Abstract
Proteins fluctuate between alternative conformations, which presents a challenge for ligand discovery because such flexibility is difficult to treat computationally owing to problems with conformational sampling and energy weighting. Here we describe a flexible docking method that samples and weights protein conformations using experimentally derived conformations as a guide. The crystallographically refined occupancies of these conformations, which are observable in an apo receptor structure, define energy penalties for docking. In a large prospective library screen, we identified new ligands that target specific receptor conformations of a cavity in cytochrome c peroxidase, and we confirm both ligand pose and associated receptor conformation predictions by crystallography. The inclusion of receptor flexibility led to ligands with new chemotypes and physical properties. By exploiting experimental measures of loop and side-chain flexibility, this method can be extended to the discovery of new ligands for hundreds of targets in the Protein Data Bank for which similar experimental information is available.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baldwin, A. J. & Kay, L. E. NMR spectroscopy brings invisible protein states into focus. Nature Chem. Biol. 5, 808–814 (2009).
Koveal, D., Clarkson, M. W., Wood, T. K., Page, R. & Peti, W. Ligand binding reduces conformational flexibility in the active site of tyrosine phosphatase related to biofilm formation A (TpbA) from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Mol. Biol. 425, 2219–2231 (2013).
Burnley, B. T., Pavel, V. A., Paul, D. A. & Piet, G. Modelling dynamics in protein crystal structures by ensemble refinement. eLife Sci. 1, e00311 (2012).
Fraser, J. S. et al. Hidden alternative structures of proline isomerase essential for catalysis. Nature 462, 669–673 (2009).
Fraser, J. S. et al. Accessing protein conformational ensembles using room-temperature X-ray crystallography. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 16247–16252 (2011).
Frauenfelder, H., Petsko, G. A. & Tsernoglou, D. Temperature-dependent X-ray diffraction as a probe of protein structural dynamics. Nature 280, 558–563 (1979).
Rauh, D., Klebe, G. & Stubbs, M. T. Understanding protein–ligand interactions: the price of protein flexibility. J. Mol. Biol. 335, 1325–1341 (2004).
Jorgensen, W. L. Rusting of the lock and key model for protein–ligand binding. Science 254, 954–955 (1991).
Nicholls, A. The character of molecular modeling. J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des. 26, 103–105 (2012).
Barril, X. & Fradera, X. Incorporating protein flexibility into docking and structure-based drug design. Expert Opin. Drug Disc. 1, 335–349 (2006).
Jiang, F., Lin, W. & Rao, Z. SOFTDOCK: understanding of molecular recognition through a systematic docking study. Protein Eng. 15, 257–263 (2002).
Cosconati, S. et al. Protein flexibility in virtual screening: the BACE-1 case study. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 52, 2697–2704 (2012).
Rueda, M., Totrov, M. & Abagyan, R. ALiBERO: evolving a team of complementary pocket conformations rather than a single leader. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 52, 2705–2714 (2012).
Hritz, J., de Ruiter, A. & Oostenbrink, C. Impact of plasticity and flexibility on docking results for cytochrome P450 2D6: a combined approach of molecular dynamics and ligand docking. J. Med. Chem. 51, 7469–7477 (2008).
Richter, L. et al. Diazepam-bound GABAA receptor models identify new benzodiazepine binding-site ligands. Nature Chem. Biol. 8, 455–464 (2012).
Corbeil, C. R. & Moitessier, N. Docking ligands into flexible and solvated macromolecules. 3. Impact of input ligand conformation, protein flexibility, and water molecules on the accuracy of docking programs. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 49, 997–1009 (2009).
Wei, B. Q., Weaver, L. H., Ferrari, A. M., Matthews, B. W. & Shoichet, B. K. Testing a flexible-receptor docking algorithm in a model binding site. J. Mol. Biol. 337, 1161–1182 (2004).
Clauben, H., Buning, C., Rarey, M. & Lengauer, T. FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations. J. Mol. Biol. 308, 377–395 (2001).
An, J. et al. A Novel small-molecule inhibitor of the avian influenza H5N1 virus determined through computational screening against the neuraminidase. J. Med. Chem. 52, 2667–2672 (2009).
Brooijmans, N. & Humblet, C. Chemical space sampling by different scoring functions and crystal structures. J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des. 24, 433–447 (2010).
Newman, J., Dolezal, O., Fazio, V., Caradoc-Davies, T. & Peat, T. The DINGO dataset: a comprehensive set of data for the SAMPL challenge. J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des. 26, 497–503 (2012).
Zhong, S. et al. Identification and validation of human DNA ligase inhibitors using computer-aided drug design. J. Med. Chem. 51, 4553–4562 (2008).
Amaro, R. E. et al. Discovery of drug-like inhibitors of an essential RNA-editing ligase in Trypanosoma brucei. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 17278–17283 (2008).
Cheltsov, A. V. et al. Vaccinia virus virulence Factor N1L is a novel promising target for antiviral therapeutic intervention. J. Med. Chem. 53, 3899–3906 (2010).
Sato, T. et al. Identification of novel drug-resistant EGFR mutant inhibitors by in silico screening using comprehensive assessments of protein structures. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 20, 3756–3767 (2012).
Rogers, K. E. et al. Novel cruzain inhibitors for the treatment of Chagas’ disease. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 80, 398–405 (2012).
Kumar, A. & Zhang, K. J. Computational fragment-based screening using RosettaLigand: the SAMPL3 challenge. J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des. 26, 603–616 (2012).
Bottegoni, G., Kufareva, I., Totrov, M. & Abagyan, R. Four-dimensional docking: a fast and accurate account of discrete receptor flexibility in ligand docking. J. Med. Chem. 52, 397–406 (2008).
Armen, R. S., Chen, J. & Brooks, C. L. An evaluation of explicit receptor flexibility in molecular docking using molecular dynamics and torsion angle molecular dynamics. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 5, 2909–2923 (2009).
Dietzen, M., Zotenko, E., Hildebrandt, A. & Lengauer, T. On the applicability of elastic network normal modes in small-molecule docking. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 52, 844–856 (2012).
Vinh, N., Simpson, J., Scammells, P. & Chalmers, D. Virtual screening using a conformationally flexible target protein: models for ligand binding to p38alpha MAPK. J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des. 26, 409–423 (2012).
Barril, X. & Morley, S. D. Unveiling the full potential of flexible receptor docking using multiple crystallographic structures. J. Med. Chem. 48, 4432–4443 (2005).
Afonine, P. V. et al. Joint X-ray and neutron refinement with phenix.refine. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 1153–1163 (2010).
Lang, P. T. et al. Automated electron-density sampling reveals widespread conformational polymorphism in proteins. Protein Sci. 19, 1420–1431 (2010).
Shapovalov, M. V. & Dunbrack, R. L. Statistical and conformational analysis of the electron density of protein side chains. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 66, 279–303 (2007).
Rosenfeld, R. J., Hays, A-M. A., Musah, R. A. & Goodin, D. B. Excision of a proposed electron transfer pathway in cytochrome c peroxidase and its replacement by a ligand-binding channel. Protein Sci. 11, 1251–1259 (2002).
Barelier, S. et al. Roles for ordered and bulk solvent in ligand recognition and docking in two related cavities. PLoS ONE 8, e69153 (2013).
Brenk, R., Vetter, S. W., Boyce, S. E., Goodin, D. B. & Shoichet, B. K. Probing molecular docking in a charged model binding site. J. Mol. Biol. 357, 1449–1470 (2006).
Rocklin, G. J. et al. Blind prediction of charged ligand binding affinities in a model binding site. J. Mol. Biol. 425, 4569–4583 (2013).
Wei, B. Q., Baase, W. A., Weaver, L. H., Matthews, B. W. & Shoichet, B. K. A model binding site for testing scoring functions in molecular docking. J. Mol. Biol. 322, 339–355 (2002).
Coleman, R. G., Carchia, M., Sterling, T., Irwin, J. J. & Shoichet, B. K. Ligand pose and orientational sampling in molecular docking. PLoS ONE 8, e75992 (2013).
Meng, E. C., Shoichet, B. & Kuntz, I. D. Automated docking with grid-based energy evaluation. J. Comp. Chem. 13, 505–524 (1992).
Sharp, K. A. Polyelectrolyte electrostatics: salt dependence, entropic, and enthalpic contributions to free energy in the nonlinear Poisson–Boltzmann model. Biopolymers 36, 227–243 (1995).
Irwin, J. J., Sterling, T., Mysinger, M. M., Bolstad, E. S. & Coleman, R. G. ZINC: a free tool to discover chemistry for biology. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 52, 1757–1768 (2012).
Carlsson, J. et al. Ligand discovery from a dopamine D3 receptor homology model and crystal structure. Nature Chem. Biol. 7, 769–778 (2011).
Mysinger, M. M. et al. Structure-based ligand discovery for the protein–protein interface of chemokine receptor CXCR4. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 5517–5522 (2012).
Rogers, D. J. & Tanimoto, T. T. A computer program for classifying plants. Science 132, 1115–1118 (1960).
Berman, H. M. et al. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acid. Res. 28, 235–242 (2000).
Mysinger, M. M. & Shoichet, B. K. Rapid context-dependent ligand desolvation in molecular docking. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 50, 1561–1573 (2010).
Gallagher, K. & Sharp, K. Electrostatic contributions to heat capacity changes of DNA–ligand binding. Biophys. J. 75, 769–776 (1998).
Ytreberg, F. M. & Zuckerman, D. M. A black-box re-weighting analysis can correct flawed simulation data. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 7982–7987 (2008).
Acknowledgements
We thank G. Rocklin for enlightening discussions, P. Afonine for advice and bug fixing of the occupancy refinement in PHENIX, A. Doak for protein preparation and H. Lin, J. Karpiak and T. Balius for reading this manuscript. This work was supported by US National Institutes of Health grants GM59957 (B.K.S.), DP5OD009180 (J.S.F.) and NRSA F32GM096544 (R.G.C.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.F., R.G.C., J.S.F. and B.K.S. designed the study and wrote the paper, M.F. performed all experiments and refined structures with the assistance of J.S.F. R.G.C. wrote the computer code and performed all computational work.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information
Supplementary information (PDF 4381 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fischer, M., Coleman, R., Fraser, J. et al. Incorporation of protein flexibility and conformational energy penalties in docking screens to improve ligand discovery. Nature Chem 6, 575–583 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1954
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1954
This article is cited by
-
Pushed to extremes: distinct effects of high temperature versus pressure on the structure of STEP
Communications Biology (2024)
-
RNA conformational propensities determine cellular activity
Nature (2023)
-
DNA mismatches reveal conformational penalties in protein–DNA recognition
Nature (2020)
-
Temperature-jump solution X-ray scattering reveals distinct motions in a dynamic enzyme
Nature Chemistry (2019)
-
High-performance virtual screening by targeting a high-resolution RNA dynamic ensemble
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (2018)