Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T07:49:33.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale: A Psychometric Investigation with Australian Youth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2012

Raelene L. de Ross*
Affiliation:
Monash University, Australia. r.deross@med.monash.edu.au
Eleonora Gullone
Affiliation:
Monash University, Australia.
Bruce F. Chorpita
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii, USA.
*
*Address for correspondence: Raelene L. de Ross, Department of Psychology, Monash University, Monash, VIC 3800, Australia.
Get access

Abstract

The Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS) is a 47-item self-report measure intended to assess children's symptoms corresponding to selected DSM-IV anxiety and major depressive disorders. The scale comprises six subscales (e.g., Separation Anxiety Disorder; Social Phobia; Obsessive Compulsive Disorder; Panic Disorder; Generalised Anxiety Disorder; and Major Depressive Disorder). To date, only one normative study of youth has been published with results providing strong initial support for the reliability and validity of this new measure (Chorpita, Yim, Moffitt, Umemoto, & Francis, 2000). The present investigation provides additional psychometric data derived from an Australian sample comprising 405 youth aged 8 to 18 years. In general, the data were found to be consistent with those reported in the initial normative study. Internal consistency for the overall scale and its subscales was found to be adequate. Good convergent validity was demonstrated through moderate to strong correlations between the subscales of the RCADS with scores on the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale (RCMAS) and the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI). Confirmatory factor analysis suggested reasonable fit for the six-factor model by Chorpita et al. (2000). Notwithstanding the need for additional validation, it is concluded that the RCADS is a promising instrument for use in both clinical and research settings.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)