Eur. J. Entomol. 111 (5): 649-654, 2014 | DOI: 10.14411/eje.2014.082

Quantifying predation pressure along an urbanisation gradient in Denmark using artificial caterpillars

Marco FERRANTE1, Alessandro LO CACCIATO2, Gabor L. LÖVEI1
1 Aarhus University, Department of Agroecology, Flakkebjerg Research Centre, Forgøsvej 1, DK-4200 Slagelse, Denmark; e-mails: marco.ferrante@agrsci.dk; gabor.lovei@agrsci.dk
2 University of Palermo, Faculty of Science, Via Archirafi 28, 90123 Palermo, Italy; e-mail: locacciato-alessandro@live.it

Urbanisation results in a marked modification of habitats and influences several ecological processes, some of which give rise to beneficial ecological services. Natural pest control, the effect of predators on prey is one of such services. We quantified changes in the incidence of predation with increasing levels of urbanisation using artificial caterpillars made of green plasticine. Potential predators can be identified by the "attack marks" they leave on these artificial caterpillars. We conducted this study from May to October 2010 around the city of Sorø (Zealand, Denmark), in forests along an urbanisation gradient (rural-suburban-urban). Artificial caterpillars were placed on the ground in order to obtain an estimate of the incidence of predation at ground level. Half (50%) of the 1398 caterpillars were "attacked" and 28.8% of the bites were those of chewing insects. We attributed the majority of these to carabids, the most common group of ground-active arthropods. Chewing insects exerted the greatest predation pressure in the original forest (52.1%), with lower values recorded in the suburban (10.1%) and urban (16.4%) forest fragments. Ants were responsible for only 4.7% of the attacks in forest, 11.3% in suburban and 16.4% in urban forest fragments. Mammals exerted the highest predation pressure in suburban habitats (22.2% vs. 4.9% in forest, and 8.1% in urban forest fragments).

Keywords: Carabidae, Formicidae, fragmentation, natural enemies, ecosystem services, predation, urbanisation, sentinel prey

Received: January 31, 2014; Revised: June 12, 2014; Accepted: June 12, 2014; Prepublished online: September 12, 2014; Published: December 10, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
FERRANTE, M., LO CACCIATO, A., & LÖVEI, G.L. (2014). Quantifying predation pressure along an urbanisation gradient in Denmark using artificial caterpillars. EJE, 111(5), 649-654. doi: 10.14411/eje.2014.082
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Alaruikka D., Kotze D.J., Matveinen K. & Niemelae J. 2002: Carabid beetle and spider assemblages along a forested urban-rural gradient in southern Finland. - J. Insect Conserv. 6: 195-206 Go to original source...
    2. Brodie E.D. 1993: Differential avoidance of coral snake banded patterns by free-ranging avian predators in Costa-Rica. -Evolution 47: 227-235 Go to original source...
    3. Carpenter S.R., Mooney H.A., Agard J., Capistrano D., DeFries R.S., Diaz S., Dietz T., Duraiappah A.K., Oteng-Yeboah A. & Pereira H.M. 2009: Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. - Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 106: 1305-1312 Go to original source...
    4. Chace J.F. & Walsh J.J. 2006: Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. - Landsc. Urban Plann. 74: 46-69 Go to original source...
    5. Churchfield S., Hollier J. & Brown V. 1991: The effects of small mammal predators on grassland invertebrates, investigated by field exclosure experiment. - Oikos 60: 283-290 Go to original source...
    6. de Groot R.S., Wilson M.A. & Boumans R.M.J. 2002: A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. - Ecol. Econ. 41: 393-408 Go to original source...
    7. Elek Z. & Loevei G. 2005: Ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) assemblages along an urbanisation gradient near Soro, Zealand, Denmark. - Entomol. Medd. 73: 115-121
    8. Elek Z. & Loevei G.L. 2007: Patterns in ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages along an urbanisation gradient in Denmark. - Acta Oecol. 32: 104-111 Go to original source...
    9. Faveri S.B., Vasconcelos H.L. & Dirzo R. 2008: Effects of Amazonian forest fragmentation on the interaction between plants, insect herbivores, and their natural enemies. - J. Trop. Ecol. 24: 57-64 Go to original source...
    10. Fazekas J., Kadar F., Sarospataki M. & Loevei G.L. 1997: Seasonal activity, age structure and egg production of the ground beetle Anisodactylus signatus (Caleoptera: Carabidae) in Hungary. - Eur. J. Entomol. 94: 473-484
    11. Gray J.S. 1989: Effects of environmental-stress on species rich assemblages. - Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 37: 19-32 Go to original source...
    12. Hawes C., Stewart A. & Evans H. 2002: The impact of wood ants (Formica rufa) on the distribution and abundance of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a Scots pine plantation. - Oecologia 131: 612-619 Go to original source...
    13. Hawes C., Evans H.F. & Stewart A.J. 2013: Interference competition, not predation, explains the negative association between wood ants (Formica rufa) and abundance of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). - Ecol. Entomol. 38: 315-322 Go to original source...
    14. Hilty J. & Merenlender A. 2000: Faunal indicator taxa selection for monitoring ecosystem health. - Biol. Conserv. 92: 185-197 Go to original source...
    15. Horvath R., Magura T. & Tothmeresz B. 2012: Ignoring ecological demands masks the real effect of urbanization: a case study of ground-dwelling spiders along a rural-urban gradient in a lowland forest in Hungary. - Ecol. Res. 27: 1069-1077 Go to original source...
    16. Hossie T.J. & Sherratt T.N. 2012: Eyespots interact with body colour to protect caterpillar-like prey from avian predators. - Anim. Behav. 84: 167-173 Go to original source...
    17. Howe A. & Engaard M. 2006: Ground Beetles and Urbanisation. BSc Thesis, Roskilde University, Denmark, 62 pp
    18. Howe A., Loevei G.L. & Nachman G. 2009: Dummy caterpillars as a simple method to assess predation rates on invertebrates in a tropical agroecosystem. - Entomol. Exp. Appl. 131: 325-329 Go to original source...
    19. Kidd N.A. & Jervis M.A. 2007: Population dynamics. In Jervis M.A. (ed.): Insects as Natural Enemies: A Practical Perspective. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 435-523 Go to original source...
    20. Isbell F., Calcagno V., Hector A., Connolly J., Harpole W.S., Reich P.B., Scherer-Lorenzen M., Schmid B., Tilman D., van Ruijven J., Weigelt A., Wilsey B.J., Zavaleta E.S. & Loreau M. 2011: High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services. - Nature 477: 199-202 Go to original source...
    21. Layke C., Mapendembe A., Brown C., Walpole M. & Winn J. 2012: Indicators from the global and sub-global Millennium Ecosystem Assessments: An analysis and next steps. - Ecol. Indic. 17: 77-87 Go to original source...
    22. Liss K.N., Mitchell M.G., MacDonald G.K., Mahajan S.L., Methot J., Jacob A.L., Maguire D.Y., Metson G.V.S., Ziter C. & Dancose K. 2013: Variability in ecosystem service measurement: a pollination service case study. - Front. Ecol. Environ. 11: 414-422 Go to original source...
    23. Loiselle B.A. & Farji-Brener A.G. 2002: What s up? An experimental comparison of predation levels between canopy and understory in a tropical wet forest. - Biotropica 34: 327-330 Go to original source...
    24. Loevei G.L. & Sunderland K.D. 1996: Ecology and behavior of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). - Annu. Rev. Entomol. 41: 231-256 Go to original source...
    25. Magura T., Tothmeresz B., Hornung E. & Horvath R. 2008: Urbanization and ground-dwelling invertebrates. In Wagner L.N. (ed.) Urbanization: 21st Century Issues and Challenges. Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp. 213-225
    26. Magura T., Loevei G.L. & Tothmeresz B. 2010: Does urbanization decrease diversity in ground beetle (Carabidae) assemblages? - Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 19: 16-26 Go to original source...
    27. Martin T.E. 1987: Artificial nest experiments: effects of nest appearance and type of predator. - The Condor 89: 925-928 Go to original source...
    28. Maentylae E., Alessio G.A., Blande J.D., Heijari J., Holopainen J.K., Laaksonen T., Piirtola P. & Klemola T. 2008: From plants to birds: higher avian predation rates in trees responding to insect herbivory. - PlosOne 3: e2832 Go to original source...
    29. McKinney M.L. 2002: Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. - Bioscience 52: 883-890 Go to original source...
    30. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005: Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC, 155 pp
    31. O Neal M.E., Zontek E.L., Szendrei Z., Landis D.A. & Isaacs R. 2005: Ground predator abundance affects prey removal in highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum) fields and can be altered by aisle ground covers. - BioControl 50: 205-222 Go to original source...
    32. Ostman O., Ekbom B. & Bengtsson J. 2001: Landscape heterogeneity and farming practice influence biological control. - Basic Appl. Ecol. 2: 365-371 Go to original source...
    33. Parmenter R.R. & MacMahon J.A. 1988: Factors influencing species composition and population sizes in a ground beetle community (Carabidae): predation by rodents. - Oikos 52: 350-356 Go to original source...
    34. Posa M.R.C., Sodhi N.S. & Koh L.P. 2007: Predation on artificial nests and caterpillar models across a disturbance gradient in Subic Bay, Philippines. - J. Trop. Ecol. 23: 27-33 Go to original source...
    35. R Core Team 2013: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/
    36. Rowe R.L., Goulson D., Doncaster C.P., Clarke D.J., Taylor G. & Hanley M.E. 2013: Evaluating ecosystem processes in willow short rotation coppice bioenergy plantations. - Glob. Change Biol. Bioen. 5: 257-266 Go to original source...
    37. Rowland H.M., Speed M.P., Ruxton G.D., Edmunds M., Stevens M. & Harvey I.F. 2007: Countershading enhances cryptic protection: an experiment with wild birds and artificial prey. - Anim. Behav. 74: 1249-1258 Go to original source...
    38. Sarkar D. 2008: Lattice: Multivariate Data Visualization with R. Springer, New York, 268 pp Go to original source...
    39. Sipos J., Drozdova M. & Drozd P. 2012: Effect of canopy openness on the pressure of predatory arthropods and birds on epigeic insects. - Centr. Eur. J. Biol. 7: 1021-1029 Go to original source...
    40. Speed M.P., Kelly D.J., Davidson A.M. & Ruxton G.D. 2005: Countershading enhances crypsis with some bird species but not others. - Behav. Ecol. 16: 327-334 Go to original source...
    41. Tvardikova K. & Novotny V. 2012: Predation on exposed and leaf-rolling artificial caterpillars in tropical forests of Papua New Guinea. - J. Trop. Ecol. 28: 331-341 Go to original source...
    42. Wilson A.P., Hough-Goldstein J.A., Vangessel M.J. & Pesek J.D. 2004: Effects of varying weed communities in corn on European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae), oviposition, and egg mass predation. - Environ. Entomol. 33: 320-327 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content