Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Plasmodium parasites mount an arrest response to dihydroartemisinin, as revealed by whole transcriptome shotgun sequencing (RNA-seq) and microarray study

BMC Genomics volume 16, Article number: 830 (2015) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Control of malaria is threatened by emerging parasite resistance to artemisinin and derivative drug (ART) therapies. The molecular detail of how Plasmodium malaria parasites respond to ART and how this could contribute to resistance are not well understood. To address this question, we performed a transcriptomic study of dihydroartemisinin (DHA) response in P. falciparum K1 strain and in P. berghei ANKA strain using microarray and RNA-seq technology.

Results

Microarray data from DHA-treated P. falciparum trophozoite stage parasites revealed a response pattern that is overall less trophozoite-like and more like the other stages of asexual development. A meta-analysis of these data with previously published data from other ART treatments revealed a set of common differentially expressed genes. Notably, ribosomal protein genes are down-regulated in response to ART. A similar pattern of trophozoite transcriptomic change was observed from RNA-seq data. RNA-seq data from DHA-treated P. falciparum rings reveal a more muted response, although there is considerable overlap of differentially expressed genes with DHA-treated trophozoites. No genes are differentially expressed in DHA-treated P. falciparum schizonts. The transcriptional response of P. berghei to DHA treatment in vivo in infected mice is similar to the P. falciparum in vitro culture ring and trophozoite responses, in which ribosomal protein genes are notably down-regulated.

Conclusions

Ring and trophozoite stage Plasmodium respond to ART by arresting metabolic processes such as protein synthesis and glycolysis. This response can be protective in rings, as shown by the phenomenon of dormancy. In contrast, this response is not as protective in trophozoites owing to their commitment to a highly active and vulnerable metabolic state. The lower metabolic demands of schizonts could explain why they are less sensitive and unresponsive to ART. The ART response pattern is revealed clearly from RNA-seq data, suggesting that this technology is of great utility for studying drug response in Plasmodium.

Background

Control, and ultimately eradication of malaria require effective drugs to treat infections. The current most widely-used artemisinin-based combination therapies are being undermined by the emergence of resistance in Southeast Asia. Isolates from different P. falciparum parasite populations displaying slow clearance in patients possess 10–20 fold greater tolerance to artemisinin and derivatives with the same pharmacophore (ART) in vitro [1, 2].

Following the completion of the P. falciparum genome sequence and the development of microarray technology for interrogating the transcriptome, several studies were published of parasite transcriptomic response to perturbation, including anti-malarial drugs. Whereas parasite response to some drugs such as antifolates is modest [3], other drugs, including ART provoke a greater response [4, 5]. Greater understanding of the parasite transcriptional response to ART could give insight into the drug’s mode of action and the mechanism of parasite resistance, since ART-resistant parasites display altered transcriptional programs during the normal intra-erythrocytic development cycle (IDC), as shown by microarray analysis of slow-clearance field isolates [6, 7] and laboratory-induced resistant parasites [8, 9]. Interpretation of the ART transcriptional response is complicated by the fact that sensitivity to this class of drug varies greatly through the IDC; trophozoites are the most sensitive, whereas other stages are up to 100-fold less sensitive [10–12]. This variation could correspond with different transcriptional responses depending on the stage of parasite developmental.

A previous microarray study of artesunate response in P. falciparum trophozoites revealed a major transcriptional response to the drug [4]. However, the question of whether other stages of parasite development would respond in a similar fashion was not addressed, and so it was not clear if the parasite could respond in a way to counteract the effect of the drug. Some of the artesunate-induced changes in gene expression might reflect a protective response by the parasite, since transgenic over-expression of a tryptophan-rich protein unique to Plasmodium parasites (previously identified as over-expressed in response to artesunate [4]) reduces artesunate sensitivity [13].

ART therapy is used to treat P. falciparum and P. vivax infections, and various ART compounds including dihydroartemisinin (DHA) are similarly potent against rodent malaria parasite species such as P. berghei [14]. Given the similarity of drug action against different Plasmodium species, it is plausible that there is a common pattern of transcriptional response against this class of drug. In this study, we explored Plasmodium response to ART with the aim of identifying patterns of gene expression across developmental stages and species that could give further insight into mechanism of drug action. We performed microarray analysis of the P. falciparum trophozoite DHA response, and performed a meta-analysis of these data together with published microarray data for artesunate and artemisinin responses. The profile of Plasmodium response to DHA was explored further by RNA-seq analysis of drug-treated synchronized P. falciparum ring, trophozoite and schizont cultures and mixed stage P. berghei in infected mice.

Results

P. falciparum K1 strain response to DHA assessed by microarray analysis

We tested the transcriptional response to DHA, as this compound is an active metabolite of ART compounds in clinical use. The transcriptional response to this compound was tested for in vitro treatment of P. falciparum K1 using an experimental design similar to that used previously for artesunate [4]. Synchronized trophozoite cultures were exposed to therapeutic concentrations of DHA (500 nM) for 1, 2 and 3 h. The transcriptomic changes induced by the drug were determined by comparing microarray profiles of drug treated with matched vehicle-treated controls. A major transcriptional response was observed after 1 h, as revealed by the 1886 features showing significant differential expression. After removal of dubious and multiple features mapping to the same gene, 1653 differentially expressed genes were identified. Similar numbers of significant features were found for the other treatment time-points (Additional file 1).

The DHA responses were compared with those reported for artesunate [4] and artemisinin [5]. On the one hand, we were not expecting much correspondence among these datasets since different compounds at different concentrations and treatment regimens were used, parasite strains were different, and microarraydesigns and protocols differed. On the other hand, a reproducible set of genes may be found if drugs with the same pharmacophore provoke a similar response. From meta-analysis of expression changes across different treatments, a set of 284 down- and 263 up-regulated significant genes were found (Additional file 2: Fig. 1a). Gene ontology (GO) analysis showed significant enrichment of the terms GO:0043228 ~ non-membrane-bounded organelle and GO:0043232 ~ intracellular non-membrane-bounded organelle among down-regulated genes (FDR = 4.5 %), which primarily relate to the cytoplasmic ribosome. No terms were significant among up-regulated genes. The DHA-induced changes positively correlated with changes observed during normal ring and early trophozoite development (0–28 h post infection (hpi)), whereas drug-induced changes negatively correlated with mature trophozoite and schizont stages (30–48 hpi) (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Artemisinin and derivative drug (ART) response from microarray data analysis. a. Heatmap of genes with significant changes in expression (547 genes FDR < 0.05) by RankProducts meta-analysis of microarray data for artemisinin [5], artesunate [4] and DHA (this study) induced changes. Rows correspond to genes and columns parasite drug treatments. The values used for clustering are the average of treatment replicates, or the average of multiple probe measurements for the same gene (Hu et al. data [5]). Columns and rows were ordered by hierarchical clustering; the row dendrogram is omitted for clarity. Treatments cluster according to drug derivative/microarray study, as shown by side bars. b. Correlation of DHA-induced transcriptional changes (1, 2 and 3 h treatments) in P. falciparum K1 strain with HB3 strain intra-erythrocytic developmental cycle changes over 46 time-points of hours post-invasion (hpi) [31]. Pearson correlation coefficients (PCC) were calculated from 4157 shared oligo probe features

Full size image

Plasmodium falciparum DHA response assessed by RNA-seq data analysis

In vitro DHA treatments of P. falciparum K1 were repeated (500 nM DHA for 1 h), but this time on synchronized ring, trophozoite and schizont parasites. The transcriptomes of the untreated parasite populations showed maximal correlation with early (10–20 hpi), mature (24–35 hpi) and late (40–48 hpi) time-points of the IDC from published RNA-seq studies, respectively (Fig. 2a, b, c). Drug treatments had no effect on parasite morphology (Additional file 3). The transcriptional responses to DHA among the different stage parasites were determined by comparing strand-specific RNA-seq read counts of drug-treated with matched vehicle-treated controls.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Correlation of DHA drug-induced and developmental transcriptional changes from RNA-seq data. RNA-seq data from untreated P. falciparum K1 ring (a), trophozoite (b) and schizont (c) synchronized parasites were compared with published RNA-seq data from time-points taken during the intra-erythrocytic developmental cycle (IDC) (Bártfai et al. dataset [58], red triangles; Otto et al. dataset [57], blue squares; Siegel et al. dataset [59], open circles). Pearson correlation coefficients (PCC) were calculated from 3839 genes expressed in all time-points, defined as hours post-invasion (hpi). Transcriptomic changes in expression induced by 1 h DHA treatment for ring (d), trophozoite (e) and schizont (f) parasites were correlated with changes during the IDC (data and symbols as in parts A-C). The overlap of genes with significant change in expression under DHA treatment in ring and trophozoite parasites is shown for down-regulated genes in (g) and up-regulated genes in (h)

Full size image

The global profile of transcriptomic changes induced by DHA for rings and trophozoites were almost mirror-image profiles of untreated parasites at the same stages of development (Fig. 2d, e). In contrast, the patterns of gene expression in DHA-treated schizonts were indistinguishable from normal schizont development (Fig. 2f). Of the three stages, the most dramatic response was observed for the trophozoite stage in which 2349 genes showed significant change. In contrast, 651 genes were differentially expressed in ring, and none in schizont stage parasites (Additional file 4). Among the differentially expressed genes in rings and trophozoites, there was considerable overlap (Fig. 2g, h). GO analysis showed that cytosolic ribosome function was strongly represented among down-regulated genes in rings (Table 1) and trophozoites (Table 2). Significant GO terms relating to apicoplast and protein phosphorylation functions were represented among up-regulated genes in trophozoites (Table 3).

Table 1 Gene Ontology analysis of genes down-regulated in response to DHA in P. falciparum K1 rings from RNA-seq analysis
Full size table
Table 2 Gene Ontology analysis of genes down-regulated in response to DHA in P. falciparum K1 trophozoites from RNA-seq analysis
Full size table
Table 3 Gene Ontology analysis of genes up-regulated in response to DHA in P. falciparum K1 trophozoites from RNA-seq analysis
Full size table

RNA-seq is a recent, maturing technology which has not yet been used extensively to study transcriptomic responses to drugs. We compared data obtained for the P. falciparum K1 strain trophozoite response from the two transcriptomic approaches. Although many differentially expressed genes were called as significant, the overlap between microarray and RNA-seq was rather low, with only 167 down- and 216 up-regulated genes in common (Fig. 3a, b). To investigate the possible reasons for the discordance between experimental approaches, the distributions of up- and down-regulated genes with respect to the average expression level were determined. For microarray significant genes, the distribution of up-and down-regulated genes is about the same irrespective of the gene expression level (Fig. 3c). In contrast for RNA-seq, a bias towards up-regulation is observed for lowest-expressed genes and a down-regulation bias is apparent for highest expressed genes (Fig. 3d).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Comparison of P. falciparum K1 DHA-responsive genes from microarray and RNA-seq data. The genes identified as showing significant changes in expression in response to 1 h DHA treatment for P. falciparum K1 trophozoites from microarray (1653 genes) and RNA-seq (2349 genes) experiments were compared. The overlap of down-regulated genes is shown in (a) and overlap of up-regulated genes in (b). The distributions of DHA-induced change in expression of differentially expressed genes with respect to average level of gene expression are shown for microarray in (c) and RNA-seq in (d). The log2 (DHA/vehicle) values for 1653 genes from microarray and 2349 genes from RNA-seq were divided equally into 8 intervals of average expression. The distributions of log2 (DHA/vehicle) values in each interval were determined by beanplot analysis; the mean gene expression change in each interval is shown by a horizontal line and the distributions of gene expression change are indicated by the “bean” shapes. Wilcoxon rank sum test of these distributions showed that 3/28 pairwise comparisons in the microarray data are significant (p < 0.05), whereas 21/28 pairwise comparisons in the RNA-seq data are significant (p < 0.05)

Full size image

Plasmodium berghei in vivo DHA response assessed by RNA-seq data analysis

Next, we tested whether the transcriptomic response to DHA treatment is conserved among Plasmodium parasite species with similar sensitivity to the drug. Drug treatments were performed on P. berghei in vivo in infected mice. Although P. berghei infections are not synchronous, parasites in the peripheral animal blood are mostly ring and trophozoite stages. Given the high degree of overlap in genes showing a significant change in expression in response to DHA between synchronous ring and trophozoite P. falciparum (Fig. 2g, h; Tables 1, 2, 3), we reasoned that we would find a similar pattern in terms of DHA-responsive gene functions in the mixed ring/trophozoite stage P. berghei. The lack of synchronicity and a suitable dataset for comparing with changes throughout the IDC prevented us from determining whether P. berghei also shows a global arrest response in ring and trophozoite stages. The strand-specific RNA-seq data from DHA-treated parasites were compared with vehicle-treated controls. 87 genes showed significant changes in expression (Additional file 5). Some of these genes have no orthologues in P. falciparum, including 14 annotated as exported proteins specific to rodent parasite species. Of the 68 genes remaining that are orthologous in P. falciparum, 51 P. falciparum orthologues also showed significant change in response to DHA in ring and/or trophozoites (Fig. 4). The majority of these DHA-responsive genes common between species were down-regulated. Moreover, cytosolic ribosome function was significantly represented among these genes by GO analysis (Table 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

DHA-responsive genes conserved among Plasmodium species. The heatmap shows average DHA-induced changes relative to vehicle control from two replicates, as determined by limma analysis of RNA-seq read count data. 51 genes orthologous between P. berghei ANKA and P. falciparum K1 showed significant change in response to DHA in both species. The ordering of genes in rows and columns is arbitrary. Genes with related functions are grouped, as shown by the side-bars. Genes are labeled by the P. falciparum orthologue gene ID

Full size image
Table 4 Gene Ontology analysis of genes differentially expressed in response to DHA in P. berghei ANKA from RNA-seq analysis
Full size table

Discussion

Plasmodium parasite transcriptional responses to the anti-malarial drug DHA were studied. We performed short treatments of drug at high concentration to mimic what the parasite would have to respond to in a typical therapeutic intervention. The transcriptional response to DHA for the P. falciparum K1 strain was first explored by microarray to permit comparison with other drug responses at the same trophozoite stage in this strain. DHA exposure elicits a marked response that is very similar among the three time-points tested (Fig. 1; Additional file 1). The majority of trophozoites are inviable after 1 h exposure to 500 nM DHA [10]. Therefore, the consistent transcriptomic pattern of DHA response in trophozoites is a signature of loss of viability. Moreover, this pattern is consistent across independent microarray studies measuring response to different artemisinin derivatives (Fig. 1a). This loss of viability pattern is obscured in the transcriptomic response to slower acting anti-malarial drugs such as pyronaridine and chloroquine [15] and antifolates [3], perhaps because of confounding transcriptomic changes occurring through normal cell cycle progression during the longer drug treatment period needed to observe a significant transcriptional response.

Correlation analyses of ring and trophozoite DHA treatment profiles with the IDC show that these parasite stages respond to the drug by global reprogramming of transcriptomes. This is shown most markedly for trophozoites by the negative correlation between DHA treatment profiles and mid-cycle IDC time-points corresponding to trophozoite maturation (Figs. 1b and 2e). Apart from a brief early ring phase, this is the same period during the IDC when parasites are most vulnerable to DHA [10, 12]. The transcriptome of rings is similarly reprogrammed in that there is negative correlation of DHA-induced changes with ring and trophozoite time-points during the IDC (Fig. 2d). Moreover, there is extensive overlap of differentially expressed genes induced by DHA between rings and trophozoites (Fig. 2g, h). The ring and trophozoite transcriptional response to DHA may thus be an arrest mechanism to retard metabolic processes essential for maturation, as shown by down-regulation of glycolysis and protein synthesis genes (Tables 1 and 2). In contrast, schizonts do not respond to DHA (Fig. 2f). The lack of transcriptional response in schizonts can be explained by their reduced protein synthesis [16] and transcription [17]. Moreover, schizonts are also less able to down-regulate gene expression because of an overall reduced rate of mRNA decay [18].

The maturation and metabolic status of the cell is critical in determining sensitivity to ART across other cell types, since actively dividing mammalian cells are more susceptible to ART-induced cell death than quiescent cells [19]. The arrest transcriptomic pattern in DHA-treated rings may be a trigger for a physiological protective change, e.g. dormancy. We did not observe dormant parasites in our experiments (Additional file 3) as we harvested parasites immediately after a short treatment period (dormant parasites are observed after a 6–13 h lag [10, 12, 20, 21]). Strains with lower sensitivity to ART are better able to enter, or recover from dormancy [22–24]. A similar trait has been observed in parasite isolates from slow-clearing infections [1, 2] and a rodent malaria model [25], suggesting that in vitro tests of ART response correspond well to the situation in vivo. In trophozoites, the transcriptional response to DHA does not lead to a protective physiological change, perhaps because parasites at this stage are committed to an anaplerotic metabolic state in which glycolysis, TCA cycling and glutamiolysis occur at high rates [26]. The commitment to anaplerosis may occur quite early in the IDC, since ART-resistant strains are significantly more tolerant of 700 nM DHA than sensitive strains only for early ring stages of development [2, 12]. Recently, it has been shown that ART-resistant clones from slow-clearing infection isolates have elongated ring and shortened trophozoite development stages [21]. These adaptations enhance the parasite’s ability to become a dormant ring and minimize the ART-vulnerable trophozoite stage.

The arrest response to ART in P. falciparum rings and trophozoites, perhaps acting as a trigger to prevent the parasite from maturing, implies that key metabolic functions (not yet identified) may be disrupted by ART. Plasmodium is exquisitely sensitive to ART, in part because of oxidative damage mediated by interaction of ART with heme, a major source of molecular iron. Although hemoglobin-heme is highly abundant in the parasite’s food vacuole, this may not be the major site for the drug’s killing effect since the ingested content containing red cell cytosolic proteins such as haemoglobin and catalase can help to detoxify artemisinin [27]. Another site of parasite heme and molecular iron is the mitochondrion, in which these cofactors are essential for the functions of cytochromes and iron-sulfur proteins. Although some genes with mitochondrial function are differentially expressed in response to DHA, e.g. up-regulation of PF3D7_0915000 (ndh2) and PF3D7_1034400 (sdha) genes in trophozoites (Additional file 4), there is no concerted regulation of genes with mitochondrial function as shown by the absence of related significant GO terms (Tables 1–3). The lack of a coordinated parasite response regarding mitochondrial function suggests that late rings and trophozoites are committed to mitochondrial biogenesis, which is perhaps linked to commitment to anaplerosis (see above). Maturing parasites committed in this manner are vulnerable to ART because mitochondrial biogenesis exposes the cell to the oxidative stress effects of ART acting in combination with heme and molecular iron. The inability of committed cells to arrest mitochondrial biogenesis imposes a futile energy expenditure, since mitochondrial function is ablated by ART (shown by rapid loss of mitochondrial membrane potential following ART treatment [28, 29]). Merozoites are less vulnerable to ART [11], because they are equipped with poorly developed mitochondria and have low metabolic requirements. Schizonts have low metabolic requirement and are less sensitive to ART than trophozoites as they have fully developed mitochondria. We therefore postulate that maturing parasites committed to mitochondrial biogenesis are fated to ART-induced death, whereas young uncommitted cells can become dormant. Our data are thus consistent with the proposal in [30] that Plasmodium maintains expression of most mitochondrial genes, which enables rapid recovery of mitochondrial function when exiting from ART-induced dormancy.

Among genes showing significant down-regulation in response to DHA in Plasmodium rings and trophozoites, it is notable that cytosolic ribosome function is represented among significant GO terms from both microarray and RNA-seq data (Tables 1, 2 and 4). This coordinated down-regulation is particularly striking for DHA-treated rings, since expression of these genes is maximal during the first 20 h of normal development [31]. The coordinated down-regulation of Plasmodium ribosomal protein genes is not surprising since they possess a common regulatory element in their promoters, the G-box, and putative positive and negative transcription factors to control their expressions have been described [32]. It is interesting to note that concerted repression of yeast cytosolic ribosomal protein genes also occurs under hydrogen peroxide stress, and this response is dependent on thiol peroxidase enzymes [33]. Plasmodium lack catalase and GPx enzymes, and so they rely on thiol peroxidase enzymes and the NADPH pathway for maintaining redox balance [34]. It is tempting to speculate that thiol peroxidase enzymes become oxidized under ART stress similar to hydrogen peroxide stress. The accumulation of these oxidized enzymes could trigger a peroxide-signalling event [35] that activates the observed gross transcriptional response in parasites. One potential regulator of such a peroxide-signalling event is the nuclear thiol peroxidase PfnPrx, which is essential and has intimate association with most of the parasite genome [36].

Of the significant GO terms among up-regulated trophozoite genes in response to DHA (Table 3), apicoplast function was recently shown by qRT-PCR to be up-regulated in P. falciparum recovering from DHA treatment; the up-regulation of pyruvate metabolism in the apicoplast is thought to compensate for reduced ATP levels caused by down-regulation of glycolysis and TCA cycle [30]. Among the up-regulated genes representing significant protein phosphorylation GO terms are 18 FIKK kinase genes (Additional file 4). FIKK kinases are exported to the host red cell and play important roles in pathogenesis [37, 38]. In accordance with the findings made by Natalang et al. for artesunate response [4], many other genes for exported proteins from different families such as hyp, PHIST, Pfmc-2TM, PfEMP1, RESA, ETRAMP, SURFIN are significantly up-regulated in DHA-treated P. falciparum trophozoites (Additional file 4). The expressions of Plasmodium translocon of exported proteins (PTEX) genes recently shown to be essential for protein export [39, 40] are also significantly up-regulated in DHA-treated trophozoites (Additional file 4). Increased protein export may be the final act of dying parasites to restore the energy deficit, since exported proteins are essential for uptake of nutrients [40].

Recently, mutations in the PF3D7_1343700 gene encoding K13 protein have been associated with artemisinin resistance in Southeast Asia [41]. Interestingly, this gene is significantly up-regulated in response to DHA in trophozoites (Additional files 1 and 4). K13 mutations in ART resistant parasites appear to reduce ubiquitinylation of proteins, including PfP13K [42]. The expression of the PfPI3K encoding gene PF3D7_0515300 does not change in response to DHA (Additional files 1 and 4). The up-regulation of K13 in response to DHA could reduce PfP13K protein through the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway, and in turn lead to reduced phosphatidyl inositol-3-phosphate (PI(3)P). Reduced PI(3)P could lead to interference of protein export from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), which is dependent on PI(3)P [43]. Interference of protein export would presumably lead to ER stress, for which P. falciparum is notably vulnerable [44]. Among the genes with altered expression during normal development in ART resistant parasites, genes encoding proteins in the unfolded protein response (UPR) are notably up-regulated [7]. The key genes in this pathway, i.e. PF3D7_1108600 (ERC), PF3D7_0917900 (HSP70-2 or BiP), PF3D7_0322000 (CYP19A), PF3D7_1357800 (TCP-1/cpn60), PF3D7_0306800 (TCP1-b) and PF3D7_0718500 (prefoldin) are significantly down-regulated in P. falciparum ring and/or trophozoites exposed to DHA (Additional file 4). Furthermore, the P. berghei orthologues of CYP19A and ERC (PBANKA_121650 and PBANKA_093840, respectively) are also significantly down-regulated in response to DHA (Additional file 5). From these observations, it appears that ART resistant parasites have adaptations in the arrest transcriptional response to specifically counteract the ER stress induced by ART, in particular reversal of expression changes that could actually sensitize the parasite to drug. This trend is also apparent for genes with antioxidant function, which are up-regulated in DHA-resistant parasites to counteract the oxidant stress induced by the drug [9]. Among genes with known antioxidant function, the PF3D7_1438900 (thioredoxin peroxidase1), PF3D7_1457200 (thioredoxin 1), and PF3D7_1121600 (EXP1, an exported glutathione transferase which mediates sensitivity to artesunate [45]) genes are down-regulated in response to DHA in P. falciparum trophozoites (Additional file 4) and the orthologues in P. berghei (Additional file 5).

The in vivo DHA response in P. berghei was strikingly similar to the ring and trophozoite responses in P. falciparum, as shown by the high correspondence of differentially expressed orthologous genes from RNA-seq data (Fig. 4) and with the same significant representation of cytosolic ribosome function by GO analysis (Table 4). The transcriptional responses between species were similar despite the fact that the P. berghei were not synchronous and the read depth was much lower for P. berghei owing to contaminating mouse mRNA, as shown by the high percentage of reads mapping to Mus musculus (Additional file 6). This could mean that the transcriptional response in ring and trophozoite stages to DHA (see above) is conserved among Plasmodium parasite species with similar sensitivity to the drug, although this would need to be investigated further with synchronous parasites.

Although similar overall patterns of DHA-response in P. falciparum trophozoites were found among microarray and RNA-seq data, there was rather poor agreement in terms of specific genes showing significant changes in expression (Fig. 3). The P. falciparum microarray data analyzed in this study were generated from two-channel platforms. These data must be normalized using aggressive techniques such as locally weighted linear regression to correct for intensity-dependent dye bias due to differences in physical properties of the two cyanine fluorescent dyes. Data normalization in this fashion can be inaccurate though when central assumptions are violated, for example when a high proportion of genes are differentially expressed, and/or there is a skewed direction of change in gene expression. In this situation, external RNA controls may be required [46, 47]. This approach is rarely used though as it depends crucially on the quality of the external controls, and appropriate probes for the controls designed on the array. Normalization of RNA-seq data is simpler than microarray as it involves re-scaling of global read counts. In some cases where mRNA content varies greatly among cell types, external controls may be required for normalization, as proposed in microarray experiments [48]. However, the standard Trimmed Mean of M-values (TMM) normalization method, as we have used in our RNA-seq experiments, is robust to skewed changes provided mRNA contents are similar [49]. For the DHA-responsive genes found by RNA-seq, we found a clear bias in that highly expressed genes were skewed towards down-regulation, and the opposite skew for low-expressed genes. In contrast, there was no marked bias from normalized microarray data (Fig. 3). We think that the microarray normalization procedure removes the skew, which leads to inaccurate normalization, and consequently inaccuracy in identification of differentially expressed genes. In contrast, RNA-seq data normalization is more accurate, as shown by greater statistical support for differentially expressed genes and high reproducibility, even among different species.

Conclusions

Our data show that RNA-seq is a powerful tool for identifying the malaria parasite’s response to anti-malarial drugs. In particular, the arrest response at ring and trophozoite stages to DHA is clearly evident from RNA-seq data, but is less obvious from microarray data. As sequencing costs continue to fall, a far more detailed study than we have done of the transcriptional response to anti-malarial drug could be undertaken. In particular, more extensive sampling of drug treatment including parasite starting age, drug dose and time-point of treatment may reveal the full complexity of the arrest response employed by the parasite. This knowledge could lead to more effective use of existing drugs as we would be able to deploy drugs in combinations and therapies to circumvent the protective response by the parasite, and possibly forestall drug resistance.

Methods

Ethics statement

This study was approved by the BIOTEC committee for use and care of laboratory animals.

P. falciparum K1 parasite culture and microarray

P. falciparum K1 strain was cultured in vitro according to standard procedures [15, 50]. Parasites cultures were synchronized to ring stages by two consecutive sorbitol treatment cycles [51]. 48 h after the second synchronization, the parasite culture was divided equally into new culture plates for drug treatment. The synchronized parasites were then cultured for 18 h to obtain a majority of trophozoite-stage parasites for drug treatment. Parasites were treated with 500 nM DHA (Dafra Pharma, Belgium) or vehicle solvent control (0.1 % (v/v) DMSO). Parallel culture plates were left untreated as reference controls. Samples were taken after 1, 2, and 3 h of treatment. Parasites were harvested from culture and liberated from host cells by treatment with 0.15 % (w/v) saponin for 5 min on ice. The liberated parasites were washed three times with 1xPBS (137 mM NaCl, 8 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 2 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.4) to remove host cell debris and drug.

Total RNA was extracted from parasites using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) following the manufacturers’ recommendations. Genomic DNA was removed from total RNA using a Turbo DNA free™ kit (Ambion, Applied Biosystems). The RNA was reverse-transcribed to cDNA using oligo-dT(21) primer, amino-allyl dUTP and ImpromII enzyme (Promega), and fluorescent cyanine dye coupled to amino-allyl labeled cDNA as described in [52]. cDNA from DHA or vehicle treated parasites was labeled with Cy5 and culture-matched control untreated parasite cDNA labeled with Cy3. Approx. 5 pmol of each Cy-dye labeled cDNA (estimated by NanoDrop ND1000) was applied to each DNA microarray. The microarray platform containing 8088 70-mer oligo probes was described previously in [15]. Five independent culture replicate experiments were conducted. Microarray hybridization, washing and scanning were performed as described in [15]. The images of scanned microarrays were analyzed using the GenePix Pro 6.1.0.4 package. Microarray feature signals of irregular shape or with obvious defects, e.g. large dust specks or scratches were flagged (i.e. marked as not available for analysis) manually in the GenePix software and raw data saved in .gpr file format. A total of 29 microarray hybridizations were performed [53].

RNA-seq library construction

P. falciparum K1 strain was cultured in vitro and synchronized to ring stages as described above. Parasites were treated with 500 nM DHA or vehicle solvent control (0.1 % DMSO), immediately, 18 or 36 h after the second synchronization, corresponding to ring, trophozoite or schizont populations, respectively. Parallel plates of parasites from the same synchronized culture were left untreated as controls. Parasites were harvested from culture after 1 h of treatment and processed immediately for RNA extraction.

Plasmodium berghei (ANKA) 507m6cl1 MRA-867 was obtained through the MR4 as part of the BEI Resources Repository, NIAID, NIH, deposited by C.J. Janse and A.P. Waters. 8-week old female ICR mice (approx. 30 g each) were infected with 1 × 107 P. berghei parasites each and 24 h post-infection, animals were injected i.p. with DHA (10 mg/kg) or an equal volume of vehicle control (30 % DMSO in distilled water). Parasites were obtained by cardiac puncture 2 h post-injection of drug or vehicle and harvested in heparinized tubes. White cells were separated from infected red cells using home-made CF-11 columns (approx. 4 ml packed resin). The parasitized red cells were then collected by centrifugation from the filtered blood. Harvested P. falciparum and P. berghei were liberated from host cells, total RNA extracted, and genomic DNA removed as described above.

0.7–4 μg of total RNA from each treatment condition was converted to a strand-specific RNA-seq sequencing library using a TruSeq Stranded mRNA LT Sample Prep kit following the manufacturers’ recommendations (Illumina). A different TruSeq adapter was used for each RNA-seq library to allow pooling of samples for Illumina sequencing on the same flow cell. Each experiment was performed in duplicate with an independent parasite culture (P. falciparum), or different infected host animal (P. berghei). The RNA-seq libraries were quantified by QuantIT dsDNA High Sensitivity kit (Invitrogen) and by qPCR using a library quantification kit (Kapa Biosystems). Libraries were pooled in equimolar ratios and applied to a MiSeq flow cell at 12 pM with 1 % phiX174 control library (Illumina). Paired-end sequencing was performed on two MiSeq v2 2x150 bp flow cells according to the manufacturers’ recommendations (Illumina). The raw data from the MiSeq instrument were de-multiplexed and fastq files generated for each RNA-seq library [53].

Microarray data analysis

Statistical analysis of microarray and RNA-seq data for differential gene expression was performed using the limma package [54] implemented in R 3.0.2. For analysis of microarray data from DHA experiments, the .gpr microarray files were used as input. Microarray features flagged by the Genepix software, designated as empty (no oligo probe), not in genome, negative control, positive control, plastid genome, unmapped, or mapping to non-mRNA were given zero weight for normalization using the modifyWeights function in limma. Microarray feature median foreground signals of Cy5/Cy3 ratios were background corrected with normexp.offset = 50, and normalized within microarrays by global loess. Statistical analysis of differences in normalized Cy5/Cy3 ratio was performed using limma’s linear model fitting comparing normalized signals of DHA treated/untreated as one group with vehicle treated/untreated as another group. Model fitting was performed using feature weights within each array and across arrays using array weights. Features with Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted p-value <0.05 were considered as significant. For analysis of annotated genes from microarray features called significant, we removed all dubious features that corresponded to defunct gene models, or conflicted in terms of direction of change for multiple features belonging to the same gene model.

Microarray data meta-analysis was performed as follows. The average log2 normalized values of DHA/vehicle induced change from limma output were obtained for all features. The published average normalized values for artesunate versus untreated parasites were obtained from Natalang et al. Additional file 2 in [4]. From these normalized values, the feature with the lowest reported p-value from limma statistical testing of differential expression was taken to represent the annotated gene to which that probe is designed against. For artemisinin, the published normalized log2 Cy5/Cy3 values from control treatments were subtracted from values of corresponding artemisinin time-points as available from Hu et al. Supplementary Table 2 in [5]. A data input file was constructed for meta-analysis containing values for 3196 genes, in which columns contained average normalized values of drug versus control treatment for different treatment time-points. Statistical testing of differential gene expression across the independent datasets was performed using the RPadvance package from the RankProduct suite [55] in R.3.0.2. Genes with pfp <0.05 were considered as significant.

Correlation of DHA-induced transcriptomic changes with those during normal intra-erythrocytic development (IDC) was performed as follows. The average normalized fold-change data across 46 IDC time-points for P. falciparum strain HB3 were obtained from the Bozdech et al. dataset S2 in [31]. These values were log2 transformed and a data file constructed containing these values and the average log2 normalized DHA/vehicle values from limma output for the same features (same oligonucleotide probe ID). Features with missing values were removed leaving 4157 for Pearson correlation analysis.

RNA-seq data analysis

The raw reads from fastq files were first filtered to remove matches to rRNA by BLAST alignment. Pre-processing was performed by trimming low-quality base-calls (N) from reads, followed by removal of exact duplicates and reads of low overall quality. The pre-processed reads were mapped to the P. falciparum 3D7 2013-3-1 reference genome, or P. berghei ANKA 2013-3-1 and Mus musculus build 38 reference genomes (P. berghei experiments) using Bowtie2 and TopHat2 programs. Potential duplicate and inaccurately mapped reads were removed, and gene expression counts were determined from counts of sense-strand reads (read 1 only) mapping within (complete and partial overlap) annotated genes. The RNA-seq data processing results are shown in Additional file 6. The full details of the RNA-seq data processing, including custom perl scripts are provided in Additional file 7.

The read counts from mapped RNA-seq data were used as input for limma analysis. Read count data were filtered to remove non-protein coding genes and genes with read counts per million <1 in one or more library. The read counts were normalized using the trimmed mean of M values function implemented in the edgeR package [49]. The normalized read count data were then used to calculate mean-variance relationships and sample weights in voom [56]. Tests for differentially expressed genes were performed using the linear model of DHA versus vehicle treatment in limma [54]. Genes with Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted p-value <0.05 were considered as significant.

Correlation analysis of IDC changes with DHA treatment from RNA-seq data was performed in a similar fashion to microarray as follows. The published RNA-seq data from IDC time-points [57–59] were obtained from GEO (Bartfai et al. dataset accession number GSE23865) and EMBL Bank (ERP000069, Otto et al. dataset; and ERP001849, Siegel et al. dataset). The raw fastq files were processed and mapped to the P. falciparum 3D7 reference genome as described above. The mapped reads were then used to calculate read counts for annotated genes. All reads mapping to annotated genes in the Otto et al. and Bartfai et al. datasets were assumed to originate from the annotated sense mRNA, whereas only the mapped sense-strand reads from total RNA libraries (libraries #1–4) were used for the Siegel et al. dataset. The sum of read counts from all IDC time-points in each dataset was used as a reference for determining changes in gene expression throughout the IDC. The edgeR package [49] implemented in R.3.0.2 was used to calculate log2 changes in gene expression across IDC time-points, in which read counts were normalized in each RNA-seq library using the trimmed-mean of M-values function in edgeR. The average log2 DHA induced changes from RNA-seq calculated by limma (see above) were correlated with log2 IDC changes for genes expressed at read counts per million >1 in all datasets by Pearson correlation.

Other data analyses

Venn diagrams were made using the VENNY web tool [60]. Gene ontology analysis was performed using the database for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery (DAVID) web tool [61] with default parameters. The background gene lists comprised all genes with expression values in each dataset. GO terms with FDR <5 % were considered as significant. Redundant GO terms from significant term lists were removed using the REVIGO tool [62]. Heatmaps and beanplots were constructed using the R packages heatmap.2 and beanplot, respectively in R.3.0.2 [63]. Differences in distributions of differentially expressed genes among ranges of average gene expression were tested using the Wilcoxon rank sum with Bonferroni post-hoc test in R.3.0.2 [63].

Availability of supporting data

The data sets supporting the results of this article are available in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus repository, under SuperSeries accession number GSE62136 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE62136].

References

  1. Witkowski B, Khim N, Chim P, Kim S, Ke S, Kloeung N, et al. Reduced artemisinin susceptibility of Plasmodium falciparum ring stages in western Cambodia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:914–23.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Witkowski B, Amaratunga C, Khim N, Sreng S, Chim P, Kim S, et al. Novel phenotypic assays for the detection of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Cambodia: in-vitro and ex-vivo drug-response studies. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13:1043–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ganesan K, Ponmee N, Jiang L, Fowble JW, White J, Kamchonwongpaisan S, et al. A genetically hard-wired metabolic transcriptome in Plasmodium falciparum fails to mount protective responses to lethal antifolates. PLoS Pathog. 2008;4:e1000214.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Natalang O, Bischoff E, Deplaine G, Proux C, Dillies M-A, Sismeiro O, et al. Dynamic RNA profiling in Plasmodium falciparum synchronized blood stages exposed to lethal doses of artesunate. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:388.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hu G, Cabrera A, Kono M, Mok S, Chaal BK, Haase S, et al. Transcriptional profiling of growth perturbations of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:91–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mok S, Imwong M, Mackinnon MJ, Sim J, Ramadoss R, Yi P, et al. Artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum is associated with an altered temporal pattern of transcription. BMC Genomics. 2011;12:391.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mok S, Ashley EA, Ferreira PE, Zhu L, Lin Z, Yeo T, et al. Drug resistance. Population transcriptomics of human malaria parasites reveals the mechanism of artemisinin resistance. Science. 2015;347:431–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Witkowski B, Lelièvre J, Barragán MJL, Laurent V, Su X, Berry A, et al. Increased tolerance to artemisinin in Plasmodium falciparum is mediated by a quiescence mechanism. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:1872–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cui L, Wang Z, Miao J, Miao M, Chandra R, Jiang H, et al. Mechanisms of in vitro resistance to dihydroartemisinin in Plasmodium falciparum. Mol Microbiol. 2012;86:111–28.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Klonis N, Xie SC, McCaw JM, Crespo-Ortiz MP, Zaloumis SG, Simpson J, et al. Altered temporal response of malaria parasites determines differential sensitivity to artemisinin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:5157–62.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wilson DW, Langer C, Goodman CD, McFadden GI, Beeson JG. Defining the timing of action of antimalarial drugs against Plasmodium falciparum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:1455–67.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dogovski C, Xie SC, Burgio G, Bridgford J, Mok S, McCaw JM, et al. Targeting the cell stress response of Plasmodium falciparum to overcome artemisinin resistance. PLoS Biol. 2015;13:e1002132.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Deplaine G, Lavazec C, Bischoff E, Natalang O, Perrot S, Guillotte-Blisnick M, et al. Artesunate tolerance in transgenic Plasmodium falciparum parasites overexpressing a tryptophan-rich protein. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:2576–84.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Moore BR, Jago JD, Batty KT. Plasmodium berghei: parasite clearance after treatment with dihydroartemisinin in an asplenic murine malaria model. Exp Parasitol. 2008;118:458–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kritsiriwuthinan K, Chaotheing S, Shaw PJ, Wongsombat C, Chavalitshewinkoon-Petmitr P, Kamchonwongpaisan S. Global gene expression profiling of Plasmodium falciparum in response to the anti-malarial drug pyronaridine. Malar J. 2011;10:242.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang M, Mishra S, Sakthivel R, Rojas M, Ranjan R, Sullivan WJ, et al. PK4, a eukaryotic initiation factor 2α(eIF2α) kinase, is essential for the development of the erythrocytic cycle of Plasmodium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:3956–61.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sims JS, Militello KT, Sims P, Patel VP, Kasper JM, Wirth DF. Patterns of gene-specific and total transcriptional activity during the Plasmodium falciparum intraerythrocytic developmental cycle. Eukaryot Cell. 2009;8:327–38.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shock JL, Fischer KF, DeRisi JL. Whole-genome analysis of mRNA decay in Plasmodium falciparum reveals a global lengthening of mRNA half-life during the intra-erythrocytic development cycle. Genome Biol. 2007;8:R134.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mercer AE, Maggs JL, Sun X-M, Cohen GM, Chadwick J, O’Neill PM, et al. Evidence for the involvement of carbon-centered radicals in the induction of apoptotic cell death by artemisinin compounds. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:9372–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Klonis N, Crespo-Ortiz MP, Bottova I, Abu-Bakar N, Kenny S, Rosenthal PJ, et al. Artemisinin activity against Plasmodium falciparum requires hemoglobin uptake and digestion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:11405–10.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hott A, Casandra D, Sparks KN, Morton LC, Castanares G-G, Rutter A, et al. Artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum parasites exhibit altered patterns of development in infected erythrocytes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:3156–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tucker MS, Mutka T, Sparks K, Patel J, Kyle DE. Phenotypic and genotypic analysis of in vitro-selected artemisinin-resistant progeny of Plasmodium falciparum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:302–14.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Teuscher F, Gatton ML, Chen N, Peters J, Kyle DE, Cheng Q. Artemisinin‐induced dormancy in Plasmodium falciparum: duration, recovery rates, and implications in treatment failure. J Infect Dis. 2010;202:1362–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cheng Q, Kyle DE, Gatton ML. Artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum: a process linked to dormancy? Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. 2012;2:249–55.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. LaCrue AN, Scheel M, Kennedy K, Kumar N, Kyle DE. Effects of artesunate on parasite recrudescence and dormancy in the rodent malaria model Plasmodium vinckei. PLoS One. 2011;6:e26689.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Salcedo-Sora JE, Caamano-Gutierrez E, Ward S, Biagini G. The proliferating cell hypothesis: a metabolic framework for Plasmodium growth and development. Trends Parasitol. 2014;30:170–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ponmee N, Chuchue T, Wilairat P, Yuthavong Y, Kamchonwongpaisan S. Artemisinin effectiveness in erythrocytes is reduced by heme and heme-containing proteins. Biochem Pharmacol. 2007;74:153–60.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang J, Huang L, Li J, Fan Q, Long Y, Li Y, et al. Artemisinin directly targets malarial mitochondria through its specific mitochondrial activation. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9582.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Antoine T, Fisher N, Amewu R, O’Neill PM, Ward S, Biagini G. Rapid kill of malaria parasites by artemisinin and semi-synthetic endoperoxides involves ROS-dependent depolarization of the membrane potential. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69:1005–16.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen N, LaCrue AN, Teuscher F, Waters NC, Gatton ML, Kyle DE, et al. Fatty acid synthesis and pyruvate metabolism pathways remain active in dihydroartemisinin-induced dormant ring stages of Plasmodium falciparum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:4773–81.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bozdech Z, Llinás M, Pulliam BL, Wong ED, Zhu J, DeRisi JL. The transcriptome of the intraerythrocytic developmental cycle of Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS Biol. 2003;1:E5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Essien K, Stoeckert CJ. Conservation and divergence of known apicomplexan transcriptional regulons. BMC Genomics. 2010;11:147.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fomenko DE, Koc A, Agisheva N, Jacobsen M, Kaya A, Malinouski M, et al. Thiol peroxidases mediate specific genome-wide regulation of gene expression in response to hydrogen peroxide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:2729–34.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gretes MC, Poole LB, Karplus PA. Peroxiredoxins in parasites. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2012;17:608–33.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wood Z, Poole LB, Karplus PA. Peroxiredoxin evolution and the regulation of hydrogen peroxide signaling. Science. 2003;300:650–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Richard D, Bartfai R, Volz J, Ralph S a, Muller S, Stunnenberg HG, et al. A genome-wide chromatin-associated nuclear peroxiredoxin from the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:11746–55.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nunes MC, Okada M, Scheidig-Benatar C, Cooke BM, Scherf A. Plasmodium falciparum FIKK kinase members target distinct components of the erythrocyte membrane. PLoS One. 2010;5:e11747.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kats LM, Fernandez KM, Glenister FK, Herrmann S, Buckingham DW, Siddiqui G, et al. An exported kinase (FIKK4.2) that mediates virulence-associated changes in Plasmodium falciparum-infected red blood cells. Int J Parasitol. 2014;44:319–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Elsworth B, Matthews K, Nie CQ, Kalanon M, Charnaud SC, Sanders PR, et al. PTEX is an essential nexus for protein export in malaria parasites. Nature. 2014;511:587–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Beck JR, Muralidharan V, Oksman A, Goldberg DE. PTEX component HSP101 mediates export of diverse malaria effectors into host erythrocytes. Nature. 2014;511:592–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ariey F, Witkowski B, Amaratunga C, Beghain J, Langlois A-C, Khim N, et al. A molecular marker of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Nature. 2014;505:50–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mbengue A, Bhattacharjee S, Pandharkar T, Liu H, Estiu G, Stahelin RV, et al. A molecular mechanism of artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Nature. 2015;520:683–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Bhattacharjee S, Stahelin RV, Speicher KD, Speicher DW, Haldar K. Endoplasmic reticulum PI(3)P lipid binding targets malaria proteins to the host cell. Cell. 2012;148:201–12.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Harbut MB, Patel BA, Yeung BKS, McNamara CW, Bright AT, Ballard J, et al. Targeting the ERAD pathway via inhibition of signal peptide peptidase for antiparasitic therapeutic design. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:21486–91.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lisewski AM, Quiros JP, Ng CL, Adikesavan AK, Miura K, Putluri N, et al. Supergenomic network compression and the discovery of EXP1 as a glutathione transferase inhibited by artesunate. Cell. 2014;158:916–28.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Van de Peppel J, Kemmeren P, van Bakel H, Radonjic M, van Leenen D, Holstege FCP. Monitoring global messenger RNA changes in externally controlled microarray experiments. EMBO Rep. 2003;4:387–93.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Oshlack A, Emslie D, Corcoran LM, Smyth GK. Normalization of boutique two-color microarrays with a high proportion of differentially expressed probes. Genome Biol. 2007;8:R2.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lovén J, Orlando D a, Sigova A a, Lin CY, Rahl PB, Burge CB, et al. Revisiting global gene expression analysis. Cell. 2012;151:476–82.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Robinson MD, Oshlack A. A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R25.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Trager W, Jensen JB. Human malaria parasites in continuous culture. Science. 1976;193:673–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lambros C, Vanderberg JP. Synchronization of Plasmodium falciparum erythrocytic stages in culture. J Parasitol. 1979;65:418–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Shaw PJ, Ponmee N, Karoonuthaisiri N, Kamchonwongpaisan S, Yuthavong Y. Characterization of human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum eIF4E homologue and mRNA 5′ cap status. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2007;155:146–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Plasmodium parasites mount an arrest response to dihydroartemisinin, as revealed by whole transcriptome shotgun sequencing (RNA-seq) and microarray study. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE62136]. Accessed date 15/10/2015.

  54. Smyth GK. Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2004;3:Article3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Breitling R, Armengaud P, Amtmann A, Herzyk P. Rank products: a simple, yet powerful, new method to detect differentially regulated genes in replicated microarray experiments. FEBS Lett. 2004;573:83–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Law CW, Chen Y, Shi W, Smyth GK. voom: Precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. Genome Biol. 2014;15:R29.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Otto TD, Wilinski D, Assefa S, Keane TM, Sarry LR, Böhme U, et al. New insights into the blood-stage transcriptome of Plasmodium falciparum using RNA-Seq. Mol Microbiol. 2010;76:12–24.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Bártfai R, Hoeijmakers W a M, Salcedo-Amaya AM, Smits AH, Janssen-Megens E, Kaan A, et al. H2A.Z demarcates intergenic regions of the plasmodium falciparum epigenome that are dynamically marked by H3K9ac and H3K4me3. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1001223.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Siegel TN, Hon C-C, Zhang Q, Lopez-Rubio J-J, Scheidig-Benatar C, Martins RM, et al. Strand-specific RNA-Seq reveals widespread and developmentally regulated transcription of natural antisense transcripts in Plasmodium falciparum. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:150.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. VENNY. An interactive tool for comparing lists with Venn Diagrams. [http://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html]. Accessed date 15/10/2015.

  61. Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:44–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Supek F, Bošnjak M, Škunca N, Šmuc T. REVIGO summarizes and visualizes long lists of gene ontology terms. PLoS One. 2011;6:e21800.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [http://www.r-project.org/]. Accessed date 15/10/2015.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Drs. Joseph Derisi and Jennifer Shock (University of San Francisco) for providing the oligo-set, training and facilities for the production of DNA microarray slides through generous support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI, USA) to SK. We acknowledge primary funding from NSTDA/CPM/Platform, project numbers: P-14-50752 and P-12-01270 to PJS; P-15-51002 to CU. PJS and CU acknowledge support from the Thailand Research Fund, grant numbers RSA5780022 and RSA5880064, respectively. SK was also supported by HHMI, UNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR) and Thailand-TDR Programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Protein-Ligand Engineering and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Medical Molecular Biology Research Unit, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), 113 Thailand Science Park, Thanon Phahonyothin, Tambon Khlong Neung, Amphoe, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand

    Philip J. Shaw, Sastra Chaotheing, Chayaphat Wongsombat, Nattida Suwannakitti, Pongpisid Koonyosying, Chairat Uthaipibull, Yongyuth Yuthavong & Sumalee Kamchonwongpaisan

  2. Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Laboratory, Genome Technology Research Unit, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), 113 Thailand Science Park, Thanon Phahonyothin, Tambon Khlong Neung, Amphoe, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand

    Pavita Kaewprommal & Jittima Piriyapongsa

Authors
  1. Philip J. Shaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sastra Chaotheing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pavita Kaewprommal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jittima Piriyapongsa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chayaphat Wongsombat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nattida Suwannakitti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Pongpisid Koonyosying
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Chairat Uthaipibull
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yongyuth Yuthavong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Sumalee Kamchonwongpaisan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Philip J. Shaw or Sumalee Kamchonwongpaisan.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

PJS designed experiments, analyzed data, prepared figures and wrote the manuscript. SC, NS performed microarray experiments. SK printed microarrays, designed experiments, analyzed data, and edited the manuscript. P Koonyosying performed animal experiments. CW performed P. falciparum culture experiments for RNA-seq and constructed RNA-seq libraries. P Kaewprommal, JP analysed RNA-seq data and commented on the manuscript. SK, CU and YY conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination and edited the manuscript. All authors (except SC who deceased before the first draft was prepared) read and approved the final manuscript.

Sastra Chaotheing is deceased.

Additional files

Additional file 1:

Microarray data analysis from DHA treatment. Limma results from 1, 2, and 3 h 500 nM DHA treatments in P. falciparum K1 trophozoites. (XLS 2986 kb)

Additional file 2:

Microarray meta-analysis of ART treatments. Data input file and RPadvance meta-analysis of microarray data from DHA (this study), artemisinin [5] and artesunate [4] treatments of P. falciparum trophozoites. (XLS 1911 kb)

Additional file 3:

Morphology of treated parasites. Microscopic images were obtained from Giemsa-stained smears of P. falciparum synchronized cultures. Scale bars, 5 microns. Parasite counts of each morphologically identifiable stage (ring, troph, schizont) were determined from each experimental condition at harvest after the 1 h treatment period. (PPT 3068 kb)

Additional file 4:

RNA-seq data analysis from DHA treatment of P. falciparum Limma results from 1 h treatments with 500 nM DHA in P. falciparum K1 rings, trophozoites and schizonts. (XLS 2040 kb)

Additional file 5:

RNA-seq data analysis from DHA treatment of P. berghei. Limma results from in vivo 2 h treatments of mice infected P. berghei ANKA and injected with 10 mg/kg DHA or vehicle control. (XLS 809 kb)

Additional file 6:

Summary of RNA-seq data preprocessing and read mapping to reference genomes. (XLS 7464 kb)

Additional file 7:

Supplementary information for bioinformatic methods used for RNA-seq data analysis. Complete descriptions and parameters of algorithms used and in-house Perl scripts for RNA-seq data processing. (DOC 87 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shaw, P.J., Chaotheing, S., Kaewprommal, P. et al. Plasmodium parasites mount an arrest response to dihydroartemisinin, as revealed by whole transcriptome shotgun sequencing (RNA-seq) and microarray study. BMC Genomics 16, 830 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-2040-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-2040-0

Keywords

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us