Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Screening individual hybridomas by microengraving to discover monoclonal antibodies

Abstract

The demand for monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in biomedical research is significant, but the current methodologies used to discover them are both lengthy and costly. Consequently, the diversity of antibodies available for any particular antigen remains limited. Microengraving is a soft lithographic technique that provides a rapid and efficient alternative for discovering new mAbs. This protocol describes how to use microengraving to screen mouse hybridomas to establish new cell lines producing unique mAbs. Single cells from a polyclonal population are isolated into an array of microscale wells (105 cells per screen). The array is then used to print a protein microarray, where each element contains the antibodies captured from individual wells. The antibodies on the microarray are screened with antigens of interest, and mapped to the corresponding cells, which are then recovered from their microwells by micromanipulation. Screening and retrieval require approximately 1–3 d (9–12 d including the steps for preparing arrays of microwells).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Schematic diagram of the processes described in this protocol.
Figure 2: Design of an array of microwells for microengraving.
Figure 3: Retrieval of cells from microwells with a micromanipulator.
Figure 4: Microarrays of antibodies produced by microengraving.
Figure 5: 'Curtain' western blot of 12.5% polyacrylamide gel loaded with 200 μg of complete COS-1 cell lysate with 10 μg HBSAg (ViroStat).
Figure 6: Examples of potential variations in the quality of the microarrays produced by microengraving.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barrett, W. & Newsome, M.S.E. The clinical pharmacology of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of malignancy; have the magic bullets arrived? Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 66, 6–19 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Finn, O.J. Molecular origins of cancer—cancer immunology. N. Engl. J. Med. 358, 2704–2715 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Buttmann, M. & Rieckmann, P. Treating multiple sclerosis with monoclonal antibodies. Exp. Rev. Neurotherapeutics 8, 433–455 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jennifer, M.D. & Stuart, M.L. Prospects for development of vaccines against fungal diseases. Drug Resist. Updat. 9, 105–110 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Keller, M.A. & Stiehm, E.R. Passive immunity in prevention and treatment of infectious diseases. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 13, 602–614 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Editorial. Elective affinities. Nat. Methods 5, 851 (2008).

  7. Uhlen, M., Gräslund, S. & Sundström, M. A pilot project to generate affinity reagents to human proteins. Nat. Methods 5, 854–855 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dessain, S.K. et al. High efficiency creation of human monoclonal antibody-producing hybridomas. J. Immunol. Methods 291, 109–122 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kohler, G. & Milstein, C. Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. Nature 256, 495–497 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shulman, M., Wilde, C.D. & Kohler, G. A better cell line for making hybridomas secreting specific antibodies. Nature 276, 269–270 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Clackson, T., Hoogenboom, H.R., Griffiths, A.D. & Winter, G. Making antibody fragments using phage display libraries. Nature 352, 624–628 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Boder, E.T. & Wittrup, K.D. Yeast surface display for screening combinatorial polypeptide libraries. Nat. Biotech. 15, 553–557 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fuchs, P., Breitling, F., Dubel, S., Seehaus, T. & Little, M. Targeting recombinant antibodies to the surface of Escherichia-coli—fusion to a peptidoglycan associated lipoprotein. Biotechnology 9, 1369–1372 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee, C.M.Y., Iorno, N., Sierro, F. & Christ, D. Selection of human antibody fragments by phage display. Nat. Protoc. 2, 3001–3008 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chao, G. et al. Isolating and engineering human antibodies using yeast surface display. Nat. Protoc. 1, 755–768 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Love, J.C., Ronan, J.L., Grotenbreg, G.M., van der Veen, A.G. & Ploegh, H.L. A microengraving method for rapid selection of single cells producing antigen-specific antibodies. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 703–707 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bradshaw, E.M. et al. Concurrent detection of secreted products from human lymphocytes by microengraving: antigen-reactive antibodies and cytokines. Clin. Immunol. 129, 10–18 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Story, C.M. et al. Profiling antibody responses by multiparametric analysis of primary B cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 17902–17907 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ronan, J.L., Story, C.M., Papa, E. & Love, J.C. Optimization of the surfaces used to capture antibodies from single hybridomas reduces the time required for microengraving. J. Immunol. Methods 340, 164–169 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Coligan, J.E. (Greene Pub. Associates and Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1992).

  21. Love, J.C., Wolfe, D.B., Gates, B.D. & Whitesides, G.M. McGraw Hill Yearbook of Science and Technology 323–326 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2004).

  22. Kane, R.S., Takayama, S., Ostuni, E., Ingber, D.E. & Whitesides, G.M. Patterning proteins and cells using soft lithography. Biomaterials 20, 2363–2376 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Park, J.W., Vahidi, B., Taylor, A.M., Rhee, S.W. & Jeon, N.L. Microfluidic culture platform for neuroscience research. Nat. Protoc. 1, 2128–2136 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tourovskaia, A., Figueroa-Masot, X. & Folch, A. Long-term microfluidic cultures of myotube microarrays for high-throughput focal stimulation. Nat. Protoc. 1, 1092–1104 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Harlow, E. & Lane, D. Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA, 1988).

  26. Espina, V. et al. Protein microarrays: molecular profiling technologies for clinical specimens. Proteomics 3, 2091–2100 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Saff, D. & Sacilotto, D. Printmaking: History and Process (Holt, Rinehart, Winston, New York, USA, 1978).

  28. MacBeath, G. & Schreiber, S.L. Printing proteins as microarrays for high-throughput function determination. Science 289, 1760–1763 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kramer, S., Joos, T.O. & Templin, M.F. Protein Microarrays. In Current Protocols in Protein Science (eds. J.E. Coligan, B.M. Dunn, D.W. Speicher & P.T. Wingfield) (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, USA, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Engvall, E. & Perlmann, P. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, Elisa: III. quantitation of specific antibodies by enzyme-labeled anti-immunoglobulin in antigen-coated tubes. J. Immunol. 109, 129–135 (1972).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kovac, J.R. & Voldman, J. Intuitive, image-based cell sorting using optofluidic cell sorting. Anal. Chem. 79, 9321–9330 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Simon, K., Lingappa, V.R. & Ganem, D. Secreted hepatitis-B surface-antigen polypeptides are derived from a transmembrane precursor. J. Cell Biol. 107, 2163–2168 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute, and used facilities at the Center for Nanoscale Systems at Harvard University supported by the NSF under the National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network, and services at the Stanford Microfluidics Foundry. E.P. was an NSERC postgraduate fellow. C.M.S. thanks Gordon College for sabbatical leave. The authors thank J. Ronan and J.H. Choi for helpful discussions on this protocol.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J Christopher Love.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ogunniyi, A., Story, C., Papa, E. et al. Screening individual hybridomas by microengraving to discover monoclonal antibodies. Nat Protoc 4, 767–782 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2009.40

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2009.40

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing