Sciences, Magadan, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jones, I. L. & Montgomerie, R. D. Behavl Ecol. Sociobiol. 30, 43–52 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Savalli, U. M. Nature 339, 432 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Balmford, A. P. & Thomas, A. Nature 359, 487 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Barnard, P. Anim. Behav. 39, 652–656 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jones, I. L. & Montgomerie, R. D. Behavl Ecol. 2, 249–257 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Byrd, G. V. & Day, R. H. Arctic 39, 109–118 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Flint, V. E. & Golovkin, A. N. Ptitsy SSSR: Chistikovyye [Birds of the USSR: AuKs (Alcidae)] (Nauka, Moscow, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jones, I. L. in The Birds of North America (Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, in the press).

  20. Lande, R. & Arnold, S. J. J. theor. Biol. 117, 651–664 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lande, R. Evolution 34, 292–305 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bédard, J. & Sealy, S. J. J. Zool. 202, 461–488 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jones, I. L. Wilson Bull. (in the press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, I., Hunter, F. Mutual sexual selection in a monogamous seabird. Nature 362, 238–239 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1038/362238a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/362238a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing