How to translate text using browser tools
1 March 2002 INTERPRETATION OF THE RESULTS OF COMMON PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS ANALYSES
David Houle, Jason Mezey, Paul Galpern
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Common principal components (CPC) analysis is a new tool for the comparison of phenotypic and genetic variance-covariance matrices. CPC was developed as a method of data summarization, but frequently biologists would like to use the method to detect analogous patterns of trait correlation in multiple populations or species. To investigate the properties of CPC, we simulated data that reflect a set of causal factors. The CPC method performs as expected from a statistical point of view, but often gives results that are contrary to biological intuition. In general, CPC tends to underestimate the degree of structure that matrices share. Differences of trait variances and covariances due to a difference in a single causal factor in two otherwise identically structured datasets often cause CPC to declare the two datasets unrelated. Conversely, CPC could identify datasets as having the same structure when causal factors are different. Reordering of vectors before analysis can aid in the detection of patterns. We urge caution in the biological interpretation of CPC analysis results.

Corresponding Editor: T. Kawecki

David Houle, Jason Mezey, and Paul Galpern "INTERPRETATION OF THE RESULTS OF COMMON PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS ANALYSES," Evolution 56(3), 433-440, (1 March 2002). https://doi.org/10.1554/0014-3820(2002)056[0433:IOTROC]2.0.CO;2
Received: 1 June 2001; Accepted: 1 November 2001; Published: 1 March 2002
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

KEYWORDS
Common principal components analysis
Flury hierarchy
matrix comparisons
variance-covariance matrix
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top