Next Article in Journal
The Effect of a Combined Hydrogen Peroxide-MlrA Treatment on the Phytoplankton Community and Microcystin Concentrations in a Mesocosm Experiment in Lake Ludoš
Next Article in Special Issue
Two-Dimensional Layered Nanomaterial-Based Electrochemical Biosensors for Detecting Microbial Toxins
Previous Article in Journal
Metabolome Variation between Strains of Microcystis aeruginosa by Untargeted Mass Spectrometry
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Rapid Extraction Method Combined with a Monoclonal Antibody-Based Immunoassay for the Detection of Amatoxins
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 11
Issue 12
10.3390/toxins11120726
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids in Queensland Honey: Using Low Temperature Chromatography to Resolve Stereoisomers and Identify Botanical Sources by UHPLC-MS/MS

by
Natasha L. Hungerford
1,*,
Steve J. Carter
2,
Shalona R. Anuj
2,
Benjamin L. L. Tan
2,
Darina Hnatko
2,
Christopher L. Martin
1,
Elipsha Sharma
1,
Mukan Yin
1,
Thao T. P. Nguyen
1,
Kevin J. Melksham
2 and
Mary T. Fletcher
1,*
1
Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
2
Forensic and Scientific Services, Queensland Health, Brisbane, QLD 4108, Australia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2019, 11(12), 726; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11120726
Submission received: 25 October 2019 / Revised: 22 November 2019 / Accepted: 26 November 2019 / Published: 11 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Improved Analytical Technologies for the Detection of Natural Toxins and Their Metabolites in Food)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) are a diverse group of plant secondary metabolites with known varied toxicity. Consumption of 1,2-unsaturated PAs has been linked to acute and chronic liver damage, carcinogenicity and death, in livestock and humans, making their presence in food of concern to food regulators in Australia and internationally. In this survey, honey samples sourced from markets and shops in Queensland (Australia), were analysed by high-resolution Orbitrap UHPLC-MS/MS for 30 common PAs. Relationships between the occurrence of pyrrolizidine alkaloids and the botanical origin of the honey are essential as pyrrolizidine alkaloid contamination at up to 3300 ng/g were detected. In this study, the predominant alkaloids detected were isomeric PAs, lycopsamine, indicine and intermedine, exhibiting identical MS/MS spectra, along with lesser amounts of each of their N-oxides. Crucially, chromatographic UHPLC conditions were optimised by operation at low temperature (5 °C) to resolve these key isomeric PAs. Such separation of these isomers by UHPLC, enabled the relative proportions of these PAs present in honey to be compared to alkaloid levels in suspect source plants. Overall plant pyrrolizidine alkaloid profiles were compared to those found in honey samples to help identify the most important plants responsible for honey contamination. The native Australian vines of Parsonsia spp. are proposed as a likely contributor to high levels of lycopsamine in many of the honeys surveyed. Botanical origin information such as this, gained via low temperature chromatographic resolution of isomeric PAs, will be very valuable in identifying region of origin for honey samples.
Keywords:
LC-MS; pyrrolizidine alkaloid; honey; Parsonsia straminea; lycopsamine; indicine; Heliotropium amplexicaule
Key Contributions: This study demonstrated the occurrence of indicine and the isomeric lycopsamine as predominant pyrrolizidine alkaloids in Australian honey; and established a HRAM LC-MS/MS method that chromatographically separated these stereoisomers; enabling the investigation of botanical origin of honey contamination by the respective alkaloids.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) are secondary metabolites that comprise more than 600 compounds, typified by a pyrrolizidine base with one or more ester linkages. The 1,2-unsaturated PAs are toxic to animals and humans, causing acute and chronic liver and lung damage or cancer and are mainly produced by flowering plant species belonging to the families Asteracaeae (Compositae, tribes Senecioneae and Eupatorieae), Fabaceae (Crotolaria, Chromolaena, Lotonis), Apocynaceae (Echiteae) and Boraginaceae [1], estimated to represent 3% of the Earth’s flowering plants [2]. Plants containing pyrrolizidine alkaloids are globally distributed and PAs provide a chemical defence for plants against herbivores. PA biosynthesis has been found to be dependent on many factors, with implications for plant/animal/insect interactions [3]. Various food products can contain toxic PAs either directly from plant origin (certain herbs, herbal medicines) or indirectly through natural transfer from floral nectar and pollen (e.g., some honey, pollen dietary supplements) or inadvertent cross-contamination (e.g., grains, herbs, teas) [4]. The Australian provisional tolerable daily intake of pyrrolizidine alkaloids is 1 µg/kg Bw/day [5], whilst the recommended European accepted intake is 150 times lower at 0.007 µg/kg Bw/day [6,7,8], although this has been recently revised [9,10].
Several studies have described the presence of toxic pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) in honey produced by Apis mellifera. Internationally it has been reported that such toxins can be found in honey due to transfer by bees of pollen/nectar from certain flowers, including Heliotropium, Crotolaria, Echium and Senecio species. Concern has been raised as to the extent of contamination in Australian honey [11,12] but their presence in Queensland honey has not previously been examined. Previously, investigations into the presence of PAs in Australian honey have concentrated on the introduced pest plant Echium plantagineum L. (Paterson’s curse) as the major likely PA source [11,12,13]. However, rigorous eradication and biological control programs in recent decades have decreased the prevalence of this weed in Australia [14]. Diverse PA containing plant species occur in Australian pastures and have intoxicated grazing horses, cattle, sheep or pigs and poultry fed contaminated grains [15,16] and include both native and introduced Crotalaria, Heliotopium and Senecio species [17]. Additionally, native Australian Parsonsia species grow in rainforests and on the margins of rainforest/eucalypt forest and contain PAs known to be sequestered by butterflies [18,19,20]. Parsonsia species spread from tropical and subtropical Asia to Australia and the south-west Pacific. Parsonsia straminea is native to Queensland and New South Wales [21] but there have been no field reports of livestock poisonings [17]. The distribution of these PA containing plants varies throughout the country and different alkaloids would be expected in honey from tropical/sub-tropical Queensland regions as compared to honey originating from southern temperate states. Given that honey represents a significant food source of human exposure to PAs [10], identification of plant PA sources to reduce this exposure is crucial.
In this study of market honey, samples have been identified with alkaloid profiles that appeared to be consistent with a number of PA containing plant species present within the Australian environment. This study examines the presence of PAs in a market survey of honey purchased in Queensland with the aim to assess any food safety concern for the consumer of honey and to correlate PAs identified with previously unsuspected plant sources of these alkaloids.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Pyrrolizidine Analysis Method Validation

Pyrrolizidine alkaloid levels in honey/plant material were quantitated by HRAM UHPLC-MS/MS analysis against 30 certified PA standards, through comparison of the precursor parent ion intensity (Table 1) to the standard curves, with squared correlation coefficients (R2) typically in the range of 0.9932–0.9997. The honey analysis method was validated according to the National Association of Testing Authorities (NATA) guidance document [22]. The method was validated in blank honey, based on results for 10 spiked samples, giving Limits of Reporting (LORs) of 5 ng/g for individual PAs (Table 2). The uncertainties given are at the 95% confidence level as required by NATA [22,23]. Note that for multiresidue analyses at these levels, a default standard uncertainty of ±25% RSD at the 95% confidence level is routinely applied by the authors and is used unless there is evidence that the actual uncertainty is greater than this value. Erucifoline, erucifoline N-oxide, jacobine N-oxide and seneciphylline N-oxide consistently gave low recoveries, resulting in high calculated standard uncertainty (% RSD) for these PAs, but which are not unusual for analyses at these levels. The EU recommends ±50% RSD unless it is demonstrated to be a bigger value [24]. The uncertainty values are calculated at the LOR because it is expected that this level will be the worst case scenario. A small peak was present in the blank for trichodesmine, explaining the higher LOD/LOR and increased uncertainty for this compound.

2.2. Alkaloid Levels Measured in Honey

Honeys purchased in supermarkets, health food shops, and from individual commercial/small-scale producers were analysed and calculated to contain pyrrolizidine alkaloids levels between <LOR (i.e., below limit of reporting) to ≈3300 ng/g of honey.
Figure 1 summarises the results in a histogram, with single PA test results below the limit of reporting (5 ng/g) set equal to zero. PAs were detected in 84% of the honey samples examined (n = 465). Notably the mean total PA level of PA-positive samples (280 ng/g) was greater than the median (97 ng/g), indicating that the distribution was skewed, with a prevalence of low values (Figure 1, histogram). Whilst the prevalence of low values is reassuring, the overall distribution of total PA concentration is wide, ranging from <LOR to ≈3300 ng/g.

2.3. LC-MS/MS Separation of Alkaloids

Analysis revealed that the individual PA pattern detected by the LC-MS/MS analysis of honeys was characterised almost exclusively by lycopsamine-type PAs. In this study the lycopsamine-type PAs were represented by standards intermedine (1), indicine (2) and lycopsamine (3) (Figure 2). These diastereomeric PAs cannot be distinguished based on their MS/MS spectra [26], and Figure 3 shows the identical mass spectra obtained for standards intermedine (1), indicine (2) and lycopsamine (3) by our described HRAMS method. Given the diastereomeric nature of these alkaloids all parent MH+ ions and fragment ions are identical, even with HRAMS. Separation based on retention time (RT) was therefore necessary in order to ascertain the botanical origin of PA contamination in these honeys. In most previous studies of PAs in honey, lycopsamine-type PAs were reported as the sum of unresolved stereoisomers, (including indicine (2), intermedine (1) and/or lycopsamine (3), and even the less common rinderine and echinatine) [27,28,29,30] or partially resolved stereoisomers [8,31,32,33]. Under our initial UHPLC conditions, with a column oven temperature of 40 °C, intermedine (1) eluted separately first, but indicine (2) and lycopsamine (3) co-eluted from the Kinetex XB-C18 UHPLC column. Notably the combined indicine/lycopsamine (2/3) peak represented 75% of the alkaloids present in Queensland honey. As these two alkaloids originate from distinctly different PA plant sources, our aim was to be able to separately quantify the levels of each of these PAs in honey to enable the major plant source of PA contamination to be identified.
Ultimately, separation of indicine/lycopsamine (2/3) was achieved by simply adjusting the column temperature to 5 °C. A more complicated ‘multiple heart-cutting two dimensional chromatography’ method has previously been reported for the resolution of multiple PA isomer pairs [34], but in our hands the simple gradient elution at 5 °C was sufficient to achieve our desired resolution of indicine/lycopsamine (2/3). Under these conditions, of the 30 PAs and PA-NOs all were resolved based on retention time or mass fragmentation of the MS/MS except for intermedine N-oxide (4) and indicine N-oxide (5) which displayed identical RT and MS/MS (Figure 4). In plants where these N-oxides (4) and (5) are prevalent, the N-oxides could be distinguished by reduction to the corresponding parent alkaloid (2/3) which were resolved by RT under the described conditions.

2.4. Predominant Alkaloids Present in Queensland Honeys

Analysis of all 465 honeys under our optimised LC-MS/MS conditions revealed that the predominant pyrrolizidine alkaloid present in our Queensland honey samples was lycopsamine (3), which represented approximately 51% of the measured alkaloid content, followed by indicine (2) at 24%, lycopsamine N-oxide (6) at 9%, intermedine (1) at 6% and echimidine (7) at 3% (Figure 5). Even though we did not resolve intermedine N-oxide (4) and indicine N-oxide (5), the identity of the minor N-oxide in individual honey samples was inferred by the presence of the co-occurring parent alkaloid (either intermedine (1) or indicine (2)).
In individual honeys, lycopsamine (3) was detected at up to ≈3100 ng/g, indicine (2) at up to 1700 ng/g, with the highest total PA content in any individual honey of ≈3300 ng/g which contained mainly a mixture of lycopsamine (3) and lycopsamine N-oxide (6).
Figure 6 shows a Tukey box and whisker plot of the pyrrolizidine alkaloids detected in honeys (n = 465), showing the distribution of each PA concentration, for positive samples only. The largest variation was observed for lycopsamine (3), indicine (2) and lycopsamine N-oxide (6). In honeys where lycopsamine (3) and its N-oxide (6) were abundant these were generally the dominant PAs (>90% of PAs detected).
Similarly, in honeys where indicine (2) and its N-oxide (5) were abundant these were generally the dominant PAs (>68% of PAs detected). In order to explain the relative predominance of these diastereomeric PAs in different honeys, it was clear that we had to identify two main and distinctly different PA plant sources.

2.5. Plant Sources of Indicine (2) in Honey

An examination of the locally abundant weed Heliotropium amplexicaule (Blue heliotrope) by our LC-MS/MS method revealed that indicine (2) and indicine N-oxide (5) were the predominant pyrrolizidine alkaloids in this plant, and examination of more minor components including the newly identified helioamplexine (8) provided a unique fingerprint in the HRAM LC-MS/MS profile [25]. Interrogation of the pyrrolizidine alkaloid profile from market honey samples with high amounts of indicine (2), demonstrated that there was strong correlation between the honey PA profile and the H. amplexicaule plant alkaloid profile. The presence of both major and minor H. amplexicaule alkaloids in this honey provided strong evidence that this plant represented the floral source for this alkaloid contamination [25].

2.6. Plant Sources of Lycopsamine (3) in Honey

We similarly sought to understand the source of lycopsamine (3) (and its N-oxide (6)), the major PA observed in Queensland honey. Examination of the PAs co-occurring with lycospamine (3) and lycopsamine N-oxide (6), in the source plant would enable us to establish a unique floral PA fingerprint that could be correlated with PAs observed in honey. In past studies, Echium plantagineum L. (Paterson’s curse) has been named as the source of lycopsamine (3) in Australian honey [35], despite the fact lycopsamine (3) is usually only a minor alkaloid in Echium spp. [11,27,36,37]. In fact, a previous European study noted the presence of high amounts of lycopsamine (3) (607 ng/g) compared to low amounts of echimidine (7) (15 ng/g) in imported Australian honeys, and postulated an unknown plant source as a possible interpretation [27]. Indeed our analysis of E. plantagineum revealed that after Zn reduction echimidine (7) and echiumine were the dominant PAs, with both lycopsamine (3) and intermedine (1) present in much lower quantities. Clearly E. plantagineum is not the major source of lycopsamine (3) seen in our Queensland honeys, which is also consistent with the more temperate distribution of this species within Australia [38]. Other species/genera known internationally to contain lycopsamine (3) (and intermedine (1)) include Anchusa off., Borago off., Lithospermum spp., and Symphytum spp., and Eupatorium spp. [39], and are generally not geographically distributed within Australia [40]. They can logically be excluded as potential lycopsamine (3) floral sources.
When considering PA species which are known to be prevalent in Queensland, both Ageratum and Aminscka spp. have been reported to contain lycopsamine (3). Ageratum conyzoides for example has been reported to contain lycopsamine (3) and echinatine [41,42] or lycopsamine (3) and 3′-O-acetyllycopsamine [43]. A targeted screen by Avula reported lycopsamine (3) and its N-oxide (6) as the two major PAs, together with minor amounts of dihydrolycopsamine, dihydrolycopsamine N-oxide and echinatine [1,44]. The closely related Ageratum houstonianum is locally abundant in Queensland, and our analysis of Zn reduced plant extract revealed the predominance of retrohoustine, heliohoustine and tentatively echinatine (ratio 2.7:1.7:1 respectively), with much lower amounts of lycopsamine (3) and intermedine (1) (data not shown). This result is consistent with analysis of this same species from Mexico that showed that lycopsamine (3) was not the predominant pyrrolizidine alkaloid present with three other pyrrolizidine alkaloids (retrohoustine, heliohoustine and isoretrohoustine) isolated in greater amounts than lycopsamine (3) [45]. Lycopsamine (3) and intermedine (1) have also been identified in Amscinckia spp. [46], with NMR analysis revealing the relative proportion of intermedine (1) to lycopsamine (3) varied from roughly 2:1 to 1:2 in A. intermedia, A. hispida, and A. lycopsoides. Amsinckia spp. are however regionally controlled as noxious weeds in Australia, and not likely to be a widely abundant PA sources in Queensland. The invasive aquatic weed Gymnocoronis spilanthoides has been recently been shown [47] to contain predominantly lycopsamine (3) followed by intermedine (1), however, this species is also controlled by government eradication programs. None of these plant species matched either the predominant lycopsamine (3) profile observed in our Queensland sourced honey or the regional abundance of plant species.
Historically lycopsamine (3) was identified in the hair pencil of Australian danaid butterflies in Queensland in a region where Amsinckia plants are rare [48]. An examination of the native vines Parsonsia straminea (family Apocynaceae) and Parsonsia eucalyptophylla, by these authors revealed the presence of lycopsamine (3) and intermedine/indicine (1 or 2), and acetyl derivatives. As native Parsonsia species occur widely in Queensland this species was deduced as the source of lycopsamine (3) in danaid butterflies [49]. Lycopsamine-type PAs have been identified in a number of species in Apocynaceae [50].
Interestingly, in a study of butterfly food plants, a comparison of Parsonsia straminea flowers revealed the ratio of lycopsamine N-oxide (6) to intermedine N-oxide (4) to other alkaloids of 98:1:1. By contrast, Ageratum sp. gave a predominance of two M+ 269 isomers compared to lycopsamine (3) (45:48:1) [51]. Evidently, lycopsamine (3) and intermedine (1) and their N-oxides are present in a wide variety of plant species, but we sought to identify an origin for the almost exclusive predominance of lycopsamine (3) (and its N-oxide (6)) and these literature reports of Parsonsia provided the best clue.

2.7. Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids Determined in Parsonsia Vines

Local Parsonsia straminea (Qld Herbarium ID AQ522465) was collected and re-examined for PA content using our described HRAM LC-MS/MS method. The plant pyrrolizidine alkaloids were present primarily as the N-oxides (96% in the leaves and stems, 99% in the pods, 93% in the nectar and 80% in the pollen). The plant pyrrolizidine alkaloids were analysed with and without reduction by Zn to enable comparison with the honey alkaloids (primarily free alkaloids) as previously observed [25,52]. The SCX SPE methodology was previously demonstrated to be suitable for plant extracts [36]. The investigations aimed to determine for the first time whether and to what extent PAs found in honey are sourced from Parsonsia straminea (or closely-related Parsonsia species, a number of which are widespread in coastal regions of eastern Australia [53]). High resolution accurate mass (HRAM) data, combined with RT comparison with pyrrolizidine alkaloids standards enabled identification of the major pyrrolizidine alkaloids in P. straminea (Table 3).
In the P. straminea nectar, the ratio of lycopsamine (3) and its N-oxide (6) to intermedine (1) and its N-oxide (4) was >45–50:1, in the flowers it was 78:1, in anthers/pollen >50:1, in the pods it was >50:1, whilst in the leaves, ~3:1.
Minor peaks after reduction were tentatively identified by analysis of the HRAM data (Table 4) and corresponded to tessellatine (9) or isomer (a C7 isomer, found 300.1801, calculated for C15H25NO5+H+: 300.1805), a further C9 lycopsamine isomer (found 300.1803, calculated for C15H25NO5+H+: 300.1805), 3′-O-acetyllycopsamine (found 342.1905, calculated for C17H28NO6+H+: 342.1917), 3′-O-acetylintermedine (found 342.1924, calculated for C17H28NO6+H+: 342.1917) and two helioamplexine isomers (found 314.1958 and 314.1958, calculated for C16H27NO5+H+: 314.1962). The corresponding N-oxides were found in the non-reduced plant extract. Tessellatine (9) has the same necic acid as lycopsamine (3) but is esterified at the C7 necine position rather than C9 as seen in lycopsamine (3). The C7 esterification is evidenced in the predominant (base peak) fragment ion m/z 156.1019 (calculated for C8H14NO2+ 156.1019) characteristic of C7 monoesters [54,55], which display much smaller peaks at m/z 138.0913, 120.0809 and 94.0656 than C9 monoesters lycopsamine (3)/indicine (2)/intermedine (1). The diastereomeric 3′-O-acetyllycopsamine and 3′-O-acetylintermedine exhibited a similar MS breakdown to that seen in 3′-O-angelylindicine [25], with a base peak of m/z 94.0655 and other typical peaks of C9 monoesters of retronecine, 156.1019, 138.0913 and 120.0809. In these acetyl compounds, the lack of a peak at m/z 198.1125 and the lack of a base peak at m/z 214.1074 in the corresponding N-oxides, excluded the 7-O-acetyl substitution pattern [1,56]. Similarly the two helioamplexine isomers had identical MS to that seen in helioamplexine (8) (the C-6′ homoanalogue of indicine) [25], and these components present in P. straminea which did not co-elute with helioamplexine were deduced to be the corresponding C-6′ homoanalogues of lycopsamine and intermedine.
Interestingly, PAs tentatively assigned as 3′-O-glucosyllycopsamine (found 462.2336, calculated for C21H35NO10+H+: 462.2336) and 3′-O-glucosylintermedine (found 462.2335, calculated for C21H35NO10+H+: 462.2336) and the corresponding N-oxides (found 478.2286 and 478.2289, calculated for C21H35NO11+H+: 478.2283), were also identified in minor amounts in the pods and nectar (Table 4). The MS2 spectra exhibited virtually identical MS2 to the parent alkaloids 1 and 3, 4 and 6. A 3′-glucopyranosyl 2,3-dihydro-1H-pyrrolizin-1-one derivative has previously been reported from Cynoglossum gansuense [57]. Additionally, five isomeric components with MH+ 286.1649 were also detected in P. straminea reduced extracts, with MS data consistent with these being desmethyl analogues of lycopsamine, i.e ideamine A (10) isomers (four esterified at C9, one at C7). Ideamine A N-oxide has previously been found in insects feeding on Parsonsia laevigata leaves [58,59]. Tessellatine (9), 3′-O-acetyl- and 7-O-acetyllycopsamine/intermedine and their N-oxides have been previously identified in Amsinckia or Cryptantha species [54,55,60,61]. To positively identify the PAs in lycopsamine-rich honey samples as originating from Parsonsia straminea, we sought to find some of these same minor PA components of this plant in honey.

2.8. Honey PA Profiles Linked to P. straminea

The detection of minor alkaloids in Parsonsia straminea provides a distinctive PA fingerprint in its HRAM LC-MS/MS profile, albeit in minor quantities compared to the major alkaloid lycopsamine (3). By comparison with the PA profile observed in market honey samples, there is clear evidence that this plant species is being used as a honey floral source by bees (Figure 7).
Honey samples such as H-PA#146 and H-PA#157 were independently purchased. When these honey samples were analysed against the 30 PA standards in our screen (Table 1), only the major alkaloid lycopsamine (3) and lesser intermedine (1) (and their N-oxides) were detected (Table 3). Characteristic major/minor components present in certain honeys (Table 4) included in addition to lycospamine and intermedine, the helioamplexine isomers at RT 8.20, 8.44 and 9.38 min (Figure 8) and putative 3′-O-acetylintermedine (8.91 min) and 3′-O-acetyllycospamine (9.64 min). The tentatively assigned 3′-O-glucosylintermedine and 3′-O-glucosyllycopsamine were also identified in these honey samples with the MS2 spectra observed identical to that found in the plant pods and nectar. Non-toxic dihydrolycopsamine isomers were also identified in the plant and honey. Due to the low levels of these minor PAs in the plant, they were seen most readily in honey samples highest in lycopsamine (3) (eg., H-PA#19,157,146).

2.9. Plant Origins of PAs in Honeys Surveyed

Of the 30 PA standards utilised in our survey, fifteen PAs (50%) were not detected in any of the market honey samples (Table 5). As shown in Table 5, based on profiles of alkaloids identified, most of the honey PAs were likely sourced from Parsonsia straminea or Heliotropium amplexicaule, with honey containing Parsonsia alkaloids being dominant in lycopsamine (3) (up to 3100 ng/g) and honey containing Heliotropium amplexicaule alkaloids dominant in indicine (2) (up to 1700 ng/g). PAs sourced from Echium plantagineum were much lower, with the dominant PA detected being echimidine (7) (up to 260 ng/g) in agreement with previous studies [11,62]. Even lower levels of PAs from Heliotropium europaeum (containing lasiocarpine, heliotrine and europine [11,62] (and their N-oxides)) and Senecio species (most likely Senecio madagascariensis) [63] were detected (Table 5). Of course, many of the honey samples are ascribed by their label to particular non-PA producing floral sources, so the observation of PAs in these honeys is a product of either the natural foraging of bees on different available plants, or the blending of honeys in the packaging process. This co-foraging/blending is also evident in honey samples that show co-occurrence of pyrrolizidine alkaloids from multiple floral sources, for example, honeys containing indicine (2) (from H. amplexicaule) and lycopsamine (3) (likely from P. straminea due to lack of the dominant PA echimidine (7) as present in E. plantagineum). Both these sets of PAs were present in significant levels in H-PA#11, 32, 216, 630 and 642. Geographically both the low-growing heliotrope, H. amplexicaule, and the arboreal vine, P. straminea, can co-occur in sub-tropical coastal regions of Queensland [53,64], so the co-occurrence of their respective alkaloids in honey would seem logical if both plants are visited by foraging bees within the same landscape. The high abundance of alkaloids from these quite different plant species in honey suggests that both are attractive to foraging bees, and where possible both species should be avoided when siting honey hives. It is apparent that the ‘standard set’ for PA/PANO testing of honeys varies depending on the natural flora of the region, as well as the cultivated plants present. In this study erucifoline, jacobine, monocrotaline, senciphylline, or their corresponding N-oxides and senkirkine or trichodesmine were not found in the honey tested, which is a considerably different result to those found recently in Schleswig-Holstein region of Germany [28].

2.10. Honey as a Dietary Source of Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids

Major supermarket honeys by comparison represent blended honeys from diverse locations, some of which attributed the specific floral source and in general contained only low levels of PAs. It has been observed previously that blended retail honeys had a lower PA content, but that PAs were present in more samples [65]. In this study, for supermarket honeys (n = 129), PAs were detected in 84% of honeys, and showed highest total PA levels of 1400 ng/g. For supermarket honeys, the mean total PA level of PA-positive samples was 120 ng/g and the median level was 61 ng/g.
Certain small producer honeys displayed the highest levels of pyrrolizidine alkaloids, with the PA content dependent on the location and attractiveness of PA containing plants to foraging honey bees. Paradoxically, even though analysed PA content of small producer honeys range from <LOR to an alarming 3000 ng/g, if equal amounts of each of these 205 small producer honeys were blended, the hypothetical resultant mixed honey would have a PA content of only 240 ng/g (i.e., the average PA content of all of these 465 honeys).
It has been observed previously in South American honeys that raw honeys showed greatest variety due to the availability of PA containing plants near to hives [65].
The cumulative toxicity of the 1,2-unsaturated PAs have been demonstrated in animal studies and genotoxicities/tumorigenicities were induced by hepatic metabolism of PAs [66]. Consequently, provisional tolerable daily intakes (PTDI) have been recommended to control the human consumption of PAs [5,10,39,67].
Using the Australian FSANZ provisional tolerable daily intake (PTDI) of 1 μg/kg BW/day, 0% of honeys tested (total n = 465) exceeded the limit for a 70 kg adult consuming 20 g of honey per day, but 19% of honeys tested exceeded the limit for a 15 kg child consuming 50 g of honey per day. Applying the lowest recommended PTDI (EFSA, COT, BfR) of 0.007 μg/kg BW/day, 63% of honeys tested exceeded the limit for a 70 kg adult consuming 20 g of honey per day and 84% of honeys tested exceeded the limit for a 15 kg child consuming 50 g of honey per day.
The PA content of honey samples varies with geographical location and climate, determined by the type and distribution of PA containing plants and by the propensity for bees to forage on these plants [65,68]. Lycopsamine (3) and intermedine (1) are present in many PA-producing plants, with the knowledge of the plants distributed in Australia and the ratio to other PAs present, it is likely that Parsonsia straminea is a major contributor to the high PA levels observed in certain honeys in this study. Of course, it is possible that there is more than one PA source of lycopsamine (3), with a small portion of lycopsamine contamination of honey potentially originating from Echium plantagineum and Ageratum houstonianium. Also, there are likely other PA containing plants that have not been considered. It is also possible that not all PAs present in honey have been identified by comparison with standards and by analysis of the top MSMS. Despite the observation that of the PAs tested in experimental rats, lycopsamine (3) induced the lowest levels of liver DNA adducts (formed from PA derived reactive pyrrolic metabolites), PA containing plants are the most common poisonous/carcinogenic plants affecting livestock, wildlife and humans [69]. Beekeepers are advised to avoid these known plant genera around the hive/apiary as much as possible to reduce PA contamination in honey.

3. Conclusions

The HRAM LC-MS/MS method for pyrrolizidine alkaloid analysis described here enables the ready resolution of isomeric alkaloids of the lycopsamine-type. The described simple adjustment of column conditions to a lower temperature was effective in resolving the problematic pairs of indicine/lycopsamine alkaloids present in Australian honey. This resolution has enabled us to identify Parsonsia vines as a previously unsuspected source of PA contamination in Australian honey. Low temperature chromatographic resolution may have as yet unexplored application in resolving other similar diastereomeric pyrrolizidine alkaloid isomers, of which there are many within the known pyrrolizidine alkaloids, many of which do not have commercially available standards.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Chemicals and Solvents

In total, 30 pyrrolizidine alkaloid standards were utilized in a high resolution accurate mass (HRAM) LC-MS/MS screen. Echimidine, erucifoline, europine, heliotrine, indicine, intermedine, jacobine, lasiocarpine lycopsamine, monocrotaline, retrorsine senecionine, seneciphylline, senecivernine, and their respective N-oxides, were purchased together with senkirkine and trichodesmine from Phytolab GmbH & Co. KG (Vestenbergsgreuth, Germany) and had a purity >89%. All other chemicals and solvents were of analytical reagent or HPLC grade purity. Water used for sample preparation and HPLC was Milli-Q purified (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany).

4.2. Honey Samples

Honey samples (465 in total) were purchased between September 2016 and December 2017 directly from Queensland supermarkets, fruit shops, local markets, and producers.

4.3. Honey Alkaloid Extraction

Honey samples (1 g) were dissolved in aqueous H2SO4 (0.05 M, 10 mL) centrifuged and the supernatant applied to preconditioned Agilent SPE Bond Elut 100 mg LRC-SCX columns (Agilent Technologies, Folsom, CA, USA). SPE cartridges were washed with water (10 mL) and methanol (10 mL), and pyrrolizidine alkaloids were then eluted with 3% ammonia in methanol (3 mL). The eluate was evaporated to dryness under nitrogen, and the residue reconstituted in 5% methanol in water (1 mL) for HRAM LC-MS/MS analysis.

4.4. Honey Method Validation

The validation of the method was conducted according to the National Association of Testing Authorities (NATA) guidance document [22]. The method was validated in 3 blank honeys, and based on results for 10 spiked samples at a spiking level of 5 ng/g (Table 2), 10 blank samples and 10 non-extracted spike samples and the recoveries determined. Limit of detection (LOD) was calculated as 3s. Limit of quantitation was calculated as 9s. Limit of reporting was set at the levels the samples were spiked, also the level of the lowest standard used for the calibration curve. The uncertainties given are at the 95% confidence level as required by the NATA [22,23]. Replicate samples were prepared for every tenth honey test sample to assess reproducibility. The difference between replicate samples (coefficient of variance %) was typically 0.12–6.7%. High samples were diluted to levels within the calibration curve and re-run. SPE wash steps and further elutions with 3% ammonia in methanol (3 mL) were analysed for residual PAs and the extraction was found to be exhaustive. Table 2 shows good recoveries for most PAs.

4.5. Plant Alkaloid Extraction

4.5.1. Plant Source

Parsonsia straminea was collected from a suburban area in the south of Brisbane and was taxonomically identified by the Queensland Herbarium, with a voucher specimen (AQ522465) incorporated into their collection. The Parsonsia straminea foliage sample was a collection of stems and leaves, and was freeze dried, milled and stored frozen prior to analysis. Pods were collected separately and freeze-dried, milled and frozen. Flowers were sampled as both intact flowers (freeze-dried, milled and frozen) or utilized to provide nectar and pollen separately. Nectar was separated from flowers using a microcap capillary, and anthers and pollen were separated from other flower plants with tweezers and desiccated.

4.5.2. Foliage and Seed Pod Extracts

Dried milled plant leaves and stems (1 g) and seed pods (1 g) were separately dissolved in methanol (10 mL), vortexed (20 s), shaken (30 min) then centrifuged (4800 rpm, 10 min) and the supernatants removed and concentrated to dryness under nitrogen. The residues were dissolved in aqueous H2SO4 (0.05 M, 10 mL) centrifuged (4800 rpm, 10 min) and a portion of the supernatants (0.1 mL) were applied to preconditioned Agilent SPE Bond Elut 500 mg LRC-SCX columns. SPE cartridges were washed with water (10 mL) and methanol (10 mL), and pyrrolizidine alkaloids were then eluted with 3% ammonia in methanol (10 mL). The eluate was evaporated to dryness under nitrogen, and the residue reconstituted in 5% methanol in water (1 mL) for HRAM LC-MS/MS analysis.

4.5.3. Whole Flower Extracts

Dried and milled flowers (0.1 g) were dissolved in methanol (2 mL), vortexed (20 s), shaken (30 min) then centrifuged (4800 rpm, 10 min) and the supernatant removed and concentrated to dryness under nitrogen. The residue was dissolved in aqueous H2SO4 (0.05 M, 1 mL), centrifuged (4800 rpm, 10 min) and, for each sample, a portion of the supernatant (0.1 mL) was applied to a preconditioned Agilent SPE Bond Elut 500 mg LRC-SCX column. Each SPE cartridge was washed with water (10 mL) and methanol (10 mL), and pyrrolizidine alkaloids were then eluted with 3% ammonia in methanol (10 mL). The eluate was evaporated to dryness under nitrogen, and the residue reconstituted in 5% methanol in water (1 mL) for HRAM LC-MS/MS analysis.

4.5.4. Zinc Reduced Extracts

Another portion of each aqueous H2SO4 supernatant (0.5 mL) derived from leaves/stems, pods and flowers was treated with Zn dust (100 mg) and stirred (2 h). After centrifugation (4800 rpm, 10 min), a portion of the supernatants (0.1 mL) was applied to a preconditioned Agilent SPE Bond Elut 500 mg LRC-SCX column. Each SPE cartridge was washed with water (10 mL) and methanol (10 mL), and pyrrolizidine alkaloids were then eluted with 3% ammonia in methanol (10 mL). The eluate was evaporated to dryness under nitrogen, and the residue reconstituted in 5% methanol in water (1 mL) for HRAM LC-MS/MS analysis.

4.5.5. Floral Nectar Extract

Nectar (22.5 mg) was obtained from fresh flowers using a microcap capillary, dissolved in MeOH (0.5 mL) and diluted 1 in 100 with 5% methanol in water (1 mL) for HRAM LC-MS/MS analysis.

4.5.6. Pollen Extract

Dessicated anthers and pollen were placed in hexane and shaken (1 min). The hexane containing pollen was separated from the anthers and evaporated to dryness under nitrogen. The resulting pollen (0.36 mg) was dissolved in 5% methanol in water and diluted as required for LCMS/MS analysis.

4.6. HRAM LC-MS/MS Analysis

Samples were analysed using a Vanquish UHPLC in combination with Q Exactive Orbitrap high resolution accurate mass (HRAM) spectrometry system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany). LC-MS/MS separation was achieved on a Kinetex XB-C18 analytical column (100 × 2.1 mm, 2.6 µm, 100 Å) at 5 °C. Analysis conditions: binary solvent system, solvent A (ammonium formate (5 mM) and formic acid (0.1%) and solvent B (95% v/v methanol/water with ammonium formate (5 mM) and formic acid (0.1%)). Compounds were eluted from the column at 0.3 mL min−1 with mobile phase B held at 5% for 3 min followed by linear gradients of B from 5–50% (3–15 min), 50–80% (15–18.5 min), 80–100% (18.5–19 min), where it was held for 30 sec, before reducing from 100–5% over 6 sec, where it was held until stop at 23.5 min. Instrument control, data acquisition and analysis were conducted using Tracefinder 4.1 from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Alkaloid detection was performed by positive electrospray ionisation (ESI) with a spray voltage of 3500 V and a vaporiser temperature of 400 °C. MS analysis run with arbitrary pressures of sheath gas 48, aux gas 11, sweep gas 2, spray voltage 3.5 kV, capillary temperature of 320 °C, auxiliary gas heater at 350 °C and used full scan/dd-MS2 mode. Full scans were conducted at a resolution of 70,000 FWHM (at m/z 200), with an AGC target of 1.00 × 106. The maximum time of accumulating ions per scan event was 10 ms with a scan range of 75–1125 m/z. Data dependent acquisition (dd-MS2) was conducted at a resolution of 17,500 with an AGC target of 1.00 × 106. The maximum time of accumulating ions per scan event was 50 ms. Normalized collision energy (nce) was set to 50% and an isolation window of 1.0 m/z was utilized. Dynamic exclusion was set to 3 s preventing subsequent triggering of the same ion in data dependent scans. A maximum of 5 most abundant precursors could be selected for dd-MS2 per scan event.
Pyrrolizidine alkaloid levels in honey/plant material were quantitated against certified PA standards, with calibration curves obtained for each of the 30 pyrrolizidine alkaloid standards injected at 5, 10, 20, 50 and 100 and 200 ppb (in duplicate/triplicate). Honey or plant extracts were analysed by HRAM LC-MS/MS to detect pyrrolizidine alkaloids and their N-oxides by matching of retention time with the corresponding standard and identified by their precursor parent ion (M+H+) and confirmed by the detection of product ions (Table 1). The identity of these and further alkaloids was assigned by use of the high resolution accurate mass data provided by the Q Exactive mass spectrometer, enabling the determination of elemental composition of parent and fragment ions (Table 3 and Table 4).

Author Contributions

Concept, M.T.F.; methodology, N.L.H.; validation, B.L.L.T., D.H., K.J.M.; formal analysis, S.J.C., S.R.A.; investigation, N.L.H.; extraction N.L.H., C.L.M., E.S., M.Y., T.T.P.N.; writing—original draft preparation, N.L.H., M.T.F.; writing—review and editing, N.L.H., M.T.F., K.J.M.; supervision, M.T.F.; funding acquisition, M.T.F., K.J.M.

Funding

This work was funded by Queensland Health Grant RSS17-002.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Avula, B.; Sagi, S.; Wang, Y.-H.; Zweigenbaum, J.; Wang, M.; Khan, I.A. Characterization and screening of pyrrolizidine alkaloids and N-oxides from botanicals and dietary supplements using UHPLC-high resolution mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2015, 178, 136–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Smith, L.W.; Culvenor, C.C.J. Plant sources of hepatotoxic pyrrolizidine alkaloids. J. Nat. Prod. 1981, 44, 129–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Stegemann, T.; Kruse, L.H.; Brutt, M.; Ober, D. Specific Distribution of Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids in Floral Parts of Comfrey (Symphytum officinale) and its Implications for Flower Ecology. J. Chem. Ecol. 2019, 45, 128–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Edgar, J.A.; Colegate, S.M.; Boppre, M.; Molyneux, R.J. Pyrrolizidine alkaloids in food: A spectrum of potential health consequences. Food Addit. Contam. Part. A 2011, 28, 308–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. FSANZ. Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids in Food. A Toxicological Reveiw and Risk Assessment; Technical Report Series No. 2; Australia New Zealand Food Authority: Canberra, Australia, 2001. Available online: www.foodstandards.gov.au/publications/documents/TR2.pdf (accessed on 17 December 2019).
  6. Alexander, J.; Benford, D.; Boobis, A.; Ceccatelli, S.; Cottrill, B.; Cravedi, J.-P.; Di Domenico, A.; Doerge, D.; Dogliotti, E.; Edler, L.; et al. Scientific opinion on pyrrolizidine alkaloids in food and feed. EFSA J. 2011, 9, 2406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. COT. COT Statement on Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids in Food. Available online: https://cot.food.gov.uk/sites/default/files/cot/cotstatementpa200806.pdf (accessed on 2 August 2019).
  8. BfR. Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (The Federal Instituteof Risk Assessment). International Collaborative Study for the Determination of Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids in Honey and Herbal Tea by SPE-LC-MS/MS. Available online: http://www.bfr.bund.de/cm/350/international-collaborative-study-for-the-determination-of-pyrrolizidine-alkaloids-in-honey-and-herbal-tea-by-spe-lc-ms-ms.pdf (accessed on 19 April 2016).
  9. Dusemund, B.; Nowak, N.; Sommerfeld, C.; Lindtner, O.; Schäfer, B.; Lampen, A. Risk assessment of pyrrolizidine alkaloids in food of plant and animal origin. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 115, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. European Food Safety Authority. Risks for human health related to the presence of pyrrolizidine alkaloids in honey, tea, herbal infusions and food supplements. EFSA J. 2017, 15, 4908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Beales, K.A.; Betteridge, K.; Colegate, S.M.; Edgar, J.A. Solid-phase extraction and LC-MS analysis of pyrrolizidine alkaloids in honeys. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2004, 52, 6664–6672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Griffin, C.T.; Mitrovic, S.M.; Danaher, M.; Furey, A. Development of a fast isocratic LC-MS/MS method for the high-throughput analysis of pyrrolizidine alkaloids in Australian honey. Food Addit. Contam. Part. A 2014, 32, 214–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Culvenor, C.C.J.; Edgar, J.A.; Smith, L.W. Pyrrolizidine alkaloids in honey from Echium plantagineum L. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1981, 29, 958–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Julien, M.H. Biological control of rangeland weeds in Australia. Rangel. J. 2006, 28, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fletcher, M.T.; McKenzie, R.A.; Blaney, B.J.; Reichmann, K.G. Pyrrolizidine alkaloids in Crotalaria taxa from northern Australia: Risk to grazing livestock. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2009, 57, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Fletcher, M.T.; Hayes, P.Y.; Somerville, M.J.; De Voss, J.J. Crotalaria medicaginea associated with horse deaths in northern Australia: New pyrrolizidine alkaloids. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2011, 59, 11888–11892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. McKenzie, R.A. Australia’s Poisonous Plants, Fungi and Cyanobacteria; CSIRO Publishing: Collingwood, Australia, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  18. Edgar, J.A. Pyrrolizidine alkaloids sequestered by Solomon Island Danaine butterflies. The feeding preferences of the Danainae and Ithomiinae. J. Zool. 1982, 196, 385–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Abe, F.; Nagao, T.; Okabe, H.; Yamauchi, T. Macrocyclic pyrrolizidine alkaloids from Parsonsia laevigata. Phytochemistry 1991, 30, 1737–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Honda, K.; Hayashi, N.; Abe, F.; Yamauchi, T. Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids Mediate Host–Plant Recognition by Ovipositing Females of an Old World Danaid Butterfly, Idea leuconoe. J. Chem. Ecol. 1997, 23, 1703–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Plants of the World Online (POWO). Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens: Kew, UK. Available online: http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/ (accessed on 15 November 2019).
  22. NATA General Accreditation Guidance—Validation and Verification of Quantitative and Qualitative Test Methods. January 2018. Available online: https://www.nata.com.au/phocadownload/gen-accreditation-guidance/Validation-and-Verification-of-Quantitative-and-Qualitative-Test-Methods.pdf (accessed on 22 May 2019).
  23. NATA General Accreditation Guidance—Estimating and Reporting Measurement Uncertainty of Chemical Test Results. January 2018. Available online: https://www.nata.com.au/phocadownload/gen-accreditation-guidance/Estimating-and-reporting-measurement-uncertainty-of-chemical-test-results.pdf (accessed on 22 May 2019).
  24. EU Reference Laboratories for Residues of Pesticides. Method Validation & Quality Control Procedures for Pesticide Residues Analysis in Food & Feed, SANTE/11813/2017. Available online: https://www.eurl-pesticides.eu/docs/public/tmplt_article.asp?CntID=727 (accessed on 20 November 2019).
  25. Carpinelli de Jesus, M.; Hungerford, N.L.; Carter, S.J.; Anuj, S.R.; Blanchfield, J.T.; De Voss, J.J.; Fletcher, M.T. Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids of Blue Heliotrope (Heliotropium amplexicaule) and Their Presence in Australian Honey. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2019, 67, 7995–8006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wuilloud, J.C.; Gratze, S.R.; Gamble, B.M.; Wolnik, K.A. Simultaneous analysis of hepatotoxic pyrrolizidine alkaloids and N-oxides in comfrey root by LC-ion trap mass spectrometry. Analyst 2004, 129, 150–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kempf, M.; Wittig, M.; Reinhard, A.; von der Ohe, K.; Blacquiere, T.; Raezke, K.-P.; Michel, R.; Schreier, P.; Beuerle, T. Pyrrolizidine alkaloids in honey: Comparison of analytical methods. Food Addit. Contam. Part. A 2011, 28, 332–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Gottschalk, C.; Huckauf, A.; Dubecke, A.; Kaltner, F.; Zimmermann, M.; Rahaus, I.; Beuerle, T. Uncertainties in the determination of pyrrolizidine alkaloid levels in naturally contaminated honeys and comparison of results obtained by different analytical approaches. Food Addit. Contam. Part. A 2018, 35, 1366–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kaltner, F.; Stiglbauer, B.; Rychlik, M.; Gareis, M.; Gottschalk, C. Development of a sensitive analytical method for determining 44 pyrrolizidine alkaloids in teas and herbal teas via LC-ESI-MS/MS. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wang, T.; Frandsen, H.L.; Christiansson, N.R.; Rosendal, S.E.; Pedersen, M.; Smedsgaard, J. Pyrrolizidine alkaloids in honey: Quantification with and without standards. Food Control. 2019, 98, 227–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Tamošiūnas, V.; Mischke, C.; Mulder, P.P.J.; Stroka, J. EU Publications. In Report on the 2012 Proficiency Test on Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids in Honey and Hay; Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (Joint Research Centre): Luxembourg, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mulder, P.P.J.; Sánchez, P.L.; These, A.; Preiss-Weigert, A.; Castellari, M. Occurrence of Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids in food. EFSA Support. Publ. 2015, EN-859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Crews, C. Methods for Analysis of Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids. In Natural Products; Ramawat, K.G., Merillon, J.M., Eds.; Spinger: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 1049–1068. [Google Scholar]
  34. Van de Schans, M.G.M.; Blokland, M.H.; Zoontjes, P.W.; Mulder, P.P.J.; Nielen, M.W.F. Multiple heart-cutting two dimensional liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry of pyrrolizidine alkaloids. J. Chromatogr. A 2017, 1503, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Griffin, C.T.; O’Mahony, J.; Danaher, M.; Furey, A. Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Detection of Targeted Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids in Honeys Purchased within Ireland. Food Anal. Method. 2015, 8, 18–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Colegate, S.M.; Edgar, J.A.; Knill, A.M.; Lee, S.T. Solid-phase extraction and HPLC-MS profiling of pyrrolizidine alkaloids and their N-oxides: A case study of Echium plantagineum. Phytochem. Anal. 2005, 16, 108–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Skoneczny, D.; Weston, P.A.; Zhu, X.; Gurr, G.M.; Callaway, R.M.; Weston, L.A. Metabolic Profiling of Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids in Foliage of Two Echium spp. Invaders in Australia—A Case of Novel Weapons? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 26721–26737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Atlas of Living Australia website. Echium plantagineum L. Available online: https://bie.ala.org.au/species/http://id.biodiversity.org.au/node/apni/2889451. (accessed on 1 August 2019).
  39. European Food Safety Authority. Scientific Opinion on Pyrrolizidine alkaloids in food and feed. EFSA J. 2011, 9, 2406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Atlas of Living Australia Website. Available online: https://www.ala.org.au (accessed on 1 August 2019).
  41. Okunade, A.L. Ageratum conyzoides L. Asteraceae Fitoterapia 2002, 73, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wiedenfeld, H.; Roder, E. Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids from Ageratum conyzoides. Planta Med. 1991, 57, 578–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Molyneux, R.J.; Gardner, D.L.; Colegate, S.M.; Edgar, J.A. Pyrrolizidine alkaloid toxicity in livestock: A paradigm for human poisoning? Food Addit. Contam. Part. A 2011, 28, 293–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Bosi, C.F.; Rosa, D.W.; Grougnet, R.; Lemonakis, N.; Halabalaki, M.; Skaltsounis, A.L.; Biavatti, M.W. Pyrrolizidine alkaloids in medicinal tea of Ageratum conyzoides. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2013, 23, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Wiedenfeld, H.; Andrade-Cetto, A. Pyrrolizidine alkaloids from Ageratum houstonianum Mill. Phytochemistry 2001, 57, 1269–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Culvenor, C.C.J.; Smith, L.W. The alkaloids of Amsinckia species: A. intermedia Fisch. & Mey., A. hispida (Ruiz. & Pav.) Johnst. and A. lycopsoides Lehm. Aust. J. Chem. 1966, 19, 1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Boppre, M.; Colegate, S.M. Recognition of pyrrolizidine alkaloid esters in the invasive aquatic plant Gymnocoronis spilanthoides (Asteraceae). Phytochem. Anal. 2015, 26, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Edgar, J.A.; Culvenor, C.C.J. Pyrrolizidine ester alkaloid in danaid butterflies. Nature 1974, 248, 614–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Edgar, J.A.; Culvenor, C.C.J. Pyrrolizidine alkaloids in Parsonsia species (family Apocynaceae) which attract Danaid butterflies. Experientia 1975, 31, 393–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Burzynski, E.A.; Minbiole, K.P.C.; Livshultz, T. New sources of lycopsamine-type pyrrolizidine alkaloids and their distribution in Apocynaceae. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2015, 59, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Orr, A.G.; Trigo, J.R.; Witte, L.; Hartmann, T. Sequestration of pyrrolizidine alkaloids by larvae of Tellervo zoilus (Lepidoptera: Ithomiinae) and their role in the chemical protection of adults against the spider Nephila maculata (Araneidae). Chemoecology 1996, 7, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Reinhard, A.; Janke, M.; Ohe, W.; Kempf, M.; Theuring, C.; Hartmann, T.; Schreier, P.; Beuerle, T. Feeding Deterrence and Detrimental Effects of Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids Fed to Honey Bees (Apis mellifera). J. Chem. Ecol. 2009, 35, 1086–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Atlas of Living Australia website. Parsonsia straminea (R.Br.) F. Muell. Available online: https://bie.ala.org.au/species/http://id.biodiversity.org.au/node/apni/2899618 (accessed on 21 February 2019).
  54. Colegate, S.M.; Welsh, S.L.; Gardner, D.R.; Betz, J.M.; Panter, K.E. Profiling of dehydropyrrolizidine alkaloids and their N-oxides in herbarium-preserved specimens of Amsinckia species using HPLC-esi (+) MS. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2014, 62, 7382–7392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kelley, R.B.; Seiber, J.N. Pyrrolizidine alkaloid chemosystematics in Amsinckia. Phytochemistry 1992, 31, 2369–2387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. These, A.; Bodi, D.; Ronczka, S.; Lahrssen-Wiederholt, M.; Preiss-Weigert, A. Structural screening by multiple reaction monitoring as a new approach for tandem mass spectrometry: Presented for the determination of pyrrolizidine alkaloids in plants. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2013, 405, 9375–9383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Jin, Y.-P.; Wei, X.-N.; Shi, Y.-P. Chemical Constituents from Cynoglossum gansuense. Helv. Chim. Acta 2007, 90, 776–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nishida, R.; Kim, C.-S.; Fukami, H.; Irik, R. Ideamine N-Oxides: Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids Sequestered by the Danaine Butterfly, Idea leuconoe. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1991, 55, 1787–1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hartmann, T.; Theuring, C.; Witte, L.; Schulz, S.; Pasteels, J.M. Biochemical processing of plant acquired pyrrolizidine alkaloids by the neotropical leaf-beetle Platyphora boucardi. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2003, 33, 515–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Roitman, J.N. The pyrrolizidine alkaloids of Amsinckia Menziesii. Aust. J. Chem. 1983, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Stermitz, F.R.; Pass, M.A.; Kelley, R.B.; Liddell, J.R. Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids from Cryptantha Species. Phytochemistry 1993, 33, 383–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Edgar, J.A.; Roeder, E.; Molyneux, R.J. Honey from Plants Containing Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids: A Potential Threat to Health. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 2719–2730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Gardner, D.R.; Thorne, M.S.; Molyneux, R.J.; Pfister, J.A.; Seawright, A.A. Pyrrolizidine alkaloids in Senecio madagascariensis from Australia and Hawaii and assessment of possible livestock poisoning. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2006, 34, 736–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Atlas of Living Australia Website. Heliotropium amplexicaule Vahl. Available online: https://bie.ala.org.au/species/http://id.biodiversity.org.au/node/apni/2917623 (accessed on 1 August 2019).
  65. Dubecke, A.; Beckh, G.; Lullmann, C. Pyrrolizidine alkaloids in honey and bee pollen. Food Addit. Contam. Part. A 2011, 28, 348–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Fu, P.P.; Xia, Q.; Lin, G.; Chou, M.W. Pyrrolizidine alkaloids—genotoxicity, metabolism enzymes, metabolic activation, and mechanisms. Drug Metab. Rev. 2004, 36, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. European Food Safety Authority. Dietary exposure assessment to pyrrolizidine alkaloids in the European population European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). EFSA J. 2016, 14, 4572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Crews, C.; Beuerle, T. The Analysis of Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids in Honey. In Analysis of Food Toxins and Toxicants; Wong, Y.-C., Lewis, R.J., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 237–266. [Google Scholar]
  69. Fu, P.P. Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids: Metabolic Activation Pathways Leading to Liver Tumor Initiation. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2017, 30, 81–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Toxins 11 00726 g001 550
Figure 1. Histogram showing the frequency of total pyrrolizidine alkaloid concentrations in honey samples (n = 465) analysed against all 30 pyrrolizidine alkaloid standards (and isolated helioamplexine [25]).
Figure 1. Histogram showing the frequency of total pyrrolizidine alkaloid concentrations in honey samples (n = 465) analysed against all 30 pyrrolizidine alkaloid standards (and isolated helioamplexine [25]).
Toxins 11 00726 g001
Toxins 11 00726 g002 550
Figure 2. Structures of predominant PAs (1–8) observed in honey (n = 465), together with structures of minor components tentatively observed in Parsonsia straminea (9–10).
Figure 2. Structures of predominant PAs (1–8) observed in honey (n = 465), together with structures of minor components tentatively observed in Parsonsia straminea (9–10).
Toxins 11 00726 g002
Toxins 11 00726 g003 550
Figure 3. Stereoisomeric pyrrolizidine alkaloids (a) intermedine (1), (b) indicine (2), and (c) lycopsamine (3), with identical high resolution accurate mass spectra.
Figure 3. Stereoisomeric pyrrolizidine alkaloids (a) intermedine (1), (b) indicine (2), and (c) lycopsamine (3), with identical high resolution accurate mass spectra.
Toxins 11 00726 g003
Toxins 11 00726 g004 550
Figure 4. Extracted ion chromatogram of the 30 pyrrolizidine alkaloid calibration standards, illustrating the separation obtained under the UHPLC method, with column temperature of 5 °C.
Figure 4. Extracted ion chromatogram of the 30 pyrrolizidine alkaloid calibration standards, illustrating the separation obtained under the UHPLC method, with column temperature of 5 °C.
Toxins 11 00726 g004
Toxins 11 00726 g005 550
Figure 5. Total amount of each pyrrolizidine alkaloid detected against the 30 PA standards.
Figure 5. Total amount of each pyrrolizidine alkaloid detected against the 30 PA standards.
Toxins 11 00726 g005
Toxins 11 00726 g006 550
Figure 6. Tukey box and whisker plot of distribution of each pyrrolizidine alkaloid detected in honey (n = 465) (includes results >5 ng/g only).
Figure 6. Tukey box and whisker plot of distribution of each pyrrolizidine alkaloid detected in honey (n = 465) (includes results >5 ng/g only).
Toxins 11 00726 g006
Toxins 11 00726 g007 550
Figure 7. HRAM LC-MS/MS chromatograms (m/z 300.1805, m/z 316.1755) comparing the major pyrrolizidine alkaloids in Parsonsia straminea and honey: (a) intermedine (1) and lycopsamine (3) in Parsonsia straminea leaves (Zn reduced) (b) intermedine (1) and lycopsamine (3) in Parsonsia straminea flowers (Zn reduced) (c) lycopsamine (3) and its N-oxide (6) in Parsonsia straminea flowers (unreduced) (d) intermedine (1) and lycopsamine (3) in honey sample H-PA#146 (e) intermedine (1) and lycopsamine (3) in honey sample H-PA#157.
Figure 7. HRAM LC-MS/MS chromatograms (m/z 300.1805, m/z 316.1755) comparing the major pyrrolizidine alkaloids in Parsonsia straminea and honey: (a) intermedine (1) and lycopsamine (3) in Parsonsia straminea leaves (Zn reduced) (b) intermedine (1) and lycopsamine (3) in Parsonsia straminea flowers (Zn reduced) (c) lycopsamine (3) and its N-oxide (6) in Parsonsia straminea flowers (unreduced) (d) intermedine (1) and lycopsamine (3) in honey sample H-PA#146 (e) intermedine (1) and lycopsamine (3) in honey sample H-PA#157.
Toxins 11 00726 g007
Toxins 11 00726 g008 550
Figure 8. HRAM LC-MS/MS chromatograms (m/z 314.1911) comparing minor peaks in Parsonsia straminea and honey (a) isomers of helioamplexine (8) in Parsonsia straminea leaves (Zn reduced) (b) isomers of (8) in honey sample H-PA#146 (c) isomers of (8) in honey sample H-PA#157.
Figure 8. HRAM LC-MS/MS chromatograms (m/z 314.1911) comparing minor peaks in Parsonsia straminea and honey (a) isomers of helioamplexine (8) in Parsonsia straminea leaves (Zn reduced) (b) isomers of (8) in honey sample H-PA#146 (c) isomers of (8) in honey sample H-PA#157.
Toxins 11 00726 g008
Table
Table 1. Details of pyrrolizidine alkaloids used in the Orbitrap analysis of PA containing plants and honey, including formulae, retention times, precursor ions used for quantitation and confirmatory product ions.
Table 1. Details of pyrrolizidine alkaloids used in the Orbitrap analysis of PA containing plants and honey, including formulae, retention times, precursor ions used for quantitation and confirmatory product ions.
CompoundFormulaAverage RT (min)Precursor Ion (MH+)Product Ions
Echimidine (7)C20H31NO712.86398.2173120.080983.049755.0550
Echimidine N-oxideC20H31NO812.80414.2122396.2004352.1745254.1379220.1326137.0833
ErucifolineC18H23NO66.23350.1598322.1642220.1329164.1066138.0911120.0807
Erucifoline N-oxideC18H23NO78.03366.1547278.1386218.1172164.1067136.0756119.0729
EuropineC16H27NO66.97330.1911254.1385156.1019138.0914120.081096.0812
Europine N-oxideC16H27NO77.86346.1860328.1743270.1328256.1172172.0964155.0937
HelioamplexineC16H27NO59.21314.1962156.1017138.0913120.080894.0655
Helioamplexine N-oxideC16H27NO610.42330.1911172.0966155.0938138.0913111.091394.0653
HeliotrineC16H27NO59.56314.1962156.1017138.0913120.080894.0655
Heliotrine N-oxideC16H27NO610.46330.1911172.0966155.0938138.0913111.091394.0653
Indicine (2)C15H25NO56.67300.1806156.1019138.0914120.081094.065682.0657
Indicine N-oxide (5) and intermedine N-oxide (4) (n.r.) a C15H25NO68.20316.1755226.1437172.0968155.0941138.0914111.068294.0656
Intermedine (1)C15H25NO56.26300.1806210.1488156.1019138.0914120.081094.0656
JacobineC18H25NO66.56352.1755308.1485280.1539262.1432234.1483155.1063
Jacobine N-oxideC18H25NO77.91368.1704296.1485190.1222139.0989121.0885120.0807
LasiocarpineC21H33NO714.92412.2330238.1435156.1020138.0914120.081094.0656
Lasiocarpine N-oxideC21H33NO816.14428.2279410.2168352.1746328.1753254.1384220.1333137.0835
Lycopsamine (3)C15H25NO56.80300.1806156.1017138.0914120.080894.0655
Lycopsamine N-oxide (6)C15H25NO68.65316.1755172.0964155.0937138.0911136.075594.0654
MonocrotalineC16H23NO62.88326.1598280.1548237.1354
Monocrotaline N-oxideC16H23NO77.19342.1547314.1590296.1487236.1274137.0833119.0729
RetrorsineC18H25NO69.13352.1755324.1802138.0913120.080894.0655
Retrorsine N-oxideC18H25NO79.64368.1704220.1340154.0862
SenecionineC18H25NO511.13336.1806308.1864120.0809
Senecionine N-oxideC18H25NO611.83352.1755324.1825220.1332
SeneciphyllineC18H23NO59.52334.1649306.1706120.0811
Seneciphylline N-oxideC18H23NO610.46350.1598322.1656246.1495
SenecivernineC18H25NO510.84336.1806308.1848153.0907138.0911120.080794.0654
Senecivernine N-oxideC18H25NO611.45352.1755324.1795220.1327154.0859136.0755120.0807
SenkirkineC19H27NO613.62366.1911168.1020150.0915
TrichodesmineC18H27NO68.79354.1911308.1857223.1203222.1489164.1071121.0889
a n.r. = not resolved.
Table
Table 2. Method validation results for pyrrolizidine alkaloids in honey.
Table 2. Method validation results for pyrrolizidine alkaloids in honey.
Display Name Spiking Level (ng/g)LOD
(3s)		LOQ
(9s)		LORUnitsRecovery (%)Calculated Standard Uncertainty (% RSD)
Echimidine (7)50.725ng/g8811
Echimidine N-oxide50.525ng/g6015
Erucifoline50.725ng/g3426
Erucifoline N-oxide50.525ng/g2631
Europine5125ng/g9816
Europine N-oxide50.515ng/g946
Heliotrine50.50.75ng/g1084
Heliotrine N-oxide50.20.55ng/g832
Indicine50.525ng/g988
Indicine N-oxide (5) and intermedine N-oxide (4) as indicine N-oxide (5)50.515ng/g787
Intermedine (1)50.525ng/g948
Jacobine5255ng/g6130
Jacobine N-oxide5155ng/g3651
Lasiocarpine50.515ng/g826
Lasiocarpine N-oxide50.50.75ng/g796
Lycopsamine (3)50.20.75ng/g954
Lycopsamine N-oxide (6)50.725ng/g8114
Monocrotaline5255ng/g8924
Monocrotaline N-oxide50.725ng/g8913
Retrorsine5125ng/g9613
Retrorsine N-oxide50.725ng/g5822
Senecionine50.725ng/g9011
Senecionine N-oxide50.525ng/g5816
Seneciphylline50.725ng/g7015
Seneciphylline N-oxide50.515ng/g1636
Senecivernine50.525ng/g869
Senecivernine N-oxide50.725ng/g5320
Senkirkine50.50.75ng/g915
Trichodesmine5377ng/g7869
Table
Table 3. High resolution accurate mass (HRAM) data for pyrrolizidine alkaloids in P. straminea identified by comparison with PA standards.
Table 3. High resolution accurate mass (HRAM) data for pyrrolizidine alkaloids in P. straminea identified by comparison with PA standards.
AlkaloidTypical RT (min)Molecular Ion FormulaCalculated [M+H]+Observed [M+H]+Mass Spectral Data (Rel. Int. %)
Intermedine (1)6.27[C15H25NO5 + H] +300.1805300.1804300.1804 (6) 256.1539 (1) 156.1019 (53) 139.0992 (11) 138.0914 (31) 120.0809 (18) 112.0759 (2) 108.0811 (2) 96.0812 (4) 95.0733 (4) 94.0656 (100) 82.0657 (4)
Lycopsamine (3)6.80[C15H25NO5 + H] +300.1805300.1805300.1805 (9) 256.1539 (0.3) 156.1020 (59) 139.0993 (13) 138.0915 (31) 120.0811 (19) 112.0760 (3) 108.0813 (1) 96.0813 (5) 95.0734 (5) 94.0656 (100) 82.0657 (6)
Intermedine N-oxide (4)8.19[C15H25NO6 + H] +316.1755316.1752316.1752 (41) 298.1631 (1) 272.1491 (2) 172.0967 (100) 155.0940 (18) 154.0862 (8) 138.0914 (55) 137.0837 (6) 136.0757 (15) 112.0759 (5) 111.0682 (12) 94.0655 (19) 93.0577 (13) 82.0419 (3)
Lycopsamine N-oxide (6)8.64[C15H25NO6 + H] +316.1755316.1752316.1752 (46) 298.1653 (1) 272.1491 (2) 172.0967 (100) 155.0940 (17) 154.0862 (10) 138.0913 (63) 137.0835 (6) 136.0758 (17) 112.0759 (5) 111.0681 (13) 94.0655 (22) 93.0577 (16) 82.0419 (4)
Table
Table 4. High resolution accurate mass (HRAM) data for pyrrolizidine alkaloids in P. straminea identified by analysis of fragmentation patterns, together with those identified in honey samples high in lycopsamine (identification in honey indicated by *).
Table 4. High resolution accurate mass (HRAM) data for pyrrolizidine alkaloids in P. straminea identified by analysis of fragmentation patterns, together with those identified in honey samples high in lycopsamine (identification in honey indicated by *).
AlkaloidTypical RT (min)Molecular Ion FormulaCalculated [M+H]+Observed [M+H]+Mass Spectral Data (Rel. Int. %)
* Tessellatine (9) or isomer 6.34[C15H25NO5 + H] +300.1805300.1801300.1801 (5) 156.1019 (100) 139.0990 (1) 138.0913 (6) 120.0809 (2) 112.0759 (4) 108.0810 (6) 96.0811 (1) 94.0656 (4) 82.0655 (1)
Lycopsamine isomer (isomer of 3)5.91[C15H25NO5 + H] +300.1805300.1803300.1803 (7) 210.1485 (1) 156.1019 (42) 139.0992 (14) 138.0914 (26) 120.0809 (18) 112.0759 (2) 108.0812 (2) 96.0813 (5) 95.0734 (6) 94.0656 (100) 82.0657 (5)
* Helioamplexine isomer I (isomer of 8) 8.51[C16H27NO5 + H] +314.1962314.1958314.1958 (7) 270.1704 (0.5) 224.1643 (2) 156.1019 (44) 139.0992 (19) 138.0914 (25) 120.0810 (18) 112.0759 (2) 96.0812 (5) 95.0734 (8) 94.0656 (100) 82.0657 (7)
* Helioamplexine isomer II (isomer of 8) 9.30[C16H27NO5 + H] +314.1962314.1958314.1960 (5) 270.1698 (0.5) 224.1643 (2) 156.1019 (33) 139.0992 (14) 138.0914 (25) 120.0809 (18) 112.0759 (2) 96.0812 (4) 95.0733 (7) 94.0656 (100) 82.0657 (6)
* Helioamplexine isomer (C7-isomer of 8) 8.34[C16H27NO5 + H] +314.1962314.1959314.1959 (4) 156.1019 (100) 139.0992 (2) 138.0914 (6) 126.0916 (1) 120.0808 (2) 112.0759 (5) 108.0810 (10) 94.0655 (1) 86.0605 (2) 82.0656 (1) 80.0500 (1)
* 3′-O-Acetylintermedine 8.91[C17H27NO6 + H] +342.1911342.1924 342.1924 (1) 282.1700 (4) 156.1019 (16) 139.0991 (7) 138.0913 (17) 120.0809 (20) 108.0812 (1) 96.0812 (2) 96.0450 (2) 95.0734 (3) 94.0655 (100) 82.0657 (3)
* 3′-O-Acetyllycopsamine 9.64[C17H27NO6 + H] +342.1911342.1905342.1905 (1) 282.1703 (2) 156.1019 (14) 139.0992 (3) 138.0913 (19) 120.0809 (19) 108.0812 (1) 96.0812 (2) 96.0448 (1) 95.0734 (2) 94.0655 (100) 82.0657 (3) 67.0549 (1)
Ideamine A (10) isomer I2.43[C14H23NO5 + H] +286.1649286.1648286.1648 (11) 242.1392 (1) 196.1335 (2) 156.1019 (43) 139.0992 (11) 138.0914 (26) 120.0809 (18) 112.0758 (2) 108.0810 (2) 96.0813 (7) 95.0734 (5) 94.0656 (100) 82.0657 (5)
Ideamine A (10) isomer II3.70[C14H23NO5 + H] +286.1649286.1649286.1649 (8) 156.1019 (35) 139.0992 (8) 138.0913 (30) 120.0808 (18) 96.0813 (4) 95.0734 (4) 94.0655 (100) 94.0593 (1) 82.0657 (3) 80.0500 (1) 67.0547 (1)
Ideamine A (10) isomer III4.37[C14H23NO5 + H] +286.1649286.1649286.1649 (0) 156.1018 (46) 139.0992 (7) 138.0913 (26) 120.0807 (17) 98.2419 (3) 95.0733 (3) 94.0656 (100) 93.0705 (3) 82.0655 (4) 67.0549 (4)
Ideamine A (10) isomer IV5.10[C14H23NO5 + H] +286.1649286.1651286.1651 (16) 258.9584 (3) 190.8082 (4) 188.1787 (3) 158.5305 (3) 156.1016 (48) 138.0913 (29) 124.0405 (3) 120.0807 (18) 94.0655 (100)
Ideamine A C7 isomer1.72[C14H23NO5 + H] +286.1649286.1656286.1656 (10) 156.1019 (100) 138.0915 (5) 124.0757 (2) 120.0813 (1) 112.0760 (5) 108.0811 (7) 106.0656 (4) 94.0651 (2) 86.0603 (1)
Lycopsamine N-oxide isomer7.61[C15H25NO6 + H] +316.1755316.1751316.1754 (46) 172.0967 (100) 155.0940 (21) 154.0862 (13) 138.0914 (94) 137.0836 (8) 136.0757 (25) 112.0759 (8) 111.0681 (14) 108.0811 (6) 94.0656 (35) 93.0577 (24)
7-Isomer of lycopsamine N-oxide7.19[C15H25NO6 + H] +316.1755316.1751316.1751 (5) 172.0968 (100) 155.0940 (6) 154.0863 (2) 138.0914 (3) 137.0836 (3) 136.0757 (2) 111.0681 (11) 106.0654 (6) 102.0555 (2) 94.0657 (1)
Helioamplexine N-oxide isomer I9.87[C16H27NO6 + H] +330.1911330.1908330.1908 (39) 286.1642 (4) 240.1594 (7) 172.0967 (100) 155.0940 (30) 154.0862 (11) 138.0914 (84) 136.0758 (22) 112.0760 (8) 111.0681 (18) 94.0655 (36) 93.0577 (20) 82.0419 (9)
Helioamplexine N-oxide isomer II10.63[C16H27NO6 + H] +330.1911330.1909330.1909 (46) 172.0967 (100) 155.0940 (30) 154.0862 (12) 138.0914 (91) 137.0835 (9) 136.0757 (23) 112.0759 (8) 111.0681 (20) 94.0655 (38) 93.0577 (26) 82.0419 (11)
3′-O-Acetyllycopsamine N-oxide isomer I10.25[C17H27NO7+ H] +358.1860358.1856358.1856 (15) 316.1758 (4) 298.1649 (40) 172.0968 (100) 155.0941 (23) 154.0863 (10) 138.0914 (73) 136.0758 (21) 111.0682 (19) 94.0656 (33) 93.0577 (21) 89.0602 (19) 87.0446 (14)
3′-O-Acetyllycopsamine N-oxide isomer II10.92[C17H27NO7+ H] +358.1860358.1859358.1859 (19) 316.1748 (4) 298.1648 (39) 172.0967 (100) 155.0940 (19) 154.0862 (14) 138.0914 (89) 137.0835 (8) 136.0758 (27) 112.0759 (7) 111.0681 (16) 94.0656 (44) 93.0577 (31)
7-O-Acetyllycopsamine N-oxide10.03[C17H27NO7+ H] +358.1860358.1857358.1857 (21) 214.1073 (100) 180.1019 (48) 178.0863 (14) 137.0836 (53) 136.0758 (17) 120.0810 (16) 119.0731 (14) 106.0654 (13) 101.0601 (25) 89.0602 (15) 73.0291 (20)
Ideamine A N-oxide isomer I4.87[C14H23NO6+ H] +302.1598302.1595302.1595 (67) 212.1275 (4) 172.0966 (91) 155.0939 (18) 154.0864 (10) 138.0913 (100) 137.0834 (7) 136.0757 (20) 112.0759 (7) 111.0681 (11) 108.0810 (6) 94.0655 (31) 93.0577 (23)
Ideamine A N-oxide isomer II6.27[C14H23NO6+ H] +302.1598302.1596302.1596 (65) 172.0968 (96) 158.1181 (7) 155.0941 (18) 154.0861 (12) 138.0913 (100) 137.0835 (10) 136.0757 (26) 112.0759 (9) 111.0680 (9) 94.0656 (31) 93.0577 (24)
* 3′-O-Glucosyllycopsamine8.94[C21H35NO10 + H] +462.2336462.2336300.1806 (12) 156.1021 (16) 139.0994 (4) 138.0915 (40) 120.0810 (16) 97.0289 (3) 96.0813 (2) 96.0451 (2) 94.0657 (100) 85.0290 (7)
* 3′-O-Glucosylintermedine7.41[C21H35NO10 + H] +462.2336462.2335300.1807 (17) 156.1019 (20) 139.0993 (5) 138.0914 (48) 120.0810 (19) 97.0289 (4) 96.0813 (2) 94.0656 (100) 91.0580 (2) 85.0290 (10)
* 3′-O-Glucosyllycopsamine N-oxide 9.89[C21H35NO11 + H] +478.2283478.2286316.1754 (100) 172.0968 (90) 155.0941 (15) 154.0860 (10) 138.0914 (74) 137.0837 (6) 136.0758 (19) 120.0809 (6) 112.0762 (5) 111.0680 (7) 94.0657 (47) 93.0578 (12)
* 3′-O-Glucosylintermedine N-oxide 8.58[C21H35NO11 + H] +478.2283478.2289316.1758 (100) 172.0968 (76) 155.0943 (13) 154.0863 (9) 138.0916 (56) 137.0838 (7) 136.0757 (15) 120.0808 (7) 111.0681 (7) 94.0656 (29) 93.0578 (12)
Table
Table 5. Number of PA positive samples and PA concentration in honey samples (n = 465), grouped by potential source of PA plant origin (mean and median are for positive samples only).
Table 5. Number of PA positive samples and PA concentration in honey samples (n = 465), grouped by potential source of PA plant origin (mean and median are for positive samples only).
Potential Plant Source of PAs in HoneyPyrrolizidine AlkaloidsNumber of Honey SamplesPA Content (ng/g)
MeanMedianMax
Parsonsia straminea (Monkey rope)
Lycopsamine274210333100
Lycopsamine N-oxide31320511900
Intermedine217 b3218290
Intermedine N-oxide a30 c8621660
Heliotropium amplexicaule (Blue heliotrope)
Indicine221120311700
Indicine N-oxide/intermedine N-oxide (n.r.) a30 c8621660
Intermedine217 b3218290
Helioamplexine d782313130
Helioamplexine N-oxide e5283551
Echium plantagineum (Paterson’s curse)
Echimidine933620260
Lycopsamine
Intermedine		76 f
37 g
Heliotropium europaeum (Potato weed)
Europine263011160
Europine N-oxide411724
Heliotrine17231575
Heliotrine N-oxide1999
Lasiocarpine10201459
Senecio species
Senecivernine192414150
Senecionine713841
Retrorsine18201291
No occurrence/Below LOR
Echimidine N-oxide0
Erucifoline0
Erucifoline N-oxide0
Jacobine0
Jacobine N-oxide0
Lasiocarpine N-oxide0
Monocrotaline0
Monocrotaline N-oxide0
Retrorsine N-oxide0
Senecionine N-oxide0
Seneciphylline0
Seneciphylline N-oxide0
Senecivernine N-oxide0
Senkirkine0
Trichodesmine0
a Not resolved–indicine N-oxide and intermedine N-oxide co-eluted. b,c Intermedine and intermedine N-oxide are present in multiple plants, and prominent in both Parsonsia straminea and Heliotropium amplexicaule. d Helioamplexine was quantified using heliotrine standard curve. e Helioamplexine N-oxide was quantified using heliotrine N-oxide standard curve. f Lycopsamine observed in honey containing echimidine not necessarily attributed solely to E. plantagineum, but of the 93 honey samples containing echimidine, the concentration of lycopsamine was lower than echimidine in 76 honeys, which is consistent with the relative amounts observed in E. plantagineum. In the other 17 honeys which contain echimidine, it is likely that there is more than one source of lycopsamine. g Of the 76 honeys in which lycopsamine was at a lower level than echimidine, 37 honey samples also contained intermedine.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hungerford, N.L.; Carter, S.J.; Anuj, S.R.; Tan, B.L.L.; Hnatko, D.; Martin, C.L.; Sharma, E.; Yin, M.; Nguyen, T.T.P.; Melksham, K.J.; et al. Analysis of Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids in Queensland Honey: Using Low Temperature Chromatography to Resolve Stereoisomers and Identify Botanical Sources by UHPLC-MS/MS. Toxins 2019, 11, 726. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11120726

AMA Style

Hungerford NL, Carter SJ, Anuj SR, Tan BLL, Hnatko D, Martin CL, Sharma E, Yin M, Nguyen TTP, Melksham KJ, et al. Analysis of Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids in Queensland Honey: Using Low Temperature Chromatography to Resolve Stereoisomers and Identify Botanical Sources by UHPLC-MS/MS. Toxins. 2019; 11(12):726. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11120726

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hungerford, Natasha L., Steve J. Carter, Shalona R. Anuj, Benjamin L. L. Tan, Darina Hnatko, Christopher L. Martin, Elipsha Sharma, Mukan Yin, Thao T. P. Nguyen, Kevin J. Melksham, and et al. 2019. "Analysis of Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids in Queensland Honey: Using Low Temperature Chromatography to Resolve Stereoisomers and Identify Botanical Sources by UHPLC-MS/MS" Toxins 11, no. 12: 726. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11120726

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop