Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Virtual karyotyping of pluripotent stem cells on the basis of their global gene expression profiles

Abstract

The genomic instability of stem cells in culture, caused by their routine in vitro propagation or by their genetic manipulation, is deleterious both for their clinical application and for their use in basic research. Frequent evaluation of the genomic integrity of stem cells is thus required, and it is usually performed using cytogenetic or DNA-based methods at variable sensitivities, resolutions and costs. Here we present a detailed protocol for determining the genomic integrity of pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) using their global gene expression profiles. This expression-based karyotyping (e-karyotyping) protocol uses gene expression microarray data (either originally generated or derived from the literature) and describes how to organize it properly, subject it to two complementary bioinformatic analyses and conservatively interpret the results in order to generate an accurate estimation of the chromosomal aberrations in the autosomal genome of examined stem cell lines. The experimental steps of e-karyotyping can be carried out in 20–30 h.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Comparison of genome-wide techniques to evaluate genomic integrity.
Figure 2: Representative results of gene expression–based virtual karyotyping.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ronen, D. & Benvenisty, N. Genomic stability in reprogramming. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 22, 444–449 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldring, C.E. et al. Assessing the safety of stem cell therapeutics. Cell Stem Cell 8, 618–628 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lund, R.J., Narva, E. & Lahesmaa, R. Genetic and epigenetic stability of human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 732–744 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ben-David, U. & Benvenisty, N. Analyzing the gnomic integrity of stem cells. in StemBook (ed. The Stem Cell Research Community). <http://www.stembook.org/node/719> (2012).

  5. Ben-David, U., Benvenisty, N. & Mayshar, Y. Genetic instability in human induced pluripotent stem cells: classification of causes and possible safeguards. Cell Cycle 9, 4603–4604 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Barrilleaux, B. & Knoepfler, P.S. Inducing iPSCs to escape the dish. Cell Stem Cell 9, 103–111 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu, X. et al. Trisomy eight in ES cells is a common potential problem in gene targeting and interferes with germ line transmission. Dev. Dyn. 209, 85–91 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mayshar, Y. et al. Identification and classification of chromosomal aberrations in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 7, 521–531 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ben-David, U., Mayshar, Y. & Benvenisty, N. Large-scale analysis reveals acquisition of lineage-specific chromosomal aberrations in human adult stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 9, 97–102 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ben-David, U. & Benvenisty, N. High prevalence of evolutionarily conserved and species-specific genomic aberrations in mouse pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells 30, 612–622 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Meisner, L.F. & Johnson, J.A. Protocols for cytogenetic studies of human embryonic stem cells. Methods 45, 133–141 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Speicher, M.R. & Carter, N.P. The new cytogenetics: blurring the boundaries with molecular biology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 782–792 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Baker, D.E. et al. Adaptation to culture of human embryonic stem cells and oncogenesis in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 207–215 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Martins-Taylor, K. et al. Recurrent copy number variations in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 488–491 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Spits, C. et al. Recurrent chromosomal abnormalities in human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1361–1363 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Laurent, L.C. et al. Dynamic changes in the copy number of pluripotency and cell proliferation genes in human ESCs and iPSCs during reprogramming and time in culture. Cell Stem Cell 8, 106–118 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lefort, N., Perrier, A.L., Laabi, Y., Varela, C. & Peschanski, M. Human embryonic stem cells and genomic instability. Regen. Med. 4, 899–909 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Quinlan, A.R. et al. Genome sequencing of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells reveals retroelement stability and infrequent DNA rearrangement during reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 9, 366–373 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hussein, S.M. et al. Copy number variation and selection during reprogramming to pluripotency. Nature 471, 58–62 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Abyzov, A. et al. Somatic copy number mosaicism in human skin revealed by induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 492, 438–442 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bruck, T. & Benvenisty, N. Meta-analysis of the heterogeneity of X chromosome inactivation in human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Res. 6, 187–193 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stelzer, Y., Yanuka, O. & Benvenisty, N. Global analysis of parental imprinting in human parthenogenetic induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 735–741 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lingjaerde, O.C., Baumbusch, L.O., Liestol, K., Glad, I.K. & Borresen-Dale, A.L. CGH-Explorer: a program for analysis of array-CGH data. Bioinformatics 21, 821–822 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank T. Golan-Lev for her assistance with graphic design. N.B. is the Herbert Cohn Chair in Cancer Research. U.B.-D. is a Clore Fellow. Y.M. is an EMBO fellow. The research was partially funded by the Israel Science Foundation (grant no. 269/12) and by the Centers of Excellence Legacy Heritage Biomedical Science Partnership (grant no. 1801/10).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the development of the methodology. U.B.-D. and N.B. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nissim Benvenisty.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Lists of probe sets expressed in human pluripotent stem cells for selected Affymetrix platforms.

These probe sets are expressed in undifferentiated hPSCs, and can be used for the analysis of the genomic integrity of this cell type, when using Affymetrix microarray platforms HG_U133Plus2.0 and HG_ST1.0. (XLSX 281 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ben-David, U., Mayshar, Y. & Benvenisty, N. Virtual karyotyping of pluripotent stem cells on the basis of their global gene expression profiles. Nat Protoc 8, 989–997 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.051

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.051

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing