Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Opioids induce dissociable forms of long-term depression of excitatory inputs to the dorsal striatum

Abstract

As prescription opioid analgesic abuse rates rise, so does the need to understand the long-term effects of opioid exposure on brain function. The dorsal striatum is an important site for drug-induced neuronal plasticity. We found that exogenously applied and endogenously released opioids induced long-term depression (OP-LTD) of excitatory inputs to the dorsal striatum in mice and rats. Mu and delta OP-LTD, although both being presynaptically expressed, were dissociable in that they summated, differentially occluded endocannabinoid-LTD and inhibited different striatal inputs. Kappa OP-LTD showed a unique subregional expression in striatum. A single in vivo exposure to the opioid analgesic oxycodone disrupted mu OP-LTD and endocannabinoid-LTD, but not delta or kappa OP-LTD. These data reveal previously unknown opioid-mediated forms of long-term striatal plasticity that are differentially affected by opioid analgesic exposure and are likely important mediators of striatum-dependent learning and behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Opioid receptor activation produces LTD of excitatory transmission in dorsal striatum.
Figure 2: Bath application of endogenous opioid peptides produces OP-LTD.
Figure 3: Endogenously released opioid peptides induce OP-LTD.
Figure 4: Endogenous opioids are released in an mGluR5 and activity-dependent manner.
Figure 5: mOP- and dOP-LTD operate independently.
Figure 6: MOPrs and DOPrs differentially inhibit specific striatal inputs.
Figure 7: A single in vivo exposure to oxycodone prevents induction of mOP- and eCB-LTD.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cicero, T.J., Inciardi, J.A. & Muñoz, A. Trends in abuse of oxycontin and other opioid analgesics in the United States: 2002–2004. J. Pain 6, 662–672 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Compton, W.M. & Volkow, N.D. Major increases in opioid analgesic abuse in the United States: concerns and strategies. Drug Alcohol Depend. 81, 103–107 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Manubay, J.M., Muchow, C. & Sullivan, M.A. Prescription drug abuse: epidemiology, regulatory issues, chronic pain management with narcotic analgesics. Prim. Care 38, 71–90 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ordóñez Gallego, A., González Barón, M. & Espinosa Arranz, E. Oxycodone: a pharmacological and clinical review. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 9, 298–307 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Le Merrer, J., Becker, J.A.J., Befort, K. & Kieffer, B.L. Reward processing by the opioid system in the brain. Physiol. Rev. 89, 1379–1412 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fallon, J.H. & Leslie, F.M. Distribution of dynorphin and enkephalin peptides in the rat brain. J. Comp. Neurol. 249, 293–336 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Finley, J.C., Lindström, P. & Petrusz, P. Immunocytochemical localization of beta-endorphin–containing neurons in the rat brain. Neuroendocrinology 33, 28–42 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Noble, F. et al. First discrete autoradiographic distribution of aminopeptidase N in various structures of rat brain and spinal cord using the selective iodinated inhibitor [125I]RB 129. Neuroscience 105, 479–488 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Strittmatter, S.M., Lo, M.M., Javitch, J.A. & Snyder, S.H. Autoradiographic visualization of angiotensin-converting enzyme in rat brain with [3H]captopril: localization to a striatonigral pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81, 1599–1603 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Waksman, G., Hamell, E., Delay-Goyet, P. & Roques, B.P. Neuronal localization of the neutral endopeptidase 'enkephalinase' in rat brain revealed by lesions and autoradiography. EMBO J. 5, 3163–3166 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dacher, M. & Nugent, F.S. Opiates and plasticity. Neuropharmacology 61, 1088–1096 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dacher, M. & Nugent, F.S. Morphine-induced modulation of LTD at GABAergic synapses in the ventral tegmental area. Neuropharmacology 61, 1166–1171 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Drake, C.T., Chavkin, C. & Milner, T.A. Opioid systems in the dentate gyrus. Prog. Brain Res. 163, 245–263 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Iremonger, K.J. & Bains, J.S. Retrograde opioid signaling regulates glutamatergic transmission in the hypothalamus. J. Neurosci. 29, 7349–7358 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Iremonger, K.J., Kuzmiski, J.B., Baimoukhametova, D.V. & Bains, J.S. Dual regulation of anterograde and retrograde transmission by endocannabinoids. J. Neurosci. 31, 12011–12020 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Piskorowski, R.A. & Chevaleyre, V. Delta-opioid receptors mediate unique plasticity onto parvalbumin-expressing interneurons in area CA2 of the hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 33, 14567–14578 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wamsteeker Cusulin, J.I., Füzesi, T., Inoue, W. & Bains, J.S. Glucocorticoid feedback uncovers retrograde opioid signaling at hypothalamic synapses. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 596–604 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lovinger, D.M. Neurotransmitter roles in synaptic modulation, plasticity and learning in the dorsal striatum. Neuropharmacology 58, 951–961 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith, Y., Raju, D.V., Pare, J. & Sidibe, M. The thalamostriatal system: a highly specific network of the basal ganglia circuitry. Trends Neurosci. 27, 520–527 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Voorn, P., Vanderschuren, L.J.M.J., Groenewegen, H.J., Robbins, T.W. & Pennartz, C.M.A. Putting a spin on the dorsal-ventral divide of the striatum. Trends Neurosci. 27, 468–474 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tepper, J.M., Abercrombie, E.D. & Bolam, J.P. Basal ganglia macrocircuits. Prog. Brain Res. 160, 3–7 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jiang, Z.G. & North, R.A. Pre- and postsynaptic inhibition by opioids in rat striatum. J. Neurosci. 12, 356–361 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Miura, M., Saino-Saito, S., Masuda, M., Kobayashi, K. & Aosaki, T. Compartment-specific modulation of GABAergic synaptic transmission by μ-opioid receptor in the mouse striatum with green fluorescent protein–expressing dopamine islands. J. Neurosci. 27, 9721–9728 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Blomeley, C.P. & Bracci, E. Opioidergic interactions between striatal projection neurons. J. Neurosci. 31, 13346–13356 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wilson, C.J. & Kawaguchi, Y. The origins of two-state spontaneous membrane potential fluctuations of neostriatal spiny neurons. J. Neurosci. 16, 2397–2410 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gerdeman, G.L., Ronesi, J. & Lovinger, D.M. Postsynaptic endocannabinoid release is critical to long-term depression in the striatum. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 446–451 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mathur, B.N., Capik, N.A., Alvarez, V.A. & Lovinger, D.M. Serotonin induces long-term depression at corticostriatal synapses. J. Neurosci. 31, 7402–7411 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Monory, K. et al. Opioid binding profiles of new hydrazone, oxime, carbazone and semicarbazone derivatives of 14-alkoxymorphinans. Life Sci. 64, 2011–2020 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yoburn, B.C., Shah, S., Chan, K., Duttaroy, A. & Davis, T. Supersensitivity to opioid analgesics following chronic opioid antagonist treatment: relationship to receptor selectivity. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 51, 535–539 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Francesconi, W., Berton, F., Demuro, A., Madamba, S.G. & Siggins, G.R. Naloxone blocks long-term depression of excitatory transmission in rat CA1 hippocampus in vitro. Arch. Ital. Biol. 135, 37–48 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wagner, J.J., Etemad, L.R. & Thompson, A.M. Opioid-mediated facilitation of long-term depression in rat hippocampus. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 296, 776–781 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Drdla-Schutting, R., Benrath, J., Wunderbaldinger, G. & Sandkühler, J. Erasure of a spinal memory trace of pain by a brief, high-dose opioid administration. Science 335, 235–238 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hoffman, A.F. & Lupica, C.R. Direct actions of cannabinoids on synaptic transmission in the nucleus accumbens: a comparison with opioids. J. Neurophysiol. 85, 72–83 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. DiFeliceantonio, A.G., Mabrouk, O.S., Kennedy, R.T. & Berridge, K.C. Enkephalin surges in dorsal neostriatum as a signal to eat. Curr. Biol. 22, 1918–1924 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Nielsen, C.K. et al. δ-opioid receptor function in the dorsal striatum plays a role in high levels of ethanol consumption in rats. J. Neurosci. 32, 4540–4552 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hiranuma, T. & Oka, T. Effects of peptidase inhibitors on the [Met5]-enkephalin hydrolysis in ileal and striatal preparations of guinea-pig: almost complete protection of degradation by the combination of amastatin, captopril and thiorphan. Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 41, 437–446 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang, H. & Pickel, V.M. Preferential cytoplasmic localization of δ-opioid receptors in rat striatal patches: comparison with plasmalemmal μ-opioid receptors. J. Neurosci. 21, 3242–3250 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. George, S.R. et al. Distinct distributions of mu, delta and kappa opioid receptor mRNA in rat brain. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 205, 1438–1444 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Mansour, A. et al. Mu, delta and kappa opioid receptor mRNA expression in the rat CNS: an in situ hybridization study. J. Comp. Neurol. 350, 412–438 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Huerta-Ocampo, I., Mena-Segovia, J. & Bolam, J.P. Convergence of cortical and thalamic input to direct and indirect pathway medium spiny neurons in the striatum. Brain Struct. Funct. published online, 10.1007/s00429-013-0601-z (6 July 2013).

  41. López-Moreno, J.A., López-Jiménez, A., Gorriti, M.A. & Rodríguez de Fonseca, F. Functional interactions between endogenous cannabinoid and opioid systems: Focus on alcohol, genetics and drug-addicted behaviors. Curr. Drug Targets 11, 406–428 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hoffman, A.F., Oz, M., Caulder, T. & Lupica, C.R. Functional tolerance and blockade of long-term depression at synapses in the nucleus accumbens after chronic cannabinoid exposure. J. Neurosci. 23, 4815–4820 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Hohmann, A.G. & Herkenham, M. Localization of cannabinoid CB(1) receptor mRNA in neuronal subpopulations of rat striatum: a double-label in situ hybridization study. Synapse 37, 71–80 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Tempel, A. & Zukin, R.S. Neuroanatomical patterns of the mu, delta and kappa opioid receptors of rat brain as determined by quantitative in vitro autoradiography. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 4308–4312 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Fyfe, L.W., Cleary, D.R., Macey, T.A., Morgan, M.M. & Ingram, S.L. Tolerance to the antinociceptive effect of morphine in the absence of short-term presynaptic desensitization in rat periaqueductal gray neurons. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 335, 674–680 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Pennock, R.L. & Hentges, S.T. Differential expression and sensitivity of presynaptic and postsynaptic opioid receptors regulating hypothalamic proopiomelanocortin Neurons. J. Neurosci. 31, 281–288 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. DePoy, L. et al. Chronic alcohol produces neuroadaptations to prime dorsal striatal learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 14783–14788 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Nazzaro, C. et al. SK channel modulation rescues striatal plasticity and control over habit in cannabinoid tolerance. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 284–293 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We extend special thanks to W. Xiong for his efforts in performing preliminary experiments for this study. This research was supported by the Division of Intramural Clinical and Biological Research of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, US National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

B.K.A. planned experiments, conducted whole-cell recordings, injections and stereotaxic surgeries, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. D.A.K. conducted extracellular field recordings and wrote the manuscript. D.M.L. supervised and assisted in experimental planning and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David M Lovinger.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 Field recordings reveal OP-LTD of net striatal output.

(a) DAMGO (1 μM, 5 min) induced mOP-LTD of population spike amplitude in field recordings of the DLS (vs. control: P=0.0219, t(12)=2.631, n=14). (b) DPDPE (1 μM, 5 min) induced dOP-LTD of population spike amplitude in field recordings of the DLS (vs. control: P=0.0047, t(14)=3.360, n=16). (c) U69,593 (1 μM, 5 min) induced kOP-LTD of population spike amplitude in field recordings of the DLS (vs. control: P=0.0317, t(14)=2.386, n=16). Representative traces are the average of the first 5 min (first of each pair) and the final 5 min (second of each pair) of recording. Scale bars: 0.2 mV, 2 ms. Data analyzed with unpaired Student's t-test.

Source data

Supplementary Figure 2 OP-LTD is equivalent at –60 mV and –80 mV holding potentials in DLS, but only mOP- and dOP-LTD occur in DMS.

(a) DAMGO (1 μM, 5 min) induced comparable mOP-LTD in MSNs recorded at -60 mV (n=11) and -80 mV in DLS (n=4), and at -60 mV in DMS (n=6) (at 25 min: P=0.3741, F(2,18)=1.039). (b) DPDPE (1 μM, 5 min) induced comparable dOP-LTD in MSNs recorded at -60 mV (n=7) and -80 mV in DLS (n=5), and at -60 mV in DMS (n=4) (at 25 min: P=0.6461, F(2,13)=0.4518). (c) U69,593 (0.3 μM, 5 min) induced comparable kOP-LTD in MSNs recorded at -60 mV (n=5) and -80 mV in DLS (n=5). U69,593 failed to induce LTD in DMS (n=6) (at 25 min: P=0.0075, F(2,13)=7.308). Data analyzed with a one-way ANOVA with Dunnett's multiple comparisons post-test: vs. DLS, -60 mV. *: P<0.05.

Source data

Supplementary Figure 3 mOP- and dOP-LTD are expressed presynaptically, whereas kOP-LTD has an unclear site of expression.

(a) Representative traces of sEPSCs recorded from a DLS MSN before, immediately after, and 20-25 min following DAMGO (0.3 μM, 5 min). DAMGO (0.3 μM, 5 min) induced a long-lasting increase in sEPSC inter-event interval (IEI) (b,c; P=0.0063, Friedman statistic=9.800, n=9) with no change in sEPSC amplitude (d; P=0.2223, Friedman statistic=3.200). (e) Representative sEPSC traces for DPDPE (0.3 μM, 5 min). DPDPE (0.3 μM, 5 min) produced a long-lasting increase in sEPSC IEI (f,g; P=0.0207, Friedman statistic=7.714, n=7) with no change in sEPSC amplitude (h; P=0.0854, Friedman statistic=5.429). (i) Representative sEPSC traces for U69,593 (0.3 μM, 5 min). U69,593 (0.3 μM, 5 min) produced no change in sEPSC IEI (j,k; P=0.0570, Friedman statistic=6.000, n=9), but produced a delayed decrease in sEPSC amplitude (l; P=0.0307, Friedman statistic=6.889). Scale bars: 20 pA, 2 s. Data in c-d, g-h, and k-l analyzed with Friedman test with Dunn's multiple comparisons post-test. *: P<0.05.

Source data

Supplementary Figure 4 The lack of an additive effect of a MOPr and a CB1 agonist suggests a presynaptically localized occlusiveness of mOP-LTD and CB1-LTD.

DAMGO (0.3 μM; n=5), WIN55,212-2 (1 μM, n=5), or their combination (n=6), each applied for 10 min, induced comparable magnitudes of depression (P=0.7797, F(2,13)=0.2537). Representative traces are the average of the first 10 min (first of pair) and the final 10 min (second of pair) of recording. Scale bars: 50 pA, 50 ms. Data analyzed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post-test.

Source data

Supplementary Figure 5 eCB-LTD is not blocked by opioid receptor antagonists, and OP-LTD is not blocked by a CB1 antagonist.

(a) Pre-application of the CB1 receptor antagonist, AM251 (3 μM), did not alter mOP-LTD induced by DAMGO (0.3 μM to 1 μM, 5 min; at 30 min:P=0.9836, t(8)=0.02127, n=5 each). (b) Pre-application of AM251 (3 μM) did not alter dOP-LTD induced by DPDPE (0.3 μM to 1 μM, 5 min; at 30 min: P=0.5996; t(9)=0.5441, n=5 control, n=6 AM251). (c) Pre-application of the opioid receptor antagonist, naloxone (2 μM), did not alter eCB-LTD induced by HFS paired with postsynaptic depolarization (at 30 min: P=0.6162, t(10)=0.5173, n=6 each). Data analyzed with unpaired Student's t-test.

Source data

Supplementary Figure 6 Expression of ChR2-Venus in hippocampus does not result in striatal ChR2-Venus expression.

(a) Lack of striatal expression of ChR2-Venus in striatum following an injection of AAV vector in hippocampus. Injection coordinates: A/P: -2.0, M/L: ± 0.35, D/V: -1.45. (b) AAV vector injection in hippocampus produces substantial ChR2-Venus expression at the injection site. Images are representative of 1 injected mouse. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–6 (PDF 6422 kb)

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Atwood, B., Kupferschmidt, D. & Lovinger, D. Opioids induce dissociable forms of long-term depression of excitatory inputs to the dorsal striatum. Nat Neurosci 17, 540–548 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3652

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3652

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing