Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Unbiased screen of RNA tailing activities reveals a poly(UG) polymerase

Nature Methods volume 16, pages 437–445 (2019)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Ribonucleotidyl transferases (rNTases) add untemplated ribonucleotides to diverse RNAs. We have developed TRAID-seq, a screening strategy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to identify sequences added to a reporter RNA at single-nucleotide resolution by overexpressed candidate enzymes from different organisms. The rNTase activities of 22 previously unexplored enzymes were determined. In addition to poly(A)- and poly(U)-adding enzymes, we identified a cytidine-adding enzyme that is likely to be part of a two-enzyme system that adds CCA to tRNAs in a eukaryote; a nucleotidyl transferase that adds nucleotides to RNA without apparent nucleotide preference; and a poly(UG) polymerase, Caenorhabditis elegans MUT-2, that adds alternating uridine and guanosine nucleotides to form poly(UG) tails. MUT-2 is known to be required for certain forms of RNA silencing, and mutants of the enzyme that result in defective silencing did not add poly(UG) tails in our assay. We propose that MUT-2 poly(UG) polymerase activity is required to promote genome integrity and RNA silencing.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The TRAID-seq assay measures nucleotide-addition activity in cellulo.
Fig. 2: Analyses of the nucleotide-addition activities of 40 noncanonical rNTases from seven species.
Fig. 3: Nucleotide-addition activities of S. pombe SPAC1093.04 and S. cerevisiae Cca1.
Fig. 4: CeMUT-2 is a poly(UG) polymerase.
Fig. 5: CeMUT-2 mutants resulting in RNAi deficiency lack poly(UG) polymerase activity.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All sequencing data that support the findings of this study have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE123478.

Code availability

All custom scripts have been made available at https://github.com/melanieapreston/PuppyTails.

References

  1. Blahna, M. T., Jones, M. R., Quinton, L. J., Matsuura, K. Y. & Mizgerd, J. P. Terminal uridyltransferase enzyme Zcchc11 promotes cell proliferation independent of its uridyltransferase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 42381–42389 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hagan, J. P., Piskounova, E. & Gregory, R. I. Lin28 recruits the TUTase Zcchc11 to inhibit let-7 maturation in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 1021–1025 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Jones, M. R. et al. Zcchc11-dependent uridylation of microRNA directs cytokine expression. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 1157–1163 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Sudheesh, A. P. & Laishram, R. S. Nuclear phosphatidylinositol-phosphate type I kinase α–coupled Star-PAP polyadenylation regulates cell invasion. Mol. Cell. Biol. 38, e00457-17 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Benoit, P., Papin, C., Kwak, J. E., Wickens, M. & Simonelig, M. PAP- and GLD-2-type poly(A) polymerases are required sequentially in cytoplasmic polyadenylation and oogenesis in Drosophila. Development 135, 1969–1979 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kwak, J. E. et al. GLD2 poly(A) polymerase is required for long-term memory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 14644–14649 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Yue, D., Maizels, N. & Weiner, A. M. CCA-adding enzymes and poly(A) polymerases are all members of the same nucleotidyltransferase superfamily: characterization of the CCA-adding enzyme from the archaeal hyperthermophile Sulfolobus shibatae. RNA 2, 895–908 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Aravind, L. & Koonin, E. V. DNA polymerase β–like nucleotidyltransferase superfamily: identification of three new families, classification and evolutionary history. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 1609–1618 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Martin, G. & Keller, W. RNA-specific ribonucleotidyl transferases. RNA 13, 1834–1849 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kwak, J. E., Wang, L., Ballantyne, S., Kimble, J. & Wickens, M. Mammalian GLD-2 homologs are poly(A) polymerases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 4407–4412 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kwak, J. E. & Wickens, M. A family of poly(U) polymerases. RNA 13, 860–867 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Chang, H., Lim, J., Ha, M. & Kim, V. N. TAIL-seq: genome-wide determination of poly(A) tail length and 3′ end modifications. Mol. Cell 53, 1044–1052 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gazestani, V. H., Hampton, M., Abrahante, J. E., Salavati, R. & Zimmer, S. L. circTAIL-seq, a targeted method for deep analysis of RNA 3′ tails, reveals transcript-specific differences by multiple metrics. RNA 22, 477–486 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Collins, J., Saari, B. & Anderson, P. Activation of a transposable element in the germ line but not the soma of Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 328, 726–728 (1987).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yuan, J. Y., Finney, M., Tsung, N. & Horvitz, H. R. Tc4, a Caenorhabditis elegans transposable element with an unusual fold-back structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 3334–3338 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Tabara, H. et al. The rde-1 gene, RNA interference, and transposon silencing in C. elegans. Cell 99, 123–132 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ketting, R. F. & Plasterk, R. H. A genetic link between co-suppression and RNA interference in C. elegans. Nature 404, 296–298 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Robert, V. J., Sijen, T., van Wolfswinkel, J. & Plasterk, R. H. Chromatin and RNAi factors protect the C. elegans germline against repetitive sequences. Genes Dev. 19, 782–787 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen, C. C. et al. A member of the polymerase β nucleotidyltransferase superfamily is required for RNA interference in C. elegans. Curr. Biol. 15, 378–383 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee, R. C., Hammell, C. M. & Ambros, V. Interacting endogenous and exogenous RNAi pathways in Caenorhabditis elegans. RNA 12, 589–597 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Gu, W. et al. Distinct Argonaute-mediated 22G-RNA pathways direct genome surveillance in the C. elegans germline. Mol. Cell 36, 231–244 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Jose, A. M., Garcia, G. A. & Hunter, C. P. Two classes of silencing RNAs move between Caenorhabditis elegans tissues. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 1184–1188 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Coller, J. M., Gray, N. K. & Wickens, M. P. mRNA stabilization by poly(A) binding protein is independent of poly(A) and requires translation. Genes Dev. 12, 3226–3235 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Rissland, O. S., Mikulasova, A. & Norbury, C. J. Efficient RNA polyuridylation by noncanonical poly(A) polymerases. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 3612–3624 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, L., Eckmann, C. R., Kadyk, L. C., Wickens, M. & Kimble, J. A regulatory cytoplasmic poly(A) polymerase in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 419, 312–316 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Read, R. L., Martinho, R. G., Wang, S. W., Carr, A. M. & Norbury, C. J. Cytoplasmic poly(A) polymerases mediate cellular responses to S phase arrest. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 12079–12084 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Saitoh, S. et al. Cid13 is a cytoplasmic poly(A) polymerase that regulates ribonucleotide reductase mRNA. Cell 109, 563–573 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tomecki, R., Dmochowska, A., Gewartowski, K., Dziembowski, A. & Stepien, P. P. Identification of a novel human nuclear-encoded mitochondrial poly(A) polymerase. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 6001–6014 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Trippe, R. et al. Identification, cloning, and functional analysis of the human U6 snRNA–specific terminal uridylyl transferase. RNA 12, 1494–1504 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Mellman, D. L. et al. A PtdIns4,5P2-regulated nuclear poly(A) polymerase controls expression of select mRNAs. Nature 451, 1013–1017 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schmid, M., Küchler, B. & Eckmann, C. R. Two conserved regulatory cytoplasmic poly(A) polymerases, GLD-4 and GLD-2, regulate meiotic progression in C. elegans. Genes Dev. 23, 824–836 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Rammelt, C., Bilen, B., Zavolan, M. & Keller, W. PAPD5, a noncanonical poly(A) polymerase with an unusual RNA-binding motif. RNA 17, 1737–1746 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Kadaba, S., Wang, X. & Anderson, J. T. Nuclear RNA surveillance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Trf4p-dependent polyadenylation of nascent hypomethylated tRNA and an aberrant form of 5S rRNA. RNA 12, 508–521 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Aebi, M. et al. Isolation of a temperature-sensitive mutant with an altered tRNA nucleotidyltransferase and cloning of the gene encoding tRNA nucleotidyltransferase in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 16216–16220 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kim, D. U. et al. Analysis of a genome-wide set of gene deletions in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 617–623 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Preston, M. A. et al. Unbiased screen of RNA tailing enzymes at single-nucleotide resolution reveals a poly(UG) polymerase required for genome integrity and RNA silencing. bioRxiv Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/422972v1 (2018).

  37. Reid, N. E., Ngou, J. S. & Joyce, P. B. M. Schizosaccharomyces pombe contains separate CC- and A-adding tRNA nucleotidyltransferases. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 508, 785–790 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chung, C. Z., Jo, D. H. & Heinemann, I. U. Nucleotide specificity of the human terminal nucleotidyltransferase Gld2 (TUT2). RNA 22, 1239–1249 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Munoz-Tello, P., Gabus, C. & Thore, S. Functional implications from the Cid1 poly(U) polymerase crystal structure. Structure 20, 977–986 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lunde, B. M., Magler, I. & Meinhart, A. Crystal structures of the Cid1 poly(U) polymerase reveal the mechanism for UTP selectivity. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 9815–9824 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Yates, L. A. et al. Structural basis for the activity of a cytoplasmic RNA terminal uridylyl transferase. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 782–787 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Morozov, I. Y. et al. mRNA 3′ tagging is induced by nonsense-mediated decay and promotes ribosome dissociation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 32, 2585–2595 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Kobyłecki, K., Kuchta, K., Dziembowski, A., Ginalski, K. & Tomecki, R. Biochemical and structural bioinformatics studies of fungal CutA nucleotidyltransferases explain their unusual specificity toward CTP and increased tendency for cytidine incorporation at the 3′-terminal positions of synthesized tails. RNA 23, 1902–1926 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Lim, J. et al. Mixed tailing by TENT4A and TENT4B shields mRNA from rapid deadenylation. Science 361, 701–704 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Boulé, J. B., Rougeon, F. & Papanicolaou, C. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase indiscriminately incorporates ribonucleotides and deoxyribonucleotides. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 31388–31393 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Xiong, Y. & Steitz, T. A. Mechanism of transfer RNA maturation by CCA-adding enzyme without using an oligonucleotide template. Nature 430, 640–645 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Cho, H. D., Verlinde, C. L. & Weiner, A. M. Archaeal CCA-adding enzymes: central role of a highly conserved β-turn motif in RNA polymerization without translocation. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 9555–9566 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Fire, A. et al. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 391, 806–811 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Vastenhouw, N. L. et al. Gene expression: long-term gene silencing by RNAi. Nature 442, 882 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Buckley, B. A. et al. A nuclear Argonaute promotes multigenerational epigenetic inheritance and germline immortality. Nature 489, 447–451 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Gietz, R. D. & Sugino, A. New yeast–Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six–base pair restriction sites. Gene 74, 527–534 (1988).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Whipple, J. M., Lane, E. A., Chernyakov, I., D’Silva, S. & Phizicky, E. M. The yeast rapid tRNA decay pathway primarily monitors the structural integrity of the acceptor and T-stems of mature tRNA. Genes Dev. 25, 1173–1184 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Gibson, D. G. et al. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat. Methods 6, 343–345 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Sherman, F. Getting started with yeast. Methods Enzymol. 350, 3–41 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Preston, M. A., D’Silva, S., Kon, Y. & Phizicky, E. M. tRNAHis 5-methylcytidine levels increase in response to several growth arrest conditions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. RNA 19, 243–256 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. SenGupta, D. J. et al. A three-hybrid system to detect RNA–protein interactions in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 8496–8501 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Stumpf, C. R., Opperman, L. & Wickens, M. Chapter 14. Analysis of RNA–protein interactions using a yeast three-hybrid system. Methods Enzymol. 449, 295–315 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Preston, M. A. et al. TRAID-seq: unbiased analysis of RNA tailing enzyme activity at single-nucleotide resolution. Protocol Exchange https://doi.org/10.1038/protex.2019.016 (2019).

  59. Liaw, A. & Wiener, M. Classification and regression by randomForest. R News 2, 18–22 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Dickson, K. S., Thompson, S. R., Gray, N. K. & Wickens, M. Poly(A) polymerase and the regulation of cytoplasmic polyadenylation. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 41810–41816 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Gray, N. K., Coller, J. M., Dickson, K. S. & Wickens, M. Multiple portions of poly(A)-binding protein stimulate translation in vivo. EMBO J. 19, 4723–4733 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Pisacane, P. & Halic, M. Tailing and degradation of Argonaute-bound small RNAs protect the genome from uncontrolled RNAi. Nat. Commun. 8, 15332 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Haracska, L., Johnson, R. E., Prakash, L. & Prakash, S. Trf4 and Trf5 proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae exhibit poly(A) RNA polymerase activity but no DNA polymerase activity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 10183–10189 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Rüegger, S., Miki, T. S., Hess, D. & Großhans, H. The ribonucleotidyl transferase USIP-1 acts with SART3 to promote U6 snRNA recycling. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 3344–3357 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the Wickens, Kimble, Kennedy, and Anderson laboratories for advice throughout the work. We are particularly grateful to S. Kennedy for discussions concerning MUT-2, and A. Hopper and E. Phizicky for advice on CCA-adding enzymes. We thank A. Shukla and J. Yan for comments on the manuscript. We acknowledge the University of Wisconsin Biotechnology Center DNA Sequencing Facility, especially M. Adams and M. Sussmann, for providing Illumina sequencing facilities and services, and M. Harte for assistance with cloning S. pombe rNTases. We also thank S. Sasaki for collecting Xenopus oocytes and advice on injections. We are grateful to L. Vanderploeg of the UW Biochemistry Media Laboratory for help with figures. This work was supported by a Ruth Kirschstein National Research Service Award (1F32GM103130-01A1) to M.A.P. and NIH grants GM50942 to M.W. and HG003747 to S.K. J.K. is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Melanie A. Preston & Natascha Buter

    Present address: Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA

  2. Douglas F. Porter

    Present address: Program in Epithelial Biology, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, CA, USA

  3. Christopher P. Lapointe

    Present address: Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USA

    Melanie A. Preston, Douglas F. Porter, Natascha Buter, Christopher P. Lapointe, Judith Kimble & Marvin Wickens

  2. Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USA

    Fan Chen & Sunduz Keles

  3. Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USA

    Sunduz Keles

  4. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USA

    Judith Kimble

Authors
  1. Melanie A. Preston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Douglas F. Porter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fan Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Natascha Buter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Christopher P. Lapointe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sunduz Keles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Judith Kimble
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Marvin Wickens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.A.P., J.K., and M.W. designed the experiments; M.A.P. performed the experiments and analyzed data unless otherwise noted. D.F.P. wrote the PuppyTails program used to analyze TRAID-seq data, including tail-o-grams. F.C. and S.K. performed statistical analyses of tail sequence motifs. N.B. prepared N. crassa and C. albicans TRAID-seq samples. C.P.L. wrote the script used to calculate total nucleotide incorporation. M.A.P. and M.W. wrote the manuscript, with contributions from all other authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marvin Wickens.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 rNTase assay using RNase P-derived reporter RNA.

a, RNase P reporter RNA is co-expressed with MS2 coat protein-rNTase fusion in yeast. The tethered rNTase adds nucleotides to the 3ʹ end of the reporter RNA. b, Schematic of sample processing to detect adenosine tails or uridine tails added to the reporter RNA and example data identifying PUP or PAP activity. This tail-specific approach was also used to produce RT-PCR data in Fig. 1a. c, RT-PCR analysis to detect adenosine tails or uridine tails added to the RNase P reporter RNA by control rNTases, relative to empty vector or to no-reporter control. Lanes marked with a minus sign indicate reactions performed without reverse transcriptase. Representative gel image from 3 independent experiments.

Supplementary Figure 2 S. pombe rNTases with secondary nucleotide preferences.

a, Tail-o-gram depicting nucleotide composition of tails added by SpCid1. b, Left, tail-o-gram depicting nucleotide composition of tails added by SpCid13. Right, representative tail sequences added to tRNA reporter. c, Left, tail-o-gram depicting nucleotide composition of tails added by SpCid14. Right, representative tail sequences added to tRNA reporter. For all tail-o-grams: Percentage of each nucleotide at each tail length is plotted on the left y axis. Each nucleotide is indicated by a different color: green, uridine; yellow, cytidine; purple, guanosine; brown, adenosine. The number of tails detected per million heptamers (TPMH) is indicated by black diamonds, and corresponds to the log scale on the right y axis.

Supplementary Figure 3 Sequence motif effect analysis of S. pombe SPAC1093.04 and S. cerevisiae Cca1 enzymes.

Effect analysis of tails added in cells expressing SpSPAC1093.04 (red, n = 5) and ScCca1 (black, n = 3). Oligonucleotides with a significant effect after multiplicity correction with the Bonferroni procedure at significance level 0.05 (dashed line near baseline) are displayed.

Supplementary Figure 4 Expression of both SPAC1093.04 and SPCC645.10 rescues cca1-1 temperature sensitivity: second biological replicate.

cca1-1 mutant strains containing CEN plasmids expressing indicated plasmids were serially diluted, spotted on SD-Ura-Leu media and grown at 37 °C for 3 d or 23 °C for 4 d. This experiment was repeated twice with similar results.

Supplementary Figure 5 CeF31C3.2 (NPOL-1) adds tails that are random in sequence.

a, Left, tail-o-gram depicting nucleotide composition of tails added by CeF31C3.2 in TRAID-seq. The percentage of each nucleotide at each tail length is plotted on the left y axis. Each nucleotide is indicated by a different color: green, uridine; yellow, cytidine; purple, guanosine; brown, adenosine. The number of tails detected per million heptamers (TPMH) is indicated by black diamonds, and corresponds to the log scale on the right y axis. Right, example tail sequences randomly selected from tails of the same length added by CeF31C3.2. b, CeF31C3.2 tail composition parallels intracellular rNTP concentrations. CeF31C3.2 addition of each nucleotide ± s.d. (n = 5) versus measured rNTP concentrations in yeast (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 4949–4954; 2010). c, Statistical analysis of all possible dinucleotides in tails added by CeF31C3.2. Heat map of –log10 P values for all possible dinucleotides. No dinucleotides had a statistically significant effect after multiplicity correction with the Bonferroni procedure at significance level 0.05. Five independent biological replicates were evaluated. Details of statistical analyses are provided in the Methods (“Computational analyses of sequence motifs”).

Supplementary Figure 6 CeMUT-2 adds UG repeats to a non-tRNA substrate in yeast.

a, Schematic of experiment to test CeMUT-2 activity on RNase P RNA reporter in yeast. b, CeMUT-2 adds UG repeats to RNase P RNA reporter in three biological replicates, regardless of the 3ʹ end sequence of the RNA reporter. Randomly selected sequences of tails added to different 3ʹ ends are shown.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1–6 and Supplementary Table 1

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Preston, M.A., Porter, D.F., Chen, F. et al. Unbiased screen of RNA tailing activities reveals a poly(UG) polymerase. Nat Methods 16, 437–445 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0370-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0370-6

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing