Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Termination of asymmetric cell division and differentiation of stomata

Nature volume 445, pages 501–505 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

Stomata consist of a pair of guard cells that mediate gas and water-vapour exchange between plants and the atmosphere. Stomatal precursor cells—meristemoids—possess a transient stem-cell-like property and undergo several rounds of asymmetric divisions before further differentiation. Here we report that the Arabidopsis thaliana basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH) protein MUTE is a key switch for meristemoid fate transition. In the absence of MUTE, meristemoids abort after excessive asymmetric divisions and fail to differentiate stomata. Constitutive overexpression of MUTE directs the entire epidermis to adopt guard cell identity. MUTE has two paralogues: FAMA, a regulator of guard cell morphogenesis, and SPEECHLESS (SPCH). We show that SPCH directs the first asymmetric division that initiates stomatal lineage. Together, SPCH, MUTE and FAMA bHLH proteins control stomatal development at three consecutive steps: initiation, meristemoid differentiation and guard cell morphogenesis. Our findings highlight the roles of closely related bHLHs in cell type differentiation in plants and animals.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: MUTE is required for meristemoid differentiation.
Figure 2: Genetic interactions between MUTE and known regulators of stomatal patterning and differentiation.
Figure 3: MUTE bHLH protein triggers stomatal differentiation.
Figure 4: SPCH a paralogue of MUTE , initiates stomatal cell lineages.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nadeau, J. A. & Sack, F. D. Stomatal development in Arabidopsis. In The Arabidopsis Book (eds Somerville, C. & Meyerowitz, E. M.) doi:10.1199/tab.0066 (American Society of Plant Biologists, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hetherington, A. M. & Woodward, F. I. The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change. Nature 424, 901–908 (2003)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gray, J. E. et al. The HIC signalling pathway links CO2 perception to stomatal development. Nature 408, 713–716 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Berger, D. & Altmann, T. A subtilisin-like serine protease involved in the regulation of stomatal density and distribution in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes Dev. 14, 1119–1131 (2000)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. von Groll, U., Berger, D. & Altmann, T. The subtilisin-like serine protease SDD1 mediates cell-to-cell signaling during Arabidopsis stomatal development. Plant Cell 14, 1527–1539 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nadeau, J. A. & Sack, F. D. Control of stomatal distribution on the Arabidopsis leaf surface. Science 296, 1697–1700 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bergmann, D. C., Lukowitz, W. & Somerville, C. R. Stomatal development and pattern controlled by a MAPKK kinase. Science 304, 1494–1497 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Shpak, E. D., McAbee, J. M., Pillitteri, L. J. & Torii, K. U. Stomatal patterning and differentiation by synergistic interactions of receptor kinases. Science 309, 290–293 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lai, L. B. et al. The Arabidopsis R2R3 MYB proteins FOUR LIPS and MYB88 restrict divisions late in the stomatal cell lineage. Plant Cell 17, 2754–2767 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Poethig, R. S. EnhancerTraps 〈http://enhancertraps.bio.upenn.edu/〉 (2006)

  11. Geisler, M. J., Deppong, D. O., Nadeau, J. A. & Sack, F. D. Stomatal neighbor cell polarity and division in Arabidopsis. Planta 216, 571–579 (2003)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Toledo-Ortiz, G., Huq, E. & Quail, P. H. The Arabidopsis basic/helix-loop-helix transcription factor family. Plant Cell 15, 1749–1770 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Murre, C., McCaw, P. S. & Baltimore, D. A new DNA binding and dimerization motif in immunoglobulin enhancer binding, daughterless, MyoD, and myc proteins. Cell 56, 777–783 (1989)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bailey, P. C. et al. Update on the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 15, 2497–2502 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Buck, M. J. & Atchley, W. R. Phylogenetic analysis of plant basic helix-loop-helix proteins. J. Mol. Evol. 56, 742–750 (2003)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Heim, M. A. et al. The basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor family in plants: a genome-wide study of protein structure and functional diversity. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20, 735–747 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Doe, C. Q. & Bowerman, B. Asymmetric cell division: fly neuroblast meets worm zygote. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13, 68–75 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ikeshima-Kataoka, H., Skeath, J. B., Nabeshima, Y., Doe, C. Q. & Matsuzaki, F. Miranda directs Prospero to a daughter cell during Drosophila asymmetric divisions. Nature 390, 625–629 (1997)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. MacAlister, C. A., Ohashi-Ito, K & Bergmann, D. C. Transcription factor control of asymmetric cell divisions that establish the stomatal lineage. Nature doi:10.1038/nature05491 (this issues)

  20. Dengler, N. The developmental basis of anisophylly in Selaginella martensii. II. Histogenesis. Am. J. Bot. 70, 193–206 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Brown, R. & Lemmon, B. Development of stomata in Selaginella: Division polarity and plastid movements. Am. J. Bot. 72, 1914–1925 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Weintraub, H. The MyoD family and myogenesis: redundancy, networks, and thresholds. Cell 75, 1241–1244 (1993)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Olson, E. N. MyoD family: a paradigm for development? Genes Dev. 4, 1454–1461 (1990)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Campuzano, S. & Modolell, J. Patterning of the Drosophila nervous system: the achaete-scute gene complex. Trends Genet. 8, 202–208 (1992)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Olson, E. N. Interplay between proliferation and differentiation within the myogenic lineage. Dev. Biol. 154, 261–272 (1992)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank C. Doe, B. Wakimoto, J. McAbee, and T. Kakimoto for commenting on the manuscript; F. Sack and T. Altmann for a gift of flp, sdd1 and TMM::TMM–GFP; S. Poethig and D. Bergmann for E994; T. Nakagawa and ABRC for cloning vectors; SIGnAL and ABRC for T-DNA insertion lines; and P. Chan for confocal microscopy expertise. Our thanks to D. Bergmann for sharing unpublished results and discussion about stomatal development. This work was supported in part by the grants from DOE and NSF to K.U.T. L.J.P. was supported by the NRI USDA/CSREES fellowship, and K.U.T. is a CREST JST investigator.

Author Contributions K.U.T. supervised the entire project. K.U.T. and L.J.P. conceived and designed the experiments, and wrote the manuscript with comments from co-authors. L.J.P. isolated the mute mutant and performed characterization of mutants and transgenic plants with N.L.B. D.B.S. identified the MUTE gene by map-based cloning.

The NCBI/GenBank accession numbers for the genes described in this manuscript are: DQ863645 (MUTE mRNA), DQ864972 (MUTE genomic) and DQ868373 (SPCH mRNA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98195, USA

    Lynn Jo Pillitteri, Daniel B. Sloan, Naomi L. Bogenschutz & Keiko U. Torii

  2. Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98195, USA

    Keiko U. Torii

  3. CREST, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Saitama, 332-0012, Japan

    Keiko U. Torii

Authors
  1. Lynn Jo Pillitteri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel B. Sloan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Naomi L. Bogenschutz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Keiko U. Torii
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keiko U. Torii.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Figures 1-6 and additional references. (PDF 4761 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

This file contains Supplementary Table 1 which shows PCR markers and their primer DNA sequence for genotypic analysis of stomatal development mutants. (XLS 18 kb)

Supplementary Table 2

This file contains Supplementary Table 2 which shows CAPS and dCAPS PCR markers and their primer DNA sequence used for map-based cloning of MUTE. (XLS 200 kb)

Supplementary Table 3a

This file contains Supplementary Table 3 which shows PCR primers and DNA sequence used for plasmid construction. (XLS 9 kb)

Supplementary Table 3b

This file contains Supplementary Table 3 which shows PCR primers and DNA sequence used for RT-PCR.. (XLS 16 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pillitteri, L., Sloan, D., Bogenschutz, N. et al. Termination of asymmetric cell division and differentiation of stomata. Nature 445, 501–505 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05467

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05467

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing